CA V. Robert Durst Murder Trial Day 53 - Webex Hearing Regarding Witness Andrew Jarecki

Подписаться 6 млн

Просмотров 14 тыс.

50% 1

LIVE COVERAGE: Robert Durst Testifies Live For The Murder of Friend Susan Berman
Robert Durst stands trial for the 2000 murder of friend Susan Berman. The trial began just before the pandemic in early 2020 and was halted two weeks in. The restart happened on May 17, 2021, with the same jury panel.
The defendant’s wife Kathleen McCormack Durst went missing in 1982. Evidence and testimony would show that Robert Durst killed her, the prosecutor said. The defendant allegedly told Berman it was an accident and asked her for help. She served as his alibi.
Berman, 55, was shot execution-style at her Beverly Hills home in 2000, and the prosecution suggested that it was because of what she knew about Kathleen’s death and disappearance. As defense lawyer Dick DeGuerin would have it, however, Durst is innocent. His client only came across the body, panicked, and fled, he maintained.
#RobertDurst #RobertDurstTrial #SusanBerman
Law&Crime Network is Now on RU-vidTV! Find the Addon at
tv.youtube.com...
You may already have access to the Law&Crime Network! Find out here: lawandcrime.co...
No access? That’s okay! Subscribe direct to Law&Crime here: lawandcrime.co...
Watch Us Live On Peacock Daily Free: www.peacocktv....
Click on Channels & Scroll Down to Law & Crime Network

Опубликовано:

26 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 86

@derekwalters4980 3 года назад

I believe it is abundantly clear that Mr Durst is unable to read or follow a script, even if one did exist. Durst does what he wants, when he wants and how he wants.

@zonkey2468 3 года назад

I was about to tell you that unable is a funny word choice, but it’s true. I think his unwillingness runs so deep that he’s physically unable to follow a script

@sarac1118 3 года назад

My husband is like that. If you ask him to stop doing something he will do it longer and more aggressive. It’s a character flaw of a narcissist and almost impossible to deal with. Durst is also incredibly smart and cunning. It’s exhausting to watch.

@ministryoflies..3651 3 года назад

@@sarac1118 Im guessing you are divorced ? lol

@maryb6672 3 года назад

Good point! Durst NEVER follows directions!

@sarac1118 3 года назад

@@ministryoflies..3651 nope. I would’ve thought the same.

@tony5318 3 года назад

Good argument on both sides. As to Jareckis testimony I can't wait to see where the judge comes down on this.

@thegardener7721 3 года назад

It never fails to amaze me how far a defense team will try to drag a dead horse upstream...for ten million dollars.

@loonatticat 3 года назад

Ten million dollars will get a dead horse dragged very far. To no one’s amazement. The beating is free.

@maryb6672 3 года назад

😂 Now that u mention it though, I can’t recall the last time I saw a defense team motivated to move said dead horse for ten million dollars. Durst is definitely not the average defendant!

@marcijewell2195 3 года назад

Lewin could go on forever, he really needs to stop already. I feel like he is asking the same questions again and again.

@taylormitchell1882 3 года назад

Marc….that is because he is. I feel maybe a bit of ADHD…in him cause he spends tons of time asking same question 100 different ways. He could have not got stuck on every lie ……..I wonder if jury will make him pay for wasting so much time>…….

@maryb6672 3 года назад

@@taylormitchell1882 OCD is a more accurate description. This was my initial opinion but it was confirmed in an interview he gave where he discussed having OCD. IMO, it’s both his greatest strength & greatest weakness. Strength bc his OCD compels him to be a good cold case prosecutor, spending yrs investigating, digging, putting the evidence together. And he prepares more thoroughly for direct/cross than almost any attny I’ve ever seen. BUT, weakness bc those same OCD traits cause him to get stuck on minor details, unable to let seemingly small points go. On the whole however, whatever he does seems to work. He has a 100% conviction record.

@bobbyturney6199 3 года назад

Durst is a very complicated character and it has taken Mr. Lewin to bring that out, If Mr. Durst would simply answer like normal people this crazy thing would be over with. Is very fascinating how one person can cause such caous and very sad as well

@dannycarentan917 3 года назад

I’m going to laugh if Durst gets off because the DA was so obnoxious and wore the jury out.

@toriesepahmd6468 3 года назад

That’s the big question now.

@infinite8382 3 года назад

if durst gets off, its because of lack of evidence, not how much one does or doesnt like Lewin

@brodie-tzu4753 3 года назад

I can’t believe how many people have died since The Jinx.

@elizabethcave7666 3 года назад

The jury decides if Mr Durst was telling the truth re: movie draft.

@maryb6672 3 года назад

Chesnoff gave away a vital clue re: strategy they’ll use during closing arg to explain all of Bob’s various statements & inconsistencies! I hope someone for the state heard that. They’re going to use the memory expert to explain Bob’s evolving stories.

@RoniShawn 3 года назад

Of COURSE they will!

@discoparty7989 3 года назад

Clever Ms. Mary! I didn’t catch that, thanks!

@juliepeterson6639 3 года назад

Could Mr. Durst just keep this game going until he wears everyone out? Cheez-wiz!

@rexiebrauchle9505 3 года назад

Did I miss something? Did they say why Durst wanted to wave his right to be in the courtroom during the discussion with Jarecky and his attorney???

@barstad-9591 3 года назад

They never said on the record.

@justice6156 3 года назад

I think this film should never have come into a trial for murder - Films are films real life is entirely different. If much of the WOW element had not been encouraged this film wouldn't have been a hit

@maryb6672 3 года назад

I agree the documentary was edited for theatric purposes. But, ONLY unedited versions of the Jinx interviews were allowed into evidence. That was stipulated by the defense.

@RoniShawn 3 года назад

I personally think there’s a lot of evidence in The Jinx

@RoniShawn 3 года назад

And Jarecki even stated that there was in the film, but that he wouldn’t turn it over to police

@lorny4u 3 года назад

If it weren't for the documentary we wouldn't be at trial.

@tempestnz1 3 года назад

Chesnoff always turns around all embarrassed to see whos looking like he just farted

@RoniShawn 3 года назад

Durst does that too in the trial 😂

@windsorcastle1497 3 года назад

I think he's a good DA but he could have scored excellent points about his credibility and the evidence over the span of 3 days at most. I think hes so wrapped up in the justice of all three murders he has lost sight of the crux of this trial.

@infinite8382 3 года назад

It might seem that way to us, but i am sure he has been researching and planning his approach and remember this is the only time in a long time bob has HAD TO answer questions. So Lewin is making the most of his opportunity. Though the cross has been drawn out, we have learnt a lot we didnt previously know,...although i dont beleive a word bob said about being at susans and finding a note on her door etc, since he said he didnt write the cadaver note and then when he was caught out, he and his two bit lawyer DeGuerin changed their story. I wont trust bob to tell me what color the sky is ;p

@personofinterest8731 3 года назад

I think he's establishing patterns of behaviour and how Bob learns clumps of information that he spews out, savant-style?

@legallyredone5561 3 года назад

I think he may be doing a disservice to the case if the jury is as exhausted listening to Mr. Lewin as I am. I just hope his annoying, bossy, repetitive speeches don't make the jury lose sight of the facts of the case. It is possible that he makes Durst seem like a badgered, flustered old man. He's not, but Lewin is so agressive, a sympathetic juror may feel bad for him. Its not just about the facts, its also about the presentation. Then again, I could have read one too many Grisham novels. ;-)

@janewinkworth8729 3 года назад

Mr De Guerin is way out of his depth, he is far too old and slow and clearly has little knowledge of California Court law . The prosecutors are fast, quick, intelligent and brilliantly prepared - this time Jim, it has to be a "Slam Dunk" surely ?

@thegardener7721 3 года назад

Agree. Lewin's surgical dissection of Durst was riveting.

@speakupify 3 года назад

Agree..so well prepared to put up any video, statement etc..it's riveting..people might complain that DA is going on and on, but without the physical evidence they can only rely on this snake suffocating in his own lies!

@gordonbrown3489 3 года назад

I'm sorry, but this is just wrong. Your comment is ageist, and I encourage you to ponder on this possibility before you rush to your own defence. You have mistaken a slow physicality for a slow mind. This is a burden of the old - judged by their grey hair and wrinkly skin. You'll feel the frustration of it yourself it some day. De Guerin is razor-sharp! It's been a pleasure and an education to watch him in action throughout this trial. His extensive, decades-worth, intimate knowledge of the law affords him the particular relaxation that comes with knowing when to fight and when to fold. Why waste mental energy and court-time on a point of law that he knows inside-and-out he won't win? The man knows exactly what he is doing. I doubt he'll win the case, but it's been just fantastic to watch him in action.

@elizabethcave7666 3 года назад

So many questions were about the movie, the questions could go on for days. Prosecutions says 10 min. Do you believe that ??? Already waffling on the time needed.... who knew ?? Would you really limit it to 2 questions ?

@zanpsimer7685 3 года назад

Durst could be worn out from cross but he could also be over it all given the number of lies Lewin caught him in.

@taylormitchell1882 3 года назад

Zan….all 5 lies he admitted to when Lewin was trying to get him to quantify the number…… Thank goodness the judgefinally put a time clock on Lewin cross.

@zanpsimer7685 3 года назад

@@taylormitchell1882 lol yes. Including those 5.

@infinite8382 3 года назад

@@taylormitchell1882 5 lies??? Haaaaaa. more like 5000

@taylormitchell1882 3 года назад

@@infinite8382 it was ‘5 lies’…..durst and Lewin talking about how many times durst had lied or perjured himself. Durst said ‘about 5 times’ ….Lewin said….is that on the more like really high side of ‘about said….‘5k’…….Lewin should have said…so more like 5k at the least’…..remember that convo…..it was a facetious 5….that Lewin spent 5 minutes on. Almost done after 2 weeks of American and Jewish holidays in beginning of September.are over.

@kirstenL475 3 года назад

Bobby’s running the show! Clearly

@hotshotwpg 3 года назад

Is DeGuerin really that dumb, or is he playing games? How could he have practiced law for 40 years, and not understand the rules of evidence?!?

@kelly2669 3 года назад

This trial is not about how long the prosecutor cross-examined the defendant. This trial is about the murder of Susan Berman. Unless you are a prosecutor, you can't understand what needs to go into doing a competent examination. When the defendant gives constant lies and denies facts, you have to be thorough. This is not a normal case. If Mr. Durst is found guilty of Berman's murder, I think the prosecution will soon charge him with Kathy's murder, hence the reason Susan was killed was to cover Kathy's murder. This is one of the reasons for Lewin's veracity. I would absolutely want Lewin fighting for justice for my murdered love one. Great job!

@marym2811 3 года назад

Really irks me when Lewin says the defense is "pretending" - as if his feigned incredulity isn't pretending, and as if the rest of us, including the judge, wouldn't be smart enough to see through a bad arguement. Just because Lewin doesn't like the other team's position, doesn't mean he's right and they are wrong and therefore they are pretending.

@loonatticat 3 года назад

Shout out Ted Lasso. Represent.

@taylormitchell1882 3 года назад

Hearing with Andrew’s attorneys about his testifying regarding Durst assertion that Andrew gave him a sort of script of ideas for Jinx.

@lindyhawthorne2164 3 года назад

I thought that Andrew was going to testify ???. (Im in Australia and just woke up, so havent watched all the videos yet, so not sure what's happening at this stage)

@taylormitchell1882 3 года назад

@@lindyhawthorne2164 the judge will decide in morning PCT….if Andrew will testify on very limited basis…did he give scripts to durst or form a narrative durst should follow cause that is durst’s answer to every question regarding was Andrew had me say it. Big question is that both sides stipulated before trial that Andrew wouldn’t testify…issues as a journalist of privilege…so judge will give ruling .

@lindyhawthorne2164 3 года назад

@@taylormitchell1882 Wow...you are so knowledgeable, thanks for that. I wish that I knew all the ins & outs, but Im gradually learning I guess. thanks again. However, I must say that I AM TOTALLY confused about the bow saw line of questioning....couldn't keep up with that at all... ha ha

@infinite8382 3 года назад

if Jarecki testifys and proves bob a liar, that would not look good for bob!!! Bring it on!!!! Haaaaaa

@monstalova 3 года назад

@@lindyhawthorne2164 Jarecki sent an email to the FBI stating he gave up his journalist rights as he is divulging all the information to them. So the defence questions should be whatever they want. You cannot decide to give up your journalist rights for the prosecution and not the defence. Law doesn't work that way. Why the judge has to even mediate over it is laughable

@RoniShawn 3 года назад

Judge Windam, there’s plenty of evidence that Jarecki is going to do a Jinx 2 lol. This trial youre involved in silly. Defense is right imo. Jarecki attorneys shouldn’t be allowed to stipulate what is asked of Jarecki. He’s being called to the stand to testify. Other people don’t get that chance, so why should he?

@barstad-9591 3 года назад

I think it might be akin to the journalistic privilege.

@deannawiederhold333 3 года назад

The judge true colors are coming out now. I wish we had the ability to see the bank accounts of the Defense Attorneys and the Judge.

@elizabethcave7666 3 года назад

Judge seems very pro prosecution. Given them huge leeway.

@laradesautel3013 3 года назад

I don’t think so, but then again, I completely believe Robert durst killed three people premeditatedly so..

@infinite8382 3 года назад

@@laradesautel3013 well he bought the saw he chopped morris up with 4 days PRIOR to the "accidental" deed LoL....

@lindyhawthorne2164 3 года назад

@@infinite8382 Thanks for explaining that detail. I actually had no idea what was going on with the saw questioning. Now I understand.

@infinite8382 3 года назад

@@lindyhawthorne2164 There are some good books out there, A Deadly Secret, is pretty good. Seems bob rented out kathys apartment a day BEFORE he reported her missing, and he also threw out some of her books etc and blocked the garbage chute in his building with them!. He also gave 3 different accounts of his where abouts the night kathy disappeared. :/

@personofinterest8731 3 года назад

Five lies 😂🤣😂🤣 keep counting!