CAA : J Sai Deepak Interview | 'CAA Illegality Claim Dissected " | CAA Implementation | News18 

Not staying in jail hut in jail.

Abhinav is CJI's son so obviously he do not care about rights of Indian citizens of getting timely justice.

They are as important as Bonds issue if not more -pendency 0f civil cases 30years plus. Disgraceful.

​@@abhianusaeesoman4182Yeah, yeah, only the BJP cares about Indians. All others are anti-national bigots aren't they. Laughable!

​@@123XTSKFast tracking cases will hurt justice itself. Yes there is need to make sure that all people find justice as soon as possible but it isn't that easy. Also the bonds case was of national importance, and it will always supercede individual justice (sadly), but that is something that is generally accepted on all forums. Otherwise, the same argument could be used against the Ram Mandir verdict, that why is this matter being given importance all of a sudden when there are hundreds of cases pending.

Every religion has its own personal laws not only Muslims. Hindus, Christians, Parsi, Jews have their own personal laws also. Secularism does not prohibit any religion from having its own personal laws. It simply excludes a State from having a particular religion.

​@@debarshisarkar4418 Thats a bullshit logic. Why does muslims get 4 marriages and the ability to marry under 18 girls. What kind of secularism is that?

​debarshisarkar4418 hmmm in Secular country Muslims and other can have their person laws practices but not for Hindus the same applies to the money of every Mandirs and many such examples....

​@@debarshisarkar4418 ya but hindu personal law restricts the hindus in a different way regarding marriage divorce etc. On the other hand muslim law allows any garbage they follow as faith... And triple thalak was one of that permitted laws!!!😂

Secular word was not supposed to be in the constitution. It was added by IG by 42nd constitutional ammendment 1976 during her emergency rule. And later on none had the 2/3 majority in both houses to get rid of it by another amendment. We need UCC. The society need to move towards progressive ideas.

It's based Nehru Liaquat agreement that deals with Muslims and non Muslims of erstwhile India after partition. It applies to persecuted minorities in Pak and India.

Is the objections that we are not giving citizenship for entire Pakistan, Bangladesh and afghanistan citizen.

@@ramachandrannair4554 It seems. Junior Chandrachud is Lutyens, Islamists and evangelists inspired anti national.Is.Chandrachud different? How did he release Zubair? Jr Chndrachud's influence was there? His speech raises doubts.

@@subbaraotanguturu9271 I think water is being tested by the speech of Junior Chandrachud to estimate the public mood While international pressure is mounting on India on the drug issue the junior has specifically selected ,I doubt , CAA,NPR&NRC in order for him not to antagonise the right wing supporters /friends but only to gain popularity.

@@seeniinn1You mean he spoke for RW, the Hindus!? He supported Lutyens, muslims and conversion mafia than so called RW people. All Hindus who support their own cause are RWs for them and are worse than jihadis, evangelists, who are more dangerous than jihadis filled muslims. They converted the entire NE while Muslims one Kashmir presently. WB is on the way out. Now Christians to grab another Christian state from Manipur. They killed Meteis but blaming them, BJP, government and Hindus as a whole.

🤡🤡

Yes, so that govts cannot behave like dictators and put oppn behind bars and run washing machines

Agree but most pampered one is SC OF INDIA

Stupid

​@@crankmishra3861 U literally told the same thing

They have screwed every organisation - CBI, ED, IT, EC, Banking, Foreign Trade etc, and now they want the Judiciary to also screw it and screw with it. Really ?

chandrchud's son is walking argument against nepotism in legal field

😂😂both chandrachuds actually look like chickens if tbh

High Courts and Supreme Court are the worst examples of dynastic rule. Not just judge but this guy could become future CJI. CJI D Y Chandrachud after all is the son of former CJI Y V Chandrachud an open supporter of Indira Gandhi's draconian emergency rule.

nepotism of highest order.

Nepo kid supreamcourtmacy

exactly !!

it's time for clean up...these people make us lose faith in the judiciary! Biased guys should not be allowed as judges. Like USA there should be an agency to take control of these kind of people! They are not god and such judges should never be allowed to take decisions on their own....

Me 2

​@@ritusingh8880me 3😂

Ab smjh aega ki paala kisse pada h....jsd waiting for this child😅

chandrachud family is purely name worth. CHUDIYA.

Actually he will be future CJI n JSD will be adv 😢​@@varahamihir_

And unfortunately, partition and it's terrifying consequences are a fact and an important part of the discussion whether one agrees or not.

Brahmin Power rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 😂

​@@LaPlaya-rw1cp what else can you crib on.

​@@LaPlaya-rw1cp are bhai band karo ab salo aise hi karte rahe kahin ka nahin rahoge

He is a moron and a bigot

​@@LaPlaya-rw1cp i'm Brahmin too but stfu...u may not even the hindu

👏👏👏

True!!!! Chip of the old, woke, clueless block eh!!😂😂

Lol...do you even know what bias means?😂😂 What Mr Chandrachud Jr. Said is absolutely rational and true

@@user-xk4jz1hy9x that’s precisely what bias means. You got it

then I'm guessing you're one of those who chanted "Go corona Go" to chase away the corona virus😂😂😂

It’s not even an apple, it’s a diseased leaf.

Well said!

So it doesn't matter if persecuted people from these 3 Islamic paradise nations are stopped from coming here on grounds of equality..as "long I argue and shine in front of the world"

You are right, both are mentioned of Integrity and not Andh bhakts.

No they are biased against certain groups and their judgement is not fair in many cases. s​@@dhiraj7892

True

True 100%well said

Yes, meddling in everything and always stepping over boundaries!!

Right u have SC when it against you . Remember SC gave Legitimacy for ram temple case . Then i ,m sure u didn't object to SC ruling

Wrong , SC had no choice but to give it to the Hindus. The evidences were stacked so high that it could find no excuse to delay or deny the truth that was glaring them in face. These evidences were present since decades, only now the SC was asked to stand accountable for the delayment. That compelled them to give the final judgement, otherwise the SC had done a fine job of ignoring it since ages .

SC ruling India = Anti National Opposition ruling India.

kkurran 4.97 clearly says that living in a kkuffar country ( India) is hharram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.

When were Parsis not included in this country and when were they not protected. India is the perhaps the only country with Parsis flourishing and not living as 2nd class citizens. So, please refrain from talking about the rights of Parsis. Some of our best people have been parsis

@@monadebata5223 Moron. Parsi we’re not part of partition. Partition happened because of Islam and affected persons were other religions. How many Parsi are there in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bsngladesh, Idiot. Read history.

@@monadebata5223 whatever acc. to kkurran 4.97 living in a kkuffar country ( India)is haarram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.

​@@monadebata5223They're not criticising the Parsi community, they're just stating the reason behind non inclusion of Parsi refugees from Iran in the law.

NO

No

no, but certainly not below.

The real question is, is Supreme Court above the will of the citizens and security of the nation.

​@@sydneyjay2465 Necessary question is are politicians so well read and intellectual as Supreme court judges 😂 answer is no.. they'll never be especially the actors who won bcoz of fame so judges know what they're doing unlike emotional leaders.

I do know that " Global Left Ecosystem" is the greatest threat to India and SC is " controlled" by this very " ecosystem"... However, your point is not correct.... Article 14 talks about state not denying equal rights to " person". Here the key word is " person" and do not mention " Citizen". So, you cannot counter this product of " Left ecosystem" by saying it is applicable only to " Indian Citizen"....

kkurran 4.97 -- clearly states that living in a kkuffar country ( india) is hharram that's why mmosslim are not included in CAA.

No buddy a foreigner coming into India on a valid visa is also given equality treatment. It is the right of the government to decide who can enter and who cannot enter India. Any person/foreigner who enters secretly without government approval cannot get protection under article 14. The treatment is decided by the government as it seems fit on case to case or certain policy decisions depending on the situation in the best interest of India as a country

@@shanthalakshmi2082 kkurran 4.97 clearly states that living in a kkuffar country ( India) is hharram so mmosslim were not included in a CAA bill.

Means u r as dumb as him

i dont know how are they becoming lawyers an average worst student of law also know that equality is among equals, like there are certain privileges for s.c and other groups which are not given to o.c. so what this moron studied

Ya he had the privilege to.study in harward😮

True

A hol ur h g d u

"cOurTs sHoUld noT inTerFerE" 😂😂 You get educated first and then speak😂

Lol u want politicians to pic judges? To give favorable judgement to ruling parties?

​@@astlinjCommon sense over wokeness is the need of the hour.

junior chandrachud is more scary

​@@astlinjwho said did politicians to pick judges? he said we should change the collegium where judge chooses judge. We can make new process for judge election. By we, i mean, people chosen by us.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 what else can he be

So true I wish next time when they appoint judge they should check his views Muslims and others. They should check who are pro bjp. If they are pro bjp and anti Muslims then definetly they are qualified as judges and lawyers. Because modi and bjp are our angles who came from heaven to protect us.

Most of HARVARD ,OXFORD educated literate monsters loose touch with reality of Indian society because they analyse facts with EUROPEAN ADOPTED "MASTERS "EYES . Another baggage which has to be removed from our JUDICIARY SYSTEM . Such half baked intellectuals are burden to INDIAN SOCIETY .The HARVARD ,OXFORD groups must be given classes about indian culture based on HINDU SECULARISM .

Read "Snakes in the Ganga"

These institutions are funded by anti India garbage

Because if one has to accepted into the Havard circle ..the person has to have Anti Indian attitude..

You mean anti BJP?

preach!❤❤

Read this u will learn : Article 14 in Constitution of India 14. Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Editorial Comment -Article 14 rejects any type of discrimination based on caste, race, and religion, place of birth or sex. This Article is having a wide ambit and applicability to safeguard the rights of people residing in India. This article is divided into two parts: Equality before the Law: This part of the article indicates that all are to be treated equally in the eyes of the law. This is a negative concept as it implies the absence of any privilege in favor of any person. This is a substantive part of the article. Equal protection of the Laws: This part means that the same law will be applied to all the people equally across the society. This is a positive concept as it expects a positive action from the state. This is a procedural part of article 14.

​@@phantomnetwork1217What about the waqt board, the Hindu bill, the temple taxes, the special quotas, the minority privileges. If equality is is before law for everyone, then everything mentioned above should be abolished. And if equality is to be practiced to such an extent in case of citizenship , then borders from all the nations who follow secularism should be removed. Borders are fundamentally against the very nature of art 14 , as it discriminates between PPL and restricts them from entering any place named as a 'country'. Is this your argument ?

Article 14 applies all legal residents of India

article 14 is not absolute in nature...it means you cannot bring article 14 in every contest and it should have a reasonable meanings@@phantomnetwork1217

u true@Truth_is__Bitter

Grandfather was also rotten. He became CJI by overlooking 3 seniors. Why. Because he supported Indira saying Emergency was justified unlike other 3 judges. Once he became CJI then came the collegium. Then started the muska Chaska service

Me me me

Yes i support J Sai Deepak as CJI

Me❤

Of course

What nonsense. JSD as CJI itseems:’D People have lost their minds… not knowing who is on the right side and who isn’t.

Even when we know that we have a significant link to this region or when we know for certain that the minorities were mistreated???. So much for minority rights

Rahul Shivshankar doesn't have the balls to do that

and also equality does not mean all are equal, in simple terms it is equality among equals

@@chiragarjun3270 I don't understand why don't these people even attempt to read the provision itself: >Acc citz act 1955 all kinds people still are eligible to become citizen with approx 11 yrs cooling period...it still stands upright. >Considering the grave decline of minorities in pre-independent Bharat...we are just accelerating the process for those chosen 6 communities for 6 yrs. >If we also allow Muslims as well in this(that too dominant communities who choose to break my country and messed up themselves like Pak and Bangla on religion basis)...what's the point. Do we need to allow both prey and predator? >How the muslims of Bharath are victims here?(NRC is not gonna happen now..that's different topic togather) >Even lawmakers and we'll educated people itself fail to understand this..what a woke idiots they are. >Funny part is asking that trans people to be allowed from Pak and Afg 😂. Can you even find one🤌

You’re utterly wrong poor layman. One suggestion for you: find a book called Indian polity by lakshmikant and freaking read properly the chapter on fundamental rights

@@DileepRajaMashapari Sure my dear educated man I will go through Lakshmikanthan rather than following Rajinikanth....but I don't understand.... 1.Why do we need to treat aggressor and Victim equally. Allow both pray and predator into our country? 2.Groups like Ahamedias are poineers who have pitched for separate nation based on religious lines. Now all those are so called proud islamic republics, they never stood by their minorities. Now they too want preferential treatment what are you pitching for bro. 3.Looking for trans people in these 3 countries 🤣....the woke imports

4. No victim card called Art 14 comes in when reservations sys prevails, preferential treatment prevails on religious lines .....but something good is happening for other groups there comes art 14.

Even if the Lautenberg Amendment had not been there, it would have been no moral obstacle. Our civilizational duty to Hindus is entirely our thing; no one else has any locus standi, parallel example or not.

Kudos to Tamil Brahmins who thrive & excel inspire of that!