CAESAR Self-Propelled Howitzer 155mm The Best of its Kind?! Proved by Armed Forces of Ukraine! 

Yes. I think a Ukraine had only built one when the war started. Seems very similar to Caesar to me. Either way it’s a good design and approach

so.. who is now the boss on Snake Island? Ua army?? I don't think so...

Encore une analyse un peu foireuse d'analyste... "with a 52 caliber tube (+8 meters long) allowing a similar range" Sauf que la porté maximale du CAESAR est obtenue grace aux obus spéciaux, pas grace au tube... Obus fabriqués en Allemagne que la France achète une petite fortune, l'Ukraine va aussi se ruiner avec de tels obus ? Ton analyse ne le dit pas...

Vive la résistance. A bas l’Empereur mafioso!

@@philippeplouchart8156 On ne serait si bien dire !

I don't know why Europe is soo easy to be manipulated by USA loll Go Go more more..hahahah

@@albo8404 So me as a Frenchman, to understand where is my interest in the war in Ukraine, I ask myself a very simple question, if you had to choose between immigrating to the USA or to Russia, my choice is immediately made, it will be the USA, because even if it is an imperfect democracy, it has at least the merit to exist, which is not the case in Russia, where the political opposition, the media of opposition, the journalists, association... are quite simply forbidden by the force, the intimidation... Now if you think that Europe is submissive to the USA, you are mistaken, France was opposed to the war in Iraq under Bush Sons, because it knew thanks to our intelligence services, that Saddam Hussein did not hold weapons of mass destruction as Dick Cheney and Colin Powell had affirmed it in front of the American senate and the assembly of the UNO !!! And our foreign minister Mr. Dominique de Villepin had made a scathing statement at the UN in front of the high American officials.

Два орудия уже в России, изучают, русские не в восторге .

I get your point, but do the ukrainiens have to pay for these artillery peaces tho? Otherwise you are right, it is cheaper for the US to send M777, than for France to send Ceasars and M777s can be send in greater numbers/ should be quicker to produce for further deliveries. On the battlefield, i don't think thr M777 has an advantage - less mobile, less range.

@@deepsteep4748 depends. Germany is sponsoring 1/4-1/2 of ukraines defense budget this year just for aquisitions (1.4-2.5b€ in direct payments)

@@zhufortheimpaler4041 more than a bit surprised if true. It'd be great , but I'm quite surprised. They could've done more. Heard they even blocked some Leo's from Spain to UA as a matter of fact...

@@frankmontez6853 The spanish leopard 2´s were not blocked by germany, spain never filed the export request. They just entertained the thought of exporting them, but then took a closer look at the stored Leo2A4E´s they were talking about. about 1/3 are without weaponry or even turret, they sat in non sustained storage for 10+ years and are beyond quick repairs. 10 would be salvagable within the next 6-10 months. As the german military has next to no stocks, germany is sponsoring the ukrainian equipment aquisition with 1.4-2.5b€ in direct payments and another 1b via the EU. This is in addition to the equipment germany delivers free house, like the 10 PzH2000, 30 Gepard SPAA, 15k anti tank mines, RPG´s, MANPADS, Field Hospitals, Field Ambulances etc etc etc And prior to the Invasion germany was the largest single donor to Ukraine, even outstretching US financial donnations, if the german EU contribution to Ukraine is counted in.

@@deepsteep4748 I don't think the question revolves around only sending the very best howitzer system but to send as many modern howitzer systems as possible to Ukraine. You know, the old saying that quantity has a quality all it's own - death by a thousand cuts. The Caesar sounds great and perfect for the Ukrainians. I'm glad that all these offensive and defensive systems are getting through to where they're needed most.

OMG! How dumb u ppl could be..

"the civilized world" You mean "occidental world"... The rest of the world know how occidental countries, especially USA, brought "democracy" in poor countries... It was not "civilized"... Hello Lybia, Iraq or Afghanistan...

depends on the gun. 2S19 Msta has about similar range (just slightly shorter) to NATO guns. M109A3 delivered by norway has a short barrelled gun and thus has shorter ranges than modern 155mm L/52 guns

True, but you will only have a limited amount of these rounds available, so it is good to have artillery with a great standard-ammunition-range and accuracy. 👍

80 miles?!! Not a chance…even with RA rounds more like 55 km….base bleed about 24 if I can recall. Your welcome. #UBIQUE

@@alexwilliamson1486 u want to look it up?

@@alexwilliamson1486 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bI_LT9uxH-8.html

the Archer looks better on paper but it has never seen a real combat operation. On trials and trainings, the system is immediately controlled, cleaned stored inside and repaired. The question is, how would the system react on a battlefield, with no major repair, bad weather, no cleaning and intense firing ? Nobody knows

The Archer looks better on paper but it never saw a real combat operation. On trials and trainings, the system is immediately controlled, cleaned, stored inside and repaired. The question is, how would the system react on a battlefield, with no major repair, bad weather, no cleaning and intense firing ? Nobody knows

Archer is more more expensive and heavy than the CAESAR For 1 Archer you have 3 or 4 CAESAR and a lot of ammunitions more CAESAR is combat proven in Afghanistan, Irak Syria, Lebanon, Africa MAli and now... Ukraina Archer is...factory proven and that s all And you need a lot of time to reload all the shell (dificult to maintain)

@@remistiegler5302 Be interesting to find out, Archer is the latest Kit, To be seen if it is the Greatest. As Ukraine now has a nearly Unlimited Budget it makes sense to be Ordering the Latest Kit now knowing that it will take Months if not a Year + to get even a Brigades worth of Archers delivered. While Caeser etc are already on the way. This War is highly unlikely to be over by Christmas!!

@@olivierheral5582 Can't argue with that at all, Don't get me wrong, Caeser is Quality System, Archer is the next Generation, Right now it only has 2 National buyers so could easily fulfill order for Ukraine in the next year or so, Without affecting anyone elses Orders, More Units Produced, Cheaper they get.

No need to fight...The caesar is better period!!! You see it was easy 🗼🗼🗼🗼

Where are these Archer ?? In a box ... !!

You know, that Russia and LPR/ DPR have far more estimated casualties, than Ukraine?

rusa created a huge problem for themselves bud ..

@@deepsteep4748 LOL... keep watching bbc, nbc and other BS

@@miladinseratlic5984 and what are you watching buddy? Can you recommend something?

Caesar makes meat with Russian soldiers, for sure !

@@remistiegler5302 meh

@@morge... and so goes with Himars too, those nice trucks roast them to the core at a perfect temperature... and location !

@@remistiegler5302 like a said meat for Russia ,already two down 🤣🤣🤣

@@morge... "already two" ? 😂😂😂 even between yourselves propagandists, you can't agree on a single message XD are they captured (looool) or destroyed ? You must choose 🤣🤣🤣

How would Russia capture a gun, that sits more than 30 km away from the frontline? Russia isn't making that much ground these days.

@@deepsteep4748 That is actually a misunderstanding of how these systems are used... They are driven right up to the front to fire 30+ km behind the lines and then they run like hell. this is what makes mobile platforms like the Paladin or Caesar so effective. Towed guns you might sit 60-80% of their range behind the front and support the front lines, mobile guns are used to reach out and touch the enemy where they think they are safe many miles behind the front and beyond the range of their own guns.

@@beefy1212 Sorry, i probably didn't communicate very well what i meant. I meant it exactly like you did. Clearly, mobile artillery does "shoot and scoot" to avoid counter battery fire. What i meant with "sits more than 30 km away from the frontline" is, that i don't know, how Russia should have captured some Ceasars, when the russian troops don't make enough ground to even come close to Ceasars theoretic range. I mean, Russia wouldn't even have the chance to capture them, if the Ceasars would only "sit" there 30 km behind the frontline. ;)

@@deepsteep4748 no I understood all that what I am saying is these systems drive up to the front right on it shoot, then flee it is possible for them to be over run as it were… maybe not by hapless Russian BTUs but it is possible

@@beefy1212 Do you really think, they would drive closer to the front, than they had to? Because i certainly didn't hear of a russian breakthrough or at least a the russians altering the frontline by more than a few km in the last time. All they do is grinding slowly through two cities in Luhansk, kilometer for kilometer. And i don't think they would use their Ceasars that close to the frontline. It makes bo sense.