Тёмный
No video :(

Calculating Correlation (Pearson's r) 

Patricia Jenkinson
Подписаться 13 тыс.
Просмотров 350 тыс.
50% 1

How to calculate Pearson's r correlation coefficient
Warning: I calculated the degrees of freedom (df) incorrectly.
The N is 7, not 14.
I counted the number of scores (which is typical in other calculations), instead of the number of cases. In this example, the df is indeed 5, meaning the critical value is 0.669, which is greater than the calculated r of 0.62, meaning we accept the null = no correlation.

Опубликовано:

 

23 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 145   
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson Год назад
There is an error in the calculation of degrees of freedom. Please watch the corrected version at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k_dcsZ_0uNI.html. The N is 7, not 14. I counted the number of scores (which is typical in other calculations), instead of the number of cases. In this example, the df is indeed 5, meaning the critical value is 0.669, which is greater than the calculated r of 0.62, meaning we accept the null = no correlation.
@AlmaMaeAberilla
@AlmaMaeAberilla 2 года назад
I'm in 12th grade and had the lead our group in doing our research study, as someone who had zero ideas on how to conduct one, what statistical tool and method to use, this video saved my grades from failing. THANK YOU SO MUCH
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 2 года назад
I’m so glad I could help.
@nicahcahanap6210
@nicahcahanap6210 Год назад
same
@georgenwankwo5792
@georgenwankwo5792 2 года назад
You are the best person that has ever explained this. Now I do not feel aloof anymore
@delamberty
@delamberty 2 года назад
14 minutes made me understand what I could not get in 7 days! Thank you Patricia for publishing this video.
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 2 года назад
You're so welcome!
@joelkitugwanidde2426
@joelkitugwanidde2426 4 года назад
Like Albert Einstein once said, if you can't explain it in a simple way, then you don't understand it well enough. Thank you,, Patricia, Jenkins, because you made me understand the concept so well. I look forward to more videos from you.
@IamPali2024
@IamPali2024 Год назад
This is amazing. I am a PhD student ready to conduct my correlational study and only now (after you explained the definitions and terminology in a mathematical context) I have clarity and can finish writing my proposal with confidence. Thank you for this
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@aravindssingapore4327
@aravindssingapore4327 4 года назад
Hi, Patricia. I must say your teaching style is highly commendable. I will certainly refer you to family and friends, because anything that is commendable is surely recommend-able.
@MisheckKazembe-hv4nc
@MisheckKazembe-hv4nc 5 месяцев назад
You are a great teacher 🔥🔥🔥. Only 14 minutes, very beneficial
@withlovestephaniedenise7024
I’d like to give this instructor her flowers 💐🌺 🌸 Ty
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson Год назад
Thank you! I hope you are watching the corrected version.
@lyndamccroskey1884
@lyndamccroskey1884 3 года назад
This is excellent. I will suggest to my students. Also, P. Jenkinson's vocal delivery is very warm, calming. I feel students will respond well to her lecture. Thank you so much for this lecture. best--Dr. LLM
@whoasked6147
@whoasked6147 Год назад
BEST VIDEO ABOUT THIS TOPIC EVER. THANK U MA'AAAM I HAVE MY FINAL EXAMS LATER YOURE A HERO, ANGEL, AND GODSENT. ILYSMMM
@getty3959
@getty3959 Год назад
Thank You.....Had to follow step by step and practice. Then input in spss and it gave me the exact outcome PHEW. at last I got a good expalnation. Thank you Pat.
@graceindiagordon
@graceindiagordon Год назад
Super helpful! Got the song stuck in my head all day😂
@sheilabranzuela7035
@sheilabranzuela7035 2 года назад
hi there Ms. Patricia! You're totally awesome. thnx for sharing your expertise
@matthewademola9020
@matthewademola9020 8 месяцев назад
Plainly explained. The steps are easy to follow. Simplicity at its best.
@nabuusodoreen-6442
@nabuusodoreen-6442 9 месяцев назад
it was very help ful to me,true definition of a teacher
@nicahcahanap6210
@nicahcahanap6210 Год назад
It helps me a lot. I thought it is very hard but this video helps me to understand it in a very simple way
@khenethavila
@khenethavila 3 года назад
So much videos but this is the best among them!!!
@rnsbakhietrm5914
@rnsbakhietrm5914 3 года назад
Thank you very much. The way you break down on the presentation really helps. Thank you again. 👏
@sibuskry2530
@sibuskry2530 5 лет назад
Clear and easy to understand. Best stats video I've seen by far!
@yogeetabhambhani1314
@yogeetabhambhani1314 4 года назад
Amazing informative sharing..
@aravindssingapore4327
@aravindssingapore4327 4 года назад
I also have lyrics to add to your and your professor's brilliant song. They are as follows: If any of your students wish to declare their love for each other during your lesson, they may wish to do so with the following words: The greater the *number / The brighter love's ember / Darling, don't you see / How much I adore thee? / 'Cos our hearts lie so near the magic line / So this Feb 14th, won't you be my Valentine 🌹? *in context, "number" refers to the coefficient of correlation, whereby a higher positive correlation coefficient indicates that the 2 of them are highly compatible
@Ivongjen
@Ivongjen 5 лет назад
So very helpful e-tutorial. Very best Prof. Jenkinson
@ValdirCarvalhoRibeiro
@ValdirCarvalhoRibeiro 3 года назад
Thank you so much for providing such knowledge for free.
@davecheung6957
@davecheung6957 3 года назад
Is the number of observation 7 or 14? There are only 7 data points??
@liazul540
@liazul540 Год назад
You are amazing thank you. Been confused on how to do it but I understood it well~
@ibrahimiliyas3985
@ibrahimiliyas3985 Год назад
Congratulation for the precise explanation
@bhupendersingh1067
@bhupendersingh1067 4 года назад
Best way of teaching.........thax
@mohammadmannan2253
@mohammadmannan2253 4 года назад
Very nice/under-stable presentation.
@justice24456
@justice24456 4 года назад
best explaination so far I checked out about regression. Thanks Patricia.
@waqarahmed-gi4zr
@waqarahmed-gi4zr 4 года назад
Very benificial thanks for teaching such s brief and easy way to learn basis concept
@silviar.7438
@silviar.7438 6 лет назад
That was soooo helpful. I love the way to broke that down I could actually understand it. Do you have any videos explaining Regression and ANOVA or SPSS ?
@mohanadazzam6095
@mohanadazzam6095 Год назад
very informative and simple explanation. thank you
@natarajanthirugnanasambamd5013
@natarajanthirugnanasambamd5013 4 года назад
The Training video is very simple and easily understandable .Thanks for publishing a good training video
@TheBraveOne.
@TheBraveOne. 2 года назад
You helped me a lot thanks
@moguerestherg.6547
@moguerestherg.6547 4 года назад
Thank you very much.
@ati2006
@ati2006 5 лет назад
Best exposition I have come across. Thanks
@johng5295
@johng5295 5 лет назад
Thanks in a million. Where have you been all these years!
@Littlejaneandthepistolwhips
@Littlejaneandthepistolwhips 3 года назад
Thank you so much!
@user-wo2ng5xl7j
@user-wo2ng5xl7j Год назад
This is great Ma ❤ The timing so good
@mengistumatewos1224
@mengistumatewos1224 Год назад
wonderful. please continue
@rinishitutnaik
@rinishitutnaik 3 года назад
The explanation is excellent👌👌👌👍👍 but faced a problem reading down the text. Because of translation strips running whole over the session..
@erin2150
@erin2150 4 года назад
Love the way you teach, thank you!
@vaishalisuryawanshi164
@vaishalisuryawanshi164 4 года назад
Very good explanation.
@mashiurchowdhury8536
@mashiurchowdhury8536 4 года назад
Greatly explained
@nancymalitoli9864
@nancymalitoli9864 2 года назад
best lecture
@alicenorah1208
@alicenorah1208 2 года назад
Sooo helpful...thanks for the tutorial😊
@robwin0072
@robwin0072 7 лет назад
You knocked it out of the park - Awesome
@MDAVID2903
@MDAVID2903 3 года назад
Awsome lecture. Thank you!
@KeithAurea
@KeithAurea 4 года назад
Thank you!
@SiegfriedNeumann
@SiegfriedNeumann 5 лет назад
Thank you very much indeed. You made my assignment easy.
@bobwrotenstien315
@bobwrotenstien315 4 года назад
Would it be correct to say that the essence of Pearson's formula when stated in words is: For the denominator see how far all the X's and how far all the Y's vary from their average. The larger the variation of all the X or all the Y or both makes for a larger denominator. For the numerator, see how much each (x,y) set moves in tandem. (X1 is increasing while Y1 is increasing for example) . If in many of the sets x and y are both moving by large amounts in the same direction as in the other sets you get a bigger number than if they are moving in different directions in some sets vs other sets. If the amount of movement in the same direction between the (x,y) sets approaches the amount of movement between the Xs and Ys seperately then you have found correlation.
@adenmuumin9458
@adenmuumin9458 4 года назад
Thanks, Ms. Patricia.
@joanleslie-jones1381
@joanleslie-jones1381 4 года назад
This extremely helpful, very clear step by step explanation. Thank you very much
@alialasadi9570
@alialasadi9570 4 года назад
really nice way to explain the subject and make it great you did a great job
@melhaniegean903
@melhaniegean903 2 года назад
useful content, thanks
@alexandermrkich8734
@alexandermrkich8734 4 года назад
That was an excellent explanation and example. Thank you!
@eJavierLaChira
@eJavierLaChira 4 года назад
That was a fantastic explanation, thank you!!
@pialesschipulu4589
@pialesschipulu4589 3 года назад
Well explained
@kristinemartinez6505
@kristinemartinez6505 4 года назад
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PAPASA NA KAMI SA THESIS YEHEY HAHAHAHAHAHA (BALIKAN KO TO PAG PUMASA KAMI) AMEN!!!
@SlowZX2
@SlowZX2 5 лет назад
THANK YOU SO SO SO MUCH! You explained it perfectly making it seem so easy to me :) Made me feel like a genius after I found that I got the exact number that popped up on the automatic answer in excel! Thanks for the video! Today I have a Biology IA due and this just saved me! (it's 4:00am here right now) *#IBLife*
@eduardobronson8653
@eduardobronson8653 3 года назад
i know im asking randomly but does any of you know a tool to get back into an Instagram account? I stupidly lost my account password. I would appreciate any help you can offer me
@noraal-fikey6115
@noraal-fikey6115 Год назад
First, thank you for your help Can I ask what is the difference between ( scatter diagram, Karl person's coefficient of correlation)
@governor2545
@governor2545 3 года назад
Very nice teaching
@josephricafrente8195
@josephricafrente8195 4 года назад
Thank you..👍👍👍
@Magmatic91
@Magmatic91 4 года назад
In excel the correlation is not significant at 0.05. The p value given in Excel is 0.136 which is > 0.05 so we accept H0. So the correlation is not sig. Can you please explain to me why is this?
@washingtonmuriungi
@washingtonmuriungi Год назад
Easy to understand
@economyforcivilservicejite6431
Good explanation
@EdutObona
@EdutObona Год назад
Very educating. Thank you.
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson Год назад
Glad it was helpful!
@DorjiWangchuk101
@DorjiWangchuk101 6 лет назад
Your ending song was great. Although I am a postdoc, kindergarten pedagogy still works HA HA HA
@villemarieadrias1783
@villemarieadrias1783 5 лет назад
How did you find the pearson's r? plsss helpp me
@lefhikaphokontsi4444
@lefhikaphokontsi4444 Год назад
you saved me bro
@rajadhav
@rajadhav 6 лет назад
Fantastic! Keep educating.....
@glennafranke7360
@glennafranke7360 4 года назад
Thanks. Very helpful and I could understand it!! :)
@mush543
@mush543 3 года назад
very good video
@wendyrabvunda9412
@wendyrabvunda9412 6 лет назад
thank you so much you really explained it well in a nice way
@NomansSkywalker
@NomansSkywalker 3 года назад
Useful video and well explained. However, there is a mistake in the DF calculation. Your sample N is 7 not 14.
@mohammedahmedjalloh531
@mohammedahmedjalloh531 3 года назад
yeah, I think she added the values up to make it 14 since we were checking for the weakest and strongest relationship.. for X and Y that is X(7) + Y(7) = 14 for the total samples.
@okaysidd
@okaysidd 5 лет назад
Great explanation! Thanks
@eternalreality4346
@eternalreality4346 Год назад
Thank you so much 💓
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson Год назад
You're welcome 😊
@mushimejuliana3984
@mushimejuliana3984 Год назад
Hi...but i thought you are mistaken on 5th column that not the summation of them
@beckybearOo
@beckybearOo 5 лет назад
This was exactly what I needed thank you so much
@kobusingyeann9223
@kobusingyeann9223 4 года назад
This is great thanks so much I was helped
@xoalexalovesyouxo
@xoalexalovesyouxo 7 лет назад
This helped me so so much; thank you!!
@sia8158
@sia8158 5 лет назад
Very helpful. Thank you
@alfiedilag624
@alfiedilag624 5 лет назад
This was so great... Thanks a lot 👍
@dr.sangeetasachdeva8773
@dr.sangeetasachdeva8773 4 года назад
thank you very much for the excellent presentation. only one point I couldn't understand i.e. when we are comparing to critical r, what is; assume alpha level =.05 for a one tailed test?
@engalavanivani9299
@engalavanivani9299 3 года назад
Thank you mam.
@saurabhmardi8109
@saurabhmardi8109 3 года назад
Awesome
@user-gv1sd9ht6m
@user-gv1sd9ht6m 5 лет назад
Thanks for the very helpful video! 😊 but I have a question. Is this applicable to a sample size of 60 or even more?
@lez-b-real8791
@lez-b-real8791 7 лет назад
Thank you soooooo much. My professor is more interested in showing us the computer work and not so much the long hand. Sadly MyStatLab loves math problems and doesn't care about JMP.... thank you, thank you, thank you
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 7 лет назад
So glad it helped. But the computer work is so much easier. The benefit of knowing how to do it by hand is that you are better able to understand the concepts so you can interpret the results. However, as someone noted, I actually counted the degrees of freedom wrong in here. All the calculations are correct, but when compared against the critical value, I used the wrong df so compared to the wrong CV. I created a newer video with the correction: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k_dcsZ_0uNI.html. Essentially, we only have 7 cases, not 14. df is N-2, so 7-2 = 5. Sorry for the mess-up. I tried to redirect the video. But, you got the idea on the calcuations at least.
@16kickboxing
@16kickboxing 5 лет назад
Thank you. It helped
@lianacampopiano56
@lianacampopiano56 Год назад
thank you queen
@toritrylovich1
@toritrylovich1 8 лет назад
really good video, thank you so much!
@aravindssingapore4327
@aravindssingapore4327 4 года назад
The greater the *number / The brighter love's ember / Darling, don't you see / How much I adore thee? / 'Cos our hearts lie so near the magic line / So this Feb 14th, won't you be my Valentine 🌹?
@ikos_hederal
@ikos_hederal 2 года назад
Great
@jb411000
@jb411000 6 лет назад
Excellent! Patricia.
@michalnawracaj6164
@michalnawracaj6164 4 года назад
Why is the degree of freedom equal to 14-2 and not 7-2 ?
@Devilupz
@Devilupz 2 года назад
ik im late but it is 7-2. She apologized and made a new video.
@sarahz9703
@sarahz9703 4 года назад
I think you mean epsilon not sigma, but this was great thanks
@woodchuk1
@woodchuk1 7 лет назад
Just curious...for correlation, the degrees of freedom is indeed n-2. I thought that for correlation purposes, n was the total number of paired data points, not counting each part separately. Since we have 7 students, wouldn't we only have 5 degrees of freedom, not 12?
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 7 лет назад
Dang! You are correct. I counted the number of scores (which is typical in other calculations). In this example, the df is indeed 5, meaning the critical value is 0.669, which is greater than the calculated r of 0.62, meaning we accept the null = no correlation. (Dang! I hate it when I'm wrong. I'll see what I can do to put a note on the video. Thanks for catching my error.)
@woodchuk1
@woodchuk1 7 лет назад
Patricia Jenkinson Hey, no problem. We are all human...you're doing a great job in clearly explaining a topic that is undoubtedly hard and/or tedious for many people. I just happened to develop a passion for math and number-crunching, so stats has always interested me. Subbed!
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 7 лет назад
Thanks. Unfortunately, this will be a low priority for me. RU-vid has taken away the option to edit and keep the same URL. So I will need to re-record (and come up with different numbers so I can make the result significant), re-upload, and redo the captioning. That's going to take some time. In the meantime, I put a note in the description. Good for you to be a number-crunching person! (I'm really not; I've just learned to do it and have had to teach it.)
@PatriciaJenkinson
@PatriciaJenkinson 7 лет назад
I did it all today (I couldn't stand to have an error up there.) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-k_dcsZ_0uNI.html
@woodchuk1
@woodchuk1 7 лет назад
Patricia Jenkinson Wow, I hope I didn't cause you any headaches! Your dedication is commendable...I don't know if I would have had the strength to do it all in one day! I think YT needs to make editing videos easier!
@thatoangelobuseng8804
@thatoangelobuseng8804 3 года назад
♥️Wow thanks a lot
@sserwaddaderrick1523
@sserwaddaderrick1523 2 месяца назад
The best 🎉
Далее
Correlation: Calculating Pearson's r (Corrected)
9:40
Correlation Coefficient
12:57
Просмотров 1,9 млн
“Bernabéu… pressure… 90,000” 🔥🔥🔥
01:02
Statistics 101: Understanding Correlation
27:05
Просмотров 717 тыс.
Pearson correlation [Simply explained]
7:50
Просмотров 159 тыс.
Pearson Correlation Explained (Inc. Test Assumptions)
16:36
Pearson's Correlation, Clearly Explained!!!
19:13
Просмотров 380 тыс.
Correlation Analysis - Full Course
27:00
Просмотров 54 тыс.
Linear Regression and Correlation - Example
24:58
Просмотров 1 млн
Introduction to Correlation & Regression, Part 1
12:55
Просмотров 277 тыс.
Spearman's Rank Correlation #2
15:39
Просмотров 300 тыс.