I like bo4 more because it is less realistic and it’s harder to be skilled meaning of you’re good at it you can be really fun. But MW is more realistic and easier to play for new people and the time to kill is so low making for a game with camping and bad players being able to easily kill good players. But I think Warzone and search and destroy are good from MW
MW butchered the guns in such a way that it can't be called realistic. For example the SVD being a sniper rifle when it's one of the first true marksman rifles in existence. Kar98, AUG, G36, crossbow and SKS also don't fit in their category. AK-47 is an extremely rare gun in real life. It got replaced by AKM in 1960s and then several newer designs got adopted. So seeing the 47 in MW makes zero sense. L85 can't be used by lefties becouse of the ejection port and reciprocating charging handle right under their face. What's the IW's solution? Adding ambidextrous charging handle so that nobody can use the gun. 3 round burst on a FAL? What kind of sorcery is that? First of all FAL was a fully automatic gun and second of all if you want the gun to be limited to bursts you need to add a mechanism which physically blocks the hammer or the bolt. That's not easy.
Fun fact: at mw, when you called uav, cuav or ad uav, you can hear that there is many people talking at the background when the uav operator is talking, it is very realistic
Black Ops 4 is a game from 2013, not 2018... at least, it feels like it. But nope, it was out in 2018 and felt 5 years out of date right out of the gate.
So true, it felt so fast when MW came our with such good shit and graphics when BO4, a game that wasn't released so far before had graphics from 2015 of some shit. Still enjoyable, but I thought it was too drastic to have such improvements in a short amount of time
@@ashaduzzaman6629 warzone has way better features and shit, bo4 for no PC players and lower chances to encounter a hacker, but, with that cross play can always be turned off.
They are different games,BO4 is a more arcade focused game that actually requires skill and aim,while modern warfare is a hard aiming campfest that belongs in a trashcan
@@Its.Mr.Bonelezz_Pizza I feel MW plays more like battlefield tdm than actually a cod game. However I am a fan of both franchises so I dont mind that. Hovever I think I will like CW more.
Adam Bond for sure it was a far goofier than other contemporary cods,even more than BO3,in my opinion,BO4’s biggest strength was the fast paced gameplay and the superior pick 10 system,having said that,fuck the acoustic sensor and comsec device
@@Its.Mr.Bonelezz_Pizza I just feel like there wasnt enough effort put into bo4 and didn't like specialists and the silliness. However the core gameplay was fun.
@@lambdaxian9974 Every CoD has campers. Dealing with them is half the fun. If you want a game that doesn't require strategy or thinking, then I agree, the BO series is more that style.
Well no one talks about it cause BO4 was shit(I mean not a surprise as Black Ops games have been shit after BO1) and MW is basically the best COD ever.
One FUN little detail is that in BO4, the care package landed where you marked it. Regardless of where the grenade went afterward. Unlike MW where you can get fucked over because the care package drops where the grenade goes. Meaning, if the grenade happens to roll off the playable area, you're screwed.
Mw scorestreaks are very awful. I dont like why each air support scorestreak has the same dialogue. I like how bo4 has different matching dialogue each scorestreaks
@@nighthawk5719 bruh. The announcer like calling in UAV is the same thing "request recon plane over" calling in advanced Uav "request recon plane over" Calling in cruise missile "target marked, send it" calling in precision airstrike "target marked, send it" now do you see what I'm saying?
The BO4 streaks play out better. MW’s Counter UAV is trash But at least MW has the advanced uav. Mantis> Wheelson Hellstorm> Cruise Missile BO4 Sentry> MW Sentry Juggernaut> Strike Team BO4 Gunship> MW Gunship
I hate to tell y’all but I think the lethals in bo4 r better like the tresher and the snipers nest and the gunship they just last longer and get more kills
For real ! ----- I used modern warfare for a year and black ops 4 for a year. - modern warfare After playing for two months, I started to feel sick and not have fun playing it🦶🏻 _____ As for Black Ops 4, the fun is endless and the fighting spirit is awesome ❤️❤️❤️❤️ The colors in Black Ops 4 are pretty and clear, but in Modern Warfare, unfortunately
You gotta be fucking 6 to even agree on such a shit game, the thing is too, is that it didn't even get a little better until they added "pick-a-bribe" which allowed you to (as it says in the name) "pick a weapon of your choice through a bribe", there were glitches that should've been seen before it had launched and patched after, and the 'MT'S' were agregious, and the stupid variants were just for looks besides the XP it granted you for the weapon as a whole, but no. You had to get "Cod points" how? "By buying it" honestly. You must have low standards man. Even fuckin zombies wasn't good, because of how they changed the perk system, and how you couldn't customize the "DLC weapons" if you didn't have them. Not only that, but on launch. All zombies really was, was just a "blue screen". And too boot, *there also wasn't a Campaign* .. so have fun I guess. I Don't get it and I'm not mad, but this just weirds me out
Ehh, I rather have a gritty-looking FPS game (sort of) that actually include challenges to complete to unlock new camos and actual FREE DLC weapons than a "pretty" FPS game with an absurd season pass system that locks DLC weapons in Supply Drops for no good reason in the first place
