Call of Duty MWIII - Season 1 | Warzone Review 

I dont mind them not having destruction. But the campaign absolutely needs to go back to the old format. This years (and the last couple years) have featured some weak solo campaigns

Destruction would be a cool mechanic, but it changes the whole dynamics of Call of duty, as Call of duty will always be an arena shooter at its core, even with ground war offering large scale battles with vehicles, the game has still been balanced with arena maps in mind, that’s why I wasn’t a fan of their take on large scale battles as the weapons particularly snipers were far too overpowered compared to Battlefield (prior 2042) who are well acquainted with large scale battles, balancing their game out much better making it so you have to go for head shots to earn a Insta-kill otherwise two shots are required, which is how it should’ve been in ground war as the snipers dominated the mode to the point where playing anything else wasn’t feasible. As for the campaigns, I thought they did a fantastic job with all of them except Black Ops 4 as they removed the campaign, and Black Ops Cold War felt too short, and this years MW3 was pushed out too early to be anything substantial, however I can’t say I felt the same for MW2019 & MWII campaigns, sure their not as grandiose as earlier titles, but the earlier games had a habit for exaggerating real life warfare where I think the reboots have tried to take a more realistic approach to actual warfare.

I have that footage on my PC. That could be the first direct comparison of the new year :)

@@Nick930 Awesome! :D

Cause the last one didn’t make enough money

imo the only thing that sucks about this cod is THE ENTIRE GAME. Cash grab half assed BS

I think it does. Def still run into some suspicious players every now and again, but compared to other pc games, cheaters do seem pretty rare

It uses its own software called Ricochet, although I don’t know if it’s up there with Battle-eye. It could be I just don’t know.

@@myrussianpotato6650 Ricochet is also kernel level software. i believe

Yeah, as someone who can't deal with the competitive PvP stuff anymore (I can barely keep up with the actual MP in CoD anymore, it's so fast help me!) the BR modes are just not for me. I think the only BR games I've ever gotten into are all basically shut down at this point, or soon to be shut down (Ring of Elysium comes to mind, loved that one).

@@LordLOC we play games for stress relief. But these BR trends and competitive games are rising our stress to next level. Old school cod games are huge relief. But nowadays cod having SBMM hurts more in long run. Imo, in case of multiplayer fps now, Battlefield is the only non competitive AAA casual arcade game alive. But due to the corporate greed, BFV and 2042 sucks also. Competitive gaming and micro transactions are the worst things that ever happen to fps gaming.

This is why I play CS2. I don’t have to sweat with all the movement. The challenge is less about movement and more about aim, map knowledge, and strategy.

Because I haven't had a chance to talk about it before and wanted to share my own thoughts on it. Been playing this game in my free time a lot. I've got lots of big projects planned I'll talk about soon :)

90 is good for me. Anymore and the image looks warped and fisheyed. I'm not a fan of maxing out the fov personally

@@Nick930 anything above 105 is when fisheye effect starts to get noticeable, you should increase it a bit

also allowing matches to be 200 players