If a former president lets you into his house - MULTIPLE TIMES - AND you have 1 on 1 conversations with people in the government often, you are not an "average American citizen"...
I was thinking she was just uninformed about the point he was trying to make and didn’t want to concede the argument because of that. And there is an argument against that if you watch one conservative vs 20 liberals
My rebuttal to that is 4.5 million votes is not a lot for a state with 37.5 million people. Democrats toe the line here in California that's why they've been running this state for over 5 decades and counting. She was running against Republican Steve Cooley. Democrats all vote blue down the line uninformed. Harris received 4,442,781 votes while Cooley lost with 4,368,624 votes. Her Republican mate didn't lose by that much considering the state is majority Democrat.
@@michaela9548 That's not true though. Remember when Dean claimed that Harris only convicted 45 people for marijuana possession but in reality, 45 represented the number of people imprisoned for it?
He was triggered from being called racist and was shut down early so he kept attempting to walk away with a win. Unfortunately he didn't do well for himself 😂
I could never do what he did, arguing with people when they live in a delusional fantasy world where facts don't matter feels like repeatedly running into a brick wall to me, his patience is off the charts.
I am so disappointed by the young lady who chose to squander her chance to make a point by arguing that the most qualified, experienced candidate for President with over 30+ of public service slept her way to the top. When men do this we rightfully call them misogynistic. When a woman does that to another woman … it heart breaking. 💔
Every nation on this planet has racism for some other nation or skin color. Racism has somehow devolved into whites against black!!! Black folks just get the grunt of it internationally!!!
They’re all sheep that’s why lol They obviously disagree with him and therefore dislike him so they’d keep whoever interrupts him in for the sake of not letting him talk. Very immature of these “adults” if you ask me 💀
@@brunetteXerit’s really not valid his not a child his a teen who speaks eloquently with facts more than alot of the fully grown adults. Also in a debt you’re meant to be respectful to the other side.🤍
“You’re probably more educated than all of us on policies and stuff like that, but that’s not really applicable to real life living” that statement alone summarized the entire intellect of this video.
@BruceLee-qc2lm correct. but if you have working eyes and ears, I'd hope that you could see that his self-admitted statement about the insane level of stupidity in that room was a correct and astute observation
Just because someone doesn’t speak as concisely as someone who debates for a living doesn’t make them less knowledgeable. Life experience provides a unique perspective that goes beyond what’s on paper. Data and surveys can be flawed due to human error and unseen variables, and real-life decisions often involve complexities that stats can’t capture. Perfect information doesn’t exist, and we’re often working with incomplete or inaccurate data, which is why critical thinking and real-world experience and exposure are crucial. Younger crowds tend to lean more liberal because they’re supplied with book knowledge and stats but often lack the life experience needed to balance the two. Age isn’t always a factor, though - many in their 50s still live in a bubble. It’s about combining knowledge with real-life exposure to form a well-rounded perspective.
These debates need moderators. The discussion would be more productive if those fact checks that pop up post production were mentioned when the person tries to fight the validity of the claim.
I feel like that would be a great idea but people here already "not logical"so i feel like if there would be moderators they would be accuse of taking sides and things might get sideline
Jubilee you need a moderator for these. it's horrendous how much they just gish gallop and interrupt him instead of having a back and forth, someone needs to shut that down
So if that’s true why didn’t Charlie Kirk get this same treatment. Interesting when it’s on the other foot you think this liberal needs a moderator but Charlie didn’t. Typical
@MrRenwick19 he never even said charlie didn't deserve a moderator?? he said THESE videos as in all these kinds of videos (including charli and dean), you're assuming for no reason
@@MrRenwick19 Interruption is consistent regardless of political identity when you are dealing with a seasoned debater and untrained individuals. Charlie Kirk however is particularly known for his ability to interrupt others. He would have definitely benefited from a moderator, as would have some of the untrained individuals who spoke over him.
I like the concept of this debate but someone has to mediate a little better or people like the women in blue will just complain cause she doesn’t get to speak even tho she’s been speaking the most when she goes up there every time
Micah definitely had the best rebuttals and was assertive and polite. He should have gone first to set the example for the rest 😕 bc the others did not so so well
@@princessl0llie421she presented it like she physically had aversion of it not a digital version that anyone could reference. If that was clear no one would have clapped or cheered
I have a feeling people raise their flags when they want the conversation to stop because it’s actually challenging their views, not because they themselves want to participate
The statement could be used for the debate of the conservatives vs liberals..but it was the design of this debate, not a trick..the liberal can continue his argument if he is so certain of it despite whomever comes on board, as he should be able to defend it from different angles. So, you can rest assure that this platform did not work in favor of one or the other and even offer a fact check to the statements.
@@spartrif you’re Tracy, even if you were instructed to raise flags you did a horrible job with debating. You continuously interrupted him, even after he admitted to not knowing nearly as much about the Afghanistan pullout as you. Instead of letting him make a claim and attack him there, you just hammered in repeated info that you heard from RU-vid videos. Please actually learn to engage in discussions.
Shout out to Carter for being mature and giving Dean the space to say his point without interruption. It felt like he was actually trying to hear Dean out and come for a genuine conversation
@@nickstockwell9148did we watch the same video or? Tracey’s whole argument was interrupting him and adding something else for him that didn’t add to the discussion and when he tried to talk she would say “I’m listening I’m waiting” while not letting him speak at all
@@nickstockwell9148 he let the opposing side talk as much as they wanted to unless he jumped in to correct them on an incorrect claim. For example, watch the clips with Lori. Do you see how much she talked where he sat and listened?
@@nickstockwell9148lol did we saw the same video or you just ignore the whole conversation with Lori? Hahah dean couldn’t say more than 10 words with her and she participated a lot in all the prompts lol
"you're calling a hispanic cuban a racist??" like yes girl im cuban and I know VERY well many cubans are racist. Same energy as "im not racist I have a black friend"
is a rumor that mostly all Cubans that came in boats , stablish in Florida and thanks to the help law became citizens..and now they they hate other people from other states......is the rumor that is beeing hear for years....They are racist..
I mean, if I come to a debate fully prepared with researches and sources just to get interrupted and yelled at by genuinely insane people using facebook infographics as their main sources I would want to kms too
@@ba_sic facebook is unhinged tbh. the amount of posts i see from middle aged and boomers complaining about how they cant beat their kids anymore is insane.
This went exactly how I feared it would go, one guy got flagged out for simply listening to the others argument, he hadn’t even spoken yet and had 8 flags up.
@@imjamf I think the other went well because the person was allowed to state their case and it be argued against even if the arguments didn’t get to pan out as much as we’d like. Here the debating point is mentioned, someone comes along to debate, doesn’t listen to any of the points and starts ranting about Kamala Harris.
They raise their flags because they won’t want to hear it anymore and most of time it’s when important things. And most people there just sit and don’t bring anything to the table
@@Vanillattte Actually to certain people he was very impolite and interrupted them repeatedly (mostly referring to that Chicago black dude) he didn't interrupt Dean once and when he started to explain his point on why Trump's residency lowered crime and homeless rate in Chicago, Dean interrupted him 4 times "This is incorrect", and he is a debater? Give me a break.
Not the blonde lady being friends with every member of the American government. Been in trumps house 3 times and personally got told a bill didn’t make it to the house. 😭😂
Turns out he's also a convicted felon for stalking, threats, attempted extortion, and campaign finance violations. His name is Omar Navarro and he served 6 months in prison in 2019.
@@swampsprite9 people aren’t born gay. If they were, then aborigines and other tribal groups dating back thousands of years would’ve had gay people. That means it’s society that creates them
I think jubilee definitely should’ve stepped in when that one woman did not let him finish a single sentence. This is not how you promote or stimulate a productive dialogue.
He actually annoyed me a little because he would cut them off when they were responding. But when they would interject him, he would be like "I'm not done speaking."
@@Witdabear that’s not true. He would only interject when they were wrong, or when they were making ridiculous claims. They didn’t let him speak because they were afraid of what he had to say. Every time someone did speak, they voted that person away. If you look at the timer, you can see how much time some people took up and how long Dean let them speak, while couldn’t get in a single sentence with some people.
Facts can be retooled. I.e looking at data under different terms which are effectively different conditions. Like data on school mass shootings vs “gun incidents”.
At least he was being honest. 🤷♀️ But he shouldn't have expected to be able to overpower a teenager with his own sheer ignorance when the kid had facts and truth on his side
This "debate" is anything but fair. Bringing regular every day people in to debate with a professional debater is rigged from the start. I'd love to see a fair contest between this chump and an equally prepared supporter. But you're the smart one Mojo, because you placed a crying emoji after a sarcastic comment. *pats on the head* P.S. I'd love them to find one of these woke who doesn't have an air of unearned superiority and smugness about them. That'll be the day.
@@shefalichow7917since when does being educated equate to being a professional debater? the truth is that dean is a normal person too. one of the youngest people there, as well. you’re just upset that dean doesn’t side with your beliefs, and you know he’s making valid points.
@@gyllian5280 Yeah, sure. Nice echo chamber you're in. Those are some fine linens. I pity you folks, to a degree, as I used to have the wool pulled over, just like you. Enjoy the illusion while it lasts. The discovery of reality will not be kind to your conscience, if it ever comes.
The person who sacrificed his turn so Dean could make is point is a hero for standing up to the others who just wanted to talk over him. Highly laudable civility.
I cannot handle HOW NO ONE ANSWERS ANY QUESTIONS, THEY JUST DEFLECT. The state of politics in this country is infuriating. Sometimes it's okay to be proven wrong
@@TheOCHapaI won’t comment at all on anything other than you answer. You cannot fight fire with fire and you shouldn’t do something you think is wrong regardless of who did it first
And how many times did Dean RUDELY cut them off the very second that he didn't agree with any of them? Dean rudely cut off everyone in that group at least 100 dozen times! He shared his thoughts with anger in his voice, but, he can't handle when they share FACTS with him.
Education has failed if a young woman has an attitude like that. She is a disgrace to the women who died to fight and secure her voting rights, for her to be free to work and have a bank account and own her own home. I'd be ashamed of her if she was my daughter.
She said that because he misrepresented what she said. She didn't say what he said she said. He interpreted incorrectly. I would guess he didn't fully listen to what she said before crafting word salad in his head.
People kept mentioning that he had "20 minutes" to get his point across, but that's literally the point of this episode. it's 19 v 1; he literally only has himself to defend his side.
Which in hindsight may be more beneficial because he doesn't have to defend anyone else's position except his own. Also, it's easier to keep track of his arguments than trying to follow someone else's. He practices political debate where clearly these people other than the real politician lady in the blue, were just average everyday civilians. That's the releasing he had so much trouble with her because she knows how to debate
@@sharpmarbles4491 the thing is, he didn't have "20 minutes for himself", the only time he had was what was allowed to him by either the conservatives letting him explain his initial point (which didn't always happen), or when he was allowed to respond to their arguments (and more often than not, he was just being interrupted to the point of being unable to properly finish his responses)
Gurl aint no damn way ur saying she “ate” him up- did we watch the same video? How can that even be the case when we didn’t even get to hear his responses to her questions when she just kept yapping over him. She was not even letting him even finish one sentence the whole time and acting childish.
The woman talking about the Afghanistan pullout literally said answer me but then wouldn't let him answer. She legit was the most annoying and condescending person
Im actually confused... he's the main debater in this episode, so why do they keep getting mad at him for talking about the subjects he brought up and not let him speak? There were like 3 people that actually let both sides talk.
in the alternate one, where Charlie Kirk was the debater, the liberals got mad at him repeatedly. I think Jubilee stacked the deck, ensuring that the only one who knew sources off the top of their head would be the debaters to make them look better.
@@TyroTalks the debaters themselves have come forth and said they weren’t briefed before the debate. Also while they did have emotional reactions, they still allowed for a debate to happen but Charlie (like the conservatives in this video) didn’t allow for the other side to get off their argument, instead interrupting at every possible time.
@@alangreen142 thats just not true bro, i really recommend you fact check the things he said.... Even the video fact checks a lot of this, just watch the video dude
It happened with the previous video as well. Red flags up immediately. I would like to see Dean and Charlie on a 1 on 1 format. It’d be far more productive.
“It’s yes or no” some questions like hypotheticals can be yes or no but when it is such a nuanced issue there needs to be more addressed, so many specifics in her question, it was insane to say just yes or no.
that what happened the whole time when the liberals were debating the one conservative they wouldnt even let him get a sentence out without screaming at him thats wrong. it goes both way....
@@hihowariait was no different then the 20 libs was one conservative. Obviously you’re going to get one sided opinions when you have 20 of the same mindset. Bozo
I felt bad for the blonde girl who tried like 3 times in a row to speak but couldn't. If you're behind the speaker you're already at a disadvantage because of how far you need to walk. It should honestly be whoever stands up first can speak.
@@jamesanthony5257 The one where the guy went to the back of the chair, looked at the girl walking towards it, and made it seem like he was going to pull it out for her or turn around but then just takes it was shitty
It also annoyed me how Omar would speak, get flagged down, someone else speaks, they get flagged down, then Omar wants to speak again on the same prompt.
The blonde lady with the ponytail really set me off. To be asking for an answer but not letting the person answer you by speaking over them is actually crazy. You will never win a debate if you won’t allow the other to respond to your claims.
He lied about the function of an IUD. It prevents implantation, which means it prevents conception, which means it prevents a unique life form. And IUD does NOT abort a human life If you don't know what a gibbet is, you can still argue against death sentences.
Trumpers are living in denial the world is watching this and the truth is obvious where I live Trumps racism would get him indicted and rightfully so as a South African resident I feel fully qualified to know what racism is
The dude from Chicago was smart he let Dean talk him self in circles and caught him in a string of lies. He looked angry...don't lie to dudes like that, you won't like it.
While I agree character should be an important part, in today's world we must choose between a person with not so great character but excellent policies, or someone whose character seems great on the outside, but whose policies would ruin this country. I'm going to back my country and vote for the guy with little character, because at least he has American citizens set as his priority.
@@Ryden22 totally understand your point and I do agree to some extent, however I still do think saying character does not play a role in how one leads is pretty insane in my opinion
Guy in the Blue suit acting so stressed in the background anytime Dean says anything has me rolling. Really just likes to hear himself talk more than anything it seems 💀
selina was SOOOO condescending and thought she was so correct then as soon as she was presented with actual facts she went “i have no comment on that” and silent 💀💀💀 tracey just made it so much worse, never stopped talking and never let him finish and accused him of “dancing around the question” when she kept asking different ones
It’s funny because she knew she was beat on that point, hence why she didn’t want to comment on that. It’s mainly because she’d have to backtrack all she said about abortion which would make her look like a fool
@@jessicagirl889Nah the worst person there was the blonde girl with the ponytail, Selina at least tried to keep the conversation on the original topic and let him answer I'm even surprised anyone had a problem with her at all
Omar Navarro (GUY IN THE BLUE SUIT): -Facing 43 federal charges for campaign finance violation. -Spent time in prison. -Was previously charged with stalking, criminal threats, extortion, and violation of restraining order. -On December 12, 2019, he was remanded in custody for a further seven charges by San Francisco county superior court judge for being a threat to public safety, and was ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation. -He pled guilty to one charge and spent 6 months in prison.
why was this guy even in there at all? wtf. what a terrible video, how could they not do ANY sort of screening for this video.Jubilee needs to do better
He was trying to say that being book smart doesn't equal street smarts. Everyone has their perfect ways of how the country would thrive. That's not going to happen. Everyone needs to find a middle ground here and put their pride and "sides" aside.
Lori's first attempt was okay, slightly annoying, but when she came back later everytime she was worse. Also somehow believed he spoke more than her during their debates lol
Who ever did the “FACT CHECK” needs to be fired !!! 24:42 The Center for American Progress is a public policy research and advocacy organization which presents a liberal viewpoint on economic and social issues. It has its headquarters in Washington, D.C. The faken founder is pedophile John pedestal
He can't answer yes or no on the afghan pullout. He was going for the same Kamala tactic "I was born in a middle class family" and changing topic after that😂
@@chocolateangel8743 its more info dumping to the point where they just load people with facts and because theres just so much info chucked at them, they get confused about what he is even saying. imo thats a tactic
bro the guy with the orange shirt and glasses was so respectful, this is how you have real conversations and i wish i could’ve heard what he had to say!!!
It was very similar to Charlie against the libs. It was very difficult for him to get his points across. It just goes to show that both sides are filled with the same sheepish “cult” members, but at the same time both sides have reasonable people that all work for the same goal, just different paths to achieve that goal.
@@austinduke8876 Maybe a chess clock that accelerates a bit until you end your turn, that way the more time you take at once, the less total time you have.
Can I tell you why I feel he doesn't care about the American people? "Sure in 10 seconds or less." *Quickly goes through his reasons* "No, let's slow down because you just put down so much."
@@starboyjadenn it was a brief statement with three points, rushing him to give the reasons then being upset he quickly and precisely gave his reasons like she asked him to.
He has anger issues. Very emotional little boy. He was being petty. Plus he’s a convicted stalker so idk why he thinks he can sit here and debate Dean like he has some moral high ground.
She was extremely obnoxious, and the fact that they just let her yell like a lunatic and only started raising the flags when Dean started talking was unreal.
@@brigrantright she kept telling him to say what democrats have done that is patriotic but when he started on policies she said “We’re not talking policies” girl go sit back down 😂😂
He's rattling off overly verbose talking points that are loaded with his opinion. It's difficult to argue against that when he doesn't stop bloviating. It IS "book smart" in a sense, because he "sounds smart" saying a bunch of words back to back to back. But it's ALL couched in him stating his opinions as though they are objective facts.
“Can I just have thirty seconds?” “No, you can not” that about sums up this entire debate. It’s all yap yap yap and NOBODY actually listening to his points. Ridiculous.
No one listens to him because he tries talking at the same time the other people are talking and that guy is rude. Charlie kirk actually lets people talk to argue against him.
if we're talking about the woman with the chart on her phone, she was saying this because the timer for when she had to swap out for a different person had less than 30 seconds 😭 it wasn't because she didn't want to let him talk.
