Can Fossils Last Millions of Years? | The Creation Podcast: Episode 16 

Also trigger her reflection of God. Atheïst delusion is a good documentairy for this. Also Ray comforts 10 commandments approach to appreciate and value the cross. And the case for Christ movie. Reason wont be enough. Its the love of the world/sin and to keep comfortable in there.

@@smgibv4393 God is like Harry Potter. He can conjure things up. It is the easiest thing in the world to conjure things up. Every God can do this. Otherwise we would call him a showman. I think the classification, evolutionists do, is wright. What do you think? Is it possible to believe in things who don't exist? Many stupid creationist children played with dinosaurs, but not all survived. God is as useful as a pimple on the face. However, apparently some of us are very proud of having a pimple on the face.

She it taught evolution because it is the best explanation for the facts surround speciation.

@@StudentDad-mc3pu Someone say: "I know that the God of Abraham , Isaac and Jacob created me from the dust of the earth, Amen." Maybe some of us get a little too much of this dust in their brains. Creationists are humans who have not yet reached the level evolutionists have arrived as "Real Human". Maybe in a two million years they will reach this level of mature. But they stuck in evolution, because they read such funny things like the bible. Ohnfitzgerald wrote: "The Bible is a collection of children's bedtime stories that parents would tell them. Later, The Brothers Grimm would do the same, travelling the countryside, writing down the stories that they could learn from the many people of Europe." Maybe in a two million years they will reach this level evolutionists reached yet in evolution. But not everyone can reach this age. An exeption maybe is Jesus. But he has another problem. His resurrection did not take place until a few days after his death. He will probably smell and look like a zombie. And to run around allmost 2 million years as a zombie is not that fine. Only to can be called as "Real Human". Creationist are the evolutionists of tomorrow. It's amazing what funny conclusions a creationist's brain can come to. Did you know that for them we live on a flat earth?

Ask your daughter to bring you a fossil of an animal in the process of change from one KIND of animal to another KIND of animal. They teach the kids about evolution and claim we come from cells, then fish , lizzards , monkeys, and finally humans. There is ZERO fossils to back this theory up , but so many try to push this as a fact. Evolution never happened. God created Adam and Eve in the beginning along with all the animal Kinds we did not evolve the way scientists brainwash kids to believe.

I was brought up to believe the Genesis account of creation to be accurate. There was a time, however, when I entertained the idea of Genesis meaning "period of time" when it said "day" as given by old-earth creationists. However, when I learned that, for the old-earth account to be true and to take what we see in rock layers as representing which materials were laid down first (without considering things like weather and natural disasters moving those materials around), that would mean that there was evidence of death and decay in the ground before God created Adam. That would mean that the bible is false in saying death came after Adam and Eve sinned and would also mean the Flood either didn't happen at all or happened locally which is preposterous considering the bible clearly states the waters rose above the mountains and on all the earth. So once I realized that the old-earth account would be contradicting the bible, I immediately dropped the old-earth theory and never considered it to be a possibility again. There was a time when I also tried to see if evolution could fit in the bible. Once again, I figured out that it couldn't and dropped that as a possibility as well. The word of God I will always trust over the word of man.

@@WeepingWillow422 I did something a bit more real and rational. About the time I was 10, I realized that the universe is the way it is, and scientists basically do a real job in seeing how it is. I also realized that while "how it is" does not serve to refute the existence of God, it certainly serves to refute some of the hilarious dogma of religions. Refutation of the dogma of a religion about God, is not refutation of God. It would be better if you did not tie religious dogma to the existence of God. Know that God pays no attention to hilarious attempts to "prove" God exists. It is not earning you any brownie points Might be time to grow up and realize what the Bible is, and is not. That way you might get more out of it.

@@archimedesmaid3602 Your comment assumes that scientists have no bias. We know that it is almost impossible to research a matter without bias. As original poster @KA Fleury mentioned above: "I came across an article or essay that quoted scientists and philosophers of fairly recent history (Post-Enlightenment) who discussed their aim to seek an explanation for the origins of everything without the need of a god to create it. That was their hypothesis, and they set out to prove it." I would love to see that article, because that would show scientists were a lot more honest than they are today. I think we need to start realizing that the people in charge are fallible. They may not know what they are doing. Worse yet, they may know exactly what they are doing and enjoy manipulating the data to support their bias. Dissenting opinions have been suppressed and canceled for hundreds of years now. If we are only willing to listen to the people in power with the loudest microphone, we come away repeating one side of the issue. That is the sign of someone who is not well educated.

Observable science proves evolution is impossible. It should be clear to everyone who thinks about it logically. We would see every other person and animal half way evolved. We would have all sorts of animals and human beings becoming new species constantly. How did evolution stop happening if it ever happened? How is it possible that we all have the same DNA showing we all have a common ancestor? Biologists know it is impossible for DNA to accept any new information. Adaptation happens when information is removed form our DNA. To grow our hair longer or for our skin to get darker information is removed that allows the process to continue till a later stage of development. When the mountain goat needed longer hair it's DNA had information removed to allow the hair to grow as the signal to stop growing at a certain point was removed and the finish line moved forward.

​@@archimedesmaid3602considering the billions of taxpayer dollars that have gone into trying to disprove God, and the corruption and scandals in science, not to mention the fake fossils and bogus papers, you might want to rethink your worship of fallible men. The Bible is the Word of God.

Certainly nobody in these videos.

Maybe the sin is in your ignorance...

Absolutely. The Bible really only gives 2 reasons that keep God from men. As you mentioned PRIDE, or people's love of sin. So both of these to me is proof that there is no such thing as an athiest. If you hook them up to lie detectors, I believe they would fail. They are just too prideful to give God the glory for the " good things" they believe they achieved in their life

@@michaela.kelley7823 are you so indoctrinated that you deny all reason and logic? I have a healthy pride, there's nothing wrong with that and don't sin. What I have done is read the Bible, probably more than you, and can see the vile happenings within in it and the fear it preys on. I can also see from reading it how illogical it is. You need to be a little more humble and understanding, not so dogmatic.

Bingo

To be proud of one's achievements is no sin. Unfortunately, everything is a sin to a theist. Try thinking logically about what you claim a sin to be.

Yep - I've got some of those. It depends on the conditions - however wood is porous which is why this happens.

He believes in an old earth!

Agreed... including the rejection of ice age pseudotheory.

Because if they start to believe than evolution (at least almost wholy) would be wrong and the text books would have to be changed and then communism, marxism and socialism could not be dictated in the universities and a more family friendly environment would occur.

Because it isn't living tissue it is remnants of collagen molecules found after soaking the fossil in weal acid for a month.

@@parkinson1963 BS. Dead tissue will not stretch and retract. They've also not just found collagen molecules, they've found blood vessels, muscle ligaments and DNA. None of which can last more then several thousand years. Stop lying to yourself.

We have dinosaur fossils dating back 260 million years. We have hominid fossils dating back 7 million years. We can get DNA from 2 million year old fossils. We have the skeleton of a young girl with a Denisovan mother and a Neandertal father. Everyone who is not from sub Saharan Africa has some Neandertal DNA. Aquinas said back in the 13th century, that all creation was one thought in the mind of God. Why wouldn’t that be the Big Bang?

​@@jagdtiger9287 boom, hit the nail on the head.

God is like Harry Potter. He can conjure things up. It is the easiest thing in the world to conjure things up. Every God can do this. Otherwise we would call him a showman. I think the classification, evolutionists do, is wright. What do you think? Is it possible to believe in things who don't exist? Many stupid creationist children played with dinosaurs, but not all survived. God is as useful as a pimple on the face. However, apparently some of us are very proud of having a pimple on the face.

Great if you want to keep them in the dark.

@@offthefront7537 But I can give him a little light that can illuminate his brain. I make the world how I like it. Some people say the universe popped up out of nothing and exist since 14 billion years. Other people say, God popped up out of nothing and thereafter he let pop up our universe out of nothing by conjuring it up. The second possibility seams to me a little bit complicated. The first possibility also seems more credible to me, since the existence of our universe is proven and it is also visible to almost all of us, except for the blind among us. The existence of God seems not to be profen all the 14 billion years. To make matters worse, he is in contrast to our universe also not really visible. Therefore I prefer to worship our visible Universe instead of an invisible, maybe sometime popped up God. Maybe you prefer the second possibility, with two popped up things out of nothing. But for me that seems to be a little to complicated and stupid. What is your meaning? Two things popped up out of nothing and one was conjured up? Maybe there is somewhat that can let pop up gods. I think the real God is the God who let pop up your God out of nothing. I think I know now who the real God is. A wizard like Harry Potter. But. Did he use a magic wand and who created this wand? I think when you engage in religion, you deal with nonsense.

@@marculatour6229 agreed

indeed! as a PhD scientist, I agree

Yes, of course we find C14 in all living and in all unfossilized tissue...life is carbon based, so every living thing takes in carbon with a known proportion. Once an organism dies, it no longer takes in new carbon, so the C14 decays into N14 at a known rate, and that ratio will give us an age for a specimen. This is only good for a date back to about 60,000 years. Beyond that range, there are other isotopes that decay at a known rate, and they can date much further back than for C14 (example, the ratios of uranium to lead in a sample.)

​@greygrey6151 - *Except that it is incredibly unreliable and almost never gives correct dates for samples of KNOWN age.*

Where?

@@greygrey6151 The very Fact that the bones or wood or carbonized wood contains Any Carbon 14 at all (that is detectable) tells those who are paying attention that it isn't "millions of years old" -- or at least they should admit that the millions of years they assign are Highly Questionsble dates. But in the case of dinosaurs, there is lots more evidence that they are not all that old : ie they are found in historical accounts and were often callef dragons. But we also have pictographs and figurines that confirm their young age.

So let's junk all of "science" and just read our bibles, shall we? All the while enjoying the fruits of the "science" that you reject, including the internet. Confused much?

@@phildavenport4150 All things were created by God and through Him. If you put 100 scientists in a room they could not create anything unless they used what God has created. And that would not really be creating- it would be simply manipulating the things God created.

@@jannaswanson271 No doubt your God told you this, one-to-one. You didn't read about it in a book, did you?

@@phildavenport4150 It is simply truth.

@@jannaswanson271 Oh, well, that's OK then. Problem solved. Let's all turn off our critical faculties and listen to you.

That isn't fossilization.

​@@richtomlinson7090??

Turned into a stalactite by limestone water ?

@@mattbrook-lee7732 think about it. A body encased in mud (from a sudden catastrophic flood probably) would be a great place to preserve something. Hundreds of years is a lot to ask. Thousands of years? Remember this bone was at the surface sticking out in the air. Other random fossils they’ve tested are in drawers at the Smithsonian. They all had pliable tissue. Some has red blood cells. Some have viable DNA. A million years this stayed preserved? Are you that naive? 65 million years???? Just how absurd does a number have to get before you balk? Or are you good with whatever the “experts” say? I mean, they’re the experts; right? Kinda like the Covid vaccine; right? When do you ever question anything? There’s a chemical element, that has an accepted “half life” that’s accepted by scientists around the world, of less than 6,000 years. It’s found nearly everywhere. It’s found in coal that is found in rock layers OLDER than the fossils. These rock layers help determine the “era” different species lived. Rock layers with this element all over them are judged to be millions of years old. How can that be? It’s not possible. Here’s the deal. Radiometric dating is older (less reliable), but has “acceptable” ranges of millions of years (I’m not kidding). The newer, better, science uses this method that has the element with a known half life. It gives ages in the thousands of years. They know this is true, but they refuse to accept it. Now they’ve got pliable tissue, and stomach contents with vegetation that is recognizable!!!! They keep bending the science and ignoring the obvious. Why? What’s up? Why not follow the evidence, and go where it leads you? Nope. They KNOW what happened and when; even though they weren’t there and CAN’T know. I’m tired of being lied to, “for my benefit”.

No one is “ignoring” it. Micro evolution is simply a change within one species. It utterly fails to support evolution but creation instead.

I dont you have ever taken an in depth look into the models or experimental evidences the "young" earth camp has. They pretty much have an answer to everything you put forth as an evidence of deep time here, and contrary to what your (and mine at first) knee-jerk reaction would be it's all suppored by evidence. Most of it experimental. And that which isn't inferable through observation.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. You are funny.

You are correct, but these people have no interest in learning anything that challenges their backwards thinking Biblical literalism.

there are definitely fossils out of place, but im not really sure how old the earth is

"This is called circular logic." The synonym is guess work.

We're glad you found us!

Except that penguins didn't leave Antarctica to hop on an ark, and neither did the kangaroos in Australia. A baby dinosaur brought onto the ark would have grown so large prior to the waters receding that it's feet would have fallen through the wood floor. And that the native Americans have just been over here twiddling out arrowheads (clueless about what would have been happening in the Mediterranean region) and hunting buffalo all along. And need I mention that human remains are always discovered high above the ancient animals now gone extinct - and there are millions of extinct species. There need not be a discussion on radiometric dating when deciding if Genesis 1-11 is some literal scientific text - Russia dug a 40,000 foot hole in the ground and four miles deep they found plankton fossils. You can examine certain types of lakes and find that tens of thousands of summer/winter seasons have left layered deposits at the bottom. And we observe that phenomena every trip around the sun. A flood that catastrophically ended it all would mix up all the fossils as to be unrecognizable - we don't observe that in the rock record. It is far more organized than that. Flood geology is the biggest pseudoscience ever created - and it needs to stop. It's needlessly sending innocent well-meaning Christians back to the 1800's - a time when Christians were leading the way in discovering the earth's ancient age. I am a Christian, Jesus saved me from my sins, and I would firmly take the evolutionary creationist position after what I've gotten to learn. Radiometric dating aside if you prefer. The Bible, Rocks, and Time is a great resource on geology and I Love Jesus and I Accept Evolution is a great take on evolution. These are written by Christians who actually know their stuff, and it's a lot of fun to learn about.

@@tcrowetcrowe Evolution cannot walk together with Genesis, because evolution has a life-death cycle in order to function. If there was death much before man came to be, it means death existed before the first sin and that death is NOT the wage of sin. Therefore, if death is not the wage of sin, Jesus's sacrifice was for nothing. The theory of evolution and the Genesis account in the Holy Bible cannot coexist...

​@@tcrowetcrowe 3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing ... they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed." 2 Peter 3:3, 5-6) I'm sorry to say but like many Christians, you have arrived right on time in these last days, scoffing and denying the very flood that scripture literally warned you that you would come scoffing about. I mean, did you ever read that verse and wonder, even if only for a moment? Peter could have used your name to make it more personally relevant I suppose but he pretty much captured you and those who stand in your ideological lane. Atheists I can understand but Christians...that's just disappointing. Maybe you spent too much time in the literature (even though it is widely understood that there is a catastrophic crisis in ALL peer review because of "financial interests, personal disagreements, or professional opportunism" as one source puts it. Apparently they should have added spiritual rebellion and wilful delusion to that list, no?) and not enough time in the scriptures, scriptures like Peter's second letter? Christians who reject the historical eyewitness account (God was the eyewitness, yes?) of the first book of the bible tend to also reject the same eyewitness account of the last book of the bible. Often the screw up a lot of what happens in the middle too, which is to be expected when a person rejects the beginning and ending of pretty much any book, non-fiction or otherwise. When God raises up the antichrist empire - the most powerful empire in history spanning from Greece to India (see: the Islamic Caliphate unless you know of a more appropriate potential beast empire that occupies the lands of the former Babylonian, Medo-Persian and Grecian empires?) - and they begin systematically executing Christians and anyone else who doesn't recite the shahada, your knowledge of literal occult naturalistic philosophy passed into the mainstream by satan worshipping Freemasons (like the Darwin family) is going to be pretty useless. You: "Don't worry, fellow Christian, you can be assured Abdul won't sever your head from your neck because the flood is just pseudoscience!" Dying Christian: But can feel the tendons separating... *gurgle* *gurgle* You "Don't be a fool! That's just the pseudoscience speaking!" As a Christian, you really ought to better research the origin of ideas, especially unbiblical, unsupported in scripture ideas. They almost always come fro the same place and have a much longer history that most people bother looking into. Those alleged "Christian" scientists you are referencing, many of them were actually deists who publicly claimed "a belief in a god" in a culture called "Christendom" where to do otherwise would get you shunned, which is hardly the same as confessing Christ incarnate, crucified, resurrected and glorified. Interestingly enough, "a belief in a god" is exactly all you need to be welcomed into the Freemasonic brotherhood with its curses and oaths that Jesus warned us not to take. Do the math.

Do you also cringe when these same people tell us we live on a spinning globe?

@@difficultjourney3216 Yes sir! We don’t live on a spinning ball!

@@HalfWarrior 👍

You can’t, they are lying to you.

No you cannot, I know this from experience, thank you

It would be great to have every Christian resource available in every language and tongue all over the earth. Sadly, the truth is, we ain't there yet but in the meantime, there are translation resources - if you are able to google it yourself?

No. Different word for Day. Back in my Day Today is Wednesday (a day) My days are numbered. All are differing periods for the word Day. Yom is the word in Genesis. Everywhere this word used (other than Genesis) we know it to be a 24 hour day.

from all rock layers except 2

Just reading off an unsubstantiated comment like yours just goes to show how shallow your thinking and reasoning actually is.

God is like Harry Potter. He can conjure things up. It is the easiest thing in the world to conjure things up. Every God can do this. Otherwise we would call him a showman. I think the classification, evolutionists do, is wright. What do you think? Is it possible to believe in things who don't exist? Many stupid creationist children played with dinosaurs, but not all survived. God is as useful as a pimple on the face. However, apparently some of us are very proud of having a pimple on the face.

Do you also hold to the historic Biblical worldview that the earth is a plane covered with a dome?

@@difficultjourney3216 Of course the earth is flat. Everyone who didn't want to believe that, went out and fell over the edge, because the dome is just thin air. I always say:" Dealing with religion is dealing with insanity."

@@marculatour6229 I wasn't referring to religion. I was referring to the historical Biblical view on the interpretation of the Genesis creation narrative. The Israelites clearly understood it as describing a flat earth, surrounded by seas and covered by a dome (firmament). Josephus called it a crystalline. Maybe you should study it a little further. And by the way, I am a Christian who not only believes it but knows it to be true. Have a good day.

@@difficultjourney3216 What? You live on a flat earth? Be careful when you reach the edge. At the edge you can touch the firmament. There are many very hot stars. So be careful when catching them and thereafter count your fingers. But there are people who have tried to reach the edge. They kept running, but in the end they reached the starting point again. Strange! I think that was a kind of "Teleportation". We live on a very strange earth. Easy question. When did religion begin? "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." Voltaire: "La religion a commencé le jour où le premier fripon a rencontré le premier imbécile." Hi fools! I´m a wolf among sheep. As i said:" Dealing with religion is dealing with insanity."

The post flood conditions caused a rapid coming effect. I've watched a few explanations that really make a good case for that and explain it well.

My understanding is most creationists have a different view, look up Michael oard on the ice age.

God was only testing Abram. God had no intention of letting Abram kill his son. This was just the reference to God later sacrificing His only begotten Son, so that we humans would have the chance to get redemption.

Why

@waukivory2756 Because he's from Australia and he's a Geology expert.

@@whyaskwhybuddry doesnt make his opinions right or wrong does it. They are just his opinions.

@waukivory2756 Well, he has made Scientific studies. There are 5 basic parts to any Science Paper: Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Findings and Discussion. The only parts that matter are Materials and methods and Findings because they are the hard Science. It doesn't matter what the researchers believed or thought about the results of the Testing.

Not always an obvious concept, but clearly a common sense observation!

@@thomasshannon6472 Yes but one mainstream science does not want to except.

I think there've been many before him but of course this is good addition. There's never too much of this kind of info.

Yep - fantasy.

Thanks to the fantasy of James Hutton and Charles Lyell, geologists took the wrong turn.

Because the land your garden sits on has been well worked and/or eroded over time (that's only one of many reasons/possibilities)

isnt that guy a real scientist?

Uhh... No

"Why bother with real science ,the scientific method, evidence and independent peer reviewed papers ..." Studying the so-called evolution definitely is a sphere nobody should bother to work on. In the world of evolutionary thinking there are no such things as real science, scientific method, objective evidence or independent peer reviewed papers. Nobody from outside the evolutionary brotherhood is accepted to get a peer review. And better so, because only naturalistic observations and conclusions are ratified. Methodological naturalism is predominantly used by atheists in the scientific studies. Because of its inherent prejudice it however can hardly be called science. Atheists in their scientific work tend to choose the most unlikely choice if it fits their atheistic worldview. Is this scientific thinking? Of course not. It is based on prejudice, and prejudice is anathema in science. Atheists however never give up. If the main evidences are heading towards intelligent design, atheists are ready to reject the obvious path. They start going the less probable path as long as it's materialistic. No theistic researcher could be as fervent in his religious worldview than an atheist who has the blind faith in the power of "Holy Happenstance". Lot of jobs, professorships and money are at stake in the worn out pseudo science of evolution. Scientists and researches do not want to lose their face and well-paid jobs so they continue to flag for evolution.

Well, to be fair, sceintists determine probability not Truth. Science can never know anything for sure, it's not supposed to.

Exactly. Either we take Bible literally or we reject it. Anything in between means running around blindly not knowing what is true and what is not. Bible tells us when it uses metaphor. Like the serpent in Paradise. It is clearly said that it was Satan. And it would be strange if the angel couldn't have got Bileam's donkey to utter words to Bileam. How it was done is irrelevant. Supernatural is supernatural and that was how Bileam experienced it.

Why?

@StudentDad-mc3pu because organic tissue can not even survive 5k years, let alone a million or 65m years, also think on this, the Colorado River is supposedly cut the grand canyon over millions and millions of years, if true at the current rate of erosion of 1.35" a year the canyon would be over 200 miles deep over just 1million years. Not just a mile deep or what 5200 some odd feet..The Old earth philosophies do not hold water, pardon the pun under the scientific methods. Today's science is more a religion than science.

@StudentDad-mc3pu also please investigate the the discoveries of Ron Wayatte and his sicoveries of Noah's Ark and many other things that God himself led him too.

@@KirkDavis1966 It's a rock formation, sorry.

​@@StudentDad-mc3puA rock formation in the form of a boat like structure. Over time, wood can turn into rock.

God is like Harry Potter. He can conjure things up. It is the easiest thing in the world to conjure things up. Every God can do this. Otherwise we would call him a showman. I think the classification, evolutionists do, is wright. What do you think? Is it possible to believe in things who don't exist? Many stupid creationist children played with dinosaurs, but not all survived. God is as useful as a pimple on the face. However, apparently some of us are very proud of having a pimple on the face.

God is like Harry Potter. He can conjure things up. It is the easiest thing in the world to conjure things up. Every God can do this. Otherwise we would call him a showman. I think the classification, evolutionists do, is wright. What do you think? Is it possible to believe in things who don't exist? Many stupid creationist children played with dinosaurs, but not all survived. God is as useful as a pimple on the face. However, apparently some of us are very proud of having a pimple on the face.

You're welcome!