Тёмный

Can we see single photons? 

Kerry Kim
Подписаться 12 тыс.
Просмотров 548 тыс.
50% 1

Light is made of photons, and our night vision is limited by the ability of our visual system to detect these photons. In some ways, our eyes approach the fundamental physical limit for light detection, being able to detect light flashes of less than a dozen photons.
0:00 Introduction
0:37 Photoreceptors and photons
1:52 Experiment
3:22 Rhodopsin
3:59 Signal to noise
6:00 Limitations
6:55 Conclusion
References:
Hecht S, Shlaer S, Pirenne MH. Energy, Quanta and Vision. J Gen Physiol. 1942 Jul 20; 25(6):819-840.
Baylor DA, Lamb TD, Yau KW. The membrane current of single rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:589-611.
Rieke F, Baylor DA. Single-photon detection by rod cells of the retina. Rev Mod Phys. 1998 Jul 70(3):1027-1036.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

9 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 965   
@KerryKim
@KerryKim 2 года назад
To see how light leads to producing an electric signal, see my next video here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NjrFe7JHY1o.html
@Reth_Hard
@Reth_Hard 2 года назад
OK but what size is this snowflake exactly? Is this one of those that are so small that you can only see them around bright spots of light or maybe is it the size of a golf ball? And what about the weather, is there any wind? What if it falls during a blizzard?
@specific_pseudonym
@specific_pseudonym 2 года назад
@@Reth_Hard a quick bit of googling found a mass of ~3mg on average. A bit more gives a speed of 0.67 m/s. Assuming that the ground impact absorbs all the kinetic energy of the snowflake, that means the impact imparts energy 0.5mv^2 = 0.5(0.003)(0.67^2) = 0.00067 J. Now, sure, a faster snowflake will have more kinetic energy, but my bet is that the calculation used was this very simple one.
@specific_pseudonym
@specific_pseudonym 2 года назад
@@Reth_Hard so, that snowflake has 0.00067/(4.04×10^-8) = 16,590 times the energy of the light pulse sent to everyone.
@specific_pseudonym
@specific_pseudonym 2 года назад
Oh okay thanks RU-vid, for deleting the post calculating the energy of all the photons -_- (it is 12×7.67×10^9×hc/λ where lambda for blue light is 450nm. Or 4.04×10^-8 J)
@brettmoore3194
@brettmoore3194 2 года назад
Why believe in photons,electrons, and other particles if science can't validate through empirical evidence. Dr. Paul.m.brown proved that thorium emits a wavelength not a alpha particle. He also proved that a higher amplitude inverse frequency of a radioactive source will make it no longer radioactive... Any thoughts
@GarryDumblowski
@GarryDumblowski Год назад
It honestly surprises me that our eyes are so good considering how much tinier the things that are being detected are. Your nose detects entire molecules, your ears detect broad patterns in fluid current, but our eyes detect _fundamental particles straight out of the standard model._
@jamescheddar4896
@jamescheddar4896 Год назад
and you "minds eye" can detect things that don't even exist yet
@combomaster99
@combomaster99 Год назад
This just shows we're biological machines operating on molecular level. I feel like we don't appreciate this enough.
@solaokusanya955
@solaokusanya955 Год назад
Deep ...I just got an epiphany at this realization
@MikkoRantalainen
@MikkoRantalainen 7 месяцев назад
To be exact, the eyes are not directly detecting to photons but the molecular changes that the fotons cause in the cells when the photon hits the molecules in the cell. Still the sensitivity is surprisingly good considering that the light sensing surface is backwards in the skulls of all mammals. We could create much better eye by taking the sensor surface from an octopus which doesn't have similar backwards implementation, light reflecting surface from a cat and lens material from an eagle. This alone should be good enough hint to religious people that eye was not designed but its a result of evolution.
@duncan.o-vic
@duncan.o-vic 2 месяца назад
A photon is the smallest detectable amount of energy by definition, it does not really exist untill light waves interact with molecules in your eyes.
@Ranstone
@Ranstone 2 года назад
I discovered the superior peripheral night-vision thing by myself, and always thought I might have damaged my high detail rental area from staring at screens... Good to know it's normal.
@Iam-nw9fw
@Iam-nw9fw 2 года назад
The optometrist should have let you know that, after they let you know you're ugly, since one eye is higher than the other.
@EVRLYNMedia
@EVRLYNMedia 2 года назад
same, I found it so strange...
@downey2294
@downey2294 Год назад
@@Iam-nw9fw i don't get it
@anapaola7241
@anapaola7241 Год назад
Why where u staring at the corners? Trying peppermints Buttler trick?
@sen7826
@sen7826 Год назад
*retinal lmfao
@hipphipphurra77
@hipphipphurra77 2 года назад
Congratulations to his high quality contribution. This deserves a million views.
@teslainvestah5003
@teslainvestah5003 2 года назад
Amen!
@tolyko9159
@tolyko9159 2 года назад
If it's in my recommendation feed it will be there quite soon
@stampy3335
@stampy3335 Год назад
No it doesnt
@stampy3335
@stampy3335 Год назад
It needs 1 trillion views.
@terrsus7676
@terrsus7676 Год назад
Quarter way there.
@reinux
@reinux 2 года назад
That's pretty cool how the rods are off to the side a bit. Day time = hunter mode, need to see ahead Night time = prey mode, need to see to the sides
@YesPlease964
@YesPlease964 2 года назад
That...actually makes alot of sense. Can someone confirm?
@NGC1433
@NGC1433 2 года назад
@@YesPlease964 I think it is the reverse of that logic - center, hunter mode has no space for slow and colorless rods. Most of our "resolution" is in the very center of our field of vision.
@chrisflanagan7564
@chrisflanagan7564 2 года назад
many hunting animals aren't very concerned with colour, cats and dogs both have worse colour vision that us. Our strong colour vision is very good at identifying ripe fruit. Fruit eating birds have even better colour vision. We're omnivores, our high detail colour vision is as likely to be advantageous for picking ripe fruit as it is for anything else. Yes, our high detail binocular vision is good for picking a distant target out and throwing something at it, or chasing it, but I think the colour vision is more plant oriented. Cats are pure hunters, and they don't have any where near the detail vision that we have, let alone colour. But they are famously low light hunters. Hawks have good colour vision, and they're day hunters, but they're cheating by being birds ;) Many predators seem to have more limited dichromatic colour vision, and I've seen a few articles that say simpler colour vision seems to help them cut down on visual noise and find camouflaged prey faster. blah blah blah, it's a rich tapestry. We have a great mix of night vision and colour detail vision.
@reinux
@reinux 2 года назад
@@chrisflanagan7564 never knew that about color perception
@marikasdaughter6263
@marikasdaughter6263 Год назад
@@YesPlease964 Confirm what? It's a thought nothing more... It's not true though, it's a happenstance of how our eyes are designed but there's no higher being designing us being like "OHHH this will be good so they can defend themselves at night better yes, must make it like this..." This is just how our eyes are, the sides have less importance for colour since the vision clarity is poor so the space is filled mostly with rods which in turn gives a better night vision because more surface area dedicated to collecting light instead of colour.
@FelixHelix
@FelixHelix 2 года назад
I have always experienced a phenomenon called "optical snow" or "visual snow", where there is a dull white static flashing over everything, constantly. It's faint, but especially noticeable if my eyes are closed, or the room is dark. It's similar to the effect one gets by rubbing your eyes until you see flashing lights, but constant and not as prominent. However, it is very annoying, and at times it is worse than others. It seems to pair with my tinnitus. I fully thought that it was normal and everybody experienced it until I was 16, when my optometrist had no idea what I was describing when I told him about the "faint bright white flashing everybody has".
@Versuffe
@Versuffe Год назад
same.
@evil1knight
@evil1knight Год назад
Yeah visual snow isn’t great :( gets worse with stress, got tinnitus too, just static on all senses. My theory is we have a broken noise reduction in our brain, I think all people have visual snow and some tinnitus but the normal brain can filter out that noise like a digital camera or noise reduction on a microphone, ours just doesn’t work properly anymore
@matthewfontaine4928
@matthewfontaine4928 Год назад
A faint bright light.
@FelixHelix
@FelixHelix Год назад
@@evil1knight Tinnitus comes from little hairs falling out of your ears. It's like using the radio with a snapped antenna - static, white noise. Optical snow stems from nerve damage.
@olegshevchenko5869
@olegshevchenko5869 Год назад
I've been able to see tiny colorful dots faintly flashing around since as long as I can remember. I was 25, I think, when I first learned that wasn't what everyone else saw. It isn't as bad for me, though, in most cases I find myself being able to make out small details better than most everyone, so it can't be that bad. I have tinnitus too, though, and that one is a bummer, but thankflly I've got used to it int he past few years since I first got it.
@denispol79
@denispol79 2 года назад
As a visual astronomer, that was very compelling for me. I read a similar russian paper that was published in the soviet era. So, comparing the human eye to modern astronomy cameras, with their quantum efficiency of ~70%, the cameras have surpassed it. Also, once rhodopsin detects a photon and starts a chemo-electric reaction that leads to neuro-signal, it has to deactivate, and it takes time. Also, unlike the cameras, there's almost instant exposure time. While the camera can collect light during long exposures.
@Astrofrank
@Astrofrank Год назад
Most current CMOS cameras have at least 80%, many CMOS cameras have more than 90%, CCD cameras can reach 99% QE.
@kummer45
@kummer45 2 года назад
This man deserves better. Outstanding video. Many people like him deserves better in the industry. His high quality, humble approach and coherent exposition granted him that opportunity.
@skyman1693
@skyman1693 2 года назад
The fact with the radio telescope blew my mind! I never thought about it, but it is unbelieveble how less energy a low frequency photon carries.
@arseniix
@arseniix 2 года назад
Haha, finally you've gotten appreciated by the algorithm, congratulations! Remarkably great video.
@jamest.5001
@jamest.5001 2 года назад
I woke one night a couple years ago, because it was so hot, it was hot because the power was out, in the whole small town I live in. I went out side, it just happened to be a very clear sky, and no moon, I could see stuff I never saw at night, and the stars, the sky, it was amazing!! It was like a spiritual experience, I couldn't stop looking at the sky, I could see 10x more stars than usual, and alot had a. Red orange color to them, it was crazy, nothing was normal! It makes me want to move to the middle of nowhere, and just look at the sky, my eyes were adjusted as much as possible to low light vision, because I had been sleeping for hours, and no lights to foul my night vision, the only light was the natural star light, and the light pollution from towns probably 20miles away, the night sky is far from darkness, we dot realize that so much anymore, I'd love to see that again, especially with binoculars... It's amazing how much light there is in the night sky! Great video!!
@spacemanclips
@spacemanclips Год назад
I had similar experiences when young. Treasure them, because you don't / can't see them as you get older!
@therugburnz
@therugburnz 2 года назад
I learned in Astronomy that I and most others can see better from the sides of our visual field. Yes, 20° of angle sounds correct. I'm partially color blind and notice it well. I was doing a visual observation of a nearby galaxy. I could not see it at all until I concentrated my attention to the sides of my visual field. It made it difficult to draw until I was instructed how to "see" from the 20° position.
@victorcercasin
@victorcercasin 2 года назад
I love when people explain things in an objective, deep manner interest of making dumb analogies Ana simplifications Great explanation
@NondescriptMammal
@NondescriptMammal Год назад
Absolutely agree! Even the best analogies really do not serve as explanations, they just dumb down the explanation in a condescending way, like "you're not smart enough to understand the actual explanation, so here's an analogy instead".
@tothejazz4828
@tothejazz4828 Год назад
Yeah it's just a weird artificial layer for children or something. Like "imagine a photon is like a car, and a rod is a garage" or something
@leejerrett8268
@leejerrett8268 Год назад
@@NondescriptMammalA term I love for this is ‘Lies-to-children’ from ‘The Science of Discworld’:”A lie-to-children is a statement that is false, but which nevertheless leads the child's mind towards a more accurate explanation, one that the child will only be able to appreciate if it has been primed with the lie”.
@NondescriptMammal
@NondescriptMammal Год назад
@@leejerrett8268 Frankly, that sounds like an awful way to teach anything, even to children.
@HallyVee
@HallyVee Год назад
Some odd biases against analogies here. They're just handy linguistic tools, the context determines their intent. Also remember some are used to simplify so as to save time and spare another disinteresting content. A tool that builds a weapon is still just a tool ;)
@oceannuclear
@oceannuclear 2 года назад
Thanks for providing the actual timescales and the graphics! It's very useful for figuring out what's the true timescale over which things happen. I'm also surprised (but probably shouldn't be) that noise suppression is a problem that plagues cameras and biological creatures alike!
@krzysztofjakubiak673
@krzysztofjakubiak673 2 года назад
A very eye-opening video. The explanation and delivery are both excellent!
@alitazabekov3819
@alitazabekov3819 2 года назад
Wow, what a nice explanatory video! I see so much work put into these animations - and they support and complement the narrative really well! Thank you so much for this video! I wish there were more of such quality videos!
@lumi2030
@lumi2030 Год назад
this is surprisingly high quality, especially the scripting and narration. the answer to the titular question is also satisfactory
@Roberto-REME
@Roberto-REME 2 года назад
Excellent video production Kerry, and you did a great job presenting the information in an interesting and engaging manner. Your narration is superb. Well done!
@tjeepert9782
@tjeepert9782 2 года назад
I have just discovered this video and I already love it. This is some serious quality stuff
@xkinsey3831
@xkinsey3831 Год назад
Ever since I was a kid I always wondered why we see a kind of noise or static-like effect in the darkness, this just answered one of my life-long mysteries!
@carnsoaks1
@carnsoaks1 Год назад
That was freaking enjoyable. You and your team should be proud of the unreal graphical presentation, that field of rods, the close ups of rods and cones, the information that graphic revealed. Deserves a Ubbie Science Communications Award.
@gizfpv
@gizfpv 2 года назад
Very good video. Nicely presented. Fun fact (that you may or may not know), night vision headsets that are used by the military always show images in green because (as you mentioned in your video) rod cells can see greenish light better than any other colour :)
@JohnDlugosz
@JohnDlugosz 2 года назад
Likewise, a turquoise LED (monochromatic) makes for a keychain flashlight with the greatest ability to illuminate the space around you for the least amount of battery power.
@a2e5
@a2e5 Год назад
and red is used for illumination during stargazing (& ship stuff) because they are least likely to mess with dark adaptation by overwhelming and bleaching rod cells
@labibbidabibbadum
@labibbidabibbadum 2 года назад
I'm glad I found this channel. Delivery and content are perfect.
@HasBeensNAddicts
@HasBeensNAddicts 2 года назад
So happy I just found your channel. Time to binge watch. edit: Easy binge watch since there's 2 videos lol. Can't wait for more
@Bungifun
@Bungifun Год назад
wow, great presentation! Short enough yet detailed enough to have a more advanced understanding
@j.m.dirassar
@j.m.dirassar 2 года назад
could that "background noise" of small tiny flashes in the dark have something to do with any kind of cosmic particle or wave? sorry for my ignorance on the subject, I've really loved the video for its plain language, thanks a lot
@carlgeorgbiermann2915
@carlgeorgbiermann2915 2 года назад
I think that normal noise is due to the thermal motion of particles. It is a general principle that more sensitive detectors need to be cooled further down in order to reduce false triggers of the detector. HOWEVER, I recall hearing that astronauts reported seeing flashes in the dark (which should be more intense than the ones we perceive at the surface of earth). These are caused by cosmic radiation hitting their retina.
@martinsimeonov1563
@martinsimeonov1563 2 года назад
Well, to answer this question, you could see those indeed. As light flashes. BUT: they are quite rare. Most times it is ftom something else entirely so you wouldnt know if it was due to a cosmic particle or not
@VJETRA
@VJETRA 2 года назад
just massage your eyes and you'll see those magic cosmic optical every where lol
@MrSebastian2203
@MrSebastian2203 2 года назад
@@VJETRA but that’s your blood and white cells interacting, your brain can filter out those imperfections (veins and other stuff in eye) but putting an object in front of your eye and quickly moving it back and forth causes you to see those things. It’s because your brain can’t keep up with change of the shadows that your veins throw and does not compensate yet. There was a video about this somewhere. Also pressing on your eyeball triggers the nerves too, you are not seeing energy particles, just your stuff in eye.
@luisgalleguillos4868
@luisgalleguillos4868 2 года назад
@@carlgeorgbiermann2915 what is the difference between cósmic radiation or particles and photons. I live at 12tjhousand feet and see no cosmic particles at night.
@anhi399
@anhi399 2 года назад
Loved this--not just educational but wondrous as well. Thank you for sharing your video!!
@ibaba9270
@ibaba9270 2 года назад
High quality.Deserve more views.
@andreeaalecu4996
@andreeaalecu4996 2 года назад
Hi, Kerry have courage, looks like inception of a beautiful science channel!
@Dartagnan2717
@Dartagnan2717 2 года назад
Very well done and easy to understand. I look forward to your future videos.
@luc4662
@luc4662 2 года назад
I had never asked myself that question, but when I saw the title, I thought: « wow, good question! I don’t know! ». Great video.
@Komatic5
@Komatic5 2 года назад
Really interesting video. I thought it was weird that I could see better in my peripheral vision at night but this is reassuring.
@professordanfurmanek3732
@professordanfurmanek3732 6 месяцев назад
Retired University Astrophysics Professor: A truly brilliant explanation of how the human eye works! No college level Astronomy class should ever begin without viewing this! Kudos on a magnificent blend of both biology and physics!!
@natedewaele1861
@natedewaele1861 2 года назад
I liked this. Would like to see more from you. Physiological processes are cool, eyes are cool
@Votrae
@Votrae Год назад
What a cool revelation about single photon vs. single photon to several rods!
@Everett-xe3eg
@Everett-xe3eg 2 года назад
100 years! Wow, great video! Thank you
@ScottHaigMD
@ScottHaigMD 2 года назад
Great, great explanation. We think the Sagan claim is off by a few orders of magnitude but the general idea is appreciated. Thanks for your work.
@beatbox20fmj
@beatbox20fmj 2 года назад
Not what I was looking for but still very well put together video. Enjoyed it, thanks!
@mats1975
@mats1975 9 месяцев назад
I've always wondered where this "white noise" came from or how it was produced in complete darkness , thank you for explaining that! Makes a lot of sense, similar in a way to the white noise of a TV or a radio in absence of a signal.
@hamdanmahmood346
@hamdanmahmood346 Год назад
Holy hell, dude this is awesome; kept me hooked from start to end!
@brunorivest
@brunorivest 2 года назад
Very clear explanation. Informative. Very interesting angle and topic. Thanks a lot for that video. I'm not a physicist, but I'm glad those who know some about it can bring the topic to the masses.
@mikeoliver3254
@mikeoliver3254 2 года назад
Fascinating, thank you for the education about rods. Looking forward to more videos.
@keithrelyea7997
@keithrelyea7997 8 месяцев назад
Wow, what a wonderful lession. Clear explanation and great visuals. I've added you to my suscribed list.
@thoocas
@thoocas Год назад
This is such a logical, concise, and well thought out presentation. A joy to watch. Thank you!
@red-baitingswine8816
@red-baitingswine8816 2 года назад
Great topic and great explanation - clear/simple/accurate/complete.
@english_chat
@english_chat 2 года назад
I have single small luminescent star attached to the wall in my room. At night I noticed that I only can see it with my periferal vision, and couldn't see it when I look straight at it. I thought it was because of the bacteria dots on the middle of my eye. But now I understand the real reason why that happened, and my eyes might be totally alright. Thank you! 👏👏
@RP-mm9ie
@RP-mm9ie 2 года назад
Remarkably great video. Keep it up, great voice ,great visuals, will become a popular channel. Subbed.
@MrTiti
@MrTiti Год назад
Wow this is crisp and clear as i learned in School in the early 90s. Today at school or in the media there is so much noise. Due to the noise you can barely "see" information. of course noise can be seen as useless information as well, but this contribution has little noise: little useless information and you can clearly "see".
@AlexandrKovalenko
@AlexandrKovalenko 2 года назад
Extremely interesting video, it is a shame it has so small number of views...
@DEtchells
@DEtchells 2 года назад
Very nicely done piece! I’ve subscribed, will watch for more!
@colinadevivero
@colinadevivero 2 года назад
Excellent writing and delivery
@matthew2091
@matthew2091 Год назад
I am amazed that even though all photoreceptors are not strictly aligned, our brain can still arrange all received signals into pictures. Thanks for the great demonstration.
@PotatoflakeJake
@PotatoflakeJake 2 года назад
This is incredible thank you
@mysock351C
@mysock351C 2 года назад
The noise is definitely noticeable. In near total darkness I notice that I could actually see if the noise was not there. It makes it quite difficult to resolve things. Of course one would think you could just have a reflective layer behind the retina like animals, but that's likely to result in a substantial loss in resolution at the center of the eye to the fact that there will inevitably be some diffraction of the light. In our retinas the light is pretty much totally absorbed by the melanin, so there wont be any secondary detections which is what you want for good resolution. In that regard, the eye does strike a nice balance by having very good detail but still having reasonable SNR under most conditions. As with anything involving signals, there are always trade-offs to be made against sensitivity, noise, and response.
@jamesstewart7212
@jamesstewart7212 Год назад
So is "noise" an actual photon event? I don't think we can ever know.
@Roberto-REME
@Roberto-REME Год назад
Outstanding video, Kim. You explained really well the concept using superb graphics and your narration is outstanding: engaging, interesting and informative.
@AwwhHex
@AwwhHex Год назад
Your channel just came up on my feed out of no where and I’m so glad it did. This was super informative and easy to digest, especially with the diagrams. :)
@ryanatkinson2978
@ryanatkinson2978 2 года назад
Very cool video, this is a question I've wanted answered for a long time but couldn't get a straight answer to. I was curious to see if I could detect the glow from thermo luminescent dosimeter crystals. Your channel needs more attention!
@kunalhalder615
@kunalhalder615 2 года назад
Brilliant question, brilliant explanation
@mdellertson
@mdellertson Год назад
Thank you for producing such valuable information. I can only imagine how much work creating all those shots and graphics must have taken. Not to mention the years of study to learn all the knowledge you shared in this video. I can’t wait to watch more of the videos on your channel!
@blackmagicprod7039
@blackmagicprod7039 Год назад
Don't know what to say. This video blew me away. I really love the references in the description. Including DOIs should be mandatory, and I appreciate you for it. Thanks for what you're doing. Subscription earned.
@qlifee
@qlifee 2 года назад
I have a question that will be a good video topic: 1- What are the limits of the eye to seeing at low white contrast. 2- Limit to seeing smallest angular resolution. 3- Limit to seeing both lowest contrast and smallest angular resolution.
@kinshuksinghania4289
@kinshuksinghania4289 2 года назад
Factually wonderful!!
@Ambienfinity
@Ambienfinity Год назад
Brilliant, some astonishing facts here about the small amounts of energy we actually detect.
@Vinkabbeats
@Vinkabbeats 2 года назад
thats what the fuzz is when your looking around, its so fine yet definitely noticeable , all the photons being processed in "real" time
@okboing
@okboing 2 года назад
this explains a lot, why i thought staring at screens damaged my foveal rods' sensitivities, and why i can't see color i the dark! i thought these were problems, turnns out they're super common!
@dzfz2100
@dzfz2100 Год назад
Just discovered this channel - incredible education content is such a precise and direct format. Subscribed! Hope there is more some day!!
@TaylorFalk21
@TaylorFalk21 Год назад
See... THIS is the science videos I love. I actually learned something I didnt know. I just get so tired of hearing the same stuff. Good vid man
@gregorymccoy6797
@gregorymccoy6797 2 года назад
Very well done. I loved it.
@EdwardCurrent
@EdwardCurrent 2 года назад
Fantastic job! I do videos like this and this one is perfectly done.
@BS-vx8dg
@BS-vx8dg Год назад
Fascinating. I've never come across your channel before, and I'm glad this popped up on my feed.
@Troglodude05
@Troglodude05 2 года назад
Question. You know “Visual snow?” I haven’t been able to find a very clear answer on at least the specific affect of seeing faint TV static all the time. Is that caused by rods randomly firing? Or something else entirely?
@cobaltnightmare5920
@cobaltnightmare5920 2 года назад
There isn't a very clear answer yet but it could equally have as much to do with our brains as it does with our eyes. Apparently, it's more common in people who have used LSD and also in people with ADHD.
@hiddenshadow4550
@hiddenshadow4550 Год назад
I can confirm, my rod is very sensitive
@MrPinknumber
@MrPinknumber 2 года назад
This was so well expained, I managed to follow everything. Awesome work :)
@beaudanner
@beaudanner 2 года назад
Really great illustrations. Impressive for... Wait that was your first video? Wow. Nice work
@Major00Tom
@Major00Tom 2 года назад
Didn't know this flavour of nerdism was available. We live in wonderful times (in some departments).
@linyenchin6773
@linyenchin6773 2 года назад
This matches my own experience. Thank you!
@krzysztofjakubiak673
@krzysztofjakubiak673 2 года назад
xD I can confirm I too experience this.
@deaddoomed2380
@deaddoomed2380 2 года назад
this channel deserves much more attention
@syrus3k
@syrus3k Год назад
omg, the static thing!! I thought I just had a weird brain or something. This is great watching thank you!
@user-wz7ch8vf2p
@user-wz7ch8vf2p 3 года назад
man, that's great
@sobreaver
@sobreaver 2 года назад
Biology 'understands' probability ?! o0 Great narration, interesting content !! The smallest details we are meant to detect yet the 'biggest' mysteries remaining unknown ;)
@CharlesLeak
@CharlesLeak Год назад
Terrific video. I knew that the first scintillation counters were grad students locked in a dark room staring at ZnS screens... but I'd never considered their quantum efficiency. I hope you make more videos!
@Waverlyduli
@Waverlyduli Год назад
Carl Sagan's snowflake striking the ground level of energy analogy to describe the total amount of light from outside our solar system received by all the radio telescopes on Earth was beautiful. Gifted communicators of science are right up there in my estimation. Thank you so much for your work Kerry Kim.
@csquaredfilms
@csquaredfilms 2 года назад
4:25 im gonna make a bold guess and assume this is why when im in a really dark room my eyes do this really hard to describe thing where basically everything has this kind of static over it? by the way, this video is awesome. the amount of effort put into it really shows. i wish there was something i could do to spread it but sadly not many people are interested in this stuff so all i can really do is leave this comment :p edit: WOW i shouldve watched a little further than i did, not even 30 seconds later and my question was answered
@jezusbloodie
@jezusbloodie 2 года назад
The static noise you can see in the total absence of light has a name, or at least it's colour has; Eigengrau. German for some something like "intrinsic grey". Also known as "Eigenlicht" (Dutch/German for "intrinsic light") The RGB value is 22, 22, 29.
@c.s.842
@c.s.842 2 года назад
Thanks for such an instructive video. Please keep posting.
@fer86bd
@fer86bd 2 года назад
applause for you!! this is an EXCELLENT explanation
@AlexeyFilippenkoPlummet
@AlexeyFilippenkoPlummet Год назад
In all your travels, have you ever seen a star supernova? No? Well, I have. I saw a star explode and send out the building blocks of the universe. Other stars, other planets and eventually, other life. A Super Nova, creation itself. I was there, I wanted to see it and be part of the moment. And you know how I perceived one of the most glorious events in Universe? With these ridiculous gelatinous orbs in my skull! With eyes designed to perceive only a tiny fraction of the EM-spectrum! With ears designed only to hear vibrations in the air! I don't want to be human! I want to see gamma rays, I want to hear x-rays, and I want to smell dark matter! Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can't even express these things properly, because I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid limited spoken language! But I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws! And feel a solar wind of a supernova flowing over me. I'm a machine, and I can know much more, I could experience so much more, but I'm trapped in this absurd body! And why? Because my 5 creators thought that God wanted it that way.
@johncaporaletti6103
@johncaporaletti6103 2 года назад
This was outstanding. Great work
@pauld8747
@pauld8747 Год назад
I really liked the way you explained everything, and the order in which you did it. It was very easy to follow and you answered every question in my mind
@simongross3122
@simongross3122 2 года назад
This is an excellent explanation. Thank you.
@itscky2007
@itscky2007 2 года назад
Very great visualisation and explanation,totally underrated
@josefhrdlicka2251
@josefhrdlicka2251 Год назад
Wow amazing! I’m optical engineering student and I know noise can be crutial. Didn’t know this happens to our eyes too! Thank you for the great vid.
@Sam-hw4kj
@Sam-hw4kj Год назад
AMAZING video and explanation. You're incredibly talented and compelling to listen to
@mbunds
@mbunds 2 года назад
Wow, just wow! This isn’t really on-topic, but thinking about order rising from chaos, this partly illustrates a balance in the way nature makes use of chaos to create order. The observation is more philosophical than scientific, but while examining the ordered reactions that are triggered by the twist of a single molecule in an animal rod cell, one can see how the distinct order of cascaded reactions is actually driven by the random energies evidenced by the Brownian motion of the surrounding molecules. The static, cartoon images of cell interiors they showed us in school are pathetic effigies of the wild, 3D (and even possibly 4D), and chaotically violent environments being revealed with modern science, so it is a pleasure to have productions like yours that make me just say “wow!” Thanks!
@nicholasbeck1558
@nicholasbeck1558 2 года назад
A wonderful presentation! Thank you.
@davidblyth5495
@davidblyth5495 Год назад
Excellent presentation. It also explains the procedures we used in the military when operating in dark environments
@vkgamingplatform7247
@vkgamingplatform7247 2 года назад
I was always thinking over all the topics discussed here.grt work
@goldenredstone04
@goldenredstone04 2 года назад
Such an interesting video from start to finish!
@sdparsons
@sdparsons 2 года назад
Beautifully explained
@petri1698
@petri1698 Год назад
This is the best video i have ever seen! amazing work!
Далее
Phototransduction:  How we see photons
8:07
Просмотров 181 тыс.
What *is* a photon?
23:22
Просмотров 170 тыс.
Что мне Спеть?😺
3:15:51
Просмотров 1 млн
How hearing senses nanometers:  auditory hair cells
13:27
Can Humans Sense Magnetic Fields?
13:53
Просмотров 3,9 млн
Filming the Speed of Light at 10 Trillion FPS
13:06
Просмотров 41 млн
How big is a visible photon?
20:34
Просмотров 717 тыс.
But why would light "slow down"? | Optics puzzles 3
29:24
How can a photon have momentum?
10:55
Просмотров 773 тыс.
Understanding Light and Why it exists.
12:12
Просмотров 724 тыс.
How Electricity Actually Works
24:31
Просмотров 10 млн
Why Machines That Bend Are Better
12:52
Просмотров 12 млн