Can You Hear the Difference Between One Million Dollar & $5000 Cello? | Bach Cello Suite No. 1

Подписаться 110 тыс.

Просмотров 6 млн

50% 1

Today I am comparing three different cellos in Julie Reed Yeboah's violin shop playing the famous Bach Cello Suite No 1. The first cello is $5000 by Jay Haide. The second one is an English cello by Thomas Kennedy. The last one, the fancy one million dollar cello is by Alessandro Gagliano. Can you hear the difference? Which one do you like better? I am using the same bow for all three cellos. All three are recorded with the same mic Zoom H4n Pro with ZERO processing after.
▷Watch NEW Bach: Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major, Prélude HERE:
• The Most Beautiful Ver...
▷Be sure to subscribe to this channel and hit the bell for updates:
bit.ly/ConnectwithWendy
▷PREVIOUS VIDEO:
bit.ly/RecentCelloVideos
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
🌟B I O G R A P H Y
www.WendyLaw.com
🌟 L E S S O N S
If you are interested in taking lessons with me, please see details here www.wendylaw.com/cellolessons and email me CelloLesson@WendyLaw.com
🌟S U P P O R T
Support my work on venmo: @WendyLaw or www.paypal.me/CellistWendyLaw
Please consider supporting my video productions on Patreon: / wendylaw
🌟 D O W N L O A D
Download my new album PASIÓN here:
www.WendyLaw.com
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
▷WATCH MORE CELLO VIDEOS NOW:
💜PASIÓN - a Visual Album by Cellist Wendy Law
bit.ly/PasionWendyLaw
💜Stay Home With Me Cello Practice Challenge
bit.ly/CelloPracticeChallenge
💜Cello Covers of Popular Songs
bit.ly/CelloCovers
💜Cello Vlogs, Tutorials, Tips and Lessons with Cellist Wendy Law
bit.ly/CelloTutorials
💜Behind the Scenes of Pasión -a Visual Album by Wendy Law
bit.ly/PasionBehindTheScenes
💜Most Recent Cello Videos
bit.ly/RecentCelloVideos
💜Cello Music Performance Videos:
bit.ly/CelloMusicPerformances
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Connect with me:
I N S T A G R A M
/ cellistwendylaw
F A C E B O O K
/ cellistwendylaw
T W I T T E R
/ cellistwendylaw
W E B S I T E
www.WendyLaw.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Business or Online Lesson Inquiries: Cellolesson@WendyLaw.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A recent video comparing expensive to cheap violin:
$69 vs $10,000,000 Stradivarius Violin - Ray Chen
• $69 vs $10,000,000 Str...

Опубликовано:

12 апр 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 28 тыс.

@WendyLaw 4 года назад

❤️Stay in touch with me and find out all about the Cello Mastery Academy Launch here: bit.ly/3Hjc0Wg

@adat575 4 года назад

awww was hoping to hear your opinion as well. I couldn't hear a huge difference between the middle and most expensive.... I found the "cheapest" one didn't sound as full and the lower tones and higher tone sounded more reedy and not as much depth. THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN FOR gifting our hears with music

@ConnyNordlicht 4 года назад

I would love to get lessons but my hands and fingers don't work as well as in former days. So l give lessons But can't play my instruments for longer than just a fewminutes. To show what l mean for my pupils it's enough but l sadly nearly can't play but my guitar for 1/2hour and my viola for about 1/4hour. The cello about 5 min. But it's so sad!

@OdiariOficial 4 года назад

You are so cute ❤️

@brittanymcnair8238 4 года назад

Can totally tell the difference! Oddly enough I loved the base in the second one but understood the important of precision on the last. Beautiful playing made me tear up at the end, thanks for sharing!

@jcmcclain57 4 года назад

Wendy Law, thank you for the inspiration. I play bass guitar and have been intrigued by the cello. I am going to work toward learning this instrument.

@WorshipLeaderCoC 3 года назад

The Cello start times are: $5k -1:20 $180k - 3:45 $1M - 6:05 Like this to keep it near the top.

@cocafernet6242 3 года назад

Thanks. I like the first cello but she didn’t slap.

@ikeofili355 3 года назад

Wow, such courage bossing me around like that

@justinelliott3529 3 года назад

They all sound the same to me

@WorshipLeaderCoC 3 года назад

@@ikeofili355 You're welcome

@joshw9037 3 года назад

@@ikeofili355 you didn’t even know you needed it huh?

@sergioreyes9962 4 года назад

Give them to me and I will make them sound like 10 dollar cellos

@danabereza5320 4 года назад

You kill me 😂😂😂😂👌🏻

@patriciac8067 4 года назад

lol

@MonaLisaFace 4 года назад

Lmao

@thomasosborne8579 4 года назад

Significant differences. first, cello while quite nice, had a booming quality to lower register and not a good balance between high and lows. And, while the second cello was quite good, again the big difference to me was the quality heard in all ranges of the final instrument. Wonderful playing, by the way! Love it.

@saram4832 4 года назад

Give it to me I’ll accidentally break the million dollar one trying to tune it

@gjweldon Год назад

Personally the $180K Cello had the most pleasing overall sound to me. I'm not much of a musician I just know what I like and I thought the tone was very pleasing. It was very clear without sounding bright. Actually they all were lovely and all were played so masterfully. Very talented young lady.

@johannagerarda1636 Год назад

That’s what I thought too

@tysontyson1244 Год назад

The $180K cello is very aggressive vs the $1,000K cello which is smooth and balanced over the entire spectrum. The $180k cello pleases me when I want to hear raw forceful reverberation, which is most of the time. Both cellos are extremely soulful and I appreciate both equally over the $5k cello.

@tysontyson1244 Год назад

And, I must say this gals skill at making a cello sing is AMAZING!

@deanvargas3921 Год назад

the million dollar one seemed to have more volume.

@andik777Arme Год назад

That’s what I thought too

@marciastrang8504 Год назад

I didn’t expect to hear that much of a difference. The first one was beautiful. The second one, immediately with the depth of the bass notes, my eyebrows lifted, and I thought “Oh, wow!“. 😳 Then with the million dollar one I didn’t expect a difference, and yet it was so smooth it was both more soft and more full. And then, at the crescendo just before the end, suddenly tears came to my eyes!😢 I was not expecting that. Thank you for your post, it was all very beautiful.

@alexandramccarthy4648 Год назад

I agree with your observations. I was wondering if I didn't know the price for us upfront would I judge it all the same? 🤔

@adamFIVE88 Год назад

@@alexandramccarthy4648I honestly like the $5000 one better, it had deeper tones that I love the sound of.

@alexandramccarthy4648 Год назад

@@adamFIVE88 I thought it was a bit scratchy and flatter then the one after. To each ear its own, I suppose?

@qtrfull Год назад

I agree, the bass notes from the first had an unpleasant buzz that wasn't as pronounced in the others. But I found the difference between #2 and #3 to be much more subtle. This was a wonderful exercise. Thank you so much!

@leonardcollings7389 Год назад

Definitely an impressive difference between them.

@TunesurfersMsc 4 года назад

The first one sounds the best when you imagine what you can do with the remaining $995k while listening to it.

@akramsyed623 4 года назад

Nice one

@Kdog307 4 года назад

haha no shit

@operation6604 4 года назад

Lol

@brianmiller5598 4 года назад

Lol!

@r.p.4493 4 года назад

LOL, literally laughing out loud and brought family members over to read this! The practicality of this cuts like a hot knife through butter.

@robinboyle5786 3 года назад

The real art is making each cello sound like a million dollars. Such talent!!!

@WendyLaw 3 года назад

Thanks Robin

@Vangelis2019 3 года назад

This is the most beautiful comment I’ve ever seen on the internet. And utterly true. 🥰

@aubheegulandaz288 3 года назад

Nice comment, though my ear liked the middle one's sound the most!

@VictorHeuer 3 года назад

Perfect!!

@mechaknight.27-36 3 года назад

Agree ^^

@enkynakamura8040 Год назад

I have been fascinated by the various opinions expressed by the listeners regarding the three cellos. It is evident that the second cello made a significant impression on most people, with many appreciating its fluidity, captivating nature, and ability to fully express the artist's musicality. At the same time, the third cello generated interest, with its rounder sound and goosebump-inducing high notes. Meanwhile, the first cello was considered inferior in terms of resonance and clarity of sound. It has been exciting to read the comments of those who recognized the differences and the artist's skill in highlighting the distinctive characteristics of each cello. An extraordinary performance that showcased the value and uniqueness of each instrument. Personally I like the Thomas Kennedy Cello because it was truly captivating. The smooth and effortless sound caught my attention, and the artist expressed their musicality exceptionally well. The bass notes were deep and well-defined, and the resonance added vibrancy and character to the sound. Additionally, the cello provided a pleasant playing experience. In short, the second cello stood out as an extraordinary instrument in my opinion.

@sillybean5658 Год назад

did an ai write this?

@robertpatric6652 Год назад

Agree with your comments the first cello was a bit obnoxious on the bass end. The second was delightful. The third was also a beautiful sound. Now I listened on an iPad so there are problems with my sound with regards to live. If i had the chance to listen live i suspect the subtlety of the third would be more evident. But overall I too prefer the second.

@rebeccasmith1846 Год назад

I most certainly could hear the difference in each one. Especially on the deepest notes. The most expensive one wins and hits it way out of the park. You play beautifully.

@corenchiereynaldo2417 Год назад

Bull !!

@quebrandomitos5910 3 года назад

touch the numbers to go to the starting time on the 3 instruments: 1:24/ 3:49/ 6:13 some interesting timemarks: 2:19/ 4:45/ 7:07 2:34/ 4:59/ 7:22 3:21/ 5:46/ 8:09 3:27/ 5:52/ 8:15 comparing these timemarks I was surprised to see that her interpretation changes quite a bit from one instrument to another, which is very logical if we stop to think, she responds to diferent instruments in different ways. basicaly the main difference is the accuracy: the more expensive, the more responsive the instrument is. The cheaper one quite wobbles sometimes, as the most expensive she has to be even more aware as it responds to the slightest nuances of touch. the irony is that the cheaper student's instrument demands more knowledge to give a good sound. she seems more familiar with the second one. It was remarkable , to me at least, how much each execution is a new organic thing. edit: wow! what a surprise to see so many positive feedbacks, and 1 thousand likes in one week? Thank you for your support. Really appreciated.

@sheldoncat7979 3 года назад

Your coment is underrated

@thedaystarsfall 3 года назад

👏 comment of the century

@jans8961 3 года назад

You did really helpful thing 👏👏👏👏👏👏

@aruneemabanerjee1425 3 года назад

My goodness...... Your comment is so wonderful

@ruskind391 3 года назад

Top class reply, thank you!

@frankhicks6412 4 года назад

Sounds like million dollar talent on all three.

@WendyLaw 4 года назад

Well you just made my week! Thanks Frank!!! I appreciate it.

@m.s.5775 4 года назад

I agree!! She made each one sound amazing!!

@jewswhoswingssnakes923 4 года назад

Mariel S. I wish I had an ear for music. It all sounds the same to me

@emmgeevideo 4 года назад

Frank Hicks - Nicely said!

@colinlyne8688 4 года назад

If I played the million dollar one, it would sound absolutely rubbish! It’s the player, not the instrument!

@hplovecraftmacncheese 7 месяцев назад

I'm a cellist and I have played 5000, 50,000 and over a million (Stradivarius). Doing it yourself has quite a profound impact. I just played one note on the strad, and I had to stop to gain my composure. The teacher took the cello back because I looked too overwhelmed by it emotionally. I just played one note on a strad in my life (so far.) That Gagliano cello reminds me of a Dutod French cello that I used to play that is now valued around 50k. It has the same focused dark sound, and a similar dark reddish-brown varnish finish.

@paulmitchell5798 Год назад

A huge difference between #1 and #2. The quality of tone improved incredibly. #3 and #2 much closer in tone but #3 really beautiful

@scottraines4254 Год назад

I don't know anything about cello but kind of disappointing how far off the 5k one was from the 180. Some of the notes on the 5k were quite abrasive even in the hands of a pro.

@TheTricksterFigure Год назад

yes expensive ones sound cleaner on 5000 $ isound is more distorted

@abecker7231 3 года назад

me listening to 3 cellos all through the same $8 headphones like "man I really cant tell any difference"

@artisticuday7613 3 года назад

Relatable

@SorrySuckYou 3 года назад

EIGHT... dollar... Headphones! Jeez, you don't need to brag, rich man. Go to the dollar store like the rest of us!

@camstirling 3 года назад

The quality of the microphone used to record all 3 cellos also impacts upon the ability to hear the difference, being in the room clearly increase the differential

@GiBalassoMusic 3 года назад

kkkkkkkkkkkkkk me too

@LuizPaulo-st3yz 3 года назад

For me there's a litle bit difference between U$ 180 AND U$ 5000

@JewiMacca Год назад

For those, like me, that wanted to skip around to compare: 1:24 5k Cello 3:49 180k Cello 6:13 1Mil Cello

@echoawoo7195 Год назад

Doing the collective's work. Take a high five !

@-Thunder Год назад

If you did a blind test I wonder how many people could really identify them. I think the $1M was most mellow, but the other two I'd have a hard time distinguishing. I certainly could not have told you the value of any without them being labeled. But hey, I'm a rock guitarist. I probably shouldn't even be allowed in here. 😂

@DR-ee5ul Год назад

Thank you for breaking down the video. I watched Wendy's arm motions as she moved the bow on each one. There was a definite difference between 5K and 1M. Not sure how much that impacted the more mellow sound of the 1M cello.

@steamyzebra Год назад

Hero of the day

@Loknath009 Год назад

Thanks man, this helped a lot and saved some work.

@cw330 Год назад

You played so beautifully on all three. I only wish that you made us guess which three you were playing. No matter how objectively I tried to evaluate each instrument, there was a bias that was hard to ignore. The 1M dollar cello did sound great, as I was able to listen with a high-quality speaker.

@dontbanmebrodontbanme5403 Год назад

EXACTLY! Someone posted that they make classical guitars and could hear the difference and I responded with, how well would you have been able to hear if they mixed up the instruments. In fact, a double blind would be perfect, where even SHE doesn't know what instrument she's playing. It reminds me of an experiment done years ago to expert wine tasters. They completely fooled them and in some cases, even mixed cheap wines together, but were told they were super expensive wines. Sure enough, they gave rave reviews, even trying to guess the vintage of the wine. I don't care how rich you are: I'd rather buy the $5k cello and take the extra money and donate it to the poor!

@teresabertrand6555 Год назад

@jackmiller8227 Год назад

I make classical guitars and could hear a huge difference from all three. 1st cello was lacking a lot, low projection, not balanced, etc. 2nd cello sounded very nice with fairly good projection, reasonable sustain, reasonably balanced, wood grain straight but not very tight. 3rd cello, I had my eyes closed and said "wow," the projection, balance and sustain was amazing and really brought out the various voices of the piece with such clarity. I loved the 3rd cello immensely...!

@dontbanmebrodontbanme5403 Год назад

I'm not doubting your skill, but it would have been much cooler if they would have mixed the three instruments up, she played each and then you told us which you thought was best. To my completely untrained ear, let's just say if you've got money to burn, go for the most expensive one. I thought the $5K cello sounded great. The average listener won't have the knowledge to know why one is better than the other and if she played with the $5K cello at a concert, the overwhelming majority of listeners would be just as entertained.

@truer870 Год назад

lol....only blind listeting cant be fair.....Until now you opinion is worth nothing

@marparcepelopo 11 месяцев назад

I’m not a musician nor an enthusiast but like classical music and there’s a big difference from the 1st and 2nd, and slight difference with the third one. The sound of 2nd sounds smoother, less scratching and low-pitched than first one. And the third is the purest sound of others.

@goph999 9 месяцев назад

@ayannawilliams90 3 года назад

Can we all just give her a round of applause for how well she played that piece I got goose bumps🤩

@travis.g__ 3 года назад

A little too fast for me

@nazarvilchakovskyi5308 3 года назад

Simp

@nlinh5462 3 года назад

Same! Tot got goose bumps

@julienherrmann8718 3 года назад

@@travis.g__ yup, agree, way to fast

@Honey-fq3nh 3 года назад

Yes I agree it is beautiful but it's so overplayed and abused

@cameronjones8410 3 года назад

1:24 - $5000 cello starts 3:49 - $180,000 cello starts 6:13 - $1,000,000 cello starts

@tumipare3121 3 года назад

Thank you so much

@ilkasanchez6896 3 года назад

I was looking that comment 🤭

@amopastorcanadense 3 года назад

THIS COMMENT DESERVES TO BE ON TOP GUYS C'MON

@britdude74 3 года назад

You're so conscientious. Thank you! :)

@victoriousinChrist 3 года назад

The hero we all need

@SUNKINGME 4 месяца назад

My 13 year old, a brand new cello student (4 months), and I listened. I could certainly hear a difference. More importantly I wanted him to see the possibilities of cello. Thanks to posting.

@corazonceleste374 Год назад

I enjoyed the 180K the best. the tones were much richer than either the 5K or 1M ones. However, whichever cello was played, you made it rock! Your talent is phenomenal!

@a.r.4767 Год назад

I agree, I don't like the one priced at 1 million because it resonates poorly in the bass and produces unpleasant harmonics sometimes.

@user-vo9lr8ru1e 9 дней назад

why did i read that as "your talent is pneumonia"

@user-vo9lr8ru1e 9 дней назад

@@a.r.4767 thats the recording

@KeithBeacham Год назад

They all had their unique sound. The million dollar instrument handled the resonance of the low notes in the most sonically pleasing way.

@attilakovacs6496 Год назад

i'm too stupid for these types of things... but i would like to think i can agree with you...

@timhallas4275 Год назад

If by that you mean it had a more subdued low response, then I agree. That probably comes from the age of the wood. As hardwoods age, they become harder and less resonant. Imagine what it sounded like when new.

@gangoolie68 Год назад

I agree

@brickovenfarmandfare8653 Год назад

The $5k was very bright, almost metallic sounding, heavy vibration in the bottom end. The $1mil one even tones across the board, but I also believe you played it with less intensity, beautiful instrument. But would choose the $180k. Much more broad midsection in sound, where all of the emotional expression should be. The highs blend perfectly to the mid scale, and the lows reaffirm the same. The most well rounded of all three. But what do I know? I made up my own technical terms.

@timhallas4275 Год назад

@@brickovenfarmandfare8653 Compromise?

@shannononeil2751 Год назад

I'm a classical guitarist not a cellist, but you can hear and feel the uniqueness of each instrument ( that's why we choose different guitars for different pieces.). To my ear, the 5k cello was much brighter and at times harsh, but not displeasing. The 180k instrument was milder, not as brassy yet had a strong voice. The 1 mil cello was much softer, mellow and as smooth as silk. I enjoyed all three and probably the artistry of Wendy the most. Types of wood, finish, craftsmanship and aging all produce some very unique instruments, each with their very own qualities.

@sakurabrent1242 Год назад

👏👏👏👏

@marylupapada4601 Год назад

Agree!

@mrosspa Год назад

Shannon is correct. We choose the instrument by its sound, and we are all drawn to different timbres. While I will have disagreement from the classical guitarists, here it goes. When the first cello was played, my initial thought was "spruce top guitar." Overly bright. Find an instrument that draws you to its sound. They are a joy to play.

@kristiangandy6664 Год назад

too much words

@gailmcclurebohrer7317 Год назад

Old choral director and cello lover here..wonderful video, a real pleasure and everything Shannon said, spot on. Thank you playing on you tube.....Gail

@vickiesheppard4840 Год назад

I’ve played trumpet, French horn, and piano. I must admit I wasn’t expecting to have the ears to hear a difference in a cello, but I actually did. Heard it most in the low tones on ea instrument. But the most expensive blended them all better overall. Thank you for this demonstration! Didn’t think my $25 ears would hear a difference!

@isabellecholette-bachner994 Год назад

You, beautiful artist, made me cry while you played the million dollar cello. It was obvious that you enjoyed that one best, with its mellow tones, amazing resonance and smooth transitions from one string to the next. It sounded so effortless. Thank you so much!

@nualanicghearailt8011 Год назад

Such smooth transitions

@PRIMAAL 2 года назад

As a sound engineer, I love how quickly the resonance of the 1M Cello die down to make room for the other notes. Consistency of the notes and tone is incredible. Liked the clear and sharpe sound of the $180k sound too.

@abrahamrios1196 2 года назад

Exactly what I was thinking- thanks for your words and expertise

@ve2xdx 2 года назад

I'm actually surprised at the difference. They all sounded pretty good but the mega$ cello sound was more focused and balanced. Your performance seemed better too so I think it's obvious which one you liked best. 😅

@jishkabob213 2 года назад

The $180k and $1mil definitely sound sharper

@SamsonViolin Год назад

I side with u on the part of sound quality. All of them sound great but 1m dollar cello brings out all the notes well and clear. Thanks to the talent who brings out as best as she can. 👏👏👏

@hellomate639 Год назад

Yes... The 1 million dollar cello is analogous to high end speakers that separate all the overtones. But it's more than that. It also has the most high inharmonic and harmonic overtones, which really makes it sound so much more complex and rich. Its draw is sooooo clean and dry.

@vincentweber1359 4 года назад

Funny: For me the difference between the first and the second Cello was way bigger than the difference between the second and the third. But both of them sounded much more resonant, full and clear than the first. Super impressive!

@dcrijns 4 года назад

Agree, don't think the third one sounds better than the second one. Reverb was a lot better on the second one.

@mal2ksc 4 года назад

That's the Law of Diminishing Returns at work. Beyond a certain point, which depends on the type of gadget or instrument, paying more does not necessarily translate into getting more -- at least not 6 times as much.

@marinaluz8757 4 года назад

I thought the same

@s.johnson8519 4 года назад

Yes, but the third one allowed for more nimbleness and smoothness, plus lower register more resonant. Better dynamics.

@rickperry2145 4 года назад

I agree. I can hear a very noticeable difference between the 1st and 2nd but not much between the 2nd and 3rd.

@elena6142 7 месяцев назад

in the third, at the end, tears 😢came to my eyes. complete harmony. smooth flow.

@Gerri.CelloLove 6 месяцев назад

I could definitely hear a difference in each one. The first one compared to the second had a more ‘harsh’ sound; the notes of the second one ‘melted’ together. The last one was even more so. Absolutely all were beautiful with you playing! I would be interested in looking at the height of the strings on each one and even doing a comparison of each as to what the physical differences are. That would be so interesting! Thank you , Wendy! ❤👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@comoelitamelendez8467 5 месяцев назад

I KNOW RIGHT! I used to be one of those, who cares how much it costs types? Is there truly a difference? And this vid made me take several seats!!! Funny just to think a $3k cello is considered mid. But I mean the bassoon is not exactly a cheapy instrument either lol I agree with your assessment. ;)

@danipar7388 4 года назад

The Parts you were searching for: $5.000 Cello: 1:20 $180.000 Cello: 3:43 $1.000.000 Cello: 6:07 You are welcome

@-HolySpiritDove- 4 года назад

Thanks @ 1, 2, & 3! 🐤

@aaronscottmatthews7883 4 года назад

Thanks Dani; I used your time stamps and the right-key to switch between instruments. Clearly the most expensive Cello has like a 'wider' sound at the higher frequencies

@iluna94 4 года назад

Hero

@yanammm 4 года назад

Thanks 😎🥰

@raultorres2601 4 года назад

@@-HolySpiritDove- ¿How must we interpret your nickname? ¿Are you catholic?

@shawnshipley1344 4 года назад

The more expensive ones sound more full and less tinny - that being said I can hear a much bigger gap between the cheapest and middle one than between the two most expensive ones.

@melissabean7973 4 года назад

Shawn Shipley agreed fully. But the most expensive had the richest sound.

@KarleneE 4 года назад

Exactly! I think I like the tone of the middle one better than the other two.

@weljenks 4 года назад

Definitely wouldn’t pay the extra 820k for the third one over the second. The second seemed like it was the easiest one for her to play.

@deslow7411 4 года назад

I went from $10 headphones to $130 to $400 with £300 amp/dac in the course of 15 years and its pretty much the same effect. However after listening to my current headphones and going back to $130 the difference is huge.

@fleroviux1927 4 года назад

Agreed. The first one sounds quite tinny, the second and third much less so with a much more controlled reverberation. Particularly the bass also sounds much better (full and saturated) in the more expensive ones.

@bethmaccrindle220 Год назад

Thank you for this video. I realize it was done 3 years ago, but I just found it. I have an extremely limited music background, but I can definitely hear the difference! The first was tinny sounding. The second had more body and was more balanced. The third picked up every nuance and beautiful richness of every note. I could even see how your body reacted to some of the sounds you were creating- as if you were moved by it’s lushness.

@Ryanrickybobby Год назад

I have played cello for about 19 years. And I must say, the way you nailed that song to perfection was outstanding. There was a difference between the first two for sure, the pick ups and depths of the harmonics and sound created sounded almost like a reverb was put on. The 2nd cello itself sounded fuller and richer. Maybe you talked about this, but did each cello have the same set of strings on it?

@mtleavey Год назад

Nearing the end of the 3rd song you had me tearing up. Very good!

@33gamba 3 месяца назад

If I may, and with all due respect, it's best to delete the word "song" from your vocabulary for a piece of music unless there is a "singer" involved in the performance. This incorrect use of the word "song" is in part due to all the ways of accessing music on line where every kind of music is referred to as a "song". What should be used instead is terminology like "symphony, string quartet, sonata," etc.,or if you are not sure what the composition is, use "piece" or "work" as a description. The word "song" refers to a piece of music that is sung by a singer and should not apply to any piece of music.

@antonellomendolia8180 2 месяца назад

@@33gamba Bravo. Well said.

@abigail.r.snyder77 3 года назад

My favorite was the second one it was the warmest and it’s tones were so rich and velvety. The million dollar one was brighter but still beautiful.

@esthersteinberg26 3 года назад

I'll second that!

@Familylawgroup 3 года назад

I thought the second one has much more resonance in the deeper registers. The first one “rattled.” The third one sounded good but not enough better than the middle cello.

@maddesmelodi1389 3 года назад

My favorit was also the second 👌

@goddim2006 3 года назад

I think the million dollar one also had the best tonal balance. All across the lowest and highest note it feels so uniform. I would still prefer the 180K one.

@swebigmac100 3 года назад

Agree. Middle one gave the clearest sound. The cheep one was to resonant

@vista17j 3 года назад

The biggest jump in quality came between the first and second instruments. And your talent made them all come alive.

@Fawkinchit 3 года назад

This

@n.ericson7684 3 года назад

Agreed

@tachzusamm 3 года назад

Same here. Seems the first instrument's body does not have a good sound itself - and that all tones come mostly from the strings.

@MaritaVG69 18 дней назад

Cellist here! Absolutely you can hear the difference between them. The sound is much smoother on the million dollar one. ❤

@Creewoman82 10 месяцев назад

Tansi means Hello in my Native Cree Language, from Canada. I happened to come across this youtube channel and was interested in watching. Personally I think you make every cello you played sound spectacular! The one that stood out to me the most was the 180,000 cello, sounds more smooth. Thank you for sharing the differences so much to learn! Hiy Hiy means Thank you in my language.

@fyrstikkenofnorway2744 3 года назад

I wanted to know ONE thing about cellos, only ONE thing, and now youtube algorithm has decided I should dedicate my life to it.

@anitrahokai3890 3 года назад

I wanted to know about violins 🎻 but hey 🤷🏽‍♀️

@PassionJo777 3 года назад

It’s a violin cello

@darthkek1953 3 года назад

I watched ONE thing about Warhammer 40k miniature painting and now 95% of my feed recommendations are based on them.

@Lasselucidora 3 года назад

Never watch anything about boxing....

@poulwinther 3 года назад

Like looking up where to buy a new mail box, go buy it, and the next half year google chases you down with mail box offers :-D

@Mububban23 4 года назад

$5k cello - 1:21 $180k cello - 3:44 $1 million cello - 6:08

@mkvazquez5351 4 года назад

Thanks, this helps!

@mornixz3292 4 года назад

thank you bro no homo though ight

@TallSilentGuy 4 года назад

Your comment = priceless.

@B-leafer 2 месяца назад

Amazing.. Even on a smart phone! ... 1st note on the $180,000 gave me chills!! So alive, and vibrant! The million dollar one has depth.. Like a Granddad with a story to tell. It commands respect. Kind of like the most decadent dessert, which you know you shouldn't eat the whole thing because it's much too rich!

@svkanm Год назад

Thank You for this wonderful video. Even for me, a non-cellist, the difference was audible. I can't wait until I can listen to this through proper loudspeakers and not only the cell phone...

@DanielH212MC 4 года назад

Me listening through my $5 earphones. Hmm yes the sound here is made of sound.

@cjeam9199 4 года назад

If you spend like $25 you’ll probably get something that’s much much better than what you’re using now and is like 80% of what a $250 pair will get you. Check some wirecutter reviews. Your ears deserve better.

@maikeli7smusicaljourney265 4 года назад

Daniel_H212 Hahaha!!

@kend609 4 года назад

@@cjeam9199 just enjoy the joke

@ssimms8995 4 года назад

Daniel_H212 your $5 earphones are probably better than my $300 Sony headphones that are broken in so many ways. Listen to the other comment about the $25 dollar earphones. I wish I would have instead of buying these expensive stupid headphones

@VorganBlackheart 4 года назад

@@ssimms8995 Are you referring to the WH-1000XM3s? I've been planning on getting those

@braineeey 3 года назад

Nobody: RU-vid: You like cellos now.

@amopastorcanadense 3 года назад

@andregoepfert2745 3 года назад

YES!

@MrJewvicast 3 года назад

lol

@alexisperalta8714 3 года назад

Yes

@EmiSen 3 года назад

Actually ...

@martynas.6649 Год назад

I know nothing about classical music - but the difference between those 3 cellos is huge. Wow!

@senseipaans Год назад

Came for the comparison. The first one made me just listen to the music😍😍

@meeofcourse4152 3 года назад

The most expensive holds a deeper, richer tone in the lower register. As the value of the instrument increases, the warmth of the notes increase..... Would not have noticed it not being compared. Thank you.... Such a talented musician- of course!

@gemrouf 3 года назад

Yes, the lower registers were warmer, richer and fuller. Also, it seems the more subtle strokes, the vibrato had a more expressive, emotive quality which also has much to do with the performer's touch.

@olafisele4900 3 года назад

I came to same conclusion having somebody play it in blind random trial. The 1M cello seemed louder, compared to 180k cello too loud, in the high frequencies (registers). But when listening on a mediocre to cheap loudspeakers or not paying attention the 5k is just fine. Maybe during concerts, Wendy can quickly switch between the 180k and the 2M cellos depending on which registers dominate.

@olafisele4900 3 года назад

The step from 5k to 180k is noticable better (when listening with good stereo speakers). But what would a harmonious chorus of 36 5k cellos sound like compared to the one 180k cello?

@colleenblanchard5729 2 года назад

This expresses my thoughts exactly so no need to repeat it - 😌

@ellerivendale3290 2 года назад

@@gemrouf Yes, the most costly cello allowed us to properly hear all the performer’s nuance, her fingering. Quite lovely.

@mimilauducci301 3 года назад

The lower notes on the 2nd one sounded fuller, richer than the other 2. On the 3rd one the sound was fuller overall. My favorite was the 2nd one.

@nancyhadden1135 3 года назад

I'm no musician, but I agree.

@jurigelato4366 3 года назад

I had a similar impression listeing on my phone. I am sure listening live in the room is yet another world.

@mimilauducci301 3 года назад

@@jurigelato4366 I bet you're right. Would love to hear it live

@rabarberellum1017 3 года назад

With closed eyes listening on the couch I had the same ideas while describing them. The 2nd grabbed my feeling the most. Only thing I didn’t do was listen to it again on another day in a different order. The gap between the least expensive and the other two is so enormous that it enhances the experience you have while listening to the one that comes directly after that. Would be interesting to listen in 1-3-2 order again

@garrett6064 3 года назад

Exactly. I wish she gave her own thoughts at the end.

@grindmind81 11 месяцев назад

By far the most astounding and delightful is playing the $1 million instrument. What timbre power! The other two just get lost in the pack.

@occamrazor5180 Год назад

I suddenly want to watch Master and Commander again. Thanks Wendy for all three performances, I do not dare to make comparisons .

@genewest1801 4 года назад

I can't believe I heard the difference between these instruments. I can only call it, richer, fuller and "rounder" sound.

@blueswan2175 4 года назад

she got confused in the order, the most expensive was actually played first

@Oliwolf78 4 года назад

Yeah. It almost sounds like a more "chambery" sound with the million dollar chello. It sounds like the sound is coming from a larger, deeper, richer place. Hard to describe, but I can definitely tell the difference. I think chambery is the best way to describe it

@Chelsey-Cello Год назад

Honestly, the $180,000 cello had the most responsive and resonate sound of the three, especially on the D and A string, which was most pleasing to my ears. Very rich timbre.

@betmenizorahovice4843 Год назад

same here, 180k was more pleasant

@johna6767 Год назад

Agreed, I liked that one best.

@merccat67 Год назад

I also agree. The 180k cello was night and day better than the 5k cello. The million dollar cello did offer a noticeable improvement but not an 800k improvement. Perhaps in person the difference is more pronounced.

@user-qy7fy4iv7v Год назад

Agree

@eusouoAlex Год назад

very true

@sapphire6722 Год назад

I really love the mellow responsive sound of the million dollar cello! My chest vibrated towards the end of the piece!

@danamatsukawa4762 8 месяцев назад

the mellowness and richness of the sound is evident in the more expensive ones, especially in the last cello.

@underthemermaidmoon 3 года назад

I prefer the middle one- smoother, richer without harshness.

@didunow 3 года назад

I totally agree, opinion not worth Zim $1

@nahor88 3 года назад

There are other factors to take into account... is each cello strung with the same type/brand of strings, and is she using the same bow? You're gonna get a different sound quality with shitty strings, and using a fiberglass bow versus a wood bow.

@y0utuberculosis 3 года назад

I do think the middle one has the richest sound, but there's something about the strad. it's something I can't really put my finger on.. like it's mysterious. Maybe it's not as obviously beautiful but it seems to have its own emotion. it's more complex.

@kimberley9089 3 года назад

@@y0utuberculosis yeah the middle one is beautiful. Though I will say the last one is not a strad. I play the cello and will probably never own one more that like 20 thousand since I never want to do it professionally or anything. The last one might be the prettiest one though. The wood is a beautiful amberish colour.

@y0utuberculosis 3 года назад

@@kimberley9089 ah yeah she mentioned playing the strad at juilliard and I confused that thinking this one was also a strad.

@Ysoie 2 года назад

I honestly thought I wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between them (traumatised by a Tragic Cello Incident as a child), but the difference between the first and second was astonishing- the leap in clarity and crispness was enormous. The difference between the second and third was more subtle to me, but I can still say I heard an additional richness and depth. Thank you so much for this- I really have wondered about this for years.

@deborahlong4417 2 года назад

Did she use the same bow and would that make a difference?

@deborahlong4417 2 года назад

PS What was the tragic incidence?

@Ysoie 2 года назад

@@deborahlong4417 I took cello lessons, and pretty much the entire mess was tragic, but when I broke a string, that was the humiliating end of the matter. How, you may ask, does anyone break a string on a cello? Trying to tune it an octave too high. That’s how. It was at that point I gave up in despair.

@megamadchief8098 2 года назад

@@Ysoie that is actually very common for new people trying to tune, especially when you aren’t used to tuning by ear

@Ysoie 2 года назад

@@megamadchief8098 That actually makes me feel much better, now, decades later. Though I’m still glad I never told my choir director about such a colossal blunder. He would have given me that disappointed look and I would have imploded on the spot.

@geion54 Год назад

The million-dollar cello was the richest fullest sound out of the three, Bach always makes me feel good so that was a nice treat.

@nadinebakes 5 месяцев назад

The million dollar one definitely gave me chills literally and I don't even play. The second one was nice and the first one felt harsh but the way you played all 3 was beautiful

@amybailey4468 3 года назад

The $5,000 one was loud and bright, but some of the notes on the high end and low end sounded "hard." There was a big difference between the first cello and the second. The $100,000 cello sounded richer and more mellow. The $1,000,000 cello was not as loud and brash. It was more balanced throughout its range of strings when it came to quality of sound, and it just sounder "sweeter." The playing was beautiful on all 3. Thanks for sharing with us.

@PanicKernel2008 3 года назад

Yes indeed, even if the 5k sounds harsh sometimes, the playing is very good and pleasant to listen.

@douglasbarbour2224 3 года назад

I agree. The sound was lovely. I honestly like the second one. It sounded much smoother and balance but you were able to use the firmness to hit bright tones when needed. I suspect the million dollar cello was older or made from wood that had been allowed to dry cure longer. This too happens to guitars and a performer needs to find a balance of what they wish to do and how mellow their tone can be.

@matthackert7386 3 года назад

on a oppo ha-2 se paired with fostext50rp i agree with every once what you say minus "sweeter" and would call it deeper/ meaty / heartier what was you listing on ?

@mohamadfahmi404 4 года назад

The right way to compare the sound is to hide the price and let the people guest which is the best sound without any price biasing factor.

@efnerva664 4 года назад

There is no "right" way, just different ways.

@pf4773 4 года назад

This was a wonderful vlog. That said i agree that a blind sound only test then a reveal is best for an unbiased comparison

@RK-su4hs 4 года назад

Correct. Even better a double blind where the lady doesn’t know either the value of the instruments

@Bluebirdfalling 4 года назад

I closed my eyes and listened.

@tzodearf2596 4 года назад

Good point.. I think hearing the same song evens everything out and she didn't ask for the bias: "Which one sounds best?" She asks can you hear a difference and what do you hear. The repleis have it.

@taraflinn3647 Год назад

Wow this is amazing and the sound just gets more clear and buttery

@TruthfulNews.at.Tell.a.gram7 Год назад

The vibration and depth of sound and improved with each instrument you played. You play the cello very well. A pleasure to hear. Thank you.

@Average.lifter 3 года назад

Imagine hearing a 1milion dollars cello with 10 dollars headphones. LOL

@royalbohemian9757 3 года назад

LOL!!!

@d947 3 года назад

Apple AirPods Max $500 joined the chat

@julespierson6307 3 года назад

@@d947 currently it’s 629€ in Europe :)

@simclardy1 3 года назад

@@d947 that would be a good comparison...$10 vs $500 headphones

@remuspierre8965 3 года назад

That's awesome

@nobazn 3 года назад

Me who knows nothing about the cello: Hrm, the differences are so apparent. *sips cup of noodles with pinky up*

@rianneashleigh808 3 года назад

Real talk

@janicewilcox8590 3 года назад

I concur. *Cleans monocle with monogrammed handkerchief and puts it back on with a quite unimpressed sniff*

@allsmilesx0573 3 года назад

Takes sip of apple juice, I concur.

@ottots0093 3 года назад

-British accent- I too, concur, my good sir! 🧐

@janicewilcox8590 3 года назад

@@ottots0093 jolly good show old boy

@middler5212 Год назад

This has got to be one of the most beautiful songs ever created. 🥰 I liked the first and last more than the middle. Definitely could tell the heightened dynamics of sound from the last one. But the first sounded richer overall…at least through my headphones.

@lori3502 Год назад

The million dollar cello sounds the richest, smoothest and resonates with my “inner chord’s” best. Thank you for this interesting post and beautiful playing.

@labronco7511 3 года назад

The second cello had a crisp clear sound on each note, the third had a richness of character on every note. Both have incredible sound.

@jeremythomas4744 3 года назад

There was a more resonance with the third one as well

@pphelps2222 3 года назад

@LaBronco I really like the way your reply is worded. Now I can find my words. The first was a struggle to make it sound good, the second was tonally balanced, the third one had much smoother dynamic changes. Akin to a choir from people randomly pulled off the street, a well rehearsed choir with good singers, a well rehearsed choir of Juilliard graduates under a great conductor.

@msarchive6247 3 года назад

You guys can't be serious like litterally no difference

@gregorylaco6193 3 года назад

I agree with the last guy. If you think there is much a difference you are a haughty snob (who should be slapped). That is my opinion.

@rallyman1122 3 года назад

@@msarchive6247 I know nothing about cellos or music for that matter. To my uneducated ear the second sounded the best. But what do I know really? The real talent is the in the musician.

@charlescoleman5509 3 года назад

There’s an apocryphal story about Jascha Heifetz when he met a fan after a concert he did. She said to him “I really love the sound of your violin.”. Heifetz then puts the violin to his ear and says “Really? I don’t hear anything.”. ☺️

@cassiusstorm3590 3 года назад

I will like to keep it near the top 😊

@paulatudor691 3 года назад

If you could get the same sound from a $5,000 one then Juilliard would use it.

@lyndsaygillespie6391 Год назад

i love and appreciate videos like this!

@hakeemmatthias2619 Год назад

The last one I’m in the middle of the piece and the richness is giving me goosebumps

@captainz2232 4 года назад

My young children stopped cold in their tracks and were glued to this video when I watched it. The youngest one mouthed "wow" a couple of times. ❤ ❤

@WendyLaw 4 года назад

Awww Captain Z! This made my heart sing!! Thank you!

@amandametta 4 года назад

cute!

@jidana3194 3 года назад

For a million dollars instrument i was waiting to see it playing by itself

@AnthonyKravitz 3 года назад

You can get a Casio Keyboard for like 50 bucks. 🤣 But I get your point.

@jidana3194 3 года назад

@@AnthonyKravitz i know good instruments are very expensive i am a musician 👍

@tristanlumbres1203 3 года назад

@@AnthonyKravitzlol 😂

@maddoxmb2969 3 года назад

I was expecting to be made of gold

@andrewcrespo1031 3 года назад

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOOOOOOOL

@erichstocker8358 8 месяцев назад

Apropos a great piece to choose for the comparison. It was amazing how easy to pick up the differences.

@miguelherreroona Год назад

amazing. you are amazing with the three of them. Thank you

@WendyLaw Год назад

Thank you too!

@BrianAmbrozy 4 года назад

I usually assume these videos are gimmicky, but I'm not gonna lie: the million-dollar cello sounds .... like a million bucks. It sounds very noticeably better. Incredible resonance and richness of tone. Just beautiful. Lovely, and thank you for playing these so wonderfully for us.

@ellemdee276 4 года назад

Agree! I'm amateur listener, so I didn't think the difference between the 5k & the 180k was noticeable enough to justify the price difference, but...ditto what ^this guy^ said about the Gagliano. I definitely heard the difference in tone & timbre & I don't even play cello. It was palpably gorgeous. Maybe some ridiculously rich patron will buy it for Wendy & she can play it all the time.

@RP-rw6jj 4 года назад

The 2nd cello sounded nicest (very warm, rich, velvety, strong, deep bass, and clear). The 1st cello sounded nice yet cold (not warm) and crisp (not velvety) and more treble than the 1st and 3rd cellos. I'm sure some ears will prefer the 1st if you like a cold crisp sound. The 3rd cello sounded semi-similar to the 2nd cello, yet the 2nd cello sounded warmer and deeper bass, although the 3rd cello seemed to project a little more (i.e., more volume).

@Anon54387 4 года назад

@@RP-rw6jj My opinion is that the 1st cello sounded pretty bad especially on the bass string sort of like the horrible buzzing sound when one doesn't fret a guitar correctly. The $180,000 one sounded a lot better to me, but I honestly couldn't tell a difference between the $180,000 and $1 million one. And that's listening with good headphones. Perhaps on a 2nd listen I might be able to, but perhaps it'd take hearing them in person to truly have a chance at telling the difference. Even as great as recorded music is now, there still is something to be said for hearing something in person.

@dreamers2246 4 года назад

Agree!!

@AverageNobodyBen 4 года назад

Just a hack metal guitarist, but I'll be dammed. Skipped a head, thinking there'd be brakes. All of a sudden boom. Buzzing gone, tone is clean as hell. Makes me rethink that fancy guitar I've been looking at!

@polarnaut9645 3 года назад

You can really notice the difference when she hits those low notes at 2:18, 4:43 & 7:05. The first one sounds like a chainsaw compared to the others.

@kshannasmile2 3 года назад

You’re so right!!!!!!!!!!

@msarchive6247 3 года назад

Meh, it's so very subtle. I wouldn't even notice in a theater.

@lesterp79 3 года назад

Thanks!

@boonjaminbokchoy5725 3 года назад

@@msarchive6247 Which begs the question: Is it really worth owning an expensive one over a cheaper one? For such an almost unnoticeable amount of performance?

@JamieStewart3 3 года назад

I hear a significant difference between the last one and the others on that lowest note.

@kizmo2317 Год назад

I could tell the difference between resonance between low and high notes between each cello. Amazing.

@gershomj.holies1686 Год назад

In her hand all the three sound perfectly, but is undeniable the last one´s superior quality!

@jdgretz 2 года назад

The biggest difference I heard was in the low string. Each more expensive cello had better, cleaner tone on the low C. In the mids and upper frequencies, the two more expensive ones were more mellow and warm. Again, as the cello moved up in value, the clearer and cleaner were the tones through out the range. Very nice. Thank you.

@latigoflagelante 2 года назад

Exactly my view. Nothing to add.

@daye8132 2 года назад

Agreed

@LSun-it8zy 2 года назад

You certainly know cellos! Like pianos, low tones are always harder to deal with, which makes a good instrument different from a cheaper alternative.

@rogersthilaire8179 2 года назад

Agreed!! Exactly what I heard. Cleaner and warmer tones with each upgrade :)

@autonomous6788 2 года назад

The cellos all produced amazing sounds, but, I kept getting distracted by the beauty playing them.

@mariannabenedict4936 3 года назад

The first cello sounded a bit scratchy; the tone left we wanting more clarity. The 2nd cello had a cleaner tone and much more resonance. The 3rd cello had the best clarity and was still resonant.

@faridalaghemand3320 3 года назад

Exactly the first one sounded scratch y

@crycry9785 3 года назад

The vibrations of the 3rd is more eargasmic.

@geniferteal4178 3 года назад

I agree about the clarity of the third one I was thinking the sound was sharper but that's kind of what I meant. The first one just sounded flat and dull. Not so sure how I feel about the middle one.

@worthdixon1072 3 года назад

I agree with this. There was a big difference in clarity and depth between cellos #1 and #2, however the difference between cellos #2 and #3 was not as great. If tone is the primary driver of these instruments' value, I'd say that the jump from $180K to $1M is probably not worth it. There would have to be other reasons to justify the $1M price tag. (Being made by a famous builder, being a well preserved and playable historical antique, prestigious history of ownership, etc.)

@TheChenny73 3 года назад

@@worthdixon1072 Just my opinion but the intonation and right hand technique of the musician is far more important than the two bling instruments. A virtuoso will make a $5K instrument sing.

@apriltoronto5254 3 месяца назад

yes, you play these instruments wonderfullyyy!! thanks for uploading

@Winter.5555 9 месяцев назад

And also congratulations on 100,000 subscribers 🎉

@5375moli 3 года назад

If i had a $1M musical instrument in front of me, i could die of a heart attack from anxiety, without even touching it.

@AGC828 3 года назад

What if you get distracted and drop it? 😁👌 Pricing is ridiculous. The variance is too extreme. A flagship Steinway concert piano is around $250k... Do much more instrument posts and man hours..vs any of the cellos. Even if it's rare. A Strad... Unless it was played by Back himself Heh...

@paddlefar9175 3 года назад

I’d sell it and buy the $180,000 one (so that it didn’t hurt my career) and live off the $820,000. The second and third instrument sounded the same. The first one was close though.

@HelenadeEspartaDrz 3 года назад

Me too 😂😂

@PieFaceGuy9000 3 года назад

@@AGC828 Bach*

@flacsmada 2 года назад

just like a beautiful women im guessing!

@eugeneforge 2 года назад

I would say that the jump from the $5000 to the $180K was much more obvious than the $180K to $1M. It is rather amazing how the harshness in the lower cost cello does not exist as the cost and quality increases. I would love to hear a string quartet do this every same demonstration. Also, I would like to know what that feels like as a musician. I would guess that the way that the body of the cello vibrates just feels better as you play making it a more enjoyable experience. Edit: I just rewatched just the beginning of each and watched your face and with the first you looked like it felt off. The sound and feel wasn’t right to you. The second was a joy for you to play. Your smile looked real as I am sure it was. The third hit you on a deep emotional level. You had a moment that you looked into the camera and conveyed so much feeling that it actually made me cry. Your talent is undeniable, but I am amazed at how much your instrument can put that talent on full display.

@dirkkarmel5209 2 года назад

Visit the VOF !

@paulc5333 Год назад

As a musician you can feel the difference in the quality of the instrument. I am (was) a tubist in HS I was first chair in the Senior Concert Band and I got to play a King "Monster" a 4 valve DB Flat that used to belong to the first chair in the Toronto Symphony. It dated from the 1930s. The sound I was able to get out of it was so dark and rich it echoed in your soul. 35 years later I still long for it.

@lutiger8941 Год назад

I guess you could also hear the diffrences better while listening to live play instrad of an recording. But you still could hear a difference.

@Countavery Год назад

Kennedy wins..

@kamilbeelidebelfort3319 Год назад

The third cello was also very nice! The sounds coming out was much more rounded, and the high notes did gave the most goose bombs. But the difference wasn't as big as between the 1st and 2nd. That being said, even though I loved all the mini performances. My favorite was the second one, for some reason it just captivated me the most. Thank you for sharing!

@f1redemon966 Год назад

the geese have bombs now!?

@mauflex 2 месяца назад

The 2nd cello is the one i like the most, but honestly you're so talented it's really hard to tell the difference

@DenzCasuela 4 года назад

I don't have $1M headphone to hear the difference

@gotubo 4 года назад

denzyl casuela that’s the great one!! 😂 lol

@unoperatic2800 4 года назад

hahaha LOL

@MarcoMartinezimagen 4 года назад

Yes, I agree with you, the 2nd one is the best cello.

@mateopiedra8713 4 года назад

LOL!!!

@TheTARANISh 4 года назад

@-- yeah that's because it is least sensitive, thus making it casual to play and to listen, while the most expensive one is so sensitive you can actually hear her fussing on the notes. In other words, I think only a true virtuoso can really value a cello masterpiece.

@northamericannomad7822 3 года назад

For me the 5k cello sounded "muddier", The second one was obviously different. The notes were more defined, crisper. The million dollar cello was similar but it added a richness to the low notes.

@jadenframpton2000 3 года назад

That’s what I was thinking 🤔

@eloeelwe 3 года назад

Agreed, the lower notes were tighter, and possibly a bit louder on the million dollar cello.

@SoapandSecrets 3 года назад

Could not have said it better! :-)

@delanisharples7134 3 года назад

Me like mmh makes sense.

@kfc_scotch9095 3 года назад

I agree. I think that was what I was thinking too....I couldn't describe it well.

@domsau2 Год назад

Dear Madam: 1st cello: perfect. 2nd cello: perfect. 3rd cello: perfect. It's not the cello: it's You! Congratulations! Thanks!

@markkeller9378 3 месяца назад

Wow, listening from my iPad the 180 was solid, but the 1M seemed 3 dimensional. Popping on the headphones, listening to various parts of the music…..the clarity and depth of each note from the 1M is amazing. The 180 still sounds good….nice balance…..but the 1m is incredible. Your talent is truly amazing. Thank you for doing these videos. I love your work!

@frostclaus15956 2 года назад

It’s worth unintentionally coming here and heard your play them.

@studionatalie9233 3 года назад

How can you even hold a 1,000,000 cello without breaking a nervous sweat?! That’s amazing!

@monsiuersmartypants3391 3 года назад

Just know that it already has been banged up and repaired countless times. No worries

@hoangthehung2248 3 года назад

@@monsiuersmartypants3391 hahaha

@sethheathcote4949 3 года назад

Because she's already played on a $6 million dollar cello (@ 1 minute in)

@ryanlongo3434 3 года назад

Most cellos of that price have their own insurance plan.

@Dominasty 3 года назад

Being a Julliard Alumni probably has a bit to do with it. That's legit cred, mang.

@vivmack4810 Год назад

Oh my GODDD....the $M. is as smooth as silk. It brought tears to my eyes! x

@WendyLaw Год назад

🥹

@ellenconderman5785 Год назад

I CAN tell the difference! You’re playing is magical ❤

@kimsheets1219 2 года назад

The lowest and highest notes were harsh sounding on the 1st one. They were much better on 2 and 3. I lived the middle one. It has a more consistent velvety tone from top to bottom.

@smijification 2 года назад

I agree. Nicer tone altogether. Dare I say that the most expensive one sounded more like the cheapest - perhaps I prefer a less strident tone in my old age (72). :)

@harriepark6112 2 года назад

were u trying say loved instead of lived

@Konnordawg 2 года назад

@@harriepark6112 What do YOU think buddy?

@smijification 2 года назад

@@harriepark6112 yes

@saspirella09 2 года назад

Snap 👌🏾💯✨

@simapierce3429 Год назад

The first had a brassy undertone. The second was full and buttery. The third sounded like I was in the middle of the sound, so lovely and intense. In the overall quality I hear it most in the deep notes. That’s where I think most will hear it even if they don’t recognize that.

@maglevcuber Год назад

99 likes? Imma make that 100😊

@BostonWells Год назад

Exactly perfect description of each

@merelmerula9313 Год назад

Yep, the difference for me is in the resonance. More $$, more resonance. The lower notes show it off.

@vic2631 Год назад

Yes the lower tones are full and rich in sound.

@PK-gw2rz Год назад

Suddenly I'm in the mood for Chardonnay

@drstew1 Год назад

I didnt compare price .Having nothing but my ability to hear and feel . The third one by passed everything and touched me immediately. Stunning experience. It reminded me of the viennese Philharmonic Orchestra. And the sound i the orchestra . Thank you Wendy Law

@marktompkins3180 5 месяцев назад

Thank you for sharing this!

@yvonneclarke9062 Год назад

All three played beautifully but the 180k cello was my favourite - depth of tone, mellow. Would love to know which one you enjoyed playing the most.

@jmcd9212 3 года назад

I actually CAN hear the difference. However, I enjoyed the 2nd cello the most out of the 3 of them.

@rlittlewood6343 3 года назад

The second one did it for me

@maureenfrank 3 года назад

that was my feeling as well. the 2nd one had a mellow, rich, deep tone to it. the $1m had more of a crisper, richer tone to it which was exquisite in its own right, but the 2nd one was more appealing to me. btw... speaking of exquisite...i’m in awe of you playing that piece three times flawlessly. well done. thanks for the demo. 💙💜💚🙏

@Lord_Volkner 3 года назад

Wow. I thought, after listening and going back and forth between them, that maybe my ear wasn't so good, because in the end, I liked the 2nd one best. Then I came down to the comment section and find that pretty much everyone else did as well. If my ear is off, so is everyone else's.

@5teve05 3 года назад

I can kind of hear the difference. But the only thing that makes the sound the same is that they all sound amazing!

@wayando 3 года назад

Me too. I can't tell why the 1M one is soo expensive. Maybe there is a story behind it that gives it value.

@DavPles Год назад

They all sound great and you are are very talented. The 180k sounded very defined and clear however the million dollar one sounded very warm and full. It was a pleasure to hear you play . Thank you.