Canon 24-70mm f/4 IS USM 'L' lens review with samples (Full-frame & APS-C)

Подписаться 340 тыс.

Просмотров 272 тыс.

50% 1

I've been holding off covering this particular lens, because before I even tested at it I thought it was overpriced, and I /hate/ overpriced equipment. But, I've had a lot of comments from people wanting me to cover it, so I caved in to the pressure and...well, you'll see what I thought of its quality.
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link):
geni.us/canonef2470f4
This video includes my new test chart, as I've moved to a new place far away from all my old shooting locations. I've tried to make it a colourful one.
Support me on Patreon! www.patreon.com/christopherfr...
My Canon 70D had to be sold as I was saving up for my wedding/ honeymoon, so I'm still using my old Canon 60D. It's kind of falling to pieces by now! All pictures and footage shot by me on Canon 6D and 60D cameras.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Хобби

Опубликовано:

21 июл 2016

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 226

@guitarist6494 8 лет назад

That feel when Chris uploads a new video

@superbikeaborad 8 лет назад

Its a warm fuzzy feeling

@eddieoreilly9391 8 лет назад

+Pabla Digital ... Even the slight shoulder slump when you see it's not a review of the Sigma 50-150mm f1.8 can't totally spoil the pleasure. Next time, maybe next time. Hope springs eternal...

@harmonytrader 5 лет назад

best reviews on RU-vid. your videos get to the point . keep up the good work

@JemiToShumafuk 8 лет назад

I have this lens over year... My review: Pros: - very sharp even on f/4 with good contrast even when resisting sun (image quality is best thing on this lens for me) - very effective IS (perfect for hand-shoot video) - smooth zoom (mine is really smooth) and focusing - build quality is superb - macro is nice feature - weather sealing - universal focal length (best zoom lens for documentary, street and portrait photography - outdoor) with same aperture (good for video) - USM with newer cameras is really quiet (not like in video with 60D) Cons - price (cashback was the reason why I bought it) - heavy - sharpness getting worse from f/8 (not very good for long exposures or landscape photography) I was deciding between this and 24-105 but sharpness is really much better on 24-70 than 24-105. I would probably use more +45mm than macro feature but sharpness was crucial.

@user-mb7jj1op1d 4 года назад

Jemi-To Shumafuk +35mm* ;)

@PaulFanMing 4 года назад

Price is drop now it is a very affordable lens and the IQ is good for knows price.

@TrollMeister_ 11 месяцев назад

Sharpness drop from f8 (f11 actually) is due to physics (diffraction), outside of anyone’s control. Happens to all wide angle lenses regardless of brand

@SH00TMARTY 7 лет назад

Hi Chris.. Thanks for this review... I did appear to miss the limits of this lens concerning the effects of diffraction.. That information I find very handy as a landscape photographer.. Thanks Again!!

@robertsmith4912 6 лет назад

Good technical review. One thing though: on this and several other reviews comments were made about short focal range. The range actually is perfect for those who own either of the 70-200 mm L lenses. The macro mode also allows one to leave their 100 mm f2.8 L macro at home thus reducing the weight of one's kit. Cheers from Chicago!

@TrollMeister_ 11 месяцев назад

The 2.8 II version is a wedding lens. For all other uses the f4 is much much better. On a 4k display the photos are about identical but the f4 has other advantages (size weight stability) that the 2.8 doesn’t. It’s my workhorse. Have had it for 8 years

@christophewagner4028 8 месяцев назад

In all cases the f4 is better. Bokeh f2.8 and f4 are the same at 70. For wedding use 85 1.2 and 35 1.4. Then you will see a difference in bokeh

@mevszach 5 лет назад

Again one of the best reviews out there when it comes to DSLR lenses, thx!

@ThisKory 8 лет назад

I had the 100mm f/2.8 L Macro and sold it to buy this lens. The 100mm is AMAZING, seriously amazing... I want one again still. But I could only afford one or the other. I like this lens because it has that zoom range but also gets you those macro shots when you want them. It's sharp and I don't have the same problem he mentioned in the video about the zoom ring being a little jerky. I purchased this lens mainly for hikes and general shooting. I like doing landscapes and macro work, and this lens allows me to do both pretty nicely in one package.

@WWTBAMWinner 8 лет назад

Very well made review. I find the macro mode a bit...odd, but useful at the same time.

@keithspillett7312 8 лет назад

Excellent review as always. Keep up the good work. On the cost front, I suppose r&d costs do rise over time, but I can't understand why prices appear to rise QUITE so much.

@roberthoward9482 5 лет назад

I just received my 24-70mm F4L lens! Absolutely amazing!!!

@johntinker3457 2 месяца назад

Just curious, as I am seriously considering buying this lens this week....are you still enjoying it and does it still take over all great photos? Thanks..

@JoeJacksonJr 8 лет назад

Excellent review Chris. God Bless..

@mommyhacks 7 лет назад

Thank you so much! This was abundantly helpful!!!

@keith8252 7 лет назад

Really great review

@kingcutzz 3 месяца назад

Man this is a bad ass lens..I just purchased it .after purchasing 10 other lens from Sigma,tamron etc.that canon 24-105 is clean asf❤

@samwill4442 8 лет назад

ONE OF THE BEST -SADLY UNDERRATED- CHANNELS !!!!

@Hubieee 7 лет назад

Cashback on this lens is always big: 200 € in Germany. So it's like a 25% discount, which gives it a good price to performance ratio. The macro mode is a feature I've always liked about this lens. But I have to say, that I more and more tend to use primes because I find the f/4 very limiting regarding party shots indoors and general low light photography. With a flash it's all right and let's be honest... you won't get a hell lot of out of focus background with a 35 f/2 either, when you can still zoom in to 70 mm with this zoom lens for a tighter headshot. A nice lens.

@HackingDutchman 8 лет назад

I have this lens and absolutely love it. I buyed this over the standard 24-105mm because of the macro mode.

@Nipy1 7 лет назад

i don't mean to correct anyone because I'm not a native english speaker as well. But Buyed really burned my eyes.

@GreatKeny 6 лет назад

Sorry about your eyies

@clartypaths840 8 лет назад

Hi Chris, I took your advice some time ago and picked up a nice black copy of the 24-85 for a meager £26 off ebay. It works well on my 5D Mk2, and I have no remorse at all. Similarly, the Tamron SP 70-300 Di VC USD you recommended, came to me for £165, also from ebay, and what an excellent job Tamron did there . I also own a Vivitar series 1, 19-35 f3.5-4.5 for full frame, cost me £70. This lens can also be found badged under Tokina, Cosina and others, and has become my favourite landscape lens. It's a very cheep feeling, plastic thing, with a front element that spins, and no full time manual focus, but I couldn't care less hehe. I also have a 20D and a 60D and have been using the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS HSM and the Canon 55-250 STM on them, and they are very impressive lenses too. So I'd just like to say thanks for everything you do, your honesty and integrity when it comes to reviewing lenses is second to none.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Thanks! Really glad the information has helped you. Sounds like you have a great kit there :-)

@trakkino 7 лет назад

I would love to have an image quality comparison tool with your resolution chart photos.

@Inkwellish 8 лет назад

I love the 24-70 range lenses. I used to own the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L (the original version). That lens was okay, I put it through hell and it never failed me. That said, it was SUPER bulky and heavy. I decided that I am less concerned about maximum aperture and more concerned about all day comfort and sharpness. I decided to sell my 24-70 2.8 and buy this lens...best decision I've made in a while. This lens is almost a pound lighter and much more compact than the original 2.8, and the sharpness is amazing on my copy. I would recommend the 24-70 f4.0 IS to anyone who wants a lightweight sharp lens from a proven company.

@JemiToShumafuk 8 лет назад

I agree... Sharpness on f/4 is really surprisingly good.

@borism68 8 лет назад

I am always excited to see your videos when you upload a new one. Would you give a comment or educated opinion on the Tokina 24-70 f2.8 ? I know you haven't reviewed it but perhaps you might have a comment on whether or not is a good option s a fast normal zoom lens now that DXO mark favored the sharpness ? thank you for all the information you share

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Someone's made a review of it - I think that Lenstip have made a review of the new one

@ivanblanco8165 8 лет назад

Was considering going with this lens over the Tamron 24-70 VC, but I caved and bought the Tamron last night. I feel I made the right choice for my needs, but man I could have used this video yesterday! :P

@headbang3r519 4 месяца назад

Picked this one up recently for under £400.00 n excellent condition. Sharpest lense I have used. Sharper than the 35 mm 1.8 RF .. Sharper than the 16-35 F4 [EF]. I am not into Bokeh's, I normally use my 1.8 RF 35mm for night but generally my style is more about detail but with haze and light tones. I must say, the images of this lens till this very day remain in the top bracket. I never liked RF lense due to their crap build quality. Thye feel like a toy. EFS for me are heavy duty and in term of image quality it is just small margins really. Barring the AF on RFS interacts with the Cmera faster but hey, I am not a sports journalist.

@Tu2O4fan 5 лет назад

Chris, so you would better prefer EF-S 18-155 for wide angle on crop than this one?

@bweeeda 8 лет назад

I have this lens and prefer it over the twice as expensive 24-70 2.8 ii as that has no IS and the IS is great on this for handheld video! nice to not need the hassle of a steadycam or tripod or shoulder rig (juddery zoom sucks tho as u mentioned). I used it recently with my 1dx2 as it also makes a very short list of compatible lenses that can do a slow focus pull transition from the touch screen while shooting, most lenses with the 1dx2 are a set speed only and quite quick but this can be smooth n slow if u want. Interesting and strange it's soft up close in the middle but sharper if focused at a distance, hadn't noticed. The macro is nice except u often get so close with the lens that it shadows ur subject and leaves it with back lighting only hehe

@bweeeda 8 лет назад

Oh not only super slow focus transitions but extra fast ability over most lenses, which is best for continuous auto focus tracking during video

@TrollMeister_ 11 месяцев назад

Agreed. I too passed up on the 2.8 II. In real life shooting the f4 is every bit as sharp at the 2.8, and I love the lightweight, compact size and IS.

@DynamixWarePro 8 лет назад

Very good review as always. The macro feature is a bit odd, especially as it isn't that sharp until f/8. I know wider apertures on macro isn't always that useful, but I would have been good to be sharper though at the wider apertures. These are popular macro lenses, so could you possibly review the older Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro and or the newer version, the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Maybe how they compare to the Canon 100mm L Macro lens.

@ffmnokia Год назад

Chris if you were going to buy a lens today which would you buy, the 24/70 f4 or the 24/105 f4 ???

@CvrlosSvnchez 7 лет назад

Does the 24-85mm lens you mention compare to the 24-70mm?

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

It compares surprisingly well

@MbrisGaming Год назад

Great video but can I ask what camera you were using?

@Andreatuzze 7 лет назад

I love your accent and your reviews too!!

@ColeFrechou 8 лет назад

i really recommend you trying out the sigma 150-600. And the sigma 50-100.

@annisasabrina8259 7 лет назад

don't forget to record and upload your beautiful wedding/honeymoon footage to us! :D

@ebrahemmh 7 лет назад

Hi Chris Thanks for the review. Which one do you recommend this one or the24-105 mk2? Which do you think is sharper.

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

The 24-70 is just a touch sharper with less distortion. Take a look at my reviews for more info

@ebrahemmh 7 лет назад

Christopher Frost Photography I already watched your review for 24-105 version one. But I want to know about version two 24-105... Thanks.

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

I haven't tested that yet

@ebrahemmh 7 лет назад

Christopher Frost Photography OK Thanks await your review with comparison to 24-70 f2.8 2...

@thattassiewargamer 8 лет назад

I'd recommend the EF-S 15-85mm for APS-C. It is roughly equivalent to the 28-105mm in zoom range but was built specifically to suit an APS-C sensor and it's optically equal to an L lens but Canon don't give the L label to EF-S or EF-M lenses. It's not cheap but worth it.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

The 15-85 is actually even better than that - it's the equivalent of 24-136mm

@hariantosuhendro1428 3 года назад

I plan buy 90d, its handle hires 32pxl ?

@glalol5310 7 лет назад

Hi Chris, I'm looking for a general walk around lens but keeping the price tag reasonably low. I'm shooting on a Canon 80D. What lens would you buy between this, the 24-105 f/4, or the old 24-70 f/2.8 mk1? I'm oriented on the one in this video because of sharpness and minor vignetting and distortion compared to the 24-105 f/4, and because of the IS compared to the old 24-70 f/2.8. Plus, the price is not to high on this, and has a pretty good macro function. Just wanted to hear your opinion. Thank you in advance.

@freedomxgarcia 4 года назад

Alessandro Magnani which lens did u buy

@nightsbeatswitchgood 6 лет назад

It would be nice to see a comprehensive comparison with the 24-105. I was going to buy this lens, but my only concerns are the not super smooth zoom ring and the autofocus noise in video mode. Are those two better or worse on the 24-105?

@christopherfrost 6 лет назад

I can't remember off the top of my head but I cover all those questions in my reviews - take a look

@mauabid 6 лет назад

please review Tamron 24 70mm f2.8 G2 lens chris

@nikonmark37814 2 года назад

Just sold my old 24-105 f/4 L, the one that came out in 10/2005 and now I'm looking for a replacement and I'm considering the 24-70 f/4L IS and the new 24-105 f/4L IS II, hope this video makes that decision easier!

@vinvanid Год назад

So what lens did you buy ? Is it good ?

@richmck007 8 лет назад

What another exceptionally well put video from you Chris. I see absolutely nothing negative towards your review of this lens. You explained your review from an utmost professional point of use, as per usual. I, like many others continue to learn constructive information always when watching your videos. I might add, without blowing your trumpet even further, that I have purchased two lens thanks to your videos. ( canon 24-105mm L and the canon nifty fifty 1.8 ). I have been happy with my images becuase I learned to listen and learn. My next dillema is to trade in my old sigma 70-200mm f2.8 non imagw stabilised lens for something lighter and with an IS ! Any suggestions..? Keep up the the excellent work, you are blessed.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Thanks! Glad I could help. Tamron are rumored to be working on an image stabilized 70-200 f/4 lens at the moment, so it might be worth holding on for that. Otherwise it's the Canon 70-200 f/4 IS USM - which is a little expensive.

@richmck007 8 лет назад

Christopher Frost Photography thanks as always for your swift response! Another f/4 tele may be not as bright for concert shoots, so perhaps that Tamron might just be up my street! I already have the 24-105L f/4 thanks to your review ! Have a blessed day.

@trevorreedstudios 8 лет назад

Another fair-minded and useful review. Thank you. Did you get those 2 emails I sent you Christopher? Love to know what you thought! Trevor

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Hi Trevor, yes, I'll try to reply soon :-)

@jsal999999 7 лет назад

My concern with both of these is the external zoom. Should I be worried about dust getting into this thing when it's zoomed out? Also it looks 'goofy' with that front barrel sticking out. I just like the way the 70 - 200 zooms internally, and also the image quality.

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

They're quite well weather-sealed so dust doesn't really get in on Canon's 'L' lenses (in my experience, anyway)

@nabeeel1 6 лет назад

Thanks for the review Chris. I just bought this lens for the 5dIV and paid only 400 pounds for a new one on gray import. I think that is not a bad price for the lens like this. The lens is though not the sharpest but the Light Transmission is better than 24-105 F4 II and I which helps it keep a bit faster shutter speed at the same focal length upto 70mm

@TrollMeister_ 4 месяца назад

The nonsense gets repeated. “Not the sharpest” compared to what ? The 300 f2.8 IS II ?

@user-iq7en1lg3i 5 лет назад

If you have to choose between Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 DC HSM and Canon EF 24-70mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens for Canon 80D, what would you choose and why? mainly for portrait, landscape, buildings and just everyday-stuffs.

@christopherfrost 5 лет назад

Well the differences are obvious. If you want a nicer zoom range and IS, then the 24-70. If you want a far brighter aperture and wider angles, the 18-35. Take a look at my review of the 18-35 to see what I thought of it

@Avriox 8 лет назад

I have a slight problem... At the moment I'm using a Sigma 18-38 and a Canon 100-400 on my 7D mark ii. I find those 2 lenses work quite nicely but the gap from 38-160 (multiplying the 100 with the crop factor of the small sensor) is quite big. So I wanted to get the 24-70 f4 because it's weather sealed and sort of closes the gap. I'd really like to have a "weather proof" lens but I'm not sure anymore what to go for. Do you have any other suggestions on what could help me out (and that is in a similar price rang). note: I'd need it for video work as well as normal photography

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

There's no obvious solution so it's up to you, really. Another option for you is to look at the Canon 24-105 (although, a new version is supposed to be coming out soon)

@Avriox 8 лет назад

+Christopher Frost Photography I'm not in a hurry... I have almost a year till I really need it. So you think waiting for a refreshed 24-105 might be an option? (could be a bit pricey maybe :/)

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

One option of many, yes

@user-ck4pt1yb9e Год назад

Holding such a cool lens in your hands, but never catching up ... Master - fu

@mani1654 7 лет назад

I have a Canon 550D, a 50mm 1.8 (nifty fifty), and 70-200 f4 non is. I want your expert suggestion on what you think i must buy or upgrade in order to get better outdoor pre wedding pictures. Kindly reply. Thanks

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

You'll probably want a nice Canon 17-55 f/2.8 - a nice fast standard zoom lens. If you want to do wedding photography seriously then you should probably upgrade to full-frame

@18yearsoldnot Год назад

This is my future lens for my sigma fp

@cianos 6 лет назад

I’m looking to invest in a good lens - a multipurpose one. Would you recommend this or something like the 24-105 f4, or perhaps a good one that isn’t an L lens?

@brandonj8018 3 года назад

24-85 as mentioned here or the tamron 28-75

@godofhope 6 лет назад

You didn’t mention the focus shift. Would have been nice to watch a good explanation of this problem not only reading stuff elsewhere I don’t quite understand....

@ozdemirmurat 5 лет назад

Hi Christopher. I bought tamron 24-70 f2.8 . But I gave back. Because of some af issue. And I decided to buy a canon lens. And my budget is not enough for canon 24-70 f2.8. I m thinking about these two lens, 24-70 f4 and 24-105 version 2. The most important thing is sharpness at f4 for me. I watched your 24-105 review and it was really bad about sharpness. even version 2. So what can you say to me about these?I will use it for wedding photography and also "image stabilization" is important for me. Thanks.

@brandonj8018 3 года назад

Tamron 28-75 😊

@abhineeet 7 лет назад

Hi, I have a 60D with 18-135mm kit lens. Now I want to upgrade to a sharper L series lens. I'm confused between 24-70 and 24-105 f/4. What would you suggest!

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

Take a look at my reviews and see what would be good for you :-)

@GreatKeny 6 лет назад

What about the RSA? Is it as bad as people talk about it?

@bhimbifannoni8316 7 лет назад

hai christopher. I have another question. Some people keep telling me that video mode take lots of shutter count. is that true?

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

Nope

@LiveUPMedia 8 лет назад

hey Chris, I know this lense has caused some heated discussions :) basically I am in full frame land now and I am used to my beloved 18-552.8 efs but it doesnt work on a full frame :( I like to do studio work.. which lense would cover a similar range and sharpness? is the one in this review as sharp? or would you recommend another? I also need IS

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

For a good idea of sharpness, take a look at my review videos. This 24-70 will give you a wider angle but won't zoom in as tightly. I really like the 24-105 - I think that's a better choice overall

@LiveUPMedia 8 лет назад

+Christopher Frost Photography on one question, regardless of zoom range.. do you think the 24-70 f4 is sharper?

@LiveUPMedia 8 лет назад

+kdx films I already have rokinon primes for the latter zoom ranges. I miss my 18-55 2.8 but I'm in full frame now so I want something comparable

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

The 24-70 is a little sharper. Watch the video - I talk about it

@LiveUPMedia 8 лет назад

+Christopher Frost Photography ok sorry sometimes u just need someone to confirm it

@KaelanRios 7 лет назад

Hello Christopher Frost, which lens do you find sharper: the Canon 24-70mm f4, or the Sigma 24-105 f4? Cheers, and God bless!

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

They're both as great as each other. The 24-70 might have a slight edge.

@KaelanRios 7 лет назад

Christopher Frost Photography Thanks so much!

@jacobsamuel5444 Год назад

@@christopherfrost Good morning sir, Between Canon 24-105mm f/4L Is usm and Canon 24-70mm f/4L usm dis lens, which one is day best for studio use ?

@FULLofJOHN 8 лет назад

Chris, you should try out some Voigtlanders whenever you have the chance.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

I wouldn't mind actually. Perhaps sometime soon

@FULLofJOHN 8 лет назад

That would be lovely. Looking forward to it!

@Jemm54 8 лет назад

Hi chris, cheers from Argentina, could you review the Tamron 70-200 vc, I heard good things about it, I will have to choose betwen this and the canon 70 200 f4 is. Thanks

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Apparently the Tamron lens is very sharp so the ultimate difference is whether you want a smaller and lighter f/4 lens, or a bigger and heavier f/2.8 one.

@petermitchell2729 8 лет назад

I have the 70-200 Tamron (VC) and use it for sports photography, paired with a Canon 70d. As I often shoot under lights having the wider aperture was paramount for me, more light means I can get away with faster shutter speeds, which is important if your subject is moving. Sigma makes a very similar lens and Canon have a 2.8 that is similarly priced with no stabilization or a much more expensive and probably a little better stabilized one. For me it was a coin toss between the sigma and the tamron as the canon was out of my price range. I didn't really look at the F4 though as getting more light was key for me.

@varshavsky_boy 4 года назад

Do you think it is better then the 18-135? The zoom range and price doesn't bother me. ( I can't try both so I need someone's opinion)

@brandonj8018 3 года назад

If you need the range, then no.

@TonySahoo92 6 лет назад

But, now both costs same. And this lens costs less when bundled with any Canon DSLR.

@DartzIRL 4 года назад

My only regret so far with this lens is that I didn't buy it before my last holiday. It's that good compared to all the old second hand gear I've been using. It also works remarkably well with an original EOS650. It is *big* however. Bigger than the 28-80mm USM it replaces, or the 50mm F1.4 that normally lives in my bag. Balances well on the old beast, mind. Tested it on a 100D for sheds and giggles and it was out-resolving the sensor It could read the text on a license plate from 100 metres away in 50mm, which the kit lens with the 100D just rendered as a white.

@benficaM8888 5 лет назад

I have this lens, i love it, but I'm looking for something lighter to replace it. which lens is a good candidate?

@christopherfrost 5 лет назад

I'm a secret admirer of Canon's old 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 lens but it does have its limitations

@brandonj8018 5 лет назад

tamron 28-75

@user-mb7jj1op1d 4 года назад

Just bought this lens for my Canon 6D mkii, i got the lens for €375!

@theanubhav89 3 года назад

Hi, does this lens have IS ?

@allsam3407 6 лет назад

Hello Chris, i have a aps c canon760d with sigma comtemporary 17-70mm. Wath zoom can i have to get more sharp ? Maybe canon 17-40 f4 L ? Maybe canon 24-70 L ? Or maybe canon 24-105 L ?

@christopherfrost 6 лет назад

You mean, you want to replace your 17-70 lens? The 24-105 will be sharpest

@allsam3407 6 лет назад

Christopher Frost Photography and wath about the 24-70 L ?

@christopherfrost 6 лет назад

Look at my reviews, and you'll see

@cscchua 8 лет назад

can its macro zoom take very close up insect photos?

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Watch the video, and you'll see how it performs as a macro lens.

@stanleynickels6106 7 лет назад

This Video is very good, I am new to photography, I just have a question about the f/4 mark. Does f/4 mean this lens has a fixed aperture of f4? (in your video, you compare the images with not only f4 but f5.6 and so on, if the aperture is fixed how did you change the aperture?) Thank you so much!

@joevalenza2822 7 лет назад

Yunbo Wang No, it is Not fixed at f/4. It goes all the way up to around f/22. The f/4 in the name is basically just saying what the widest, or biggest aperture is f/4.

@stanleynickels6106 7 лет назад

I see, thank you for your kind response!

@heribantomas 4 года назад

Hi Christopher, great review - what would you say for price tag of 500 euros.. still bad option for APS-c. or ?

@christopherfrost 4 года назад

Take a look at the results from this review :-)

@libassi.studio Год назад

Hi Christopher, thank you for taking the time to post such terrific reviews. What are your current thoughts on this lens (about $500 used) vs Canon 24-70 2.8 L mark ii (around $1,400 used). For use on a Canon 5D Mark II. Cheers -Matt

@Adrian-Grth 7 лет назад

I was told that the Canon EOS 6D + 24-70mm f4 L IS USM is not available for a full frame camera, is your advice correct in suggesting this lens?, thanks.

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

Are you asking me if this is a full frame camera lens that will work on a Canon 6D? Watch this review or read the description and you'll find out!

@Adrian-Grth 7 лет назад

Hi, thanks for your prompt reply, I have been informed the lens you suggest over the 24-70mm f4 L about half way through your video which was a zoom lens does not fit on the Canon EOS 6D, was just wondering of you knew about this?, (Thanks from Australia!).

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

You mean the 18-135mm lens? As I said in the video, that's an option if you're using an APS-C camera.

@Adrian-Grth 7 лет назад

Thank you for helping people from all around the world, I am in Australia and I have a basic knowledge of cameras (about 2 hours of basic educations in this field), thanks again for your help and your quick reply.

@mauabid 7 лет назад

please review Zeiss Milvus 1.4/50 chris!😁

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

I'm thinking about it

@Sandi-tq3lm 8 лет назад

This is recomended for videomakers? than 24-105mm f4? i'm videomaker using canon 5d mark ii..

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

It's good for video makers

@dearsarvesh 8 лет назад

Hi, When are you going to test Sigma 50-100 1.8. Waiting eagerly for your confirmation before I invest...

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

It's taking me a while for various reasons. Should be coming in a month's time (I know I keep saying that to people)

@DanielFazzari 7 лет назад

A major difference between this lens and the 24-105 L is their t-stop values. The 24-70 lets in nearly a full stop more light at the same aperture!

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

That's if you trust DXO Mark hehe. I wish I'd done my own tests, to look into it.

@DanielFazzari 7 лет назад

Oh, I wasn't just trusting them ;-) I ran my own comparison. Using full manual exposure, I metered a subject properly with my 24-70 and took a shot. Then, without changing any settings, put my 24-105 on the camera and it metered 1 stop underexposed. Photos definitely show the difference, as the ones with 24-105 are considerably darker than the ones with 24-70. I also reversed that by metering properly with the 24-105. When I put the 24-70 on, it metered 1 stop overexposed.

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

That's very interesting - I'm surprised to hear it! Like I said, I wish I'd looked at it myself at the time.

@laurentl714 7 лет назад

@daniel Thank you for your comment, that's very interesting. If you had to choose again between the 24-70 f4 IS Macro and the new 24-105 f4 IS version II, which one would you pick?

@DanielFazzari 7 лет назад

Laurent L I thought about that very seriously! I do not have first hand experience with the mark II version of the 24-105, but according to DXOMARK, it has lost peak sharpness and still doesn't let in as much light as the 24-70 (approx. 1/2 stop less). In the end, I sold my 24-105, and don't plan on getting the mark II.

@Spazza42 4 года назад

Lol, £550 for an L lens isn’t expensive. The 2.8 II version costs almost £2k, which doesn’t have a macro zoom or IS.

@miamidolphinsfan 8 лет назад

Thanks once again for a very thoughtful & thorough review Christopher. I think if this was priced at $300-$400 I'd be after it, but not for $800.....NO THANK YOU CANON.

@kmcat 8 лет назад

I saw this on Amazon for £300 uses x display

@brianwalker5214 8 лет назад

Hello, I'm just getting into videography, I have a Canon 70D and I need a good all around lens, does anyone have any suggestions ? Price is not an issue. I just need a good one for wedding video.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Canon 17-50 f/2.8 IS USM

@BachPhotography 7 лет назад

Very nice review! Personally I think that someone looking at this lens should just buy a Tamron 24-70 2.8. Sharper, lower maximum aperture, same price!

@justinholding02 6 лет назад

Hi Christopher, did you do any testing at 50mm? I have read several times the lens has a weakness here!

@TrollMeister_ 4 месяца назад

My sample is just fine at 50mm. I think it could be a problem with misfocus or sample variation regardless of what Roger Cicala says.

@moovieman693 3 года назад

I"m late I know but my 16-35 mm f2.8 is no longer giving me sharp images so I need a new wide angle lens. I really liked this lense because I had the 16, 24 and 35mm at my disposal. I was sure I wanted to get a prime 35mm f2 but I just found about this lens. I think it has a great assortment of focal lengths (and it has a macro feature!?) so now I"m not so sure about the 35mmg f2. I'm pretty sure I won't be using this lens (if I got it) in low light situations and If I do it'll be for group shots a wedding receptions or wide angle shots of a room on a tripod (for dark areas). In your opinion, is the Canon 35mm f2 a better lens or does this lens have more to offer?

@brandonj8018 Год назад

This is better. Colors, range…

@EktorTsolodimos 2 года назад

I might buy this lens to replace my 100 mm 2.8 macro L-series. I will not get rid of it, since it's better for serious macro (product) photography, but this macro feature seems perfect for "quick on location work" with it's 0.7x magnification (definately with todays resolutions). Especially nice for weddings. Right now I carry a dedicated macro lens for the rings. But this will be better I think, since it's also a nice backup to my 24-70 2.8, in case something happens. Same goes for all my commercial work: usually I shoot mostly on my 24-70 2.8 @ 4.0-8.0. So this would make a great backup, besides being a macro as well. Also, it's not too heavy or large, which is always nice for a backup lens.

@Gaming_qube 7 лет назад

What is better to choose? 24-70 f4 or 24-105 f / 4?

@christopherfrost 7 лет назад

Why don't you watch the video - I talk about that question.

@Gaming_qube 7 лет назад

I'm sorry, maybe I missed this point.

@joelbiggs 5 лет назад

Would this work wi5 my canon 200d

@christopherfrost 5 лет назад

Yes. All Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera, except EF-M lenses

@perezrob93 8 лет назад

Great video as usual , I personally would never purchase this lens. I just don't see what use this lens would be when there are better 2.8 aperture options ?

@PeterWMurphy 8 лет назад

Hi Chris. I also shoot a 6D and bought this lens when it came out for €1250. I was so disappointed with it! I had never owned an f/4 lens before and it was just too slow for me. I brought it back to the shop and swapped it for a Sigma Art 50 and a Canon 35 f/2 IS. Best decision I ever made!

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

That definitely is a good decision if you ask me :-)

@DistortionWorldTCG 6 лет назад

Doesn’t this leans come with the 5d mark 4

@christopherfrost 6 лет назад

It's probably one of the kit lens options, yes

@wimpusdaftlander6938 8 лет назад

question. why most lenses are at their sharpest at f8 or f5.6

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

There are multiple laws of physics behind general patterns of optical performance

@wimpusdaftlander6938 8 лет назад

I'll look it up... Great job by the way

@carlozuzic2617 7 лет назад

can this go on the 700d

@simonboone6631 5 лет назад

Carlo Žužić yes

@kitkaneth 8 лет назад

So 24-105 + dedicated macro lens is a way to go?

@Frank-Ding 8 лет назад

I have this lens and I LOVE it. I don't find the close-up image quality issues that Chris encountered, and I can achieve extremely sharp Macro photos even at F/4. I would push you toward this lens. It's smaller and more convenient than using the 24-105 + dedicated macro.

@kitkaneth 8 лет назад

or 24-105 and macro tube?

@Frank-Ding 8 лет назад

Macro tubes decrease the amount of light you get to your sensor, and since macro photography usually requires a lot of light, I'd still say go with the 24-70 f/4L

@awillingvessel238 6 лет назад

is this good for sports?

@brandonj8018 3 года назад

Outdoor, yes. Indoor might be pushing it.

@alexis1959 7 лет назад

Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art is an amazing alternative...

@angeloop 8 лет назад

It has shorter zoom than 24-105mm, but can make macro shots. But, oh wait, its macro capacities are weak! I don't see any value for this lens. If I'm going to replace the kit 24-105, I think Tamron 24-70mm VC is a better choice.

@alanhart9976 8 лет назад

You did not mention that the zoom ring is ultra close to the body making it uncomfortable to use in practice. Also this lens performance falls off in its mid-range, something you completely failed to demonstrate.

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

The placement of focus and zoom rings is a question of personal preference. And there is no evidence whatsoever that "this lens performance falls off in its mid-range" as you state.

@Thaeldenodon 3 года назад

One day I wanna do a drinking game with my friends... After covid and stuff... One for every "indeed" Jk - I really enjoy your reviews and base a lot of decisions on them! Thank you :D

@maxfactor4209 8 лет назад

what happen to your 70D?

@angeloop 8 лет назад

+1 I wonder the same.

@NatesFilmTutorials 8 лет назад

Read the Description

@christopherfrost 8 лет назад

Read the description

@alexandrebrsilva 8 лет назад

"My Canon 70D had to be sold as I was saving up for my wedding/ honeymoon, so I'm still using my old Canon 60D. It's kind of falling to pieces by now! All pictures and footage shot by me on Canon 6D and 60D cameras."

@maxfactor4209 8 лет назад

:((((