You can stay up to date with Matts latest work at www.mattgranger.com/ - join the mailing list! Check out the Nikon Expert Setup Guide: learn.mattgranger.com/courses... / _mattgranger / mattgranger
I’ve never heard of the Eos R10. I just wanted to say that Matt Granger taking photos and talking through those photos are some of the best video content I’ve seen. Thank you very much to you and your models.
The only trick I think you missed is adapting EF glass to it. You make a good point about people not buying an entry level body and using pro glass but there are some people who might already have pro EF glass and would consider using it on the R10. OTOH you might not have any L lenses on hand, so there's that. More or less what I expected from the camera in terms of performance, but for the price it seems like you're getting quite a bit. Thanks for taking the time to give it a serious test! I think you're the only reviewer to give it a serious challenge.
This is actually a very challenging scenario. Indoors vs outdoors, shooting against the lights on the wall, with the atmosphere fog making it harder for the camera to find the eyes. Judging by how well it went, I'd say this camera probably performs amasingly well outdoors during the day, which is how most beginners shoot anyway. I'm not considering it, as I'm very happy with my R6, but I was curious about the new models.
I am still rocking my Fujifilm X-S10 which is a great little camera. I thought Canon would go aps-c with their cameras on the RF Mount as Nikon have done the same. Not sure how many native dedicated aps-c lenses they will produce for this system though. I was interested to read recently that Canon is still top of the league for camera sales in Japan with the M50 MK II (twin lens kit) leading the way so that sytem must still be very popular over there!
Great video! Thanks! Regarding the kit lenses, have you been able to compare the 18-45mm against the 18-150mm? Other than the additional reach of the 18-150, do you find one sharper than the other?
Not looking at this camera Matt but love to see you working with the models and what you put the cameras & lenses through when you do reviews………….and if I can help keep your subscribed viewer numbers up, it’s win:win……………….goodonya mate!
Bought it 2 weeks ago and I'm super surprised how good it is for the price! It replaced my Nikon d5600, and i dont regret it at all. I use it to do my work with it now and im happy with it so far! Thank God I have small trump hands so that's fine haha. I use it with the 50mm RF 1.8 and that's a great combo for now. Would love something with some zoom as a next buy. Great video!
please help me . Can a godox v860ii v860iii or any other speed light fit this canon eos R10. I cant seem to find the contact points on the hotshoe. I also noted that you are using a third party flash on your R10. Any extension of help would be appreciated.
Not thinking of buying the Canon it myself, but enjoy your reviews and analysis. Now, the Maserati on the other hand…that I would love to be able to afford.
Hey Matt, are the images you took with this camera still available, the link is not in the in the video description? I’m thinking about getting this camera. Maserati Image!
Sadly Canon has never loaned me gear, so I can only review when B&H or someone can loan it to me. I hope it changes in future as I would love to test more Canon gear on the channel.
I kinda want one for street (maybe R7 tho)! I feel so uncomfortable walking around NY with an R5. I feel like I'm gonna get robbed the WHOLE time. I also work on zoom alot, and using my R5 as webcam pretty often, so I would love a cheaper cam for that too.
I think if you get an R10 then currently the EF 10-18 IS or EF 10-22 (used? zillions around) and the EF-RF adaptor are really worth buying. The 10-18 is cheap and decent. I loved my 10-22 and only traded it in (for a EF 16-35 L f/4 IS) a huge time after I stopped shooting APS, as it was so good. I miss it (the L is really good, but has less soul). Still don't have a camera the 10-22 would have fitted on tho (except my 20D, which is somewhere around)... Oh and Pagani !!! Zonda !!!
First off: Eating blue potato ice cream in a Maserati is the best! I’ve been a Canon shooter since 2005 with a Rebel XT. I’ve upgraded my kit over the years acquiring better bodies (7D and now a 5D Mk IV) and lenses, but ever since the 7D, I’ve been struggling with focusing issues. I feel that the focus precision I get is not worthy of the price range of a 5D Mk IV paired with L glass (16-35mm f/4 IS, 24-105mm f/4 IS, 70-200mm f/2.8 IS USM II). With all the money I’ve spent for lenses changing camera maker makes little sense to me. I wonder if upgrading to a mirrorless body would solve my focusing issues. However, a camera like the R10 is too small and doesn’t have the control I like. I wouldn’t mind going back to APS-C if the image quality is there, but the issue with Canon is that the good quality lenses don’t have focal ranges well suited for that sensor size. Looking at the RF lens lineup, I still feel that’s the case. It’s one of the reasons I went to a full-frame body when I replaced my 7D. Unfortunately, the R5 is just to expensive right now.
I was surprised when I first started seeing the Maserati SUVs in my city during my drive-time. 😄 I'm a little discouraged to hear that the R10 does not perform well at ISOs higher than 800. That's my main complaint with my Rebel.
as some of other viewers comment, I guess people can use the camera as a backup, (or as i want to do, as a range extender to the R6) and use it for wildlife... with the high-end lenses. such as Canon 100-500 RF, or 400L F5.6... would it be possible to check these? or hands down you will recommend the R7?
nope - not considering it at all ... just that I enjoy your reviews and videos - so I try to always stop by and hit the like. :-). You're one of those rare folks who does reviews and is actually a great photographer to begin with. ... hope you're doing well Matt.
Hello! I am from Brazil, and I have a question for you: does this camera have a very aggressive rolling shutter, recording in 4K and full HD? I watch a lot of videos here on RU-vid saying that the rolling shutter is very accentuated and that video recording is of poor quality both in full HD and 4K. And the body material of this camera is plastic, which breaks easily. Please, could you tell me why I would like to buy this camera?
Maseratti. Let me go to the garage and count my acquisitions..... ZERO. How didn't I know that? That said, great review with rational constraints. Cheers!
The reasons I watch your videos are definitely not the cameras you are presenting. It's your great pictures and your always pretty models. I haven't been tempted to buy a new camera since I got my Pentax K-50 in 2013.
After owning multiple Canons and Sonys over the years the last Canon I owned was the RP and it sucked, went to a Sony A7iii and it's fantastic. Looking through all my photos I have printed out since I have owned both brands I would say the vast majority and the best I have shot were from Sony. Also finally a proper watch, the CasiOak, nice. Rosanna did great, I like her.
And the maserati quattroporte is a beautiful car, intersting when they go EV. Kudos for finding Felicia, another photogenic model who moves well and can aid in your reviews.
I think the R10 sounds a lot like the M-equivillant instead of a mazzarati - I do like they took a page out of sony's handbook and made the whole lineup use the same mount.. makes soo much sense. And also- this is the very first video about r10 I have seen - (owning an R5 i am looking for the B-cam too it.
Annoyingly, the link takes me to a sign up page for Nude Art Photography - not something I'm interested in. Can you redo the link to just the images only please. 😡
I dunno what Canon has done with their skin tones but my god, it makes everyone look like they are kinda sick. I really do not enjoy the SOOC skin tones at all on the new RF lenses.
The R10 is in a weird place in my mind, and I think Canon knows it. I feel like the idea here is that the entry level market is basically dead in terms of what a Rebel offers, as in, the T6 and the other iterations of it. Smart phones killed the casual market, and well, content creators that are in the young demographic are too smart to think they need some fancy recording device that they also see as something their parents and even grandparents use/used for their "content". So I think Canon wants to shed the Rebel name from their entry level cameras, and market them as something that is a step up from their all-in-one smart phone. I don't think this is it, at least not in regards to something kids will go "yes, that is what I need instead of my phone", which is painfully obvious as Canon's intent based on those ads out there (the ones where the same actress is using a phone and an R10 side by side). From a photographers POV, I think it is a lot of camera for the money, and outclasses everything in the M series and Rebel line. But that is from someone that knows what a camera needs to do in order to impress me. What people in this class now consider are basically two things. One, what can it do that my phone can not and I actually need? And two, how easy is it to get my content from the camera to my preferred social media (tik tok, IG, whatever the kids are into now). I wouldn't hesitate to tell someone that didn't have the cash for something more expensive that it's a good camera to get, but I also have only run across maybe two people asking about it (they are more interested in the R7 in these cases). I could go into the whole "the best content creators have realized how much better off they are with a better production set up" but then, would this be the camera they would get? I think not. And even so, would the low end creators think this does something they need? No, I think the low end creators are sticking to their low end production, most of which revolves around video (and for that, short, not very well produced, intended to look so, videos). Maybe some of them will realize this is a good stepping stone to larger productions though. Its in a weird place. Glad you reviewed it though, there just are not a lot of people talking about it in spite it being a very good camera for under 1000 USD.
Yeah, I'm a bit surprised that Canon bothered to create this camera. An entry-level camera is your phone at this point. But still, it's a lot of camera for the money, especially if you've already got EF glass that you can adapt to it.
How a camera performs in perfectly lighting doesn't matter. They all perform really well in great lighting, seeing how a camera can perform in not so great lighting and moving subjects shows how good it is.
