The reason I'm here is just because of the grip and half the video is talking about the grip. Thank you for making this video, it made my mind up for hopping on to the R10
That’s definitely the most important difference by far! You won’t know until you feel it. I’ve been doing photography for 30 years and trust me that’s way more important than other specs.
That’s definitely the most important difference by far! You won’t know until you feel it. I’ve been doing photography for 30 years and trust me that’s way more important than other specs.
That’s definitely the most important difference by far! You won’t know until you feel it. I’ve been doing photography for 30 years and trust me that’s way more important than other specs.
That’s definitely the most important difference by far! You won’t know until you feel it. I’ve been doing photography for 30 years and trust me that’s way more important than other specs
Some notes: They changed the hot shoe! Just try using one of your external flashes and it won’t work because the contacts have been removed! Also, the R50 grip is designed so you can easily hold the camera facing you. The R10 is not. Try it!
At that point, the price would be the same, while adding size and wight to the R50, wich are basically its main pros (cheaper, smaller, lighter). So I would just buy the R10 instead of both the R50 and a cage.
Hello, I need to shoot a video of the assembly of the constructor (shoot many, many hours) from a distance of about 2 meters. Take off your hands as you collect small parts. Canon P10 with 18-45 mm suits me. ? Thank you.
So, for the average video creator, do you think they would be happy with the R50? I have the Canon g7x and I love it, but I would like something a little more updated and newer. The only thing is, with the G7x, it goes to 1.8 aperture and is really good in low light. I don't see any lens that would go on the R50 that has a 1.8 aperture, or maybe there is one out there. Do you have any recommendations? I enjoyed the video, thank you!
