Canon EOS R7 vs EOS R10 vs EOS 90D | Comparison Review 

I've got an R7, and my "old" EF-S lenses work perfectly with the adaptor.

Canon r7 is mainly aimed for wildlife and sports photography just like the previous 7d series.

In my opinion you should wait for the R7 mkii

Yes with the adapter, same for EF.

Z9 be like, am I a joke to you?

@@JamesHaule Z9 at least has a stacked sensor to reduce rolling shutter. These unfortunately don't.

What are you trying to do with photography? Are you trying to run a professional business? Street photography? Landscape? I think you'd be hardpressed to honestly see a difference between these two sensors for everything except for video and sports shooting. The R7 doesn't have a battery grip, but the 90D does. That can factor a lot into the kinds of shoots you do and how long you will be shooting for.

If you photograph professionally, the dual card slot on the R7 would be a big plus. Built in backup of your shots.

r7

R7 is better in terms of specs/features and has marginally better image quality. Though you may prefer gripping a larger DSLR body and the twice as good battery life with the option of a battery grip.

😂😂, it's not the equipment it's the person taking the picture

Why were you disappointed? Just surprised to hear that given the drastic jump in models. I love my 90D

@@StrangerTwenty The vintage T2i photos quality is not bad but it lacked 4K in video so I was hoping 90D could replace it. Sadly, 90D does not look all that great in 4K video compared to my half the cost Sony ZV-E10. I pre-ordered the new Canon EOS R7 so I hope that will replace T2i and Sony E10. Fingers crossed.

@@HiFiInsider Sorry to hear the 90D was lacking in video for ya, I only shoot wildlife, so I never looked at the video aspect of it. I personally was gonna pre-order the R7 as well, but then I found out that they're purposely not adding support for battery/vertical grips, which is a total let down for me as someone who uses one constantly on the 90D. Pretty salty about it, feels just needlessly crippling for a $1,500 camera, when even their much cheaper DSLRs have support for them. Either way, I hope you end up loving the R7! :)

Best lens really depends on what you plan to shoot. Since it sounds like you're just starting off, it might be best go with kit lens for now, once you find the focal range you like shooting at, then look into better lenses in that focal length. If you've already come this far, I can start to recommend other lenses for you if you'd like

B&H sells it

i don’t think it is THAT much better 6mkii already has really good capabilities and clog included, fast af, touch screen and a really fast 14 fps mode the only difference that you will gain is maybe IBIS… and better grip

I keep my M6 ii as my compact/travel camera. If you need something that's more professional then I'd recommend something full frame, unless you're doing something like wildlife or where a crop sensor would benefit you.

Nikon D90 or Canon 90D, cause both of them poound the OG 7D in low light performance (It's honestly not even funny), especially the full frame D90, focusing is of course better on the newer models when using the VF, and especially during LV on the 90D. The 7D mark II would put up a better fight, but it'll still fall short.

@@thenotsookayguy Youre mistaken on the Nikon D90. That camera is from 2008 and is crop sensor with bad low light performance.

@@brodylockwood14 Damn, my bad, camera names are confusing.

Minimal sealing wouldn’t take it out into the rain etc

Me too.... The music was nice but then she started talking about cameras.....

Wow, I have never seen such a great personality in my entire 60 years of living. Keep it up.

If you're a true "professional" and you're shooting with a 90D, you shouldn't be taken seriously!!!!

Cropped sensor on R7 or full frame R6.

Yes and yes. The video and photo quality is great, and it offers 2 card slots incase you wanna backup photos.

I do not know if anyone answered your question but Taylor Jackson put out a video about the Canon R7 and his a wedding photographer/videographer. He said that the video capacity is wouldn’t be good for wedding videography. I think the crop of the video.

Yes it's rf mount

canon eos R

canon eos R is mirrorless, full frame so great lowlight, amazing fast auto focus and the most important part for video is that it has canon CLOG so you can color grade your videos professionally and that is REALLY necessary for commercial videos, a non color graded video is just mediocre.

you can get it body only for 1500 or used for like 1200 and then invest in rf lenses like rf 50 and rf 35 mm, the 35 has amazing IBIS For video

Its not weather sealed sadly..

$1000000000000000 😂

@@momo_the_great6969 😭 canons idead of affordable 😂

Canon EOS R7: $2300 (Body only) $2800 (With 18-150mm Lens) Canon EOS R10: $1500 (Body Only) $2000 (With 18-150mm Lens) $1600 (With 18-45mm Lens)

@@lightedits. thanks so much 👍

If 7DMKII is compared with the R7, R7 wins all ALL categories. R7 has adequate weather sealing, NO internal space to put a CF card or even a 3rd dial. Just as 3rd party has created a "simple battery grip" for the EOS RP that cost much less (for less than $100 price including 2 batteries), they can do the same for the R7. Who buying an R7 for $1500 is willing to pay $800 for a Canon OEM battery grip? Your type of criticism is absurd

​@@set3777 The R7 is not aimed at the same market as was the 7DII. It is aimed at the XXD market of enthusiast cameras. Canon has already said that the R7 is a replacement for the 90D (or the closer still: M5) in one of their videos and other reviewers have confirmed that. It is significant that the lenses released for the R7 and R10 match those of the EF-M series. The 90D was not a replacement for the 7DII, it was a replacement for the 80D. If it had been a replacement for the 7DII it would have had the much superior tracking system of that camera - it didn't. I have both and tested them and it is absolutely clear. I have already commented on the sensor of the R7 related to competitors out there, but it is the balance of sensor readout, buffer and card speed performance that is really challenging this camera. Most pro's and serious enthusiasts want to shoot RAW, which generates larger files that need to be processed and saved to card. The camera can shoot mechanical shutter at 15fps, and electronic at up to 30fps. This sounds massively impressive until one wants to use that high speed with RAW files. Tests show that the buffer fills up in just over a second when shooting RAW. One has to drop the ES speed down to the 15fps (or use mechanical and that sounds like a tinker's cart) to get a significantly longer sequence. That kills the ES performance. The system is out of balance. What was needed was a BSI/stacked sensor that will transmit at high speed to the buffer, a buffer large enough to accommodate that throughput, and card systems that can take the data from the buffer and clear it rapidly. So, if Canon had wanted to remain compatible to the older SD card standard but have a much higher card speed, the answer was to go to the CF-Express type A slots that are compatible with SD cards and have the much higher write speeds. That's what Nikon have done. As far as the sensor performance goes: similarly, tests indicate quite a bit of noise above ISO-3200. Cramming more pixels (Photosites) onto the same size sensor does not do it any favours - it's always a balance between resolution and noise. The Photosites have to be smaller and are less efficient at light gathering, thus more noise. That is why cameras stayed in a 'sweet spot' of the mid-20MP sensor size for so long. Finally, as regards the battery grip. It is interesting that Canon previously offered grips for all but the lowest-end DSLRs. Why is a battery grip useful? It not only offers seamless access to twice the energy reserve, but has a duplicate set of controls for portrait use - which is significant when using long, heavy lenses where the grip allows one a much better ergonomic hand positions. Similarly, the grip offers more body mass that helps to bring the CofG back along a big lens, and towards the body. I am sincerely glad that Canon have released a couple of crop MILCs, and for the price the R7 is great value, despite my reservations. I am absolutely sure a huge number of people who were waiting for an APS-C. I am waiting for the camera to evolve, or a new model with the features I want. You obviously like it, but it might be worth considering that our needs are different.

@@trevor9934 The buffer issue is NOT TRUE. There is a C-RAW file system that is 1/3 the size. And there is Jpeg too. If you buy the ADATA branded UHS-II SDCARD, the buffer issue is not there. Using a slower Sanddisk Extreme Pro UHS-II is like pulling the handbrake and complaining you car can't move fast. Someone with a Sony A7IV (33MP FF camera) complained that Adobe software inserted random noise into his RAW pictures. He said: "I've called both Sony and Adobe support. Sony had me open the raw files using Imaging Edge - their proprietary software - and the issue didn't show up so they told me they won't help me. Adobe said can't do anything but the issue might get resolved whenever camera raw is updated. " Adobe software also inserted noise into the R7 C-RAW/RAW files. Someone opened the same files with DPP and the noise is not there up to 10,000 ISO. So using Adobe Software to check for ISO noise is like using a lens full of fungus and then blaming the Camera. Both Sony FF and Canon APSC exhibit the same problem so it the the Adobe Camera RAW codex that is buggy. When they do not support the new RAW files yet, Adobe probably just inserted FILM base ISO profile in order to deceive.

@@set3777As I said: I an many others like me will not want to settle for just JPG files. C-RAW is a possibility, but not for all PP systems. What this does not address is the significant shutter lag that comes with using electronic shutter at high speed. That is where the BSI/Stacked sensor would bring balance to the system. You won't convince me that this system is fit for MY purposes, it may be great for yours, and will obviously be brilliant for many others - and Canon will sell tons of them.

@@trevor9934 There is also HEIF which is 10bits that is superior to 8bits Jpeg. C-RAW is 14bits. I am not trying to convince you. I am just annoyed at ignorant people "hitting below the belt". They used to attack Nikon and Canon DSLRs for having no IBIS - without thinking! How is it possible to move the mirror, prisms, focusing sensors and imaging sensors at the same time? So Canon and Nikon sold LENES with IS and VRs instead of IBIS. BSI/STACK sensor is another attempt at "hitting below the belt". There are patents involved. However Canon now has superior AF called DPAF (dual pixel auto focus) that has been proven more accurate than Sony, Nikon, Lumix and Fujifilm AF BECAUSE Canon sensors are NOT BSI/stacked sensors made by Sony.

It should if you have an EF to RF adapter.

Erm, no. Mirrorless is still in baby steps. Battery life is subpar at best, compared to mature tech of 90D and its endless b-life. I took more than 1600 images and still had the juice left in 90d. The main and almost only advantage for ML is autofocus, not image quality. Nobody knows nor cares what camera you used to get the image. So there goes your apple and oranges comparison. Film vs Dig was something else. ML vs Dslr. ML is mostly marketing. The tech in ML could be applied to Dslrs and its liveview, like they did for 90d, but they won't.

Lol your statement makes no sense you’re just saying go to mirror less because it’s cool? FYI, ask any actual professional photographer… Once you get paid or do it for a living… you will hear a much different statement and will also find we actually still have to carry the DSLR for stills and depending on the situation. Another actual professional photography fact is the only arena mirrorless shines in is auto video. DSLRs still produce far better quality stills - that if you’re doing this for money, it’s extremely important if you match your art of the craft with quality, of course… The industry does not care how cool anything is they care AND BUY the end results. And if you’re going to spend thousands of dollars on camera equipment I assume it’s not for shits and giggles. Well logically speaking that is lol

@@jeffchristianson-ziebell7727 I can’t get into mirrorless because I feel it’s too new and too overpriced. Canon is trying to force our hand tho by removing all the IS lenses for EF one by one.

You have not said anything at all! LOL. Go for mirrorless because it's "going to be the future". LOL I'm only interested in the image quality TODAY, Tuesday.

That's lovely, mate.

Canon is no 1 in all categories even defeating Sony in the mirrorless ILC sales from Nov 2021 to Jun 2022. Canon :Made in Japan Sony: Made in China/Japan Fujifilm: Made in China

???