Brilliant and thank you. I admit my confirmation bias but I just ponied up for the R6 after the recent price drop and still have my 24-105 Mk I as my main workhorse, which makes me two for two on equine references in one sentences. 😆 Your side-by-side convinced me not to worry about getting a replacement RF lens, at least for now. .
Thanks for the comprehensive comparison! I'm considering getting the EF 24-105mm F/4 myself as a main lens for studio shoots as my kit ef-m 15-45mm and 18-55 EF-s are good but not the best!
I love the idea of the additional avenues of creativity though slower shutters from the stabilisation. I just can't justify the high price on the R5 and that lens.
Excellent comparison! I worked for years with the EF Mark 1 version, and I love this lens. I sold it to buy the RF version, but now I'm in doubt: I can get a used EF Mark 2 version (in excellent condition, like brandd new) for $490 less than a brand new RF model. Is there a big optical difference between the RF and the EF Mark2 version? Of course, I know the RF version is a little better. But my real question is, is she $490 better? =) Thank you and congratulations for the video!
I am using the 24-105 mk 2 with the 5D mk4 at the moment, it is heavier but I am enjoying using it. The spacing of the focal lengths at the wide end is better, they have also put the 85mm in the range which is useful, I think I must have had a bad copy of the 24-105 RF lens, is your RF lens sticky?
I wish they'd stop moving the buttons around. I think the button and dial layout of the 5D classic was perfect. I don't get the point of moving the dials all over the place with every model.
I’m just getting into/back into photography. Bought an R6 body and now considering options to cover this focal range. I have the adapter, so can choose from both EF and RF mount lenses. Debating between the EF v.2 ($600 used) and RF ($950 used) versions of this lens as well as the RF 24-240 ($900 new). I like the 24-240 as a one lens solution for travel and variety of shooting, but not crazy about the aperture range. Eventually I see myself owning both the 24-240 and one of the 24-105 lenses, but for now can only do one. I do like the idea of the EF and using the $ saved to buy another lens, but also like some things about the RF, including not having to use the adapter. Any thoughts on which way you would recommend for a relative newbie who wants to get out and learn?
Merhaba. Canon 17-85 USM ile 18-55 IS II sahibim. Hangisinden vazgeçmem gerektiğine karar veremedim. Sizce hangi lenste kalmalıyım. Hangisini seçmeliyim.
you can use what ever lenses you like. I only use two. the Canon 24-105 f4 L and the 70-200 f4 L both EF lenses. Build quality of the L series lenses is important when you are running around at weddings
