Тёмный

Capacitor leakage tester design & build - Part 4 

Electronics Old and New by M Caldeira
Подписаться 24 тыс.
Просмотров 20 тыс.
50% 1

You can now support the channel:
/ mcaldeira paypal.me/macaldeira
_______________ THANK YOU ________________________________
WARNING! The mosfet shown in the clean schematic in this video is wrong! It should not be a IRF540N, but rather the one mentioned in the video 2 of the series, which is a higher voltage component.
The design and build of a capacitor leakage tester to check capacitor leakage at their rated (or working) voltages in tube radio and other tube era equipment.
The linearly variable voltage implemented in the design also serves as a means of reforming old electrolytic capacitors.
I could have bought an old one and restored it, but this seemed like a better idea - designing and building a more accurate and modern one, as well as making the applied voltage linearly variable so that I can get a true reading of the leakage as the operating voltage rises.
Obviously, another requirement was safety. High voltage zaps you, and I like living.
This video is the third of the design stages of the circuit.
Have fun, and be careful - this thing has high voltages that can kill you.
The other parts of this series are available in the playlist:
• Capacitor leakage test...
You may also be interested in ...
Re-stuffing filter capacitors in this tube radio:
• Re-stuffing filter cap...
Replace Selenium rectifier with silicon diodes:
• Replace Selenium recti...

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

3 авг 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 125   
@parkjv1
@parkjv1 Месяц назад
It's been a long time since I've gone through electronics school, and this is really a great refresher! Thank you!
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Месяц назад
My pleasure
@anandawijesinghe6298
@anandawijesinghe6298 Год назад
Definitely not too much theory. Essential not only to understand the design process and operation of the device, esp when not understanding can destroy the device itself !
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
👍
@TOM-cj4ct
@TOM-cj4ct Год назад
You don't need two voltmeter, you can add a third section switch, in discharge position the voltmeter is connected directly to the cap in the others positions is connected before the ammeter. Thank you for your job and time spent on. Tom
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
👍
@carolmartin7042
@carolmartin7042 5 лет назад
Thank you for your video. I am relearning electronics after several years away from the research laboratory. The safety concerns and explanations are appreciated.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
carol Martin : one can sometimes become careless with experience, so repeated warnings about safety are never wasted.
@kevinfox7660
@kevinfox7660 4 года назад
I am building this lovely tester. In making the shunts for the meter, for the 100mA shunt, I use a 50 ohm mini multiturn pot in parallel with a 2.4 ohm resistor, likewise, for the 10mA shunt, I use 100 ohm multiturn in parallel with a 39 ohm, 1mA shunt use 1000 ohm multiturn in parallel with a 470 ohm. These values are based on the multiturn pots set at midpoint to get the shunt resistance of 2.16 ; 21.8 ; 240 ohms respectively.
@jims2222
@jims2222 3 года назад
This was an extremely interesting series and the theory was presented in a manner that is easily understood. Great job. I'd build one myself but I'm still relying on my old school IT-11 and TO-5.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 3 года назад
if they work, there’s no reason to replace them 😊
@Bobo-ox7fj
@Bobo-ox7fj Год назад
Thank you so much for these carefully laid out, properly taught insights.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
Pleasure
@GeorgeChristofi
@GeorgeChristofi 6 лет назад
Many thanks for this video. I have just built the one from Max Robinson's website before I found your series. I am actually tempted to build a copy of your design as it reads directly and consequently means the testing process of capacitors is quicker per capacitor. A very clear and concise video that makes the whole device simple to understand. Thank you once again.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
George Christofi : you’re welcome. It is very useful and I have not been tempted to change anything, which is unusual for me.
@joeteejoetee
@joeteejoetee Год назад
@@electronicsoldandnew We used to call design temptation "Feature Creep". It's often irresistible !
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
😊
@ThomasACarlos
@ThomasACarlos Год назад
Great explanation of the Shunt circuit. I have a 0 to 400vdc Power Supply. So I will be using that to feed the second half of this device. The one problem is finding the "shorting" (make before break) switch. Several switches I found do not specify if they are "shorting" or "non-shorting."
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
Yes. That is crucial, or you could burn out the meter.
@Edisson.
@Edisson. Год назад
Hi, nice project, I came across it because I'm thinking of something similar, but I want to go from 0 and end at 600V. To check the discharge of the capacitor, I intend to use a circuit from a separate discharger that I once made - a diode resistance divider, an LED is used as a control element - when it goes out, it is safe. A bipolar led was used in the discharger itself, so it doesn't matter which polarity I choose when discharging electrolytes (+ on the red terminal - it lights up red, + on the black terminal it lights up green), in this case an ordinary LED would be enough because it is necessary to keep the polarity. Nice day 🙂 Tom
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
Good luck with your project.
@Edisson.
@Edisson. Год назад
@@electronicsoldandnew Thanks
@stephanc7192
@stephanc7192 5 лет назад
Great project
@stephanc7192
@stephanc7192 4 года назад
Great series!
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
Thanks.
@Stelios.Posantzis
@Stelios.Posantzis 4 года назад
I've been enjoying this presentation. I had in fact forgotten I had partly watched this in the past. 6:15 : A tiny improvement you may want to consider, if you have more than one spare positions on the rotary switch, is to add additional progressively lower value resistors on the additional unused positions adjacent to the starting position. It's not fail-safe as one could still have the switch at one of the measurement positions before plugging the unit into the mains.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
I’ve received so many great suggestions from viewers that I’ll have to think of an upgrade soon :) The problem is that I’ve been using this as is for quite a while now and just love it.
@Stelios.Posantzis
@Stelios.Posantzis 4 года назад
@@electronicsoldandnew I'd love to build one. I've been thinking of getting a vintage one but not only the're very pricey, they're also super rare! The one additional benefit they offer is the reforming feature which might be handy in certain situations.
@Stelios.Posantzis
@Stelios.Posantzis 4 года назад
@@electronicsoldandnew There's an added benefit to simple function devices which is hard not to love: we always are aware of their limits and know not to push outside those boundaries. With complex devices, on the other hand, it's easy to forget what these boundaries are because they lie in some obscure combination of conditions which are all to easy to forget.
@lennartbenschop656
@lennartbenschop656 6 лет назад
You could have placed a diode across the 100 uA meter to protect it, so the meter would not burn out if you put it into a too low range by accident. In normal operation the diode would not conduct as the voltage drop across the meter is lower than the threshold voltage of the diode.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
Lennart Benschop : good point. Thanks.
@mrmaxgain
@mrmaxgain 9 месяцев назад
You are really good at design. And you have to get the design down on paper before you build otherwise the design becomes a problem.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 9 месяцев назад
👍
@faizmomin9658
@faizmomin9658 2 года назад
Good work 👍
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 2 года назад
thanks
@lour3548
@lour3548 3 года назад
Hi, I am completely self-taught and continuing to learn every day. I got interested in your leakage tester for a couple of reasons: 1) I have some nice tube equipment that was in great condition when I stopped using it 10+ years ago, but it's been sitting in its packing crates in my office ever since, and I'd like to be able to test the big caps (12,000uF, 100V); and 2) I am finally getting around to doing some DIY stuff that I started thinking about 15+ years ago, and I have a box full of 15+ years old Black Gate caps that have never been used. I was thinking your tester could also be used to test and possibly "re-form" any that are salvageable. So, I did my best to build your tester, only I used a 12VDC power supply and a boost converter to get an adjustable 25-390VDC. (I already had the power supply and the boost board was cheap.) Just this evening, I think I got the tester working. I have some NOS Panasonic caps from 2002 and tried one of those first. I couldn't get it to settle down once the voltage got to about 300V (330uF, 400V cap). The leakage current seemed to shoot up around that 300V point. I assume the cap is bad and beyond re-forming. I then hooked up one of the 12,000uF, 100V caps. When I turned on the current from the discharge to 100mA position, the voltage dropped to nearly zero, and after switching ranges a little, I figured out that, as the leakage current ticked down, the voltage ticked up. I kept messing with the cap until I got the voltage to around 90V and the leakage current stopped settling--in fact started getting a little jumpy--around 20-30uA. Does the tester behavior I describe make sense? For example, would you expect a very large capacitance cap to drop the voltage significantly while its leakage current settled back. I don't have enough confidence at this point to trust what I'm seeing on the meters rather than wonder if I've wired something incorrectly. FYI, I measured the voltage across the cap with my multi-meter and it was showing the same thing as the tester--a very sow tick upward as the leakage current very slowly ticked downward. Thank you in advance for any help. Stay well. Louis
@drdomestos
@drdomestos Год назад
Don't forget - the capacitor will need to charge up so you will measure current whilst this is happening and this will cause your supply voltage to drop. Once the capacitor is charged the current should drop and the voltage should stabilise. With a good capacitor, at this point you should have a very very low current flow. If not the capacitor is leaky.
@kevinfox7660
@kevinfox7660 4 года назад
The 100 ohm inrush current limiter behind the bridge rectifier should be around 2 watts.
@ianide2480
@ianide2480 7 лет назад
For the scale adjustment (100µA - 100mA) I understand the usage of paralleling a resistor with a trimpot. I assume that you set each of the ranges exactly as you calculated? Or did you set the pots with the probe wire included? I tried looking through the series but this wasn't mentioned.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
Ian Ide : I actually set the values as calculated and then checked and adjusted them by using an ammeter that I trust in series to confirm the current readings between one and the other.
@ianide2480
@ianide2480 7 лет назад
Thanks for your response on my earlier question. Before I do a smoke test on what I have created, another couple of questions popped into my head. Do you have a part number for the 12v zener diode that you used or does this not matter (will any 12v zener do the trick)? Is it possible to get this exact ampmeter to read 10μA or does involve more complex circuitry to increase the signal strength to read a lower value?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
Ian Ide : the zener voltage and power ratings are important, not the actual part number. The lowest current that the meter will read is the base meter rating, without any added shunting, and in this case it was a 100uA meter. Not sure you can actually get as low as 10uA in these meters.
@erikdenhouter
@erikdenhouter 4 года назад
I think 50 µA is the smallest scale for this type of meter, BUT. . . then the meter will be much smaller, because that 50 µA cannot move a large needle. That is the main limitation. An alternative is to design a circuit with an opamp to amplify the current, but that is for now out of my league.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
True. Using a voltage (or current) boost circuit is an option, but quite delicate at the very low readings, where that function is most important. The leakage characteristics of the opamp come into play, and I don’t think it’s that important in this case.
@carloshenrique177
@carloshenrique177 6 лет назад
Good evening, I really liked your video and I was interested in putting this device together, I would like to know which is the secondary current of the total transformer?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
Carlos Henrique Santil de Oliveira : The transformer that I use can source 30mA, but on idle it probably is sourcing about 1mA.
@budgiefish
@budgiefish 6 лет назад
Great stuff! On the selection of the mosfet, what sort of power dissipation would we be looking at given 30mA max current, I notice the mosfet you went for is rated at 370W which is very high... I'm planning on building one with a step-up transformer to get up to 600V working DC, so am looking at a STW34N65M5 rated at 710V D-S, max dissipation 190W. I'm not sure what to do about the adjustment pot situation though, as 600V across feels a bit dodgy. As for not being able to use the voltmeter across the cap as itself draws current, I presume there's not enough zeroing adjustment on the uA meter to compensate or any other way around that?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
budgiefish : Ok, lets take a minimum voltage of 50v at the output. That means that you will have a 550v drop across the mosfet. P=VI so P = 550 x 0.03 which results in less than 20W so a much lower rated mosfet could be used. The best component to use is usually the one you’ve got on hand which is why overkill was the option here. Take care about the choice of pot to take that high a voltage. Probably a higher power one? I guess you could adjust the zero offset to compensate for the voltmeter draw, but this adjustment is a mechanical one so won’t take into consideration the current range that it is set to or even alterations in voltmeter impedance. It won’t reflect an exact reading except for the range that you set it to.
@budgiefish
@budgiefish 6 лет назад
Thanks for the quick reply! I originally thought as much but started doubting myself when I saw the 370W spec on the device you chose (now I understand it was just one to hand)! I'm pondering taking it a step further and using the mosfet as a pwm driven chopper to generate the HV which would alleviate any risk of HV across the pot, or perhaps an old inverter from an LCD panel if there's any way to adjust (could be battery powered then), but they're just a passing thought at the moment :) I didn't consider the effect of the range switching on the zero offset - doh - it's getting late here (UK), that's my excuse anyway :)
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
There should be a rule that you don't mess with high voltage after a certain hour. I've made some dramatic mistakes late at night, but never learn.
@mmecanicafina3977
@mmecanicafina3977 7 лет назад
Thanks for this series of video’s, your are great at explaining the working and design process for the circuit! You have motivated me to build this, once I have got my head around the only point in the schematic that I am not completely comfortable with, that is the max voltage on the control pot. I did not have a suitable transformer available, so I sourced one at a reasonable price that is 220V to 150V-0-150V. So the output voltage range would be a bit higher, and I can resize components accordingly, but also the max voltage on the pot would rise even further over the component voltage rating. I am curious, have you seen any isolation issues with a standard pot? Finally, if I may suggest a simple addition, as you point out at 15:14 in the video during discharge the voltmeter does not show the voltage on the capacitor terminals, so there is no simple way to know when the capacitor is discharged. Instead of adding a second voltmeter, one could add a few diodes and a led to provide a visual clue that there is tension on the capacitor and to indicate when it is safe to touch it. I have recently described in an instructable (called “ Safe Capacitor Discharge Tool ) the build of a simple safe capacitor discharger, and it would be very straightforward to add a diode string, a resistor, and a led between the 47k discharge resistor and ground. One could even keep the two strings/two led circuit as described in the instructable for the case that an electrolytic charged capacitor is connected to the leakage tester with inverted polarity, and use a different color led to warn of the mistake.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+m mecanicafina : great instructable. You did a great job on that. I agree that adding this functionality would be a great benefit to the tester. I'm reluctant to go back to tamper with it as I use it very often and have found the discharge time to be acceptable and have not been zapped (yet). As for the transformer you have, you'll get either about 210vdc or double that. The former is a little low to be useful for tube equipment capacitor testing, and the higher value of about 420vdc does put quite a bit of stress on the pot. What I would do is add a switching system to add fixed resistor in series with the pot, either at the top end or on the leg to ground, so that you will set a range and then adjust the actual voltage with the pot. I have not had any sparking on mine, but it certainly left me a little nervous at first.
@drtidrow
@drtidrow 6 лет назад
M Caldeira: Digi-Key (Jameco does too, IIRC) has some 1Mohm pots that are rated for a working voltage of 500vdc, which would seem to be the way to go here... I'm assuming that "500v working voltage" means 500v connected across the resistive element in the pot.
@Ziknazoo
@Ziknazoo 5 лет назад
Nice circuit I may just build one! However, the power LED arrangement you're using is not good. An LED should never be reverse biased as it will be in your case since it's driven from an AC source. They can be damaged by that or have their lifespan significantly reduced... Add a series diode like a 1N4148 and you'll be OK. Do you find that the test voltage adjustment is non-linear because of the non-linear relationship between Vgs and Rds? I'm sure there is some, but do you find it any problem?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
Valid point about the LED. I’ve been warned about this oversight before and meant to rectify it, but haven’t yet. And the led has held on for dear life. The adjustment actually feels quite linear. I don’t notice any significant problem.
@jonathanhendry9759
@jonathanhendry9759 4 года назад
Would a 120->240ac travel voltage converter be an acceptable source of voltage for this, in place of a transformer?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
Some of those are auto-transformers, so they would be very dangerous as you would have a “hot chassis” issue. Y ou need to know for sure first.
@ronholloway7258
@ronholloway7258 7 лет назад
Hi there Why did you change the MOSFET to the IRF540n Thanks for a good tutorial Ron
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Ron Holloway : hi Ron. I didn't. I've only now realized that the mosfet in the "final" schematic is wrong. I just used one in the schematic drawing program that was available, and forgot to adjust the name. Thanks for pointing this out to me. I'll post a warning in the descriptive part of the video.
@rogeriozambotto8539
@rogeriozambotto8539 7 лет назад
Hi there...my congratus about all the videos, I liked it a lot once its very well explained. About this Capacitor Leakage tester is there a Part 5? I wonder if you have the final schematic avaliable. thanks a lot!
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Rogerio Zambotto : hi. The full series is online. The schematic is developed as the series progresses, as this was a design and build exercise.
@rogeriozambotto8539
@rogeriozambotto8539 7 лет назад
Thanks...I didnt note the Part 1 ...very good! best regards!
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Rogerio Zambotto : great. Good luck.
@frederickcwinterburn1837
@frederickcwinterburn1837 5 лет назад
I might actually build this one thanks to you. I think you actually need to have high voltage to test a capacitor properly. Ignition condensers are a prime example, but they need even more invasive testing due to the harsh conditions they live in. They need to be thumped hard to prove their worth. For your audio work, I was wondering, without any real experience doing so (so big grain of salt) if putting a poly fuse in series with the µA meter, IE right next to the meter on the upstream side of the meter could be used to limit the current and save the meter if the switch is on the wrong scale. A very large resistor could be placed in parallel with the polyfuse to soften the response (edit: and perhaps make up for the lower voltage rating of poly fuses). I have never used a poly fuse, but off the top of my head it seems like a possible solution. Thanks very much for your well thought out and practical solution rather than buying an 'iffy' and expensive leakage tester. Fred Winterburn
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
Frederick C. Winterburn : you would need to get a polyfuse rated at the max current of the meter, and I don’t think you can get them so low. The idea is sound, but the problem is finding the part. Having said that, I’ve been using this thing constantly since the build and it hasn’t failed yet. Been lucky, I guess.
@frederickcwinterburn1837
@frederickcwinterburn1837 5 лет назад
Yes, I wrote too soon. The low voltage rating of a polyfuse might be yet another reason not to use one. Thanks again for your great videos.
@Dennis-mq6or
@Dennis-mq6or Год назад
Still room for lots and lots of improvements that can improve performance, accuracy, protection, and all with less parts.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
I wait expectantly for your recommendations
@Dennis-mq6or
@Dennis-mq6or Год назад
I go into the hospital in 9 hours; but I will work up something for you as soon as I am able to. Hint: the addition of a 10 cent transistor and a resistor can turn your FET into a precision current source. If you already know the amount of leakage that would be considered unacceptable for a particular cap, you can switch the current source to 1 Ua, 5 Ua, 10 Ua, 50 Ua etc, and take your applied voltage readings from the source lead of the fet. That will give you the voltage at which the device under test starts leaking, (plus or minus 0.6 vdc), at one of the preset currents... It will require no voltage adjustments for the test and be safe to handle the leads safely until you attached a capacitor and charge it because those microamperes of current are about 10,000 times smaller than the amount of current required to do you any harm. Another point is that your microammeter should be protected by one or more diodes directly across it's terminals since there is no resistor inside it to protect it from a massive overload. The voltmeter has enough resistance inside it to protect it internally so it should not need a protection diode, Dennis #12 Frankfort, Il. . @@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
👍
@Dennis-mq6or
@Dennis-mq6or Год назад
I want to help you but I need your help first...... I am an OLD engineer quite proficient in hardware but weak in new technology, and I cannot figure out how to print out a copy of your schematic to mark up and send back to you. I could explain what has to be done but that would take me forever. I can however explain the simple stuff like protecting your current meter. Measure the ohmic value of the meter coil and multiply it by the full scale deflection value of the current it will be measuring. If that value is less than 0.6 volts you can use two back to back diodes across it's contacts to protect it from transients that would otherwise destroy it. The current limiter for the fet is just an NPN transistor with it's base connected to the source lead of the fet, it's collector lead connected to he base of the fet, and it's emitter lead connected to one end of a resistor. the other end of that resistor is connected to the base of the transistor, which is also connected to the source of the fet. The emitter of that transistor can now be considered to be the new source lead for the fet, Any current through the fet also has to go through the resistor. When the current through the resistor gets close to 0.6 vdc, the transistor starts to turn on, and when that happens it lowers the voltage at the gate of the fet, By that interaction, you create a current source that can be adjusted by varying the value of that resistor. Normally, that would be all you would need to do, but because your voltage adjustment system is not a regulated one, (it's only a filtered capacitor system that can vary the voltage but cannot regulate it), it complicates the current limiter system. And is the reason why I need a hard copy of the schematic. If you could message me on Facebook with a printable copy of the schematic, it would be all I would need.... Regards Dennis O. Frankfort, Illinois. @@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
Thanks for your input, Dennis. However, I will not be changing this design. For one, it’s been in constant use for quite a few years now, with absolutely no problems, and secondly, I have other projects that I’m working on right now which take up all my time. As regards the current limiting of the Mosfet circuit using a BJT, it’s a function I used in the tube tester circuit that I posted recently. I am thankful for your interest, and feel free to post here as it will help others adjust their builds if they wish.
@alfredneumann4692
@alfredneumann4692 5 лет назад
One question to this wonderful video: with the 100Kohm under the 1 Mohm pot you get a minimal test-voltage of about 30 Volts. How do you test elcos with 12 or 24 Volts, which are available?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
Alfred Neumann : I can’t test those unfortunately. If I want to I set it up using my lab power supply and an ammeter in series.
@1Mong0
@1Mong0 3 года назад
Would changing that resister to lower the minimum voltage down to 12v be a problem?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 3 года назад
It would work, but then you’re increasing the voltage across the pot which it may not like 😃
@darrylgodfrey9604
@darrylgodfrey9604 3 года назад
@@electronicsoldandnew I had a slightly similar issue: I couldn't find a 400VDC meter, so settled on a 300V model and therefore put the 100k resistor on the high side of the pot giving me from zero to just over 300V - good enough. It does mean I can test the little 16V electrolytics that come my way occasionally plus I also get a reduced voltage drop across the pot. The pot I used is supposed to be good for 500V in any case.
@idiotwithasolderingiron
@idiotwithasolderingiron 5 лет назад
What are y'alls thoughts on taking a 120vac input 24vac output stepdown transformer and using it in reverse to take 120vac and stepping it up to 600vac. This would give me 845vac after my rectification. Right???
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
IDIOT WITH A SOLDERING IRON : be very careful with those voltages. Need higher rated caps and the pot can’t handle it either.
@idiotwithasolderingiron
@idiotwithasolderingiron 5 лет назад
@@electronicsoldandnew I understand upping the ratings on components to match. Is my logic sound?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
IDIOT WITH A SOLDERING IRON : you can use that back to back transformer option as long as you are aware of the high voltages, component ratings, and high currents that flow in the low voltage ends of both transformers. Be careful!
@budgiefish
@budgiefish 6 лет назад
I think I'm going to build the HV voltage source from freely available (battery powered) 5V->1200V converters out there.. that'll limit the current somewhat and be cheaper to build without the transformer (also using part of a circuit on edn.com to regulate 0-500V in a different way, optoisolated and avoid the HV pot issue)... I'm wondering though, what sort of power rating the shunt resistor and trimmer pots need to be in the situation where there could be a capacitor draw max current (go short) under test?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
As you’re looking at very small currents, your choice seems wise. Calculate the rating with the normal power formula: P=V2 / R using the maximum voltage you’re going to apply.
@budgiefish
@budgiefish 6 лет назад
Thanks ... Given the 100mA setting with a shunt of your calculated 2.16 ohms, say in your case a cap went dead short during test at 300V, doesn't that make a potential 300*300/2.16 = 56.7kW through the 20R and 3.3R resistors assuming unlimited current (not the case)? Of course your 12K current limiting resistor (which itself could get fairly toasty) ought to prevent that making the P=I2R equation more relevant. In my case I do want to go to 500V though (600 would be good but I only have a 500V panel meter!) so I guess max voltage on such trimmers is more an issue (400V rated but insulation tested to 500V looking at Bourns specs). Another thing I thought of doing is making the discharge position switch over the voltmeter to across the cap so you can see the discharge... Then another position between discharge and 100mA which just reconnects the voltmeter to source so you don't forget that you're at high voltage before switching into 100mA setting... So Discharge,Standby,100mA,10mA,1mA,100uA (probably another pole layer on the switch needed!)
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 6 лет назад
budgiefish : the 12k resistor is there to limit the current to a max of 30mA, which is the rating of the transformar. So far this has worked wonderfully as it is, but new ideas are a great stimulator for improvement. I built this quite some time ago, so don’t have the full workings in mind as regards the effects of changes, but go ahead and experiment (carefully) with a lower voltage and see what works best for you. Enjoy.
@ThomasACarlos
@ThomasACarlos Год назад
I just built this circuit (as described in my other pots). It seems like the discharge cap needs to be a lower value. It takes a long time for the caps to discharge. Instead of 47K, maybe a 4.7K?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew Год назад
It only takes longer for high value caps at high voltage. If you make the resistor smaller, the current surge when you switch it to discharge can be very large and damage your switch, so don’t make it too small.
@Sanyesz855
@Sanyesz855 27 дней назад
Hi, can I leave out the 100k resistor under the potentiometer? Doesn't fet cause problems? It would be nice if I could set the voltage from zero, I have an irfp460 which is good up to 500 volts. Thanks!
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 27 дней назад
The MOSFET isn’t the problem. The issue is with the actual pot having the full voltage across it. If you have a pot rated for that high a voltage, then there should be no problem.
@Sanyesz855
@Sanyesz855 27 дней назад
@@electronicsoldandnew Thanks for the answer, the potentiometer is 2 watts
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 27 дней назад
That’s good, but check the maximum voltage rating too.
@Sanyesz855
@Sanyesz855 27 дней назад
@@electronicsoldandnew Hi, big old Soviet potentiometer :) Has a capacitor shorted during measurement? What protects the meter then? I'm thinking about installing this protection, maybe a diode with a low opening voltage... In parallel with the meter, have you thought about this? thanks
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 27 дней назад
Have a look at the updated project video on the leakage tester. It’s been implemented 👍
@tonypattinson5528
@tonypattinson5528 2 года назад
At time 8:58 you state that you have calculated the voltage drop across the meter at FSD to be 0.216 V but do not state how. To calculate it you would need to know the sensitivity of the meter. Did you have the specifications for the meter or did you measure the volt drop at 100 micro A? BTW I am also refurbihing some boat anchors and intend to build the capacitor leak tester.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 2 года назад
I don’t actually remember how I determined that, but it’s easy to measure. Just place a large resistor in series with the meter, and connect it to a variable power supply. Then increase the voltage until you get 100uA and work it out from that:
@idiotwithasolderingiron
@idiotwithasolderingiron 5 лет назад
I was just on eBay and the good heathkit testers are $200 and up now.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 5 лет назад
They are going up. But the fun of building it myself is still the main reason for the project.
@jonka1
@jonka1 4 года назад
I think it would be safer if you put a schottky diode across the meter. If you are monitoring leakage on a low current settingand the cap decides to partly short you will loose your meter as the circuit has no protection below 30 mA. I have known selector switches to have bad or open connections and again you will loose your meter.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
jonka1 : good suggestion. Thanks.
@geoffpickles9064
@geoffpickles9064 7 лет назад
hello, firstly this is a great series of video's and has inspired me to build one. i've just built my first guitar valve amp and would like to make one for testing valve amp caps. i have a power transformer which i have bridge rectified and have a B+ of 450VDC,if i use a 100UA panel meter for the leakage would i have to recalculate the value of the shunt resistors?
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Geoff pickles : hi Geoff. Firstly, you need to be very careful using these voltage levels. If you build the circuit as described, you don't need to recalculate the resistors. The only difference between yours and mine is that you'll be able to get to test at a higher voltage. Again, be careful. Check component power and voltage ratings and test it in a controlled environment. Always assume the worst when you first test the gear, and stay safe.
@geoffpickles9064
@geoffpickles9064 7 лет назад
Hi, thank you for your good advice,i have a current limiter etc and safety comes 1st! i've already altered the resistors in the B+ to 3W 500V ratings and was just unsure about the shunt resistors.as you know most electrolytics and coupling caps in valve amps are 450-630volts and the spare PT i had just happened to give 450V,i have quite a few NOS mullard mustard caps which i would like to use in future builds and now i can test them before installing them thanks again for sharing your knowledge&video's
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Geoff pickles : you're welcome. Enjoy.
@geoffpickles9064
@geoffpickles9064 7 лет назад
Hi, just one last question! is 2.2R,22R and 240R the total shunt resistance including the trim pots? i'm just thinking i could miss out the trim pots and keep it as simple as possible,i'll only be using the unit for short leakage tests not reforming old capacitors
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Geoff pickles : its the total including the trimmers.
@erikdenhouter
@erikdenhouter 4 года назад
The problem with the pot on 340 Volt could be solved with one flip switch with double contacts. I would not keep that out, because testing on low Voltage caps is just as important as the rest. A pot of 500K between two 500K resistors, and a double switch that shorts or the top- or the bottom resistor. Adds 'some' safety too when only testing on lower Voltages.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 4 года назад
Erik den Houter : true. You can actually reduce the stress on the pot considerably. Good idea.
@erikdenhouter
@erikdenhouter 4 года назад
Thanks. And good job, I thought it is a simple but well acting schematic.
@noelguerrero2770
@noelguerrero2770 7 лет назад
A clearer image of the complete schematic would help. Anyway thanks. My screen shot is not clear enough.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 7 лет назад
+Noel Guerrero : haven't a clue where that is now. Skim through the videos in the series and all the components are described.
@rduwe9466
@rduwe9466 11 месяцев назад
I think if you accedently short the testleads of the capacitor tester you will blow up your ampmeter
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 11 месяцев назад
Two reversed diodes across the meter will protect against that happening
@lour3548
@lour3548 3 года назад
Hi, I am completely self-taught and continuing to learn every day. I got interested in your leakage tester for a couple of reasons: 1) I have some nice tube equipment that was in great condition when I stopped using it 10+ years ago, but it's been sitting in its packing crates in my office ever since, and I'd like to be able to test the big caps (12,000uF, 100V); and 2) I am finally getting around to doing some DIY stuff that I started thinking about 15+ years ago, and I have a box full of 15+ years old Black Gate caps that have never been used. I was thinking your tester could also be used to test and possibly "re-form" any that are salvageable. So, I did my best to build your tester, only I used a 12VDC power supply and a boost converter to get an adjustable 25-390VDC. (I already had the power supply and the boost board was cheap.) Just this evening, I think I got the tester working. I have some NOS Panasonic caps from 2002 and tried one of those first. I couldn't get it to settle down once the voltage got to about 300V (330uF, 400V cap). The leakage current seemed to shoot up around that 300V point. I assume the cap is bad and beyond re-forming. I then hooked up one of the 12,000uF, 100V caps. When I turned on the current from the discharge to 100mA position, the voltage dropped to nearly zero, and after switching ranges a little, I figured out that, as the leakage current ticked down, the voltage ticked up. I kept messing with the cap until I got the voltage to around 90V and the leakage current stopped settling--in fact started getting a little jumpy--around 20-30uA. Does the tester behavior I describe make sense? For example, would you expect a very large capacitance cap to drop the voltage significantly while its leakage current settled back. I don't have enough confidence at this point to trust what I'm seeing on the meters rather than wonder if I've wired something incorrectly. FYI, I measured the voltage across the cap with my multi-meter and it was showing the same thing as the tester--a very sow tick upward as the leakage current very slowly ticked downward. Thank you in advance for any help. Stay well. Louis
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 3 года назад
Your tester is working perfectly. With the big cap, the initial current draw just to charge it will drop a significant voltage across the current limit resistor. When it finally charges, only the leakage current will flow. This should also drop as it forms, so exactly as you describe. At the uA range, you’re getting the jumpy needle because it’s actually measuring sporadic discharges (leaks) within the cap, which too is normal.
@lour3548
@lour3548 3 года назад
Thank you very much for your quick and helpful reply. I managed to find your video on reforming caps, and I realized you touched on some of my questions there. Sorry for not seeing that earlier. But, your reply here adds clarity and makes me feel better about what I'm seeing. Best.
@electronicsoldandnew
@electronicsoldandnew 3 года назад
👍
Далее
Invention Release! Carlson LV Capacitor Leakage Tester.
43:02
#744 Measuring Capacitor Leakage (easy and cheap)
47:04
ПОДВОДНЫЙ ГЕЙМИНГ #shorts
00:22
Просмотров 1,3 млн
iPhone 15 Pro в реальной жизни
24:07
Просмотров 444 тыс.