Capitalism, Socialism, and the Jews 

He was an academic. A theorist. Dudn't work in the private sector like most Phds.

@@silvervalleystudios2486 because he understood in places like that you have to be with the incrowd or be left out of anything altogether. He was for freedom of policy and change for bettering things but in circles in positions like that. You are all about gaining status and the most you can take advantage of from your position of power. Of course those types of people wouldn’t take his advice because it would mean not caring about your own selfish needs but the betterment of what you’re actually supposed to look out for

Those being who are only interested in making monetary profit off others

I'm assuming solutions Milton came up with would've been too much work for a politician to give a second thought.

They took his advice, more profits for themselves. National goodness be damned.

Fascinating stuff

Nicholas Corliss its actually better

"Tolerate?" Did you pay for this video?

Imagine, our forebears thought this was acceptable quality

​​@@j.c.1902 These particular CIA pawns are individualists. They think everything is for them.

Lo que Dr Fridman sostiene es el gran intervencionismo estatal que se da en muchos países incluidos los EEUU en el área de manufactura y banca por ejemplo. Por eso los judíos prosperaron mucho más en otras áreas de la economía, las más libres (por lo menos al principio). En el caso de Alemania nazi es un modo de capitalismo dirigista con fuerte injerencia del Estado pero sin llegar a modificar el carácter de propiedad de los medios de producción que seguían siendo privados, lo contrario de la URSS en que fue abolida la propiedad privada. La Alemania nazi estaba más cerca en algunos aspectos de la China actual que de la URSS

The Jews funded hitler, who was a jew

True. Nazi Party was an abbreviation for National Socialist German Workers Party. Hitler was a socialist.

That's exactly what he said...successful in Germany BEFORE national socialism...

Quite correct! Nazism was called National Socialism for a reason.

The Middle East is always in competition of claims about being the first everything

@@tiagomoraes1510 I’m not denying any claims on anything but pointing out what the Middle East always brags about as if they created humanity or something like that

​@@c.galindo9639so the same claims made by Western chauvinists

@@0fficerpimp a lot of people want that claim so take your pick

Europe to always claim to be the first in everything and this man even claimed Africans never invented a wheel. How did he know that?

They use capitalism as a stepping stone to get to communism

​@@Huskerguy316Exactly

As a Jew, I disagree.

​@@dantheman4168the grass is green.

Except Jews are as highly targeted and murdered as Christians under socialist and communist systems. Sure, they may profit under the economic application of the theories, but socialism and communism are fundamentally not economic systems but socio-national systems, which means armed force is the primary means of achieving and maintaining such systems. As a result, Jews and other conservative groups tend to die in huge numbers under such revolutionary systems. Are the socialist elements identifiable within Judaism? Sure, those same elements exist within Christianity, albeit much less pronounced. However, both are equally targeted by revolutionary movements because of the fundamentally conservative nature of Judeo-Christian values. Ergo, regardless if it's left or right revolution, conservative belief systems including Jew and Christian are targeting and often killed as an integral part of the revolutionary movement coming to, and maintaining, power.

International Jews made Bolshevik Revolution and controlled USSR.

It's no mystery. They're just pulling up the ladder behind them.

It’s because once they acquire wealth they want absolute power which can only happen in a system that favors elites over the common people

@@franbatista9062 correction. Some did yet most suffered. Not all of the people who benefited in from the USSR were Jewish and would go against Jews as well as any other people that may be a threat to their system to control everyone

@miriamlevin it seems like you can’t be too prosperous or else you may be considered a threat to others

How you doing?

Yes, winners win, losers lose.

​@@emmanuelgoldstein8233I love your name! 😂 "For over a thousand years Roman conquerors returning from the wars enjoyed the honor of triumph, a tumultuous parade. In the procession came trumpeteers, musicians and strange animals from conquered territories, together with carts laden with treasure and captured armaments. The conquerors rode in a triumphal chariot, the dazed prisoners walking in chains before him. Sometimes his children robed in white stood with him in the chariot or rode the trace horses. A slave stood behind the conqueror holding a golden crown and whispering in his ear a warning: that all glory is fleeting."

You know when I look up the Galindo surname, a whole bunch of stuff on Human Trafficking and money laundering comes up, how come that is?

@@adambeaulieu2655 because it is a surname derived from Spanish conquest throughout the Americas. I am certain I have many distant relatives I don’t know about in Mexico participating in such activity but going into my bloodline here in the US. It can vary as I have relatives in many other states with that part of my Family

Exactly how? In the USSR, public displays of Judaic relgion was banned (same with Christianity), so was Zionism (Jewish nationalism). Many Jews were executed, imprisoned (my great-grandfather for example) and sent to Gulags for "anti-communist" actions and sentiments. It is also known that Stalin basically planned some sort of action against the entire Russian Jewish population, but died before he could do so. The Jews suffered in the USSR just like everyone else, why do you think so many of them escaped to Israel in the 90s? I know you'll bring up the fact that that many Bolsheviks were Jews, which is true, but also true is the fact that by the 40s, most of the early-Bolshevik Jews were executed during Stalin's purges. From the 50s to the 90s, Jews were no longer disproportionally reprsented within the Soviet leadership, with Kaganovich being the only exepction. So yeah, while many Jews were responsable for creating communism, you can't say that the Jewish population "benefited" from it. I mean, Trotsky was a Jew, nd he basically turned a blind eye to a pogrom that Tsarist supporters launched upon Moacow's Jews during the civil war. So much for Jewish tribalism, ha?

@@gabikogan7473 very interesting

LOL yeah the jews were the only ones who live well under socialism

@Vecxio Wrong. Stalin was a National Bolshevik/Communist.

@@gabikogan7473 thanks for educating the person who only knows of some Jewish person who helped communism in the USSR yet didn’t take into account the entirety of the Jewish community to know better. It actually is better with someone with more personal insight on the issue such as yourself who has had family history in that country. Thank you and my condolences to the wrong against your elders in the past

Guido Ahsam same shit, different name.

Because the incentive to loot is higher and the wealth is almost thought of as a given thing. I lived in Vietnam for 12 years. I noticed that in that place people would not think of material things or even survival as something granted.

​@@germandiagogomez Is the incentive to loot only higher for the wage earners or for everyone including the bosses too?

@@1wun1 for everyone. However, if you have competition for workers, the salaries go naturally higher by the incentives themselves: I give up part of my earnings to make sure I keep having earnings by getting the better workers and paying more. Unlike when the same people (government) who loot you have also the police and the power to regulate. In that case they can smash you and if you complain, put you in jail or hit you, take your wealth and do anything. Something normal business just cannot do in the presence of competition, because if you are not silly, and I do not think you are, you will just give your back to a business that loots you. The natural choice is that you go somewhere else to find something similar. Also, more competition in one area means better and cheaper services, something that intervention prevents from happening. A big difference, if you ask me.

@@germandiagogomez You're not wrong on that, but history shows only the red scare made western societies seriously care for their lower ranking. Bosses are anything but fools, sometimes they unite in a cartel. Plenty of events show that the gvt would harm you on behalf of businesses, the Ludlow massacre being a good example.

In commercial banking. The real money is in and has always been in investment banking. That's where they are largely overrepresented.

@@KurtGodel432 And Commercial Property.

contributions? like crashing the world economy three times?

The bible demands Christians to do it

Credit card interest is so high because its unsecured lending. Basically youre paying to smooth over the bank's losses due to deadbeat defaulters.

What about “the market”?

Ummm thats legit false

@JOHN WICK my response is to the “have ever controlled” that’s just not correct, America used tobacco as money which people (not banks or governments) grew to a large extent in order to use more in trade. Commodity money like gold and silver dome from privste mints, gold smiths etc. Crypto currencies currently there’s numerous examples of money. Of course now it’s a debt based system where we use national currencies as our medium of exchange. Rsther then the markets choice of money/people’s choice of money. Sea shells that washed up on shore have been money to certain groups. Read hayeks “denationalization of money”

Sure, as a "station copy" on (much cheaper) BW tape.

In the description below it says 1978.

@@avie3593 the description also mentions 1977. (They're only one year apart, and that's "close enough.)

didnt notice that. thanks for pointing it out. Begin was elected in june 77, since he said recently, youre probably right that it was in 77.

@@avie3593 I just watched the video to the very end and it says 1977. :)

So self hating? Cause a lot of havoc is being done

That's the exact opposite of actual Jewish behaviour.

@@lutherblissett9070Says it right in the talmud :)

You mean they are doing exactly the opposite? Not sure if your English is bad or it's an intentional and deceitful statement.

@@happy_thinking Friedman claimed the FED in the 30s should have increased the money supply, to give assistance to failing banks. A depression would still have happened, he claimed, but a milder one, without a run on the banks. There are several vids on RU-vid wherein he clearly states these theories. But for a more in-depth account, read his A Monetary History of the United States'. Whether Friedman would've supported a bail-out is debatable, but it's a fact that he criticized the FED's response to the crisis in regards to being the lender of last resort.

@@JAMAICADOCK If I remember correctly what he criticized was the whole fiasco that led to the shortage of money supply(tariffs, locking the dollar to gold and then hoarding gold, etc) In his opinion, the FED was the one most responsible for making A depression into the GREAT depression.

@@happy_thinking He also criticized the FED's response to the crisis, in terms of lending to struggling banks.In other words he favored a cut in the interest rate, or the equivalent thereof. And he certainly concurred with Keynes' assertion that a speculative bubble played a key role in the panic. The FED didn't take all the blame, Animal Spirits played their part too. Friedman was not a free-market fundamentalist. He even stood by his early support of the New Deal, but only in regards to a war economy. Friedman was more Neo Keynesian than Neo Classical. Which is why Mises accused him of being a socialist. Friedman also claimed that Hayek was more a philosopher than an economist.

@@msteve2233 Either way, he recommended pumping liquidity into the banks to stop a run and a severe 30s style recession, That seemed to be the advice he was giving to central bankers, regardless of the deflation. in the run up to the Great Depression, Well if he was telling central bankers only to bail out banks in a deflationary spiral, he didn't make himself clear,

And? Communists are subversive and borderline insane. Getting rid of them is good practice.

1977

Arabs are also semetic peoples but anti-semitism always refers to prejudice against Jews.