It’s actually really easy you just need the right surface Carpet: will work but is rough Wood: near impossible Poker mat like what poker tables are made of: perfect
Variation that I use: instead of cutting into three piles, spread the cards and ask the spectator to touch the card they think is the five of hearts. You look at it to verify, claim it's right, then have another spectator touch the card you actually saw. Continue like this with the look ahead for as many times as you want. You go last, and select the top card, the original five of hearts. Same trick, but you let spectators select cards from the deck.
Nice trick sir! It's like the 3 card intuition trick where they shuffle the deck but you glance at the bottom card then spread the entire deck of cards on the surface but mindful of where you've placed that bottom card. Usually right at the bottom closest to yourself. But then get the volunteer to point/ choose any card. But make sure it's yourself that picks it up. So they think that they've somehow magically pointed to the cards that you have predicted. Sounds confusing I guess but a better effect and a bit more magical imo. 👍😎
Very cool trick. Its an oldie, but goodie. Thanks for showing it. I almost forgot about it. Lol. I know you are time limited in the videos, but try these ideas. You probly already know these other routines. - You know the top card and do false cuts and shuffles, and keep it on top. -- You know the bottom card, and shuffle it or cut it to the top.
What might be even better is not shuffling the last 3 cards, but rather arranging their order when you add them to the pile of 3. Surreptitiously, of course!
I do a trick similar to this, but it is slightly more difficult. It's the same concept, but instead of splitting the deck up, you spread the deck all over the table (like how kids shuffle a deck). You need to know what the bottom card was and keep track of it as you spread the deck out. Tell them to find whatever the bottom card was, and it's the same principle as what's done in the video except you let the spectator point out whatever card they think is the card you've identified.
@@dcunited01 yes it's an awesome trick. Especially when the spectator actually picks the bottom card, I'll let them pick it up and see that it's the card I told them to find
The final shuffle made me suspect. I guess there could be a way to reorder the cards taken. Maybe putting them on top of the rest of the cards one by one?
You lost the “trick”. He pointed it out how it is done. Watch it again carefully. The first time it’s done is done for the audience. Then he reveals the “trick” the next time. He doesn’t say anything about what the cards are after shuffling.
2 года назад
@@Keifer-D you missed the point of the comment. As spectators, we see the shuffle and we think: why? Now the cards he said that are from each pile are mixed! I (spectator) suspect that the shuffle has a reason: hide the (wrong) order of the cards.
@ - but the comment was “it was obvious you were just reading the cards” (after the shuffle) But in reality, he ready out the cards before the 3 card shuffle.
I've done the same trick but did not turn all the cards over, just shuffled the cards looking at the bottom card and making sure that the bottom card ended up on top. Then I'd let them make 4 or 5 stacks and tell what each of the top cards are.
I do it where I know the bottom card then I spread the cards out face down. I tell them to pull two cards and slide it to me, then I pull the last card.
If I was the spectator I would just shuffle it again when you saw it. Then what would you do then? Would you look at it again? But then I would shuffle it again.
