Another attempt by Jung to interpret late events in light of his psychological theory, particularly the idea that we all have a "shadow." And yeah, that cute sound is the cat, and that weird sound is my dog.
Jung had a profound understanding of the dangers of inferiority complexes and the susceptibility of the human psyche for a mass psychosis while in this state. I personally believe we are witnessing a perfect storm similar to the political climate during the second world war and directly leading up to it. It seems the populous is just waiting for its leader.
Every outlet of aggression for humans has been neatly sterilized or made illegal. People are waking up to the fact that very few have most of the stuff. The fuel is already there its waiting for a match
@@frauleinhohenzollern This I greatly fear more than anything, because they will start as an angel of light and end up the biggest worse Demon in history.
“Poets, prophets and reformers are all picture-makers -- and this ability is the secret of their power and of their achievements. They see what ought to be by the reflection of what is, and endeavor to remove the contradiction” ― Frederick Douglass
Oh my do certain cycles strike a chord of familiarity in me. The leaders which the masses choose from, are truly a reflection of themselves. Left/Right, Left/Right, all the while being intentionally blind to his tory. Woe, Woe, Woe
My shadow says to shut that cat up. I mean I miss my four cats of childhood. The lack of professionalism in your reading is fine as I am not paying you for the share. Thanks. For the reading and memory of my cats.
“Man is something that shall be overcome. Man is a rope, tied between beast and overman - a rope over an abyss. What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end.” ― Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra “Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War “The only real revolution is in the enlightenment of the mind and the improvement of character, the only real emancipation is individual, and the only real revolutionists are philosophers and saints.” ― Will Durant, The Lessons of History
Yes. Just a dumbed down version. Same villain, same victim. That's the lesson he's teaching, and all that is crammed into the empty heads of the neutered masses today. No-one will think for themselves. There are questions No-one dares ask...Why? A child has the sense to ask the obvious. I can't see for everyone, and RU-vid won't let me tell what I see. It's all clear and right in front of your faces. I feel like I'm sitting at the death bed of the West...It's dying, being killed, and it doesn't have the sense to just stand up, and get out of bed to save its self....Yet im the bad guy for suggesting it. Trust your instincts no matter who or how many say otherwise. YOUR instincts, not the ideas of others, that you have subconsciously adopted as truth. Carl Jung is no better than well think of the most despicable media person, right or left, that you know. It pains me to say that because think he makes sense. However, he's not being honest. He's just reading the script he has to read.
Jung can describe _projection_ as part of political psychology, but he never adresses actual _conflict of interest_ as in regard to the revision of the Versailles Treaty system or the international role of a unified German nationstate (dominating the European continent by geography and industrialization up to this day). His concept of Swiss democracy with it's major plebiscites appears to be quite _idealized_ as well (up to the 1970s women didn't had to bother themselves with the 'civil war' of policies), once _illegal immigration_ hits not just the liberal urban centres, but also the conservative countryside the humanistic consensus of the Republic will shift to the Right - that is the _primordial drive_ of nationalism that occupies the 'blind spot' whenever civilizations have burned up their meagre supplies of spirituality (he certainly had a point there, but never tried himself to reform the Church either as others did, e.g. Hans-Urs v. Balthasar who helped to popularize *patristic thought* , thereby preventing to make 'discoveries' like 'archetypes' himself).
@@samuelpoulston2964 "You don't believe Nazism to have been a mass psychosis, then?" One can characterize European fascism as a movement that carricaturized sound statecraft due to it's _demogogic_ rhetorics, adressed to wishful thinking. But there's a _structural_ reason why the movement gained substantial momentum at the end of the 'War to end all wars'. To dehumanize one's political opponent as _insane_ is always convenient. Odd that the *_'revolt against modernity'_* is such a persistent 'clinical symptom', against which no remedy seems to show effects...
@@christophmahler Jung was a psychologist and looks at fascism through a psychological lens, something which is rarely observed. It's far more common to see it described as political/ social movement. But that does not explain its psychological tendencies such as the aggressive need for a scapegoat to project all of one's failures on to (Jews). Sure, some of this may be down to political persuasion and coercion and propaganda, but it does not explain the rage-like tendency to go after one's opponent and determination to exterminate them from the face of the earth. "To dehumanize one's political opponent as insane is always convenient". To assume that insanity is to dehumanize is to fail to see the human being at all.. Jung, for example, had to treat his schizophrenic patients in secret because they were considered un-treatable. I think if you read him more, you will find that he does explain the change in the German psychological make up and how the war forced a collective German consciousness from their possession back into sobriety.
@@samuelpoulston2964 "Jung was a psychologist and looks at fascism through a psychological lens (...)" And that is why his theories shouldn't be taken as scientific insights into politics. "But that does not explain its psychological tendencies such as the aggressive need for a scapegoat (...)" It does - as 'scapegoating' is the oldest form of demagoguery - which is why the Jews introduced the religious practice of sending a goat into the desert, _symbolically_ burdened with the sins and curses of a community, in the first place. "the rage-like tendency to go after one's opponent and determination to exterminate them (...)" That is the _normal_ state of secular culture as proven by the English and French Revolution with it's proscriptions and propaganda. It is religious practice that eases that natural drive, enabling men to coexist and 'to love another'. It is no coincidence that Christianity gained momentum at the decline of the Roman Empire - with provincial ethnicities and cults striving for dominance and civil war. "To assume that insanity is to dehumanize is to fail to see the human being at all (...)" That statement doesn't make sense as it would force You to look for rational incentives within European fascism - which You reject. "I think if you read him more (...)" That is always the worst argument in a debate as it makes Your point appear so complicated that only a priestly caste of orthodox specialists can have an opinion on the matter. Politics is always _easy_ to grasp, because it is about common, mundane *interests* . One doesn't need Freudian psychoanalytics in order to comprehend *_Caesarian delusion_* .
I think I've got it calibrated better now. For a long time I didn't use ads at all, but then I noticed that they were putting ads all over my content anyway. So then, what do you do? But I've now got it set to minimal skippable ads. I just don't like the idea of companies basically making money off of free work, which happens to everyone all the time. It's been a learning process, but hopefully I'm achieving a balance. We do need to stop working for tech companies and corporations for free.
If ya don’t like it go somewhere else. No ones forcing you to watch this video. Clearly you haven’t figured your shit out. There’s helpful criticism and then just being an ass.
this one feels kind of like a cop-out to me. it's one of those hindsight things. If things had turned out differently he would have said a different thing, that Hitler was great. Of course no one can say whether or not this assessment is true, but I tend to think that it is.
When we look within our hearts we don't find the truth there because the truth is external. The truth is outside of us. The truth is written in scripture in the bible. The gospel is the power of God for salvation. We come to faith by hearing the word of Jesus Christ. Believers are awakened by the power of the Holy Spirit to believe in the truth of the word of God. The Holy Spirit of "truth" will guide us into all truth that is written in scripture / Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life, no one can come to the Father except through Him. John 14:6/ For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
@@zion367 Looking within our hearts cannot awaken us . The Holy Spirit awakens us. The Holy Spirit of truth who lives in the hearts of believers awakens us and guides us into all truth that is written in scripture in the bible. As Christians, we read, study and meditate on God's word. The Holy Spirit helps us to believe, understand, and to be obedient to God's word in the bible.
