Cartier's Most Famous & Iconic Tiaras 

We don’t know the situation or the huge number of variables at play, so I guess we’ll have to accept it as it was. I know for sure that at Queen Elizabeth’s coronation, they squeezed a huge number of people into the Abbey, but this wasn’t possible at Charles’ coronation because of modern fire codes. As a result, the peers of the realm and their wives couldn’t all be at Charles’ much smaller service to march in procession in order of precedence; since the wives were the ones who would have worn family tiaras, it’s my feeling that they decided not to have them worn at all. But, who knows? It was a beautiful service, anyway!

There were no tiaras and jewels other the King and Queen, because of the cost of living crisis, it was stripped back to the basics needed instead of all out showing their inherited jewels.

It is a canned accented voice. As evidenced by pronunciation & enunciation.

@@cadavis5314 I realize that but they are still telling it what to say, and it’s written incorrectly.

Your comment is just crap 💩

​@@erin6083, I bet the videos you create are perfect. I would like to check them out. Can you share a link? 😅

@@mrs.hspages3044 there are minor errors and then there are mistakes. that words was just plain old used incorrectly. i hope the author reads these comments and learns for future videos.

Thanks for watching :)

Thanks for your feedback!

The more you know

Many thanks for your feedback!

Many thanks for watching!

Glad that you like it 😉

@@JewelleryPleasure 🥰🥰🥰👍👍

I agree. It almost disappeared in her hair.

It was beautiful- and chosen for her by QEII.

The narrator was incorrect in saying she chose the ,Cartier Halo Tiara as her wedding tiara. The late Queen allows royal brides to borrow their wedding tiaras and afterwards, she would be by her discretion allow said tiara and a few others to be on lifetime loan to the royal lady in question.

Maybe she didn’t want to.

Wow! Thanks for your support!

Думаю этой тиаре , подошло бы название - королева - кобра )))

I mean its not that hard to understand why they're choosing to dial it back. People have been complaining about funding the royal family's lavish lifestyle with taxpayers' money for a long time now. I also hate that we don't get to see more of their collection though...

Но она же невеста , нежность и невинность , ….

It was a rhetorical question, I know that's why. And on that point, I regret that they don't have the panache of Maria-Pia of Savoy, Queen of Portugal, who once replied to this kind of popular criticism: "If they want a queen, they have to pay for it!" But I think there's also a loss of taste and knowledge of decorum. That's what struck me about Charles's coronation. An accumulation of errors of taste, one feels that the first concerned have no longer any understanding of what they should be and do.