Тёмный

cEDH Tournaments Have BIG Problems 

Lemora's Cards
Подписаться 12 тыс.
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
50% 1

Next up: "cEDH Decks in Japan are WILD | Top 12 Breakdown"
• cEDH Decks in Japan ar... -~-
cEDH tournaments have been growing in popularity and quantity, but today Eric and I discuss how they currently aren't fulfilling the role they could be. We talk about the major pros of cEDH and how tournaments fail to highlight these, the importance of storyline and personalities in competitive broadcasting, and what we'd like to see done to make cEDH coverage as engaging as it should be.
Dope cEDH Merch: lemorascards.c...
🔮RECOMMENDED VIDEOS/PLAYLISTS🔮
📽VIDEO: cEDH - How to Get Started in 4 Minutes: • cEDH - How to Get Star...
📽PLAYLIST: Learning cEDH Podcast: • Learning cEDH Podcast
🔮AFFILIATES:
Inked Gaming: www.inkedgamin...
💜JOIN THE LEMORA COMMUNITY💜
Patreon: / lemorascards
Twitter: / lemorascards
Linktree: linktr.ee/lemo...
#cedh #mtg #edh

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 78   
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
This video is a bit different than what you might expect from me typically, but I hope that if you listen to everything we lay out here you'll see that we're coming from a position of caring and wanting good things for the community, success for organizations that choose to highlight cEDH, and an environment that promotes accessibility and inclusion in this space. Some comments here do refer to elements of how some influential groups or individuals involved in casting/the community at large present themselves in ways that, in our view, make the format and community feel less accepting and positive. But the larger portion of this seeks to mostly address how we'd like to see cEDH event coverage improve in general from anyone looking to put on these events. If you enjoy this type of thing, please let me know, and if you'd like to support the channel consider supporting on Patreon or getting some of my very cool merch.
@blipboyy
@blipboyy Год назад
Damn do I love how frank this was. Thank you very much for your thoughts and opinions!
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
@@blipboyy I'm glad you liked it!
@sirdanzig4412
@sirdanzig4412 Год назад
I'm someone who has top 16 multiple mox masters events and watched several others in which I wasn't an active participant. And I think you guys nailed it 100%. I know so many of these names from playing against them. But if I wasn't actively engaged in the community, I just don't have the same level of attachment.
@BisyBackson365
@BisyBackson365 Год назад
I watch and listen to every major content creators podcast AND youtube vids. I have never watched a cEDH tourney specifically because tourneys are NOT made for the viewer. I wish they were. I wish I knew how to do it. I would love to form a production company that is like an ESPN for cEDH. There could be a pretourney day - covering popular decks and strategies. Interviews with Tourney Creators and Players Day of - POD composition and pregame predictions or likely interactions based on the POD. Most importantly, the games themselves (hands , player names , commander , conversations). There are likely 10's of thousands of Magic players who would consume the content that have no intention of actually joining a tourney. But the love magic. Post day - TOP 16 Breakdown. Future Events. Interviews with the Final 8. tl:dr - I whole heartly agree with this entire video. Also, there is a business here that is already modeled by major sporting networks. Poker and Pool being likely models to mimic.
@MisterWebb
@MisterWebb Год назад
As somebody trying to get into cEDH, it is incredibly frustrating that there is no quality coverage of tournaments. Commentary doesn’t have to be dumbed down, but in-jokes and obscure references should be avoided. I can’t understand why Monarch et al don’t seize what seems to be a golden opportunity for monetization.
@tylercraig5633
@tylercraig5633 Год назад
100% agree with everything you guys have laid out. As much as I love the Eminence team and some of the casters associated with the tournament scene, there definitely is room for growth. I will say that I do have a lot of confidence in Eminence and they eventually will get stuff fully ironed out. Definitely fair criticism in my humble opinion
@TimsWheelbarrowMTG
@TimsWheelbarrowMTG Год назад
From having done a lot of coverage, and been very involved with various levels of EDH, doing live tournament coverage of a game that features everything you've spoken about would be super tough. 1) You almost certainly need table audio, which involves a lot of buy in from players, and is really difficult to intersperse with commentary - almost certainly requiring someone aside from the commentators who is able to do that live mix. 2) Keeping track of cards in hand is a giant job. At the Pro Tour there is a dedicated person stood behind each player with an iPad inputting cards in hand live and feeding them through to a web-interface that creates a graphic accessible to the director and commentators. Doing the same for cEDH means a body per player trying to keep up with cards in hand. Even at the Pro Tour this is far from seamless, and keeping up with Rhystic/Mystic/Ad Nauseam and similar while they are going off would be tough at any level. 3) As more cameras get added to the broadcast, the complexity of directing the feed increases multiplicatively. The cost of the cameras isn't as much a concern as the cost of being able to usefully direct. Showing the players is lovely, but showing all of them with some regularity, while providing enough fidelity on the game itself that folks can keep up, potentially with a card image picture in picture is a giant task to usefully direct. Even at Pro Tour level there would be loud (and not necessarily incorrect) voices in chat that complain the moment the camera moves away from the board to show someone thinking. Commentary in the meantime likely needs to be some mix of folks who can usefully cleanly explain the clean lines of the decks being played, while helping people keep up with literally what is going on on the board. It isn't a complete picture, but hopefully is enough to help people along for the ride, and get them interested in playing as well as watching more.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
Table audio I think is only something I'd have come through in certain scenarios where it's clear the game has broken down into pure politics, and not even necessarily a big change from how it's currently done. Right now, you can make out player audio in some streams, but it's fighting over the commentary, which I think in the abundance it's being featured is clearly frustrating some viewers. As for cards in hand I don't think a pro tour level display for it is an easy inclusion, I do think however player cams that pop up with any regularity at all that show roughly how many cards players have (and the players in general) would be a massive improvement over the current system. I think the protour, SCG, etc are a goal to aspire to, and regardless of how much that needs to be strived for, attacking your viewers and discrediting any criticism like we've seen from organizers recently is a step in the wrong direction. Especially when the current quality level of tournament coverage leaves a lot of people preferring a post game recap over live viewership.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
I think the ideal setup basically requires that someone is listening to the tabletalk of the featured match one way or another, either to swap between commentary or player chat, OR to be able to let the commentators know what the current discussion happening is. And that's again something only necessary when game actions have stopped happening. I think the interpreting politics while also talking over it has been uniquely frustrating since players are so adamantly talking about it.
@mizzlchieizzl
@mizzlchieizzl Год назад
The points here are valid, though. You have to strike a balance of how much you can invest into it, and it takes either money to pay people or dedication. I'd prioritize table talk over hands myself, since you essentially need a conference table mic instead of 4 people behind players keeping track of hands. But the balance of commentary and table talk would require some practice and training (and either money or dedication or both) to coordinate.
@syndicate5357
@syndicate5357 Год назад
As someone who used to setup multicast streams on Mixer it's easily doable using proper OBS and a system with enough ram. Also set your hotkeys toggled to player seat #'s with that making the ability to go from the 4 person "hands" top down view to hone in on the active player/their cards in hand split view as main and vice versa.. The open mic risk is real but at same dropping a M@*@^Fker isn't bad, if you're dropping other things well that's on the player.. Tracking what cards are in hand VS a combo going off will be an issue... having another walk around cam with inset to show face as decisions are made would be epic but now you need a staff for 1 or 2 tables with 2 separate pcs and 9 cameras for 8 players
@syndicate5357
@syndicate5357 Год назад
​@Lemora's Cards have it do the 70/30 or a 60/40 when commentators toggle on while there's activity on the table mic so that you can hear both like they do on some other sports casts with the ability to fade the table out completely if need be. Setup for all this type of stuff for other gaming on mixer back in the day took weeks of tweaking to perfect but once was set was just replug and play time and again while building off the base you had laid. The floating hands issue is also about the issue of how many cameras can you get/what kind of rigging setup above tables? And always ask for a sponsorship deal with a company, be it Logitech or elgato even. Could have center table facing player faces and top down view above showing cards in hand and board states for active player and a setting (scene) that has all 4 shown board states easier from those cams. End of the day is its either money needed or people plus money... sadly
@BisyBackson365
@BisyBackson365 Год назад
This comment is ment to inspire future video/podcast ideas. Some of this u have covered but I think it is difficult to have too much. Threat assessment. Pip choices vs optimized selection. Mulligans. Seat and pod composition (Archetype vs Archetype). Archetype strengths and weaknesses. Commander centric list strengths/weaknesses. Stax vs rattlesnakes. Tempo recovery / recognizing you are behind on in tempo. Top 16 "silver bullet" series highlights on Achilles Heel of top 16 decks.
@zmonty011
@zmonty011 Год назад
Monarch, Eminence, whoever? Who is Whoever?
@ashanimiller1648
@ashanimiller1648 Год назад
You keep saying your not trying to shit on anyone while trying to shit on someone is like saying I'm not racist becuase my cousin girl friend is black. Own what you say call out the people by name dont be afraid
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
We called out Monarch and Eminence, the two tournament organizers who have covered cEDH the most over the past year. I don't think this advice is exclusive to either organization though, you could apply this to anyone looking to do coverage as a list of do's and don'ts. But I can say the event I describe that I couldn't get interest in and switched to watching ProTour gameplay I believe was the last Okotoberfest. Again though, I think events in general have failed to create engaging viewer experiences on stream for all the reasons I laid out here, and that it's preposterous to think viewers voicing their dissatisfaction are somehow being unfair in their criticisms. I don't see angry people in my comments overjoyed that I put the beatdown on a company, I just see people who aren't enjoying a product relating to an explanation they've had trouble properly putting into words.
@ashanimiller1648
@ashanimiller1648 Год назад
@@LemorasCards I believe the few disgruntle people are barking very loudly and the majority that enjoys it are happy with what we do but I will listen to your opinions and work on myself to do better
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
@Ashani Miller that could very well be the case. I just think these discussions come up regularly enough that it probably warrants consideration more than it does dismissal. I know most twitch commenters especially aren't likely to voice opinions in an incredibly helpful way and it probably can start to feel like a sea of complaints with no solutions, so I definitely can understand how that could be upsetting or easy to disregard. If it's any consolation from me at least, there's a reason I don't really mention commentary much in this video and that's because I don't really think it's a major problem. For the most part, I think changing the presentation format to not need so much heavy lifting from the commentary is most of the solution itself.
@CarmenPontello-xu6th
@CarmenPontello-xu6th Год назад
Seriously one of the best podcasts I’ve ever listened to. Love your shit bro, keep it up!
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
Thank you! Happy to hear it.
@syndicate5357
@syndicate5357 Год назад
I'm so lost, I love cEDH but have barely anywhere around me to play... how do I qualify for this eminence thing?
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
For most of their events, you can just signup on their website. If you mean the Mox Masters invitational, you have to play and earn points in the monthly Mox Masters events.
@syndicate5357
@syndicate5357 Год назад
@@LemorasCards are they in person events that move around or just like I'd have to fly to cali?
@BearClaymore
@BearClaymore Год назад
Really good topic and points of view. I am certain event's broadcasting will improve, especially when we have all the tools to share our feedback. I just wish feedback was relayed constructively generally speaking, like it's done here. We have to keep in mind that trying to meet the level of protour broadcasting does not happen instantly. Presentation and public speaking are skills that need both experience and training and are rarely innate to a person. I agree, however, that whomever we are, if we intend to present ourselves "publicly" even if it is online via Twitch or RU-vid, we have to work harder constantly for viewers/listeners to feel comfortable and enjoy what we show or what we talk about. I trust things will improve, guidelines for commentators and event participants will be adjusted and we will enjoy more and better content from cEDH tournament coverage.
@Joolenplus
@Joolenplus Год назад
I'm glad someone with a platform brought this up. You guys have been absolutely killing it with your content. Great work
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
Thank you!
@Knightfall8
@Knightfall8 Год назад
it's what ive been telling ppl for years; so much edh (especially cedh) gameplay content is just absolutely not worth watching. the gentleman on the left nails it on the head during the fifth and sixth minute of the video
@the_breakfastclub
@the_breakfastclub Год назад
I really feel that opinion. I am so in love with the game but the coverage until now just did not live up to what I (personally) feel like makes this format so exciting. In my opinion that’s the micro decisions and nuances and the level of understanding and skill of the players. I think two casters chatting over the whole action and making jokes between each other - while it can be very fun from time to time - does not carry the fascination and often does not even help understanding what’s going on at the competitors’ table.
@TOTALmtg
@TOTALmtg Год назад
Another great video guys! As a new player i'd love to be able to watch a polished cedh event like a Standard PT from the past weekend. But like you say it needs to be informative and interesting to watch otherwise it pushes people away rather than growing.
@jimbomctimbo1610
@jimbomctimbo1610 Год назад
I watched a few games and yeah i agree it seems like eminence is really going at getting tournaments which i think is great but the commentary is so cringe and the interviews with winners are so wacky.
@forresttgreenland4794
@forresttgreenland4794 Год назад
this is the exact reason that i couldnt watch the mox master's cEDH tournament last weekend. i am trying to get into cEDH and there are no actual casts of tournaments to watch.
@the_breakfastclub
@the_breakfastclub Год назад
What a great video!
@Mindtricks101
@Mindtricks101 Год назад
Mox masters needs to watch this. Their hosts talk way too much and it ruins the experience. I just look at the deck lists at this point
@Imawesomedude20
@Imawesomedude20 Год назад
Watching player politics is a big reason why i love watching cEDH TV's gameplay and its what got me into cEDH in the first place
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
It's definitely of the unique strengths the format has and highlighting that seems critical to me.
@GoldSabertooth
@GoldSabertooth Год назад
Great stuff Matt, thoughtful and constructive.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
Thank you!
@jarredjenkins8054
@jarredjenkins8054 Год назад
Ban Force of Will, force of Negation, pact of Negation!
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
That might lead to less frustration in some regards, though getting rid of cheap interaction makes it pretty hard to stop early win attempts.
@jarredjenkins8054
@jarredjenkins8054 Год назад
@Lemora's Cards I find them so hard to play around... it would be cool if they need a Mana open or a commander in play to counterspell something. But yeah also cedh would be alot faster less hour long games haha
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
@jarred jenkins I definitely think there's something nice about being rewarded for knowing when the shields are down in a game, and in cEDH it's extremely hard to know if that's the case with 3 opponents who could have free interaction. I definitely get struggling with the cards, I think avoiding those play patterns kinda require playing a lower powered format where free interaction isn't needed in the first place.
@khub5660
@khub5660 Год назад
So that Dockside, Breach, and Thoracle can be even more rampant? No thanks
@camoonesar9190
@camoonesar9190 Год назад
As much as this is two people talking into the aether, it is an extremely useful conversation to have. I just wish there were already youtubers that would cover events and stats to that extent. There is a gap, a missing link, for Cedh coverage and personalities. Maybe there is, and the outreach and structure just is not there. The state id Cedh is kind of in shambles, but I hope to see it become a monolith in the tcg world. If you guys take up that role, I will be right here watching.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
We covered stats in one of our episodes and plan to make that at least a quarterly thing, how much we're going to cover individual events in the future I can't say yet though.
@mwilke07
@mwilke07 Год назад
You HAVE to play blue/white in your deck or you are massively disadvantaged with the amount of card advantages they have.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
Haha I complain about that in many other videos so I can't disagree with you.
@wbw911
@wbw911 Год назад
oh boy SCG coverage is probably the best out there Cedric and Patrick are like the best out there bringing the life out of the matches long after the games were played, they helped me understand the nuances of higher power formats and the best ways to survive in that environment also sideline coverage like Inside the Deck is crazy good and it is so awesome to see them starting again well hopefully cedh coverage gets better soon~
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
They're the best to ever do it. And I don't expect that sort of bar to be cleared early on by anyone, though I do think looking at such a great example to aspire to is very helpful. I think the coverage should all highlight each aspect of what's happening with the right goals. Commentary is there to help understand the gameplay(which is what we're supposed to be watching for), setting the stage and context but never overtaking the event itself. The visual presentation should put us in the moment clearly, showing off how cool the event is to actually attend, get you wanting to come out and engage with the community.
@wbw911
@wbw911 Год назад
@@LemorasCards well fair that is a high bar to clear but a good gold standard to strive for, they have other people doing the thing and those are also quite good when backed up with their superior showcase of the match with multiple view points and so on probably it will take more work to aggregate the decks and cards used in the match for four players to up the presentation game but it is still possible with enough work put into it
@drunklog1crecords144
@drunklog1crecords144 Год назад
I agree with a lot of what y’all are saying. However, my question to you is this, “What are you doing to change or drive this change”? Do you have tournaments or plan on doing tournaments with this type of coverage?
@lorchenakumnarth6456
@lorchenakumnarth6456 Год назад
“What are you doing to change or drive this change” They are using their platform, which has a considerable size within the cEDH community, to spread the ideas they have, as well as the criticisms, with the intention of driving change....?
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
I don't currently have any plans to run tournaments, though I can't say I outright don't want to. I view the things listed here as an issue, and they've remained long enough that I feel it's safe to assume not everyone views it that way. So my efforts, both in this video and private discussions I've had with related parties, are to highlight issues as being issues with sound examples of why and provide practical solutions to these. When I ask for feedback on my videos, I don't ask that people make better videos. When you create or work, you're one set of eyes creating for thousands. Listening to how things look for those thousands is critical in improving, because you might not know what needs improving to begin with.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
It also helps that I think in most people's eyes, better and more engaging Magic events have already been ran. I don't feel it's necessary to run an event with a better broadcast than organizer X to prove these points. They've been proven over the last 30 years by people much better at it than myself.
@drunklog1crecords144
@drunklog1crecords144 Год назад
@@lorchenakumnarth6456 I understand what you’re saying but, if we’re being honest, just talking about it isn’t enough. That’s the point I’m getting at.
@Joolenplus
@Joolenplus Год назад
​@@drunklog1crecords144 I disagree, sometimes other people with platforms pointing things out can help for the better. The impact isn't as direct or immediate but imo it's better than not saying anything
@Joolenplus
@Joolenplus Год назад
I also agree wtih the point about professionalism and not making fun of your player base. I think the way Scott and PWP reacted to people saying the commentary of the mox masters finals was bad was handled poorly. I get it, no one wants to be told something is bad, especially when people say it in a rude manner. But if I'm being honest with you content creators kinda have to be prepared and sort of expect that sort of thing. It sucks but it happens and they have to act professionally in response to that negativity. Like you don't see the command zone or other content creators give a snarky remark to any negative comment they get. PWP telling people to watch other channels in response to people asking for a version of the mox finals without commentary was baffling. And then Scott screenshotting a negative comment that was posted in another persons video that had no commentary and posting it as his twitter banner. And then doubling down by making fun of the viewers insinuating that the people that don't like the commentary don't have eminence gaming accounts, which honestly shouldn't matter. I'm pretty sure less than half of their viewers have played in an event and to just hand wave peoples opinions like that comes off as hella elitist. Like you said, pro tour players don't sit there and watch the pro tour, it's for people that want to get better or are interested in starting to play in events. Like yeah i completely get that it's frustrating to have viewers say something negative but they shouldn't match that with more negativity.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
I think there are comments worth responding to in a dismissive way, but when you lump all criticism in with the hateful and unhelpful comments you end up turning people who want the best for what you make into enemies. I think what it boils down to is a misunderstanding of how to interpret comments. When you have a lot of people who are in your target audience complaining about some element of what you're making, you have to take a step back and assess that. Often viewers are right in pointing out that there's a problem, but not always great at finding the solution. To me, when people are saying they hate the commentary, it probably doesn't really mean the commentators suck or that no commentary is better. It probably means that the commentary is intrusive to the viewing experience, either because it isn't always relevant, there's too much of it, or because what it's on top of is what people actually want to hear. Commentary is the main focus of the streams right now, and with how hard to follow the game state is with the current setups, it creates tension between what viewers want and what they get. This might not be liked, but I think Eminence, and to a lesser extent PWP, have a real problem with elitism among some of their staff, and they both in my mind have issues with interpreting feedback and meaningfully taking steps to improve from it.
@Itsmescoots
@Itsmescoots Год назад
If commenters engaged in a way that deserved respect, I would respect their comments. As is, talking about my perceived speech issues, or simply calling the whole thing dogshit are not great indicators that the comment merits my consideration. Perhaps instead of critique of one person’s response you could offer some constructive criticism to your fellow commenters regarding how to act. Blessed day to you.
@Joolenplus
@Joolenplus Год назад
​​@@Itsmescoots Sure. I think maybe boosting the background volume of the game play a bit could help. Also explaining what some of the cedh jargon might mean. Newer players watching might be unaware of what mana bullying or prio bullying is. This is kind of unrelated but the MegaMan Battle Network N1GP pvp community is really good at that type of thing. They explain a bunch of the jargon during the match. Trying to avoid inside jokes and distractions. Some of the stuff that was mentioned in this video itself like maybe giving player backgrounds/stats. Taking a bit of a less is more kind of approach maybe. I think a version without commentary might also be useful to some but I understand there might be issues with monetization or filtering out bad words? I hope this can be helpful to you.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
@Scott Gardeski I think most people will agree that the way some commenters conduct themselves is completely unacceptable. However, it seems like there's a pattern of pointing this out and then lumping in all criticism as personal attacks with no basis. Even broad statements like you just said implying all commenters don't engage in ways worth respecting is a pretty rough way to speak about a community at large. I don't think there's any reason to think PWP or Eminence have a conspiracy against them, and that's why all this "unwarranted" criticism emerges exclusively around these small aspects of what they do despite the community largely loving the efforts they make. The "us vs them" talk that comes from creators in response to what has mostly been reasonably voiced criticism isn't a way to foster a positive and healthy community.
@Itsmescoots
@Itsmescoots Год назад
@@LemorasCards please don’t attempt to frame what I’ve said as Us vs. Them rhetoric. I’d be happy to tag the commenters I take umbrage with. If you look, I think I responded to them directly.
@EspenOset
@EspenOset Год назад
I hate commentated cedh. Give me player audio or I'll just watch the ComedIan top 16 breakdown instead. Best cedh content is just 4 people streaming on twitch tbh. No editing, just politics. If you could have casters who introduce the game, tell us about the decks and players etc, but then you have player audio for the game, maybe with the casters adding extra insight when there isn't anything interesting going on in the player audio, that would be great.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
I think cEDH does require a lighter touch than 1v1, though I do think commentary is still necessary. I think you want to approach with an understanding that viewers are there to view gameplay first and foremost, and commentary that clarifies, keeps things engaging when the game is stalling, and generally provides useful info is the seasoning that makes it work and flow. When commentary takes centerstage it can feel frustrating, especially if it isn't clarifying info, and like I mentioned at times in cEDH, commentary can be outright disruptive to trying to understand what's happening. I think that's caused it to leave a bad taste in some mouths even when I don't think there are substantial issues with the quality of most commentators.
@HeWhoisHim.
@HeWhoisHim. Год назад
@@LemorasCards tournament settings should have the tables mic’ed and recorded. Because political deals are a real part of the game and it would help with just talking about what’s going on. Look at how many people try to call a judge for menial reasoning at tournaments to try to flip game results.
@ashanimiller1648
@ashanimiller1648 Год назад
@@LemorasCards So my question to you is how do you know as the viewer whats going on if the caster doesn't let you know. Also If your trying to build the community you need someone to break down what is happening on screen so a newer player understand whats happening. So what exactly do you want from the casters? do you want us to shut up so you can listen to a player make weird mouth noise for 4+ minutes or do you want the caster to paint a picure of what he's possible thinking
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
@@ashanimiller1648 There's a wide range of the amount you can feature inbetween "none at all" and "so much that commenters are frequently frustrated". I think player audio is only helpful to feature at certain times, but less commentary also doesn't necessarily equate to more player audio.
@EspenOset
@EspenOset Год назад
@@LemorasCards yeah. I know pwp is the biggest cedh creator, and they have no table audio, just commentary. So I guess the majority of consumers really want commentary. But to me personally, cedh where you can't hear the table talk is like watching draft gameplay where you didn't see the draft picks.
@HeWhoisHim.
@HeWhoisHim. Год назад
I listen to many people say Cedh doesn’t need additional bans for balance, it’s so fun listening to people lie to themselves.
@LemorasCards
@LemorasCards Год назад
If you want the game to be balanced (what that means in this context is pretty questionable to begin with) it would definitely require some bans. Whether or not "balanced" cEDH actually makes the game an improvement for the people currently playing it is its own topic. It's kinda like saying legacy is unbalanced. It obviously is, but if you balance it, are you actually left with something resembling legacy anymore?
@caeb-92
@caeb-92 Год назад
When i play tournaments usually ends in 3 or 5 turns with a infinite combo, some people says this format is more friendly but i think it's more toxic, fun to play with friends but tournaments are full of quick finishers. I prefeer another formats for tournaments, pioneer pauper or legacy
Далее
Fixing the Commander Ban List (for cEDH)
31:38
Просмотров 3,6 тыс.
Do These Decks Just Build Themselves? | EDHRECast 271
58:35
Can cEDH Work Without Proxies?
16:05
Просмотров 20 тыс.
The Best Budget Baba Lysaga EDH Deck for $50
15:15
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.
No More Midrange, Turbo is BACK | Top 16 Breakdown
35:21
The Differences Between Magic and YuGiOh
25:02
Просмотров 140 тыс.
cEDH Beginner's Guide
12:37
Просмотров 27 тыс.
Equipment Tier List | Commander Clash Podcast #26
1:23:59