Great tutorial. The only thing I would do different is the last curved feature sketching and creation method. I would convert entities of the edges of the part so if I change anything it will follow the part shapes. The last feature may not regenerate properly if the dimensions of the other features are modified substantially. Other than that, I'd follow all the other feature creation steps for sure! Thanks and have a great day!
For the final cut, instead of that line we can use convert entity on the edge and trim the rest of the circle. Also, instead of that 45mm dimensioning, we can hold shift and dimension from the bottom of the circle to the edge.
if the bodies were not merged, then you can select what bodies the feature will be applied on. so no need to trim the circle. also, the way the circle was defined should be from the edge but select minimum from the leader instead of defining from center of the circle and set it to be 5mm.
Where in the 2D drawing does it indicate that the center of the circular cut-out is located vertical of the long edge created by the obtuse angle? I heard the instructor say it out loud, but it seems to me that the drawing is missing one construction line required to fully indicated the placement of the center of the circle directly above that edge.
they look easy but they aren't because they ask you the mass of the design at the end of the question to make sure you did it accurately. They give you 4 options to choose the mass from and you have to choose the correct one
At 8:26 how did you know it would be 150 deg? The angle of that slope was not defined by you when the profile was created. I see no marking on the drawing to designate that slope at 120 deg. I was able to create the exact plane using the 30 deg given and referencing off the upper surface.
Hi, In SOLIDWORKS im updating the dimensions in equation and dimensions are updating but solidworks is not updating the dimensions of part. how to fix this.
I think he made a mistake. The radius for the top slanted surface is stated as r35 but in his model the radius would only be 25. You can make an r35 circle centred where the other circle is and just powertrim the lower half. This would probably work best if you just use one sketch for all the features
@@henriquehertz Absolutely disagree! For designing you need a professional grade GPU, preferably an nVidia Quadro for SolidWorks (an AMD Firepro is also suitable). The laptop age and specification depends on budget, but for a beginner I would recommend an DELL Precision M6700. If your budget is higher, then go for the latest model you can afford (I currently run a Precision 7730 with Quadro P4000 and 32GB RAM). HP and Lenovo also make very good workstation class laptops. Gaming laptops are *NOT* recommended if you're serious about designing!
@@MrMairu555 i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
@@henriquehertz i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
@@runtime_engineer it wasn't very hard Most important thing is speed It's just what you do in cswa but waayyyy faster I'd suggest focus on assembly problems and practice part editing, making models from drawing as much as you can
Full of adds every minute or less than a MINUTE. I have videos but never less than 3 minutes. How could you do it? After two ads, I thumb down and exited.
@@enriqueherreradavalos1937 If you apply 6061 Alloy (stated in the pdf) with density of 0.0027g/mm3, the mass of the part I got was *2040.57 grams* which is one of the option in the pdf.
Please don't speak in english if you have difficulty. Speak in hindi or prepare your script because not only gets difficult to understand but also annoying because aap kuch ka kuch kahre h vedio m and it gets confusing. Thank you !
Why I think your part is not the best way make a good parametric part... Why you don't extrude the first function both side. Why you make yours sketches that difficult... Mores sketches less problem... The worst, the hole on the left.... 😂 making an extrusion to make the half, and then redo a cut.... Erk! I think you don't work with a real parts... Make a part like yours and modify it, and the features tree explodes literally.. Make a test. Make a square plate. Make an hole. Repeat it 10 times. Repeat the previous repeat then times on the perpendicular side. 100 holes. Check models analysis and watch refresh time. Make the same part with 1 or 2 sketch.... Cry, and check the perfs.... The result is OK, the way is shit...
