Scary stuff honestly. This kind of content is a threat to the credibility of the CFAI. Thank you Mark for shedding light on this and for helping us making more informed decisions. I hope they will postpone the registrations for these pathways until fixed
This is not a liberal arts undergraduate course We completely understand whats going on here, cfai will realize it soon as they loose their credibility
In 2023, I finally earned my charter after four years of dedication. However, I'm extremely disappointed and angry with CFAI for the quality of content and readings provided by them. The lack of political neutrality and inaccuracies in the materials have shocked me. Margaret Franklin's leadership is questionable, and she risks diminishing the value of the charter many of us worked hard to achieve.
@pejpm pure academic content my friend. Mathematical formulas and proven finance concepts. The CFA is not a political or social think tank so it doesn't need to stray into that space. God knows we have enough of that in the news. As a Charterholder, I must admit I'm a little worried about the direction of the content.
@@rohanmetai6789man that’s completely inappropriate and against CFA standards…if you are a candidate I strongly suggest you go back and re-read that module…
Wow. At this point you should develop your own certification. “Mark Meldrum Certified” or MMC. It would have more credibility than where CFAI is headed..
I would argue that they are violating their own code of ethics. "Distinguish between fact and opinion in the presentation of investment analysis and recommendations". They are presenting their opinion as fact when talking about the presentation of wealth inequality. Also with them outright lying, that is misconduct...
The irony is that the CFA institute has increased their fees,made cfa study materials as separately charged but still has the audacity to teach about woke nonsense, amazing.
This seriously impairs the credibility of CFAI. The two new pathways need to be completely re-written, it isn't just something that can be "polished over time". The argument for pursuing the charter has always been the quality of the education you receive. Unfortunately, these changes seriously impair that. This is the worst thing the institute has ever done and its not even close
The U.S. being removed from all charts is just unreal. This is what they raised the exam fees for? Note how the old CFA readings all had the authors listed. I'm honestly getting a little annoyed by how much the CFAI is covering its buttocks at the cost of the candidates. Errors everywhere in the curriculum--sometimes so blatant that even an unprepared candidate cannot miss them, authors not cited so we don't even know if the person writing this has any idea what they're talking about, no visibility into the contents of the exams and how they are graded to the point that there is a section in Ethics concerning how any discussion of past exam contents will get you kicked out. CFAI: Clumsy Fallacy Administrators Institute. Eroding trust one exam season at a time.
@markmeldrum, are the Blue Box, End of Chapter, Topic Test practice questions the same in 2024 vs 2025 for the Portfolio Construction Pathway (PCP)? And if so, is it likely the style and format of the 2024 exam could be similar to the 2025 PCP exam? Thank you
I registered for the exam chose private market and can't even begin to explain how I arranged this much money. I was looking for coachings and was referred Mark. Thank God and Mark, I stumbled upon this and it had been just 2 days of registeration. I have cancelled it and going to get my refund. Thankyou Mark ❤❤❤❤❤
Can you, please, tell me in the portfolio management pathway only one reading is changed which you showed? or there are another changes also compared to 2024 curriculum?
This is the most satisfying explanation for income and wealth inequality (and for why socialism failed) that anyone has ever provided me with, i truly thank my stars every day for introducing me to your content 😂
I would be very reluctant to hire a money manager that earned their charter in 2025 especially since the designation does not reflect the specialization path. I would be terrified to get someone that when down the Private Wealth pathway and find out that they actually bought into that content. I also think that in hiding the specialization it also means they don't believe in it themselves. quote From CFAI website Q: "Will the CFA charter reflect the specialized path an individual earns? A: No, there will be no distinction made on the charter itself.
Wow very upsetting that CFAI have signed off on this. Thanks for the thorough review and guidance Mark Meldrum. I was excited about the specialized pathway feature for 2025 but will be staying on the beaten path for now.
I came here after many on reddit suggested watching MM video before choosing any pathway. And boy oh boy, I was going to go for PM or PW, but changed my mind now and sticking to traditional path. Few words for CFAI from me "Go woke, go broke!!"
I’m really worry because this will be my second attempt, but I really “hate” the portfolio pathway because I strongly disagree with the hypothesis of efficient markets, so I was excited to take the private pathway, but with this information that you presented to us, now I don’t know what to do 😅. Thanks for your time, best regards from Colombia
Dr Meldrum - I used your course to pass Level I and Level II in 2021. I left the financial industry shortly after to pursue a unique opportunity and thus never sat or studied for Level III. For these reasons I haven't kept up much with the changes in the program or with any of the discourse surrounding the program. I'm considering re-arming to study for the exam and achieve the charter, as I would like to have an easier time being able to re-enter the industry if I want to return, and for the fact that I started this mission and left it unfinished while being so close to the end. I was wondering if you had any advice for someone who is coming back to Level III after not engaging with any CFA content since 2021. I was also wondering if your opinion on the value of getting the charter has changed at all over the past few years.
Hi Mark, I'm a level 3 CFA candidate and a professional (senior financial planner) in wealth management who advises ultra-high net worth clients. I was looking forward to the specialization in wealth management to deepen my knowledge, but what you are presenting here is concerning. I'm now considering just sticking with the more traditional path for the exam and reading some of the wealth management sections as a supplement to my career. Would it be possible for you to share which sections you think are worth reading? Thanks.
Dear Dr. Mark. I am wondering if you will be offering to teach Private Market? Or just you will provide videos for Portfolio construction / traditional pathway?
I registered this morning and was excited. Watched this video, and now I’m deflated. Seriously thinking about requesting a refund within the 14 day grace period.
Do you know whether the grace period applies after scheduling an exam appointment, i.e. not only registering/paying, but also already scheduling an exam appointment?
Mark, I'm writing level 3 in August, but I'm thinking of deferring to 2025 instead. Clearly it is best to stick to the portfolio management pathway. However, do you know how much the content will differ for 2025 vs 2024 for this same pathway? Will there be big changes?
The CFAI should have to cite their sources on all facts and have clear distinctions for opinions. The fact that they don't shows they do not follow their own ethical code and standards.
@@user-rr2mh9tl7o i think I didn’t expressed myself clearly. Given that the video is about level 3 I thought it was obvious that I was talking about February 2025. Registration just opened an hour ago and I’m enrolled! Good luck to everyone
Really hoping that CFAI fix and improve all these issues because I’m really interested in taking private market pathway. But without any further information is better stay with the original pathway.
I watched this trying to defend CFAI and I could argue a case for the wealth inequality and some justification for the wealth management but I have no words for the sloppyness. This is borderline chatgpt level of content. I don't think a sociologist wrote that last reading since a real sociologist would have a much higher standard and would have some insightful critique somewhere there.
In my experience, this is pretty on-point for what to expect from a sociologist: a treatise on economic injustices without having ever cracked open an undergrad economics textbook.
It’s seriously concerning to me that they aren’t sharing the names of the people writing this content. Especially when it’s this low-quality. The pathways sounded like a stupid, overly ambitious idea to begin with and they completely botched the implementation it looks like.
I’ve been waiting a year to choose the private market pathway in my second attempt. I know you mentioned in the video that there is no incremental value, just a repetition of level 1 and level 2 content. - My plan is to work in the private market in the future. - I've already studied level 3 once and only failed the exam due to scoring zero in Ethics. I don't want to go through all the same content again. What should I do, sir? Should I wait another 2-3 years for better quality reading materials or should I pursue the private market regardless or stick with traditional level 3 content
Hi Mark, thanks for the review. Is there a possibility for you to give a direct feedback to CFAINSTITUTE ? Because education should be less of politics or propagandas and more of knowledge! They can rewrite the content ? Thanks for taking your time in analysing for us..
I dont understand the need for these pathways. Why go through the private wealth one? Just get the CFP. It seems like the portfolio management pathway is the only one worthwhile here.
Yikes, Apart from the crazy socialist shit, at least get the facts right (messing up formulas, not correctly presenting the testable material, etc). People were saying the ESG course was a hinderance to CFAI's credibility and I thought that was overblown. But as someone that passed L3, this is significantly worse for CFAI's reputation. Unfortunately, im still on the job hunt, so the reputation of CFAI still matters significantly for me
And I from you. I never said anything about the need to glorify. But to suggest lower social safety nets and much more inequality than other countries? To not include the one country with the most wealth, the most capital, and the most socially mobile wealth creation economy in the world, in a discussion about wealth management - or maybe you missed all that.
