Тёмный

[CFD] Aspect Ratio Warnings in CFD 

Fluid Mechanics 101
Подписаться 55 тыс.
Просмотров 19 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

29 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 61   
@mohame.k5399
@mohame.k5399 Год назад
i fkn hit hike before even watching, ths should say how much we appreciate your admirable efforts, Aiden , you have all my gratitudes and support. i wish you all the best in this life now lets go back watching and taking notes
@asifraj321
@asifraj321 Год назад
Your way of teaching is always outstanding. it's easy to understand.
@jessbuildstech
@jessbuildstech Год назад
What a great video on meshing! Thank you Dr Aidan 🎉
@francootaola9172
@francootaola9172 Год назад
Great to have videos about meshing! 😁
@romirder
@romirder Год назад
Holy crap. My dissertation is on CFD FSUK aerodynamics, and i wish i found this channel sooner. Been tryint to mesh a front and rear wing on the same geometry but it refused to work. I now understand why. I'll update this if i actually managed to fix it. Thank you for these
@DefaultMando
@DefaultMando 6 месяцев назад
Any update?
@sergiodavid4590
@sergiodavid4590 Год назад
That's a good video, currently I understand a mesh quality aspects in a transient simulation!! Thank you PhD.
@sergniko
@sergniko Год назад
Very usefull video! Example with meshing of 90 degree corner has cleared a lot ! Thanks for your work!
@pritampriyadarshi4530
@pritampriyadarshi4530 Год назад
Thanks Dr Adrian for the insightful lectures
@professionalprocrastinator8103
Masterful course, Aidan! Plenty of teachings and I gained a different insight on meshing (not only does it allow a gain in accuracy but also in stability)
@anudeepgupta3799
@anudeepgupta3799 Год назад
I am cleared with doubts having on Aspect ratios and what exactly happening in the transient calculations..... Thank you buddy.
@lorenzosalvatori7156
@lorenzosalvatori7156 Год назад
The examples shown on the video were really good! It helped me a lot :) Thank you Dr Aidan
@wakil16
@wakil16 Год назад
Thanks for your videos ! from France
@husseinjusab
@husseinjusab Год назад
Please start the podcasts again! They were amazing
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Will do! I've got a few speakers in mind 😎
@cwong9241
@cwong9241 Год назад
Thanks a lot for your lecture. A step closer to become a CFD expert.🤓
@abhipatil1
@abhipatil1 Год назад
Appreciate your efforts for making this video.
@harri30121993
@harri30121993 Год назад
That was a great explanation on aspect ratios!
@antares190
@antares190 Год назад
Amazing pitch, as always, thanks a lot for this masterclass video!
@akshayghorpade8624
@akshayghorpade8624 Год назад
Beautiful Explaination. Thank you
@uladzimir8042
@uladzimir8042 Год назад
Great explanation, thank you! 😊
@botonb4eg1
@botonb4eg1 Год назад
Great video! Thank you very much!
@mdshupto183
@mdshupto183 Год назад
this is so helpful and interesting . thank you so much for your effort
@danieltarraf7881
@danieltarraf7881 Год назад
What a great video, Thank you !
@oliviermpukuta2726
@oliviermpukuta2726 Год назад
Great informative session.
@jaydevdave7369
@jaydevdave7369 Год назад
Amazing insights, thank you very much
@ahmad.s94
@ahmad.s94 8 месяцев назад
Thanks a lot Dr Aidan
@mayuragrawal1060
@mayuragrawal1060 Год назад
Thanks a lot. It is good informative video
@anirbandas4201
@anirbandas4201 Год назад
Good informative video.
@Tyrim
@Tyrim Год назад
i was wondering just last weekend why did my transient simulation with structured mesh took so long! problem fixed now, thanks!
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Awesome! That's just what I was hoping for 😃
@ankit_sb
@ankit_sb 9 месяцев назад
Great video. Thanks.
@dylanharris1601
@dylanharris1601 4 месяца назад
Nice video! If you included examples of what good looks like (desired aspect ratios for varying mesh problems) for the SS and references for that it might enhance the experience.
@mahmoodmousavi8614
@mahmoodmousavi8614 Год назад
Excellent thanks
@nikhilnarale
@nikhilnarale Год назад
Great video, thank you.
@engineeringarts4509
@engineeringarts4509 Год назад
This video is so great to explain the implication of aspect ratios in CFD!!! (I usually just care about skewness and non-orthogonality more.) I'm thinking in high aspect ratio mesh, if the long-side of the cell is parallel to the flow in transient flow problem, it can mean Co number is still controllable. Does it also mean to have a good pressure correction to avoid excessive iterations? I'm struggling about the mathematical relationship between aspect ratio and pressure correction. I ask this question it's because I'm thinking in what situation CFD allows to have high aspect ratio. Thanks a lot!!
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
You will probably be ok, because the pressure field from the previous time step becomes the initial guess for the next time step, so I don't think aspect ratio will have as much of a detriment as the steady solver where you start from nothing!
@yto5338
@yto5338 Год назад
I sure you are being in my mind! ...or you are watching me somewhere! seriousely thank you for lecture!
@rentionpasolari7230
@rentionpasolari7230 Год назад
Thank you for the amazing video! I run the simple case of the flow around a circular cylinder in OpenFOAM using PimpleFOAM, and I realized that when I use structured mesh with higher aspect ratios the number of the outer correctors to converge is much higher than a low aspect ratio case. I can imagine, after watching this video that this is because of the diffusion dominant terms in the pressure equation. My question is, when my Courant number is low(around 0.5), and I use high aspect ratio cells, is it okay to perform just one outer corrector, or should I allow the solver to decide for this (since it needs more to converge)?
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
You are absolutely correct. High aspect ratio cells needs more outer corrections, due to the diffusion term in the pressure equation. As for the courant number question, I would check your residuals (and monitors) within each time step. If you can convince yourself you are sufficiently converged within a time step, then 1 outer corrector is fine. An easy way to check this is to run 2 simulations, one with 1 outer corrector and another with 2 outer correctors. The compare your drag and lift coefficients. If there is no difference then you are fine to use 1 outer corrector
@Michallote
@Michallote Год назад
I suppose that's why Fluent favours polyhedral meshes so much!
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Yes!
@maximilianmaigler8651
@maximilianmaigler8651 Год назад
could you please share the LaTeX approach you employ for your Beamer slides? It seems you either have a markdown or .tex template for that
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
It's just the beamer package for latex with the boadilla theme 👍
@maximilianmaigler8651
@maximilianmaigler8651 Год назад
@@fluidmechanics101 thanks for sharing. the schematics you create in tikz I assume
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Nope. I create them all in inkscape. I've never been a fan of tikz
@finfoil8544
@finfoil8544 Год назад
What about airfoil boundary layer cells in steady state simulations? I guess the pressure correction in not much a problem close to the wall because it's mostly diffused over the large face? And what about the wake?
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Yes correct. The pressure is mostly diffused normal to the wall, but the streamwise contributions are important, especially on the suction surface, so the high aspect ratios are always going to slow things down.
@finfoil8544
@finfoil8544 Год назад
@@fluidmechanics101 And doesn't the transient case also include a pressure correction step? What would be your best approach to calculate stall polars on low Mach number airfoils (M
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
I am not sure what you mean by 'stall polars'. If you want to find where the aerofoil is stalling, you can just run a set of steady state simulations, incrementing the angle of attack by 0.5 degrees each time (changing the inlet velocity components). You can each initialize each solution with the solution from the previous angle of attack, so you won't need many iterations (say 500 per angle of attack). You only really need dynamic or moving mesh if you have a transient inflow (like a pitching aerofoil, or a vertical axis wind turbine)
@finfoil8544
@finfoil8544 Год назад
@@fluidmechanics101 yes that's what I currently do. I was wondering if the transient case would suffer less from the pressure correction in high aspect cells, in your video I get the feeling the transient case is less sensitive to it, but I don't understand why.
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Unfortunately there are some questions even I cannot answer 😅 the video shows my current understanding. If I find out anymore I will be sure to let you know!
@ravichandrakumarkb5551
@ravichandrakumarkb5551 Год назад
Hi there it really gave a clear picture, I am working on an aerofoil post-stall aoa so i am running in transient condition, for K omega sst iIam keeping wall y+ 1 for a RE no. 2.2E6 in that first cell height I am getting around 1.1e -5m near the aaerofoil. For this first cell height I need to keep the time step size less than 1e-5 s to keep courant no. less tha 1 at all the sides of an aerofoil but unfortuanetly i don't have computer resources to deal with this time step size. If i go with larger time steps Cl and flow seperation is completley off but Cd is matching within 10% error. If I use Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, i went with wall y+ 100 the first cell height is 1e-3m so time step size was maintained at 1e-4s in this Cl and flow seperation is matcing even at post stall but Cd is at error of 70%. Kindly advise me on how to proceed further. Thank you.
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
If you are limited by computer resources then you can just do the best you can and make it really clear to the assessors / whoever is reviewing your work that that is the best you can do. If they want a more accurate result, then they need to get you access to a better computer!
@ravichandrakumarkb5551
@ravichandrakumarkb5551 Год назад
@@fluidmechanics101 thank you
@jaydevdave7369
@jaydevdave7369 Год назад
Hello Adrian, do Fluid Mechanics 101 have a discord or reddit channel?
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
Yep, discord is here: discord.gg/S9s2Zjbegf
@Maxakch
@Maxakch Год назад
👍👍👍👍👍
@adithyaajay8135
@adithyaajay8135 Год назад
How aspect ratio affect steady incompressible flows?
@fluidmechanics101
@fluidmechanics101 Год назад
It mostly affects the rate of convergence of the pressure equation, due to the coefficients in the A matrix (which are calculated from the discretised Laplacian)
Далее
[CFD] Pyramids, Prisms & Stair-Stepping
32:31
Просмотров 9 тыс.
But what is vorticity?
14:27
Просмотров 10 тыс.
[CFD] The Courant (CFL) Number
27:31
Просмотров 49 тыс.
[CFD] What is Mesh Non-Orthogonality?
32:27
Просмотров 28 тыс.
Steve Brunton: "Introduction to Fluid Mechanics"
1:12:03
What is Convergence in CFD? | Aidan Wimshurst
4:50
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) - A Beginner's Guide
30:13
[CFD] Hexcore Meshes for CFD
30:55
Просмотров 10 тыс.