It's soo perfectly poetic how ChatGPT - which labels Portals as if they were one-way (Blue = entry, Orange = exit) - got stuck on the chamber that teaches players that Portals are omni-directional x3
@@migueeeelet It's only required in Chamber 01, and the player isn't in control of the portals, so the misconception can still be formed in the context of having the portal gun.
I wonder how that even happened, I can only imagine it found some forum thread on how someone genuinely thought they were one way, and instead of using the 10k+ people swamping him with "of course it goes both ways!", it decided that to take the starting question as fact.
@@slyseal2091 It depends on the training data, as AI models like ChatGPT are heavily reliant on patterns in it's training data for generating responses. For instance, I noticed the IGN Portal Walkthrough - the FIRST text-based walkthrough search result when you google "Portal Walkthrough" - frequently tells the player to place a Blue portal first, even when the player has the full portal device and can shoot Orange portals (there's also a GameFAQs walkthrough that USUALLY refers to Blue portals before Orange ones, but isn't as consistent). Weirdly, those were the only instances I found of Blue Portals being explicitly mentioned frequently in a Portal Walkthrough (at least in my quick google search). Other walkthrough sites are more vague saying something along the lines of "shoot a Portal" or "use your Portals" instead, so unless ChatGPT is relying heavily on IGN's walkthrough as part of it's training data regarding Portal I don't know where else this heavy focus on Blue Portals stems from.
@abildamil Nah, it just has literal dementia and a case of being unable to do complex thought processing past a certain point. I've messed around plenty with chatgpt. It fucking sucks. But you knew that already by watching the video, did you?
@@patroller1592 actually it's ALSO soulless. at least i hope it is. i dont want my computer to have a soul that would be rather concerning (and portal would be very on-brand)
I wonder if you give it all the information at once would that work? E.g. "I am at a gap with a fixed orange portal on the wall. There are no cubes, buttons or platforms. I only have the blue portal gun. On the other side of the gap is the exit. How do I cross the gap?" But yeah classic generative algorithm (not gonna call it AI, lol) moment
I like to call them function approximators. As my understanding of the training is showing the thing a whole lot solved problems and it builds some approximation of the function to convert problems to solutions.
One tip I would suggest is to start a new chat with it regularly because it likes to hallucinate! You can also send it pictures. That might help you get a little farther
I am starting to think that ai is not as smart as we thought since well it can't understand that you are in the earlier levels and that both orange and blue portals are both entry and exit portals.
I think this is a pretty good example that relying on AI to help you solely is not a good practice and usually it needs to be repeatedly corrected and fact checked by the human user
That's expected, the only training data GPTs see is text, and I highly doubt there's even a single guide that would guide step by step how to win every level of portal.
An alternative way to do this would be to just 'succeed' at whatever its instructions are. The high effort way would be to edit the chambers to make the instructions viable, (make the glass breakable via some method) alternately -lower effort- use console commands to best approximate the instructions (just noclip through the glass)
Actually, it might've probably been a better Walkthrough by AI, if you gave it only screenshots with a prompt: "What do i do now here? Walk me through this" or something like that. Also, if you'd tell it beforehand, how the portals work [through your perspective], then it probably would be better in telling you what to do. But other than that... Yeah, the "AI" likes to be "Smart" even though it isn't. xd
The difference between AI and “AI”: One floods the enrichment center with deadly neurotoxin because it has understood and analyzed its situation and determined that to be the best course of action. The other floods the enrichment center with deadly neurotoxin because the phrase was one of the top hits from its training data.
Past a certain point it felt more like it was trying to roleplay a portal test chamber with you than actually guiding you through a portal chamber lmao
While i think its extremely impressive that we can take a computer and have it read a text and understand it well enough to answer questions about the text, i also just… could have read the walkthrough myself. That was always an option
@@TheManinBlack9054 When and where in the entire universe would someone not have access to a walkthrough of a game but would have access to an AI trained on that walkthrough?
it boggles my mind that ChatGPT thinks portals are one-way gates and can't work vice-versa. if that's how stupid the so-called robot takeover is gonna be, i think i can live with this.
I love that ChatGPT tried to explain flinging to you - the _only_ mechanic explicitly explained by GLaDOS(!) - seven test chambers early and it couldn't even do that right. Also, I really like you kept your chuckling in.
This is why llms arent the future lmao hopefully a hypothetical agi would actually do a good job at this. I could see better tutorials being in game where an ai watches your screen and if you spend too long at one part it could give you hints.
what ChatGPT version did you do this with? maybe ChatGPT4 will have an easier time with this since it apparently has better spatial reasoning skills (or if you did do it with 4, then ChatGPT was just not destined to play portal)
@@NoahGooder as a programmer its very worth it super helpful. I probably save enough time by using it to justify the cost. If you don’t do sonething like programming or math its probably not worth it because its not good enough yet to be worth it in other fields.
I tried to get ChatGPT to write a crossover fanfiction, the results were uninteresting. The writing was so generic- it was boring! ChatGPT's so boring!
Honestly, I feel like this one may work a bit better with the image AI stuff you did with TF2 - I think it could actually properly navigate you, at least in the beginning-ish part.
