Cheaper and Better Than a Rolex DateJust? | Watchfinder & Co. 

We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

I’ve owned both the Datejust and the Aqua Terra . The Aqua Terra was FAR superior by every measure. As everyone already knows, the Aqua Terra has better specifications, movement, materials, and value, but in addition, it looks INCREDIBLE. I’ve never seen a picture or a video that did it justice. It must be seen in person. And it looks great on so many different straps, bands, and bracelets.

Just purchased the Aqua Terra with the blue dial - passed on the Rolex. I guess that answers the question for me!

I dont have a dog in this fight. I own both Rolex and Omega and love them both. This whole discussion is equivalent to having a blond supermodel in bed on your left, and a brunette supermodel in bed on your right. Which is better? I’ll take ‘em both!

that omega aqua terra grey blue dial looks so much better in person than in pictures and videos.

I would do questionable things for that Omega.

I have noticed something: Rolex’s fans are always talking in one style like “it’s Rolex” “Rolex is better” “Rolex has higher resale value” but OMEGA’s fans are talking facts and figures like “15,000 Gauss” “silicon hairspring” “METAS” “bidirectional rotor” etc. This shows that Rolex is not OMEGA and we have to appreciate both philosophy. OMEGA has super great history that unfortunately we didn’t live (50’s and 60’s) but it’s coming back. it took the company 20 years to standup after Quartz crisis. Rolex was so lucky to rely on its financial privilege/strength during the Quartz crisis “as Charity” to take the pole position from OMEGA. For me, I’ll be proud to wear a watch that fought for it’s principles throughout challenges, keep educating its customers about watch industry and provides more options to make each watch closer to the customer’s personality and taste. Devaluing any brands means you are still not up to the right level to compare or criticise their products. As I’m a big fan of 8900 movement, OMEGA wins for me. Thank you guys.

Omega ON A BRACELET, YES, the rubber strap doesn't do it for me

I finally got mine in July for my 60th birthday. Exactly the one in the video. Omega of course. I am a happy bunny!

When I was getting my first luxury watch I was debating between these exact two watches. In the end I went for the 8900 AT simply because it's a better watch. The fit and finish, features and the overall history of Omega is just more interesting to me.

After 2 years and 5 months still enjoying this episode!!

Just went for the Omega today... couldn't resist. So much more for the money ...

Im starting to believe most Rolex owners are women. Heres why. All I see in the comments are "I like the way my Rolex makes me feel", "its timeless", etc. So many guys being emotional and in their feelings about a brand in which they dont even have equity. Funny. Let's stick to technical FACTS, and have a bit of emotional intelligence. Omega > Rolex in some areas and Rolex > Omega on others. Buy what you like. Forget resale price. Why buy a watch with intent to sale it anyway? You aren't going to flip a watch and make $10mill from it(unless its vintage or a discontinued model). Definitely not a Rolex. So it's not to be used as an investment. Go buy shares if you want to make money. Start businesses. Watches and an Investment shouldn't even be a discussion. People say most Rolexes "HOLD" their value...not GROW in value. So you aren't making money. Just sitting on it. The same as if you just kept it in your pocket. Also, only the minimalist will praise the simplistic way the Rolex looks. "Its simple and timeless." Yes, but not every likes a simple looking watch. Some people like a dash of color. Not only that but it wasnt until recently that Rolex even had a watch movement that has a 72 hour power reserve. When the hole industry has been up to 10 days ways before. So Rolex is technically behind most companies...manly because of their lack of change. My predictions for 2020 Rolex releases. Rolex will discontinue a model or two. Being out those exact same "discontinued models with another bracelet type. Rolex fans will go crazy. They will artificially make it hard to get to raise prices. People who buy will think they have a special watch. How can a company that plays so dirty by artificially raising prices through market manipulation be trusted so much by its consumers? Idk. I would guess its because most people have more money than they do brains.

Perhaps Omega's finish is too rich when you consider it a daily casual watch and compare it to DateJust. However, this Omega is a Seamaster, and despite these two being similar in design at first glance, the "Sea" here is crucial. Then the colors and all finishes make it, in my opinion, one of the most beautiful watches for a passionate sailor and yacht owner. My point is, these are two different kind of watches. If you want to compare Omega to Rolex's DateJust, do it with Globemaster :)

Rolex without brand name look like...well Seiko

That Omega is absolutely beautiful. The complexity seems natural and unobtrusive and this is a watch that will get noticed on a wrist. It just stands out. The issue Rolex has today is that there too many Rolex homages and this Rolex is just white noise. Plain, bland and uninspired. Also, with a lower price point, I can see this Omega giving Rolex a serious headache.

The problem with watches which are cheaper and better than Rolex watches is that they are not Rolexes.

I've seen this Aqua Terra in person and I personally would buy this over the Rolex especially with the blue dial

If you removed the 5 pointed crown, the "Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust" and replaced it with a "Seiko 5", most would probably would never even consider it. Brand aside, the Omega is simply the more handsome watch. Even the macro shots show it punches well above its price point.

To be fair, the Omega is a “better” watch with its superior movement. And it’s a “better value” with its price point. The issue is that the Aqua Terra as a design does not look like it will age well, where as the Rolex has a timeles quality to it. The Aqua Terra would be a much more intriguing alternative to the DateJust IF the design was a LOT more simpler.

I've bought you a Rolex honey vs I've bought you an omega honey.... No contest 👑

I like both, but my choice would be Omega, more sporty and casual, and doesn´t have the magnification

The Rolex will look good in 20 years from now. The Omega risk looking like a product of its time.

The Omega in question is a fine piece imo. This was my gut reaction and I am a sucker for an exhibition back...

If you buy a watch mostly to have your colleagues look at the marque on the dial, buy the Rolex. If you buy a watch for yourself, and hang about with fellow horology fans, get the Omega.

Happy to say I'm just two years away from having enough money to buy my first "real" watch (a Speedmaster), Never say I could never afford that, just start saving

It's funny that these Rolex fanboys keep talking about brand recognition and street cred to flex and not actually acknowledging the watch comparison. Forgetting how to appreciate the art of watchmaking and innovation but only cares about the fact it's a "Rolex"

The problem is that you guys chose literally THE WORST aqua terra model. One a steel bracelet it's minimalist and is definitely a great purchase. The blue strap just puts people off.

I think Rolex's appeal comes from being timeless. Rolex is like Harley-Davidson, to someone who does not know watches, you could be wearing a model from 1975 or 2018, they wouldn't know the difference, just that it is a Rolex. That appeal carries real value. Porsche 911's are another example, they may evolve over the years but regardless of the model, you know it's a 911. WIth that said, as an owner of both Rolex and Omega (among others), the modern Omega's are superior watches.

I prefer Omega to Rolex, I own a few Omega’s but not a Rolex. In this particular comparison I would chose the Rolex, it’s just stunning.

The Omega is Seamaster is a beautiful watch. I would buy it despite the fact I own a Datejust 41.

The omega is just a superb watch and the aqua terra is so versatile, Rolex bore me.

even if someone creates a 10000x better automatic movement than what's in the rolex, people will still buy rolex because it says rolex sadly.

That Aqua Terra is absolutely gorgeous , WOW

dude, just by watching your video you sold me that omega, even tho I am a Rolex fan with 2 Rolex time pieces.

Omega are my preferred watch brand, and although Rolex watches are finely engineered they lack character and innovative design. Omega have made great progress over the last decade and have become as desirable as any Rolex watch, and the Aqua Terra is my personal favourite. I have to agree that Omega went off on a 'creative' tangent and need to stick to a limited number of designs, just like Rolex, this will help them gain new followers and retain their current buyers.

The Omega is an awesome watch, but the Rolex simple design is hard to beat!

I've handled and plan to purchase the AT, grey dial on the bracelet, which would have been a better comparison, IMHO. Not to mention, that grey dial on steel looks awesome! The Omega AT is a better watch with better tech. Period.Whether or not you like it, well that's a different story.. (I do) & Don't get me wrong I do like many Rokex models. I've just never been able to get over that Mickey Mouse looking hour hand. Rolex are simply the best marketers, hands down. Period. Just ask 98% of Rolex wearers what movement is in their watch. They will probably say "it's an automatic". SMFH🤔 Sometimes, perception is reality. Great video as always, btw.

Rolex could put a gerbil inside a cardboard box and as long as their logo is on it people are going to buy it. You’re already paying for outdated technology, it’s all about brand recognition now

No reason to choose for me. I have both brands in my collection and love them equally.

The first time I saw an Aqua Terra small seconds I was absolutely blown away by its quality. It’s ridiculous. Such a superbly beautiful watch. I’ve owned a 300M for a while and that too is just staggering. No watch I‘be tried on (around a similar price point) have even comes close. Only criticism and by goodness is an extreme criticism and it also applies more to the AT than the 300M, but it’s quite a thick watch. I like chunky watches, but it doesn’t suit. Doesn’t matter though.

You should do a review of the Seiko Marinemaster 300, an iconic diver's watch. Would love to hear your take on it.

This Rolex looks like a beautiful girl from a noble family dressed humble yet very classy with just a bit of barely noticeable makeup. Omega is more like a hot girl in a short tight red dress at the night club. I personally am more into serious and calm stuff...so Rolex for me. But I am definitely attracted to this Omega as well)

I think one of Omegas biggest problems is that they don't make many 38mm or smaller watches that aren't "Ladies watches". I'd would love to have a 38mm(preferably a 36mm) Aqua Terra, but they don't make one without diamonds or with nice dials.

A huge negative on Rolex is their obsession with cyclops date windows. Date windows are fine but not everyone needs bifocals! Rolex ruins Datejusts, GMT's and Explorers with those hideous cyclops windows.

There are many variations of the AT and some are much less "fussy" than the one shown here. I have the version with the white/silver dial w/orange second hand and brown leather strap. It provides a classic look with a modern spin and I feel the aesthetic will hold up over the years. Through much effort, I also obtained the black rubber strap w/orange stiching and the metal inserts. This provides the option of much more sporty look, when desired.

I never get the comparison between these two as I feel the Aquaterra is a much sportier watch. I think the Omega Globemaster is the closest 1-1 comparison with the Rolex Datejust

Definitely OMEGA is better. They are not afraid to show their case back. ROLEX don't even decorate their watches and put transparent case back. WHY? IF you ask them they will say, they make tool watches and they don't need to show case back. Absolute BS. Submariner not a tool watch anymore. If so then why they have very fragile ceramic bezel? BEcause their movements are ugly and they make 1 million watches a year. So no time to give attention to detail. ROLEX became the biggest rip off of the 21st century. I hope people wake up to the truth one day.

I'd personally prefer the omega over the Rolex on so many levels. But like every single watch bought from Rolex to Orient, Omega to Casio, it's all about your own personal choice. Great video as always

What a lume shot ! Just beautiful , Bravo for the Omega!

I had the opportunity to buy either a white or blue dial 41mm DateJust at retail but passed on it as I just didn't thibk it was worth the money. I bought a green dial Aqua Terra instead!

I actually think the oyster perpetual is the perfect rolex dresswatch while the omega is a great travel piece (don’t like the date window of the datejust)

With all the Rolex fakes on everyone's wrist, I would rather have an Omega which I think are better looking anyway.

Omega wins.

You mean “less expensive”

1:35 DID THE SECONDS HAND JUST BECOME A CYCLOPS? WHAT THE...

Broken down, seemingly better specifications of Omega Pales to the whole of ROLEX which exceeds the sum of its parts. That's why Rolex wears the Crown.

I think these two also have to worry about Grand Seiko breathing down their necks.

The 8900 Aqua Terra and the 8500 before it are outstanding values. I've compared them directly and found the 8900 to have the edge in comfort while the 8500's longer lugs are more beautiful. When compared to DJ, it is amazing how much you get for your money with the AT.

1:19 the date does not alignment perfectly, sad to see this :(

Rolex is the boring brand, always has been. Still no sapphire case back to see the “ great movement “ . Only colour changes and case size increases . Less variety with Rolex. As boring as old mans Cadillac of old.

2:13 that synchronized time on both watches is very satisfying.

Omega should give option of metal rear panel. It will make the watch thinner rather than current sapphire back.

This Omega is a beauty!

don't compare Rolex to Omega. it looks like someone compare Martell Cognac to Henessy Cognac. they are different taste. some people like eat their steak medium & some like welldone.

Isn't the recent Omega Globemaster more of a contender to the DJ?

I own a Rolex datejust but will say they are over rated to get a sports model you have to wait on a Rolex waiting lists for 600 years it's a joke don't think I will buy another Rolex I have breitling colt for a sporty look and my datejust as a dress watch looking at a few omegas currently for my next buy

Not with that wonky date wheel when shown with the 22. I'm always amazed at just how many flaws these videos show up.

I tried on the aquaterra but i didn't like the bracelet :/

The only channel that doesn't show watches on the wrist and no one complaining in the comments section. Beautiful shots as always!

Interesting history lesson and comparison. Although I own 5 Rolex models, they are not as accurate as the Pierce Brosnan era Omega Seamaster or the 2 Breitlings in my collection of Automatics. I also really dislike the Rolex cyclops. If a crystal ever requires replacement, I'll prefer a replacement sans cyclops. It's unnecessary and if compromises several indexes and degrees of hand sweep. I like a lot about this new Omega but I am personally unwilling to accept a rubber strap on any watch costing over $4k. Thanks for your excellent presentation.

I've been conditioned to salivate when I see this channel has posted a new video.

In my opinion, Datejusts competitor is the Globemaster, not Aqua Terra. They have too different esthetics.

I’d say the benefit of the Omega, aesthetics aside, is availability and price including huge discounts on the grey market and moderate discounts at dealers. Rolex, at least presently, has far better value retention and resale value. Even grey market prices for stainless models is still at or above retail and has been for a while. If this doesn’t matter to you, get the Omega.

The omega is a great watch but the one thing that lets it down is the bracelet it feels very cheap that's the only thing that stop me buying this watch as the dial and movement is top draw.

I have both Rolex and Omega they are great watches

The new Seamaster AT is gorgeous , but being a timeless looking piece, it’s not.

Heritage? Omega went to the Moon. 'Nuff said.

To be honest: Rolex is kitsch. You only buy a Rolex for other people to show: Look I can afford a Rolex. I have a Rolex. I can afford a Rolex. But for the rest, the whole Rolex line of watches: it is kitsch. I thought so as a child and I still think it.

Just love the simplicity of Rolex. Omega needs to keep it simple and stop trying so hard!!

I love my Aqua Terra blue dial .. and yes i just can't stop looking at the glisening face !!

only problem of the omega (and all co-axial movement watches) is the thickness relative to rolex.. rolex is always easier to wear

Driving a Boxter is the ultimate statement that you can't afford a 911. Same with watches. I have a Seiko5, btw

I loathe the date magnifier on Rolexes. Love the Omega Aqua Terra, with both metal and rubber straps

Very good review, I was looking to purchase a Rolex today, but I've now consider adding Omega to the research

I once had a Rolex and almost everyone who saw it became an instant watch expert and asked me "is it a real one" on a daily basis. Replaced it with a used Speedmaster and the experts left me alone.

The Omega is so much better looking it isn't even fair.

In my mind Rolex is about style and Omega is about fashion. The problem for Omega is that fashion always goes out of style and the advantage for Rolex is that style never goes out of fashion.

Bought the Good Planet AT over a beautiful DJ with Arabic numerals. Wasn't an easy decision but in the end, the AT just seemed less pretentious, whereas I was self-conscious I would be wearing a 'Rolex'. I appreciate the irony of that statement, when I would still be wearing a 5K watch, and I appreciate this is in my head, but can't help but think Rolex are becoming victim of their own marketing. Both beautiful watches, but I am more Omega. Just really like the watches.

Well, I still prefer the Datejust. It's just so much more elegant, simple but elegant

1/3 of this was about the same old story....old omega vs. King Rolex.....we really need to stop this way of looking at Rolex or omega. Both are superb, both designs are stunning! Omega is a better watch, and they are back on top! 15000 gauss is crasy in a case that are only a couple of minimeters bigger and still wearable for all! Its a no brainer, but Rolex with the brand value Can sell everything to a premium

I'm no expert but from a strictly aesthetic perspective... Rolex takes no chances on aesthetics. They seem to rely heavily on the name "Rolex" alone. Of course they make extremely high quality watches but so does Omega. I agree that the Rolex in this video looks more timeless. This video should have used the Aqua Terra with the white face instead of gray/blue... it would have stood up much more closely with the DateJust.

I like the older model of the Aquaterra with the black dial better.

Rolex is for two kinds of people - those who know nothing about watches and those who know a lot. The first group wants to boast, they want a bling and they buy the only watch they actually know of for as much as they can. And then there are people who know their way around watches and they can actually appreciate Rolex for what it is - a company that builds the best luxury products in the world. I don't like many things Rolex does - undersupply, heavy marketing, certain arrogance and tendency to not show the movements...and yet I hope one day, I will buy that Batman...

Omega make nicer watches period

That white datejust is so beautiful! Its so clean and classy.

Only if Omega would make some more timeless designs like Rolex it would tramp on Rolex. I'm no fanboy of either brand, that's my true opinion

Owning a Roles Sub Ceramic and a Omega Planet Ocean, I lean towards the Omega. Maybe due to the understatement of the Omega Brand. Wearing daily, eliminates the air of arrogance people preceive with Rolex. Many aren't really familar with Omega, even though they have been around much longer.

I just purchases that exact Aqua Terra in blue. It is absolutely stunning in person. I Love this watch and I have many. Rolex just keeps playing games with the industry and they can keep it.

These are both great watches and I would love to be able to afford either one but in reality will never be able to. If I did have that amount to spend on a watch I would probably be tempted to go for the Rolex as this particular watch in the video is a timeless classic and Rolex have always kept their design simple and is therefore more versatile. This Omega also is a stunning looking watch and I like the design but is it better than the Rolex?, I really wouldn't know. Great video on these two watches.