Cheapest Bullet Time with a 9 Dollar Camera 

Knowing 3D Sage he might just be the one to do it

or bad apple

First thing that came to mind

what about the all time classic CRISIS? 🥸

Max Payne would be on topic

Thank you for noticing my humor! Mine too!

Kind of reminds me of something my dad used to do when I was a kid. He'd sneeze then say bless you dad, then he would say thank you father and then finish it with a your welcome man. Haha

Came to make this same comment.

"I think I'd be a wolf. I think so too."

​​@@JustMambaHe was in mortal fear of losing his soul everytime he sneezed thanks to his heathen children not caring enough to bless him themselves. A true man of the cloth, unlike you.

Not only is it not crazy, it is insanely predictable for the vast majority to ignore the change connected to the dollar amount completely. Did you never think as to why almost all prices are done in that way?

Ever heard of the 19 dollar fortnite card?

@@CrAzYpotpie "Did you never think as to why almost all prices are done in that way" that's the point... it's crazy to not catch onto that fact by the time you're a grown ass adult

@@oiytd5wugho You are just repeating what I said, but less detailed and explanatory as to the reasoning. Not sure why you would waste both of our time with that.

@@CrAzYpotpie dude

+1 Dude

I wish AVGN videos still looked like this

def nostalgia

Comfy is a good word for it

very true

Audio matters way more than visuals.

It's about audio. If it was bad audio you would turn video off after couple seconds.

its not about audio. kids always cry when a new video game gets released about graphics all day long. don't matter gameplay nor sound.

@@lolwtnick4362 That is different, this ain't interactive media.

oh don't trust the timestamp. Sometimes I set it to be correct, sometimes not.

@@3DSage that must be the date0 for the camera, when it was made

@@monad_tcp It likely isn't when the camera was made but rather when the software was made. For it to know the time on its own, it would need to connect to a computer who knows the time, during manufacturing. That would be unnecessary. These cameras usually have to be set manually.

@@moritz584 I believe he did it to make the timestamp removal process a lot faster. When he told in the video that he had to manually remove them, I immediately thought of the easiest time to be removed would be 2011/11/11 11:11:11.

@@3DSageI think he was joking though

Anything you record is in the past. Did I just blow your mind?

I turn the time stamp on on my phone because I spent too long looking though albums and going "WHEN WAS THIS???" so now I like to know when pictures were taken. Metadata is too fragile.

idk about the 90s but it definitely feels like the 2000s.

It's mostly about clean even lighting with low dynamic range but yes! I like it.

I have one of these and it can range from looking surprisingly really good with decent lighting, to absolutely blown out if too bright or almost pitch black if slightly too dark. Still really fun to film with though!

wait really?? That is amazing if true and I wish I could have been a part of the movie.

@@3DSage Totally true. I live in Sydney where it was shot and it was a lot of fun but I can’t claim to have had any real input, but I was there for virtually the whole production. My memory is that they used Canon still film cameras for the bullet time shots but I couldn’t swear to that. Obviously they used far more cameras than you but then I don’t think the technology existed to fill in the missing frames so they had to use a _lot_ of cameras. Also, I had no clue that it would turn out so great, I was really lucky that way, it’s the only big budget Hollywood movie I’ve ever worked on and it ended up being a classic.

@@seaoftranquility7228 They used Canon EOS A2 film cameras, but news article contradict each other on how many cameras. Some say 100, others 120, then some more 130. I guess they rented the cameras, because that would've cost $684.98 (1992) for each camera body only or $1,524.88 inflation adjusted, so at least $1,524.88 x 100 = $15,248.80 in total, not including lens and film.

I wonder if I've seen you on the making of the matrix dvd extra

​@@seaoftranquility7228I believe they used what's essentially a morph effect to go between frames, but that's obviously much more limited than modern algorithms for frame interpolation.

Even by modern standards it's kinda perfectly okay, it's not *good* by any stretch but if i was forced to record all my memories with it i wouldn't feel like i've lost anything important. It's a bit soft and washed out, but the resolution is sufficient that it makes up for it.

Being precious is all Leo knows :)

It hits the spot where "adult" camcorders were still in the DVD-qualityi-ish range, (I know I have a Sony Mini DVD burning camcorder, like it was magical) Ofc you didn't have the budget to shoot in HQ (mini-DVDs were expensive!) so you took bad video in Sony LQ mode and store it to a1 128Mb MemoryStick. This looks just like the Sony LQ mode, but with crappier optics.

“Whatever you now find weird, ugly, uncomfortable and nasty about a new medium will surely become its signature. CD distortion, the jitteriness of digital video, the crap sound of 8-bit - all of these will be cherished and emulated as soon as they can be avoided. It’s the sound of failure: so much modern art is the sound of things going out of control, of a medium pushing to its limits and breaking apart. The distorted guitar sound is the sound of something too loud for the medium supposed to carry it. The blues singer with the cracked voice is the sound of an emotional cry too powerful for the throat that releases it. The excitement of grainy film, of bleached-out black and white, is the excitement of witnessing events too momentous for the medium assigned to record them.” Brian Eno

He thinks it's his channel :)

AH! I'm so happy they shared my project! :)

This

It was scary to upload but I feel the same way :)

Why is it better? lol

@Blankult Widescreen aspect ratios take up more space than they need to, while using a more closed in aspect ratio forces the creator to use the space more effectively. It also displays perfectly in a phone if you're the kind of person who scrolls comments while watching the video. I also just like it

@@myyoutubeaccountgotsuspend8666 Yeah i guess it's better for youtube videos, not for every type of video though. I thought you were saying 4:3 was better in everyway, which is not true, each aspect ratio has its own advantages, but i think 16:9 gets the upper hand in most cases. I also don't like watching 16:9 videos in portrait mode, so i get why you dislike it.

@Blankult I also like watching movies on my crt, which is 4:3, and having movies edited for that aspect ratio on that TV is just natural. It's also very uncommon seeing a RU-vid video in 4:3 so I should probably clarify that 4:3 is a better aspect ratio for youtube. Certainly it's not the best for everything, but given the choice of only one aspect ratio I'd go with 4:3

That's a CMOS actually. A really really tiny one.

He's actually pretty late to the trend.

@@SianaGearz 👍

@@ViviSectia hipster know 🧔‍♀️

Oh I'd like to see it! :)

I know, right! :) I'm so glad I found it!

Thank you for saying that! :)

I'm glad this gave you ideas! :)

Hey that's great! I have no affiliation but I so glad you like this camera too! :)

I'm glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for the nice comment :)

Thank you, friend! I'm glad you enjoyed it :)

Hey saying that really means a lot to me so thank you! :)

It was a beautiful day to explore Traders Village :)

omg yeah it really does! :)

That was a fun day and I'm glad you connected with that footage! :)

I will keep looking! :)

I'm glad you said that! :)

It was hard to find good information on this cheap camera but I will keep trying :)

I will give this a try and post an update! :)

The “$9” thing annoyed numerous commenters, myself included. It's unlikely that _all_ of us have ASD or OCD. Granted, I have both - but I'm sure that's coincidental.