Imagine your bad at aiming on siege. You have one good round where you kill four people as amaru. You get accused of cheating. Then thousands of people watch how bad you are because someone thought you were cheating.
Whoever reported him was some idiot who constantly throws out hackusations EVERY time he dies cause there’s NO way anyone could kill him otherwise…🤦🏻♂️😵💫 lol 😂
@@cutthroatindigo i mean you say that without any background context and like you cant hack on console siege? i get accusations all the time aswell. BUT im also a good player with almost a 2.0 kd, see how theres a little context with that
@@Youllpayforthat You cannot hack on console siege. You can use m and k but there are no hacks for console and you know this. Console players just like calling everyone whos better a cheater.
@@Typzical m&k on console is considered cheating. Let alone all the ppl who rely on an elite controller otherwise. Sadly elite controllers are fair use, but man is it sad how much you have to deal with ppl having one or the other. If you're on regular controller you barely stand a chance.
Old recruit. 5 man shield rush or German shotty That or the new meme strat of 5 lmgs with super shorty and nades. Absolutely terrifying when coordinated
@@wompwomp768 i remember when siege first came out i had dozens of clips on my xbox of bs like that happeneing and its why i stopped playing the game, its a netcode issue and although its mostly adjusted to be better for modern day siege its still far from perfect and happens often and im really surprised people see his clips like that and seem genuinely surprised stuff like that happens, like its been happening for years and still happens case and point, siege doesnt work where if you shoot them in the head it kills them, you have to shoot them in the head on your screen making the victim wanna call bs on stuf simply because they have better internet
I was playing the other day with a friend. He suddenly screamed "THERE'S 3 MONTY PUSHING UP SPIRAL!" I didn't believe him until we watch the match reply. It was true. Waht we've noticed was these 3 players will leave every op picking and will be back in a moment. Then suddenly while were defending 2f at Consulate, 3 Monty's appear. Lol.
Its because its a bug in ranked/unranked. It was recently patched in Y6S2.2 Edit: What im saying is that in order to do the glitch, it requires leaving/rejoining
It's a pretty easy exploit to do that just relies on leaving and rejoining a ranked/unranked game at the very end of the operator selection phase. My friends and I tried it in unranked and we got 4 of the same operator multiple times in an unranked game, so yes, you can probably have like a whole team of the same op if you manage to do it flawlessly. Looks like with the update yesterday though they mentioned a fix for this however, so it might already be gone.
At 25:15 that's a ternary statement. It means "if msgPrefixStr is null, append nothing to the string, otherwise append a semicolon to the string". It's a useful way to build text messages. Pretty the code is valid C# as well. For all 2 of you who care.
Varsity the lack of skins, and poor sights on Fuze is actually a bug with the AK right now. If you select Fuze (and possibly Ace I haven't used him yet) and don't swap to another gun and then back to the AK before the operator selection ends the game forces you onto default skin and a Russian holographic sight. It's happened every time I've played Fuze this season
In match 2 round 4 he can see the Kapkan's feet, and it's possible he was desynced to explain the aim on the Kapkan, the other 2 headshots can be explained since it's most of what he can see and is available to hit of the players.
“Cheating” is a LOT more than downloading something. I would classify a lot as “cheating”: using exploits, glitches, traditional hacking (aimbot, walls etc), MnK, lag switch, smurfing and other means to gain an unfair advantage over the adversary. In short, cheating is a broad term, more than just hacking.
the thing is using well known exploits is something (most) game companys dont ban people for, especially if its possible to accidentally get the exploit. (an example is in DBD there was an exploit where certain areas if you put your head in a wall you couldnt get picked up.) id say cheating means more things the company would ban/warn/etc someone for. even if they dont ban for many things.
Yea I would qualify anything as cheating if it gives the player an advantage that wasn’t intentionally implemented. (Specifically something that the player is doing on purpose.)
Also as much as I hate MnK on console not according to me but a random told me Ubisoft doesn't ban MnK on console so if that is true (I haven't checked idgaf either way) it ain't cheating man
Match 2 was clearly a rage report. When the accused droned kitchen from a window one attack always camp. One defender shoots the active drone, when coming back to site. The attacker moves to get the free head shot on a person defusing with a open first story window behind himself to out side. It's such a waste of time. Legit if the dude missed that kill I'd be more worried if anything.
Technically speaking we had a somewhat game mode like this, i mean the halloween event with the sledges, you are all sledge and have different abilities, we just need something for the defenders
@VarsityGaming 25:13 The point of that part: It is called an inline if, it's a null check to prevent runtime errors/exceptions. It just to handle an incoming prefix variable. If value is provided, it will enter the case behind the ':', otherwise if the value of msgprefix is null, the case before ':' will be appended.
The match 5 guy has something common on CS. A hack named "Trigger Bot". This hack shots as soon as a person shows on your aim, and sometimes it can't identify Walls. He kept looking at higher spots cuz looking at pixels could make him shoot enemies through several walls, so they try to lineup their aim higher. Watched a lot of Hackers thing, i know how a little bit of the things works...
Ubisoft fixed the bug/glitch for double operator; the way it could be done is one person picks an operator, say Fuze in this situation. They confirm the operator, then return to main menu. Then, they rejoin as fast as they can and the other person tries to immediately pick that operator (Fuze) as soon as they see the friend rejoin. It was possible to have all 5 of the same operator. Blitzes and Yings could blind each other, Smokes could choke each other, Maestros and Echos couldn't control each other's gadgets, etc. Me and my friends decided to only do it in Unranked (it'd be scummy to do in Ranked) and we tried to only use operators that seemed an enemy would get a kick out of, not annoyed by. So like, we would do multiple castles but not multiple Kapkans, and so on.
Match 2 - when lion shot the gonne-6 and mute (?) Flicked to him, it could have been mute hearing the gonne-6 explosion and flicked over to see if the lion destroyed a bathroom wall and it was just a coincidence that it flicked to lion
Well, getting two Ashes is gonna be harder for defender. So it's kind of an advantage. But there might be unintentional bugs or glitches because this game is broken. The game itself allowed it to happen. I blame Ubisoft. Idk how to fix it but it's their responsibility to fix it.
@@shuraamano you are correct that the unintentional glitch or exploit is Ubisoft' fault but, when they are intentionally using an exploit, then they are cheating and must also take blame. We know they are doing it intentionally since they do it multiple rounds.
@@chromaticblue3976 they do it sometimes, it has to be manually reported on their website though. O got a few people banned on xbox for the deployable shield glitch back in the day
I'd really like to see this as an arcade mode, because now I wanna use this in a private match against friends, but I'm afraid of getting banned or something
Cant get banned for using something that’s native to the game. If you’re not using third party software then you’re good. Just don’t do it in ranked lol
For the first round with the Gridlock behind bomb, the only thing is that even if they aren’t communicating he’s shown proof that he can hear and has somewhat game sense. So the fact that he killed gridlock when defuser is blaring next to her so loudly 1 second after set gives him an indicator where she is
To me cheating is doing anything that gives you, or your team a unfair advantage that's not implemented by game design. That exploit is more of a borderline cheat imo. P.S. the guy in match 5 is 100% cheating. Look at round 3 39:44 where he got shot from closet in Astro, if you look closely you can see when he first shoots sparks fly, meaning he shot at a reinforced wall exactly where an enemy was standing behind. Clear case of a guy feigning innocence.
@@dadadidadadam a normal prefire would've been before that point at first corner, or to the right of the reinforcement. It makes no sense to prefire right there, even for bad players that makes no sense, but there are other instances where he was clearly cheating, if you watch closely you'll see how obvious it was despite him trying to hide it.
@@paph6699 if that was the only instance of suspicion I'd give him a pass, but too often did he just simply know where people were, too often did he have questionable moments, this is the icing on the cake. I don't want to speculate but it's possible Tabasco was his teammate. Obviously it would have no impact in that instance, but in other rounds where Tabasco is dead he could be given the guy callouts. Not as bad as actually cheating, but still an offense.
I love how you explained what a hacker is to us when 100% of us have been killed by a hacker also using exploits online is still cheating. Even Ubisoft has addressed that
varsity just to let you know, it is very possible for people who make their own cheats to control a pc from within a game, especially if they are able to get partial server access or full server access. infact in the black ops games theres a modder who has gained full server access in many of the games. and hes completely able to fully control your pc from within game that being delete, uninstall, install, or anything to your pc he requires full control for this. but even with partial server access hes able to use the game to open up your browser and send you to any website
Varsity also tunneled too much on where the sights would be and was concerned about how he knew he was there. But if you look at the full screen, you will see that there are feet running by under the table, so you don't need audio queues to defend him seeing Kap.
you can definitely have more than two of the same op, had a game where four guys did it and used 4 fuses, 4 frosts, 4 kapkans, and so on. lets just say it was hell
Could be not in ISS, we people in central Asia don't have servers. Closest ones are in East Europe where we have 120ms and it's really hard to play against those who has stable 20-30ms
I know the second one is him wiffing alot but tbh I had someone exactly like this and I thought it was weird but then I realised they were a bad player that tried to hide it by turning it on mid shooting, tbh seeing this he didn't seem like that but still the way you observed the Kapkan kill reminded me of hackers I've met
With the one Fuze not having skins or anything crazy- I've encountered a big repeatedly in console R6 lately where, even if you have skins and a scope set up on Fuze, it automatically disregards any of your personalizations unless you change something prior to beginning of the round and I hate getting stuck with a holo on the AK-12 or his LMG. It could've been this bug or a problem with the glitch 🤷🏻♂️
I’m glad the duplicate operator exploit is finally getting more attention. I had 2 teammates using double Monty and double clash the whole game. And btw, I have seen screenshots of 5 montys on one team but could have been fakes.
The arcade game mode that you mentioned should be like choosing a bomb site where everybody votes on an operator and the winning one everybody has to be
League of Legends had a game mode that was "all the same" or something like that where teams would all be the same operator. It was pretty fun the stuff you could do with that.
At whoever is the OP of this channel I forgot your Christian name. That Match 2 could honestly be a Controller Player judging by the aim, I speak of experience, especially the First kill of Amaru looked like that person hasn't been recoil controlling at all with her gun.
When two or more players use lion they have 6 health boosts and because it registers 2 lions every time one person boosts, they gain 40 extra health. I submitted a game like that where me and a friend barley pull off a win against them.
With the glitch you can have up to 5 of the same op so 5 jagers or 5 ashes or 5 zofias it’s an easy glitch but it requires some somewhat precise timing
Arc game mode where teams vote which operator to play and then they are forced to play 5v5 same operators might be hilarious, not gonna lie, I would like to try that.
Varsity: well the game gives people with a low k/d good gun skins to make them play longer Well where's my black ice ubisoft I've been playing for 3 years gimme black ice
If software developers are adding code snippets as flavor, it's probably pretty safe to assume either: The code makes sense OR It's a joke , puzzle, inside reference, or something like that. In this case, the code makes sense. The part you didn't understand is using what's called a conditional operator. It's essentially a very compact if else statement.
So the code you didn't understand: string msg = msgPrefixStr + ((msgPrefixStr == null)? "": ": ") is using an inline conditional check to determine what to append to the end of the line. Basically if msgPrefixStr is not null (empty) set msg = msgPrefixStr + ": " else msg is an empty string at this point
28:50 i agree, i'm horrible and have 14 black ices at level 185 (including buck, ash and sledge) while my carry has 4 (including doc shotgun) at level 130
"No rules" game mode Basically pick what ever op and they have every attachment possible and every secondary gadget. Idk sounds fun and theres more potential for that idea.
the people who reported the Akaishushi guy on Match 2 were Iranian. Amirhossein Ali and so on. us Iranians have a knack for calling everyone cheater whenever they own us in a game xD
So they should make a gamemode like in valorant, in valorant its called reflection where the entire team is 1 operator/agent and in rainbow they should make it so you can vote on which op to use as a team most votes win and they should do that every round
