Тёмный

Check for Prime | Sample Video I for Essential Maths for CP | GeeksforGeeks 

GeeksforGeeks
Подписаться 817 тыс.
Просмотров 19 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

25 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 45   
@JGyanRaj
@JGyanRaj 3 года назад
Great explanation with simplicity at it's peak for both problem and solver (Sandeep Sir).
@zrotrasukha8733
@zrotrasukha8733 3 месяца назад
I watched like more than 2 hours of lecture on this and still didn't understand, watched this 20 minute video and it is so crystal clear.
@superfact4556
@superfact4556 3 года назад
Simplicity level infinity
@GrowwithVivek08
@GrowwithVivek08 3 года назад
Sir what a fabulous explanation 🙏🙏
@sumittanwar7727
@sumittanwar7727 2 года назад
Sir the more efficient method can be little more efficient if you calculate the square root before the for loop because in for loop it runs again and again for same number Like int root = (int)Math.sqrt(n); for (int i = 5; i
@MahamudulHasanSiam
@MahamudulHasanSiam 5 месяцев назад
very helpful for me sir, thank you
@mahedirony
@mahedirony Год назад
good explained......dear sir
@bazar9000
@bazar9000 3 года назад
Such good explanations 👌
@surjeetsingh-cp6hn
@surjeetsingh-cp6hn 3 года назад
what about n=2 ,it gives the number itself as an output ,instead of 1(true);
@aryanyadav3926
@aryanyadav3926 2 года назад
GREAT !
@chiragagrawal3501
@chiragagrawal3501 3 года назад
What's the time complexity of the second more efficient method ?
@ACEAMIbuildsGlades
@ACEAMIbuildsGlades 3 года назад
i think it will be theta(√n/6) but i am confused for big O as in that we dont consider the constants which is 1/6 in this case so Big O might be O(√n) but i am sure of theta(√n/6)
@vivek_1012
@vivek_1012 2 года назад
in last most efficient method we put in i=i+6 but only check for n%i==0 and n%(i+2)==0 . for other numbers which are even like i+1,i+3,i+5, it doesnt need to check, but for i+4 we dont check n%(i+4)==0. What is the reason behind the same?
@vivek_1012
@vivek_1012 2 года назад
@GeeksforGeeks
@jaijaijaijai123
@jaijaijaijai123 Месяц назад
see in loop we are iterating for i=3k+2 for some k. eg. 5,11,17,23,29........ This shows that i+4 will be 3k+6 anyway will be multiple of 3. i+2 will be 3k+4 or 3t+1 type. Hence, we need not check for i+4
@vivek_1012
@vivek_1012 Месяц назад
​@@jaijaijaijai123 So lets take 5=3(1)+2 let initial value of k =1 Then, [ 3k+2, 3k+2+6 ) =[ 3k+2, 3k+2+3(2) ) =[ 3k+2, 3(k+2)+2) 5= 3(1) +2 11= 3(3) +2 17 = 3(5) +2 . . . and so on so we need to check for interval [3k+2, 3(k+2)+1) everytime. -- 3k+2 and 3k+4 are check inside iteration. -- 3k+3 is divisible by 3 -- 3k+5 not checked -- 3k+6 is divisible by 3 -- 3k+7 not checked -- 3k+8 = 3k+ 6 +2 = 3(k+2)+2 so it ends here The question still remains that 3k+5 and 3k+7 arent checked in each iteration. There is only one reason that remains, that somehow 3k+5 and 3k+7 are proved to be even numbers ( i noticed k is always odd, this might give some hint).
@utkarshmaurya6877
@utkarshmaurya6877 3 года назад
We can also look from 1 to √n to see if n is a prime number or not...
@GeeksforGeeksVideos
@GeeksforGeeksVideos 3 года назад
Running a loop from 1 would be a problem as any value of n would be divisible by 1.
@utkarshmaurya6877
@utkarshmaurya6877 3 года назад
Ya forgot about that...😀.. But is looping upto to √n more efficient or not??
@CengizAkarsu
@CengizAkarsu 3 года назад
so what is the time&space complexity of the last method?
@danielmaralending6732
@danielmaralending6732 4 месяца назад
a third of the square root of n
@3lpme
@3lpme 2 месяца назад
So guys read my comment so that you won't waste 2days to understand this. basic logic is if x divides n the n/x also divides n So lets take (x,n/x )as a pairs as x increase n/x decreases suppose they became equal at some point then x would be sqrt(n) If any factor which is >sqrt(n) repeat the pair of factors support (3,9) for 27 math.sqrt(27) =5 so lets take 9 so the pair now become (9,3) so iterating upto √n saves runtime
@billion_dreams__7787
@billion_dreams__7787 3 года назад
Is all lecture of this course is taken by Sandeep sir ??
@chandankumarram544
@chandankumarram544 3 года назад
Yes DSA all course taken by sandeep sir
@billion_dreams__7787
@billion_dreams__7787 3 года назад
@@chandankumarram544 I am not telling about DSA course, this is a new course which are added in gfg 4/5 days ago..
@GeeksforGeeksVideos
@GeeksforGeeksVideos 3 года назад
@@billion_dreams__7787 This course has all lectures by Sandeep Jain
@factsmotivation7728
@factsmotivation7728 10 месяцев назад
why we increment by 6 i cannot under stand explain me some one
@aishwaryakg2411
@aishwaryakg2411 Год назад
in the more efficient method why are we incrementing it by 6 and y are we checking for both n%i and n%i+2 ???? can some one please do answer??
@h989l
@h989l Год назад
because if you look at the loop, it is starting from 5 right, it means it is incrementing like this 5,5+6=11,11+6=17,... let's see the numbers between 5 and 11, the numbers are 6,7,8,9,10; inside a loop we are checking for i and i+2, so when i=5 , we check for 5 and 7 right .so 7 is already checked so we are actually eliminating 6,8,9,10 right . now look at those numbers they are in the form of 2n or 3n(where n is natural numbers) .the fun part is we already checked for 2 and 3 in the starting of the loop like this if (n%2 == 0 || n%3 == 0) return false. so we actually checked for all numbers but in a efficient way.
@aishwaryakg2411
@aishwaryakg2411 Год назад
@@h989l thank you so much
@madhabkafle8072
@madhabkafle8072 8 месяцев назад
@@h989l Thanks man, it helped.
@nafisaparveen9759
@nafisaparveen9759 3 месяца назад
​@@h989l omg sir! you are great teacher, solved my doubt! thanks a lottt!!!!
@ramsai6141
@ramsai6141 3 года назад
Sir...what is the reason behind incrementing i to 6 every time in last approach....?
@GeeksforGeeksVideos
@GeeksforGeeksVideos 3 года назад
To improve performance for large n as number of iterations of for loop is reduced.
@ramsai6141
@ramsai6141 3 года назад
@@GeeksforGeeksVideos but why not 5 ,7 or any other number....why only choosed 6...?
@bhanupratapsingh5468
@bhanupratapsingh5468 3 года назад
@ram because we are checking with I and I+2 in one loop so next loop should start from I+6
@yourbestie4138
@yourbestie4138 3 года назад
Bro we are not doing any other except I+6 because it covers all prime number like 11,13,17,19 and these are the only numbers which divide its square like 121,169 etc so we do I+6
@omkargunjal1611
@omkargunjal1611 3 года назад
@@yourbestie4138 well apart from detecting prime, can we say that a = 5 and d=6 and any n can give us a prime number always?
@robertb4082
@robertb4082 3 года назад
What about 5? 5%5 is 0. It makes 5 is not a prime number
@GeeksforGeeksVideos
@GeeksforGeeksVideos 3 года назад
It will not enter inside the for loop for 5, so will return true at the end.
@bhanupratapsingh5468
@bhanupratapsingh5468 3 года назад
n should be greater than i , then only it will enter inside loop
@cosmicray.sagor1
@cosmicray.sagor1 5 месяцев назад
It is not work for 999983
@jaijaijaijai123
@jaijaijaijai123 Месяц назад
my program works
Далее
Three NEW MAPS in Update 0.31.0 Nightmare | Standoff 2
01:48
UFC 308: Пресс-конференция
35:18
Просмотров 557 тыс.
Maths for DSA/CP : All You Need To Know
1:07:19
Просмотров 140 тыс.
Google Coding Interview With A Competitive Programmer
54:17
How to become a Consultant in 2024?
1:00
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.