Тёмный

China | A Nice Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad | Radical Problem 

SALogic
Подписаться 859
Просмотров 15 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

8 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 34   
@mathpro926
@mathpro926 23 дня назад
good video good solution
@SALogics
@SALogics 22 дня назад
Glad you liked it!
@DonRedmond-jk6hj
@DonRedmond-jk6hj Месяц назад
It would have been helpful to mention that the square roots should be positive integers. For example, we can get solutions involving logarithms.
@rabotaakk-nw9nm
@rabotaakk-nw9nm Месяц назад
2:35 ( m>n) є N
@SidneiMV
@SidneiMV Месяц назад
2⁶ - 2² = 60 √x = 6 => x = 36 √y = 2 => y = 4
@SALogics
@SALogics Месяц назад
Thanks for your feedback ❤
@johnlv12
@johnlv12 Месяц назад
exactly, the problem statement needs to specify the conditions on x and y.
@jamesharmon4994
@jamesharmon4994 Месяц назад
If the negative root is used, then you are adding fractions since this is what a negative power means. If either root is negative, the sum won't be an integer.
@nasrullahhusnan2289
@nasrullahhusnan2289 Месяц назад
The key in solving problem of this type is to manipulate the left hand side as the difference of 2 squares. (k^u)-(k^v)=n where k and n are constant while u and v are unknowns.
@SALogics
@SALogics Месяц назад
Yes, you are right! ❤
@SidneiMV
@SidneiMV Месяц назад
2⁶ - 2² = 60 √2¹² - √2⁴ = 60 √x = 12 => x = 144 √y = 4 => y = 16
@SALogics
@SALogics Месяц назад
Great! ❤
@key_board_x
@key_board_x 19 дней назад
@ 2:40 / 11:08 There's no need to introduce an additional variable as k 2^(m) - 2^(n) = 60 2^(m + n - n) - 2^(n) = 60 2^(n + m - n) - 2^(n) = 60 [2^(n) * 2^(m - n)] - 2^(n) = 60 2^(n) * [2^(m - n) - 1] = 60 2^(n) * [2^(m - n) - 1] = 4 * 15 2^(n) * [2^(m - n) - 1] = 2^(2) * 15 → by identification n = 2 2^(m - n) - 1 = 15 2^(m - n) = 16 2^(m - n) = 2^(4) m - n = 4 m = 4 + n → recall: n = 2 m = 6
@SALogics
@SALogics 18 дней назад
Very Nice ❤
@Psykolord1989
@Psykolord1989 10 дней назад
Before watching: Alright, so the first thing I did was find what powers of 2 (2^a and 2^b) can, when one is subtracted from the other, give you 60. The answer? 2^6 (64) - 2^2 (4) = 0. So, our first term must equal 64, and our second must equal 4. √2 = 2^(1/2), and (a^m)^n = a^(mn) So our initial terms can be rewritten as 2^((√x)/2) - 2^((√y)/2) = 60. From what I wrote above, this means that (√x)/2 = 6 -> √x = 12 -> x = 144 And (√y)/2 = 2 -> √y = 4 -> y=16 The solution is X=144, Y = 16.
@SALogics
@SALogics 8 дней назад
Great! ❤
@user-xh3ih4ks9y
@user-xh3ih4ks9y 25 дней назад
64-4=60 √2^(√x)=64=√2^(6×2)=√2^12 √2^(√y)=4=2^2=√2^4 √x=12 則x=144 √y=4 則y=16
@SALogics
@SALogics 22 дня назад
Very Nice ❤
@michallesz2
@michallesz2 29 дней назад
3a-2a=a => a=60 3a=3*60=180 => V2^Vx=180 => Vx = ln(180)/ ln(V2) => Vx= 5,1929.../ 0,34657....= 14,9837... x= Vx^2 = 224,51.... 2a=2*60=120 => V2^Vy=120 => Vy = ln(120)/ ln(V2) => Vy= 4,78749.../ 0,34657...= 13,81.... y= Vy^2 = 190,82....
@SALogics
@SALogics 28 дней назад
Great! ❤
@maburwanemokoena7117
@maburwanemokoena7117 26 дней назад
I feel like the solution to this problem you can always find it through trial and error.
@SALogics
@SALogics 25 дней назад
Yes, you are right ❤
@user-vi8dh7gv3t
@user-vi8dh7gv3t 23 дня назад
Ответ - 3.Обожаю африканских беженцев.
@SALogics
@SALogics 22 дня назад
144 and 16 ❤
@prime423
@prime423 Месяц назад
Look at the original equation!!Thats all folks.
@SALogics
@SALogics Месяц назад
I can't understand what do you want to ask?? ❤
@dardoburgos3179
@dardoburgos3179 Месяц назад
X= 144, Y= 16.
@SALogics
@SALogics Месяц назад
Yes, you are right ❤
@dardoburgos3179
@dardoburgos3179 Месяц назад
@@SALogics no entiendo.
@marccepeci2980
@marccepeci2980 21 день назад
Do you need to require the condition that the exponents are natural numbers?
@SALogics
@SALogics 21 день назад
Thanks for your feedback ❤
@viaducjy4483
@viaducjy4483 17 дней назад
Ici on trouve une solution mais quand on considère 2^n(2^k-1)=60 on considère que n et k sont des entiers mais on y apporte pas la preuve. Il faudrait prouver qu'en dehors des entiers on ne puisse pas avoir l'égalité 2^n(2^k-1)=60 ou alors prouver que la solution trouvée est unique soit un seul couple possible pour(x,y) ce qui n'est pas le cas. Pour l'instant je me casse les dents sur l'unicité et je ne suis pas davantage arrivé à prouver que n et k (utilisés dans la vidéo) ne peuvent être qu'entiers même si j'en ai la conviction profonde.
@SALogics
@SALogics 17 дней назад
Merci pour vos commentaires. J'apprécie vos efforts! ❤
Далее
Geometry | Find the Area of Yellow Triangle
10:22
Fake watermelon by Secret Vlog
00:16
Просмотров 10 млн
🛑 ты за кого?
00:11
Просмотров 92 тыс.
The Most Controversial Number in Math
6:46
Просмотров 1,2 млн
A Functional Equation from Samara Math Olympiads
8:47
A tricky question from Oxford University Interview
10:52
Olympiade Inde , Math
16:00
Просмотров 64 тыс.
Fake watermelon by Secret Vlog
00:16
Просмотров 10 млн