Hello My Dear RU-vid Family 😍😍😍 Hope you all are doing well 🥰🥰🥰 If you are enjoying my video about how to solve this math olympiad algebra problem then please Like and Subscribe my channel as it helps me a lot 🙂🙂🙂
Simplifying a numerical expression using factoring and rationalisation is not algebra, there's no unknown. The goal behind using of the word algebra is to impress an audience. A mathematician is not supposed to play this kind of game; leave that to politicians.
3:51 ¿Que paso con √3 y √5 que multiplicaban las operaciones? Desaparecieron (Si alguien puede ser tan amable de responder mi pregunta se los agradecería mucho)
0:03 during your solution you dropped a lot of facts: the sqrt of any number is +/- Also when you divide by a symbol you should suppose that it is not zero
@@dinum94015 is the square root of 25 tho. rt ab = rt x rtb rt 25 = rt(5 x 5) = rt5 x rt5. Which is also 5 Plus he did it to factorize the numerator tonget (rt3 + rt5)(rt5 + 7)
@saviplayer4546 Yes, you are right... I made a mistake.. but look, my other comment on the dot multiplication is removed by the admin.. I was right about it.. I highlighted your comments to show everyone about my mistake, but he hid his mistake by deleting my comment.
@malteschluter4516 admin deleted my comment because he can't accept his mistake, which is disappointing. So I'm writing this again.. In maths, we can not use the dot multiplication everywhere because it's a different method of multiplication. It's different than the cross multiplication. We use it to multiply vectors. Admin, Don't delete this, too. Admit your mistake instead.
@@dinum9401 Well, generally when people use multiplication in algebra They use dots to not confuse with the multiplication symbol (x) with x the most common letter used for algebra. Like instead of 3xx it'll be 3∙x make it less confusing. But yeah the admin could've at least explained himself instead of just deleted it
Задача нормальная. Но убожество типа рисования решения в графическом редакторе типа paint paint убивает какое-либо желание смотреть этот канал в дальнейшем. Дизлайк.
In my opinion, the graphic editor is *not* the big problem. It is showing all of the routine algebraic manipulations one after another instead of what might be done on a blackboard by crossing out and replacing. x = something y = something-equivalent is used instead of x = {something} {something else} or x = something = something-else Showing all of the intermediate steps *may* be appropriate for those not practiced in algebra. However, this level of detail takes up more visual space and obscures the underlying *insights* which are the most important. One thing done well here is using substitution of variables instead for raw numbers. I enjoy it more when a problem is solved in somewhat abstract fashion, then back-substituted at the end. Just my opinion. I am probably *not* the target audience at which this video may be directed. When I was in school, back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, calculators were large *mechanical* beasts which were used for business and accounting. We just had pen and paper, math tables and slide rules.
