'China can back out of LAC agreement, India shouldn’t be lulled into a false sense of security' 

This time Chinese won't back out. However, after one year they will come back to occupy Ladakh and Arunachal. As usual Indian Army will be caught napping and political class will be blind .

Naravane a great patriot. He is absolutely right.

Actually there is no Indo China border. It is Indo Tibet borders only. Since China as an aggressor, illegally occupied and annexed Tibet, now we face Indo China border dispute. To my mind, India should tell China that India would talk to Tibetian group of leaders on the border issue and agree for the settlement of pre 1947 era . China should not involve in border issue. All the occupied areas in 1962 war should restored to India. This is how India should settle border issue . Will Modi and Jai take this point.

We cannot let our guard down under any circumstance. Gen. Naravane is right.

Thanks to Trudeau's expert diplomacy, India is fast-tracking its border settlement with China. With that out of the way, India has a clear shot at a permanent seat on the UNSC-especially with the U.S., U.K., and France cheering from the sidelines. In 1960, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai proposed a compromise to resolve the India-China border dispute, suggesting that China would recognize India's claim to the eastern sector (Arunachal Pradesh) if India acknowledged Chinese control over Aksai Chin in the western sector. This "package deal" aimed to settle the boundary by dividing the contested areas between the two countries, with China prioritizing Aksai Chin for its strategic link between Tibet and Xinjiang. However, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru rejected the proposal, as he was unwilling to return any territory gained by lines drawn by its former colonial master. The U.S. maintained its embargo on China during the Great Chinese Famine (1959-1961) discouraging other nations from sending food, while millions died of starvation. Confident that China is weakened and will collapse, India implemented its "Forward Policy", expecting a weak Chinese response. If this border issue had been resolved in 1960, the past 64 years of mutual suspicion and distrust might have been avoided. China does not view any country as an adversary and is open to collaboration and partnership with all nations. Anywhere in the world, if there is a border dispute, it is usually the result of a line drawn by an Englishman; if it is an internal dispute, it is usually the US fueling it with diplomatic, financial, covert, and military support. Difference in implementation of divide and conquer strategy.

The chinese came into galwan after a senior politician from the ruling party, was chest thumping in the parliament, about his intention to reclaim PoK. It was empty words without preparation, & which china took it as a declaration of war. This disengagement has nothing to do with Indian responses/price, & is rather because of China's internal politics related to Xi. On our eastern flank, in Manipur, the situation remains volatile, due to ethnic violence between the communities. As vishwamitra, first build unity in our Manipur. The poor handling of Manipur's unrest has been going poorly; which has raised questions about this senior politician's competency in our nation's security. This criticism on Manipur is coming from the rss chief. Such level has NEVER happened in history of Manipur. While, in our western flank, this senior politician has not been able to handle his responsibilities to counter the pak-sponsoredterrorgroups that infiltrate drugs & weapons into India via drones, tunnels, & riverine routes along India's western border. China's default approach involves sweet talk about mutual peace, but their actions speak differently. Xi focus was on purely gaining territories, disregarding the cost for their troops. In 2020, their actions in galwan violated treaty rules & aimed to replicate '62. Fortunately, our brave soldiers foiled their acts. It's crucial to remember that China's history is all fabricated, their territorial claims are all calculated scams. Their system prioritizes party & leaders image, over the well-being of chinese citizens. China views India through a unique lens, viewing India as inferior, not a competitor. They criticize India over caste, yet it has not been successful in creating a classless society in their nation. When China looks down on India, it only reveals China condition about their own inadequacy. Chinese inferiority complex leads them to belittling their fellow nations. Bodhidharma was Indian, Marx wasn't Chinese. China lacks balance & human spiritual growth. They lecture others on communism's greatness while ignoring their own weaknesses. As China is a one-party state, they can delete all opposition. They spend more on internal security compared to their military. Instead of acknowledging their past mistakes & errors that they make, they love to blame the West for unfair advantages since WW2, forgetting the US saved them from Japan.

Sir with great respect, the present govt gave complete authority and freedom to you when u were the army chief to resolve the situation but u wrote in ur book that u were surprised bcose u were clueless and didn't know what to do and u were relying on the govt to resolve the issue, for a army chief who couldn't resolve the issue, dispute,differences or conflict what is that now u r suggesting ? Recently I read the external minister praising army/ military for desecalation which you missed and you couldn't despite the complete freedom from govt, how did the current military resolve which you couldn't do don't u think u failed the country although it was time consuming u did nothing

Manoj mukund naravane one of the finest commanders india has seen

India must be always prepared Militarily to defend itself from China because China does not stick with agreements. It is only Military strength that can Protect India. India must spend more money on its defense and to bring all parts to modernize with best equipments.

Wise and necessary advice of our frmr chief must be heeded by govt

Fully agree with title of video

Totally agree with ur assessment.

Not "can". "Will" needs to replace can. It's a matter of time.

When he was in charge all these things happened. He couldn’t take any precautions . Now coming with advice. Army also should be accountable.

Chinese plan flopped as RG failed to deliver . However they have realised they have to wait out BJP/RSS rule

I agree with the general.

This being the first step, i don't know why we are celebrating and calling it a great diplomatic and political success. The most realistic and appropriate response was from the present Army Chief. Can you trust China. No. Probably our political leadership wants FDI from China to give a push to our economy, as was suggested in the economic survey preceding the annual budget. So hold your horses. Let the guards be on. Let political leaders celebrate to boost the image of our PM before Maharashtra elections.

You are right general.

Bingo! They just have their hands full with their economy, the US, Taiwan and the Philippines

Field Marshal Rommel aur Gen. Patton ke baad koi military leader aayen hain to woh hain Gen. Naravane. Who could have guessed the Chinese are capable of breaking an agreement....it takes a lot of deep thinking to come to this conclusion.

Hind Chini Bhai Bhai ❤

It's useless to hear the same old news time and time again when the title says " China can back out...." The introduction/preamble took much of the time than the main point.

Difference between dis engagement, de escalation and de induction

Sir ji , When is your book going to be released??

So, can India too back out ? Ye it can. Any side can back out of any agreement.

👌👌👌👌👌

❤

India is full of 'Media Generals'. 😂

🫡 For the army men to having spine to stand against sino & anti-Indo forces... Unlike politicians and journalists...

The HIGHLY DANGEROUS & EXTREMELY POWERFUL DRAGON STILL POSSES A MASSIVE THREAT TO THE EXTREMELY WEAK BIG CAT.

The only purpose is to get more vote for Modi in a democracy.

Gen why IA could not see so much of troops movement towards border when there were having drills 60 kms from the border

He should be the chief of defence

Credits are also due to the USA 🇺🇸 for the BECA Agreement to provide realtime precision mass targeting data from its considerable space assets 🌌🚀(space-based GMTI/AMTI) to jointly give a fait-accompli to China and re-establish deterrence and détente. Its an open question whether India has established the double détente with both America and China. .

Hello general, what happened to your much talked books. When will it come? Now election has been also completed, so give a timeline to us.

Does it matter anyway..

He should explain how explain how he allowed large chinese force into ladakh in 2020

Yes. U should cos china aint got nothin to lose. Keep up with your tribal mentality and ego. Jaihind

What should be appreciated by indian people that inspite of an unfenced & unmarked border, nobody from China infiltrates into India with an AK 47 and kills civillians as in the case with Pakistan. There is no acrimony & no shootouts between the two armies on the China India border. India should keep this in mind while negotiating with China.

We have to become closer with America in terms of arms, Russia is time tasted friendship of India but they will never leave or help India against China

All these great Indian Institutions are now a days filled with RSS people who never had a courage to fight with British. So don’t expect anything significant from them in the time of crisis.They are only good at talking and misleading the public. There can not an era of wars anytime 😅😅 Hope in the future some brave, intelligent and honest people will rule the country. To build the super power and rich and wealthy and welfare state needs different levels of leadership and the government functional with most efficient and effective with a mission to work on.🙏👍💐💐

modi has surrendered,,,India has 15500 kms boundary line ,,, as per protocol troops are not present all the time,,,, the entire border is not patrolled,,, patrolling happens only in designated ,,,, the border is huge,, in many areas patrol happens only in summer, that is the protocol,,,, chinese have the habit of occupying unpatrolled regions and claiming as theirs,,,, the indian government was caught sleeping,,,, Indian military responed in galwan but modi gave away galwan also to china,,,, modi has surrendered