China's Brand New Aircraft Carrier vs USS Gerald R. Ford Supercarrier - Who Would Win? 

It’s like you know people fall asleep listening to these

Best RU-vid channel to sleep to thank you keep making 3hr+ videos

The only way to actually sink a US Supercarrier is with either Godzilla or the Decepticons

USA Military's true greatest strength is the complex and efficient logistical capabilities that allow USA to project power far away from home; operational and communication capabilities are unmatched.

I'm really digging these long infographic videos

Video is 3 hrs long because that is how long the Chinese carrier will last in a actual fight

You're sleeping and wake up wondering "why do I want an aircraft carrier and a beer"🤯

US Carriers arent unsinkable nothing is, but America really doesnt like when people mess with our toys. If a country was to attack a carrier and even badly damage it, i imagine the response would be quite... "proportional"

I love these videos they are so entertaining to watch

Love the long vids. Keeping my Bluetooth in all day at work...

I love America. Thanks America for being American. ❤

I didn't know they sailed backwards........great vidz buddy keep up the work.

Inforgraphics thank you

I'm thinking the USN will use the 003's for target practice. I'm not really seeing the 003's as much of a threat.

Awesome content!

Ford carrier has a better sortie rate. Even the older Nimitz can launch more aircraft at the same time than China's Type 003 Fujian. While the smaller "lighting carrier" Wasp and America class assault ships can have the same sortie rate with F-35Bs.

Perfect on the spot in a short video. Listening on my way to work on the other side of the country

Great graphics

Everybody knows how to fight until they get punched in the face

USNS Concord - the fueler the Kitty Hawk was tied to mostly during UNREPs while we were... adjusting the topography of Iraq and Afghanistan. Thanks for the gas! But a problem with your statement about these support vessels, and how nuke carriers don't need them: There _IS_ an Air Wing aboard, and they run on JP5.

How many iterations of this video have you guys made? It’s at least a dozen in the last year

You can't have the worlds largest defense budget without a bad guy to fight.

Can you please tell me where you create these video's? wich site or app? you would help me loads! If you got a affiliate link I can use?

Really nice voice. That's what's its all about. David Attenborough good

This is a good installment. Well done.

Love these Hollywood Top Gun commercials. Meanwhile the US carrier fleet has retreated to the second island chain 😂😂😂

idk what it is but i can only fall asleep when something I'm interested in listening to is on, and his voice just makes it that much easier

The US has running carriers down to a science. Im sure accidents happen that we never here about. But those folks that run things on a carrier do a super job

Nuclear Powered or not, does not mean they don't need a dedicated oiler, where do you think the jet fuel comes from and the food to feed 1000's of personal...

3:58 those LRAMS are an incredibly dangerous missile!

I also wonder how subs will come into play during engaments between aircraft carriers. I know you have made videos on the Subs but just so crazy to think how close some of these scenes are from coming to real life. Dangerous time. Shoutout from Minnesota, USA. I am headed into the Coast Guard, wonder what will happen with that in the future

I listen to these right when I lay down to nap. Puts me right to sleep.

HEY, LAKE, WHAT DIFFERENTIAL OIL SHOULD I USE IN MY FORD CROWN VIC POLICE INTERCEPTOR ? CAN YOU RECOMMEND A PRODUCT ? MAYBE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE LIKE THE DIF VERSION OF VALVOLINE RESTORE AND PROTECT ?

I bet Billy will have one of those carseats that look like a race seat

I would love to see the Ford I bet it’s massive to see

@TheInfographicsShow i I had an idea for a video. What sized speed and composition and trajectory of an asteroid impact on the moon get it to spin then vary the factors to have it spin at different speeds also the after effect of moon debris being spit out from impact

Being conventionally powered I have my doubts at how well the Electronic catapults on the type 3 will work. Will they be able to power all ship systems at full power including propulsion, radars, weapons, electronic warfare, ect. While launching one let alone two or three planes at a time? I seriously have my doubts.

Some of these are interesting but some help me sleep

How many drones fit on a carrier? They dont metion this at all, its hard to believe there's not 100s of drones on board as well.

Coudent a swedish submarine sink those? think i saw a video on that

Good Chat AI generated script make a soft muisc helps calm military buffs

This helps me to space out, relax

Woke up to this

I'm quite sure China has watched thousands of hours of carrier ops of the US and the UK and a few others. It is an art. It takes people who love what they do. From the deck crew and air marshal to the Ouija board to the mini boss then to the air boss. It is a concert. The bare minimum is launching an aircraft every 30 seconds ! Trapping an aircraft every 45 seconds ! Turn around time 10 minutes ! We do it faster and better than that. The USN carrier and strike group. I do believe China has had a lot of time watching with patience learning with patients. China will be no joke, that's for sure. They're only hope would be to take out our carriers. That goes both ways ! Just because the limitations of the Accord limits the amount of carriers don't think for one second the US does not have 3 fold in reserve. I'm not a warmonger. I don't want war. I don't believe Ming wants it either. They cannot even claim Taiwan has China territory just saying so doesn't make it so. Nor does saying the ocean belongs to China. That was the silliest thing I ever heard. We knew that they were dredging and building islands. The natural Islands of volcanoes were first come first served. Whoever claimed it named it. China has a lot of money and if their doctrine in defense and offense was of Japan in world war II. There will be a battle. I truly believe they're waiting for the right moment when they believe that we are thinned out between Ukraine and Israel. But they know without doubt we have more to bring to the fight. Nobody wants war. I surely don't. But those are the facts. God bless you all 🕊️🕊️🕊️

why are the ships in these videos always sailing backwards?

No pause Is wild

Its a contest to see how many times they can say the same thing.

The US military, without a doubt. Has the biggest toy box.

For some reason you have some parts of the video with the carrier traveling in reverse. Did anyone watch the video before posting it?

A number of the animations have the ships sailing backwards.

Bring it ....................

Of course! What would a new infographic be w o @ least 1 “33” somewhere…. Any1 else notice that favorite # featured more than any other?

Inside edition please bring back the challenge man or tell us why he is no longer doing challenges please

I swear i watched this video already

Wow,this did not show up in my feed,i.e. Notifications, an yes I have "All" selected ,hmmmmmmmmmm

Yes we do

I'd be impressed if China's carrier made it out of their territorial waters without breaking down. And unlike what they claim, thats not very far at all.

Why showing boats going backwards?

Type 003 is good but still nowhere near US super carriers (Ford, Nimitz). Doesn’t have a nuclear reactor. Much smaller number of aircraft onboard: US up to 90 per super carrier, Type 003 over 40.

The water graphics always makes it look like things are going backwards, what is up with that?

Anyone else see that carrier traveling backwards in the water while launching planes? 1:15

the electromagnetic catapult is "so much better" yet it still doesn't work properly xD

Man, realized how many times the video repeats itself in several sections.

I'm surprised neither carrier uses eloctromag launch rather than more complicated and limiting steam.. I would think with electro launch and catch, they could launch even 747 off the deck of the carrier was wide enough for its exceedingly long wings, which makes me wonder why they don't cut the wings in half and double them up would still equal same surface area with shorter wing span

Why do you constantly show the U.S. ships sailing backwards?

Okay, let's assume for a minute that the 003 is well equipped and meets Nimitz rather than the Ford. Now it's the oldest against the newest carrier. While the fortunes of war will on rare occasions, favor the weaker over the stronger (think Midway), that is generally not the case. The Chinese would be at a severe disadvantage against the US Navy. The Americans have over 100 years of experience of operating carriers, and have used their carriers thousands of times to attack enemies. Okay, let's do a check here and ask how many times have the Chinese used their carriers against an enemy (the wind blows across the hot desert while we wait for the Chinese guy to think of a lie to save face)? The answer, of course, is zero! Now, let's assume both carriers suffer hits and damage control is working feverishly to put out the fires. Which Navy has ships that have been built tough from actual war experience, and which Navy doesn't know how to deal with battle damage? In the end the 003 will be on the bottom, while the Nimitz will lick her wounds as her repair crews get planes quickly back into the air and clear the ocean of foolish Chinese admirals that thought they were a match for the US Navy.

Haha. This is like buying a carrier off of wish

Considering how much coastline China has (and let’s not forget about their feelings about Japan), it’s honestly bizzare that they haven’t invested more into their Navy 🤷🏻‍♂

bruh 3 HOURS WHO WILL WATCH THIS ENTIRE THING also, FIFTH YAY!

You say a us carrier doesn’t need a dedicated oiler however the aircraft’s still need fuel so they always have a oiler around both for fuel and food supplies

Why are your carriers going backwards?

I'm old school navy, off the Midway we used to launch 3 aircraft per 5 mins.... That's with only 2 cats.

Who else listens while at work

The new S-500 is especially effective when they remember to turn it on.

0:53 Why are both these guys talking at the same time?

That according to Einsteins unified field theory the magnetic field used to slow the aircraft before it lands can also be used as a force field no one actually knows it's true capabilities but you fire missiles at it and try to sink it you're going to find out the hardware just how deadly the Gerald Ford actually is

This is like asking me if i got brand new golf clubs, could I beat a PGA Tour player.

Regardless, the US has been investing those amounts for decades and china just started being able to, and the catch up they have done in technology has come from thievery and espionage rather than through experience and hard work. Good luck on the upgrades C

You used to post daily about Ukraine but not one post about what’s happening in the ME…. Anybody know what’s up with that?

I helped build that boat. Can't wait to see how she'll perform in battle.

ain’t no way infographics show just reuploaded 💀💀💀💀

Lets also point out that Chinese jets have to launch with just a few weapins and half the fuel as they are extremely underpowered. Just like Russia

A better comparison would be the older conventional carriers the US operated like the Kitty-Hawks or even the Forestals!

The Gerald Ford can launch planes with the slingshot and slow them down with a magnetic field you do realize that according to Einstein's unified field theory this could also be used as a force field to protect the entire Gerald Ford not to mention the laser weapons it's carrying

I heard Ford's catapult system is defective

US Navy has Air superiority. China doesn't have the real world experience or combat experience. Plus I can bet one thing the US Navy has a huge advantage that China doesn't have, Our Naval Aviators are trained to fly by instruments which means we don't need daylight to fly. A huge advantage over anyone. We learned our lessons well thanks to the Japanese Imperial Navy teaching us this hard lesson starting with when they brought us into WWII. It was brought to the attention of the power that be that we needed to learn precision bombing and increase carrier forces 5 years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. At the time we had a formidable Navy with lots of ships, and a pretty big Army as well. That is how we fought our wars until that point, we didn't focus on the air, shoot we didn't even have an air force that was run by the Army. The powers in charge disagreed with the information presented to them, a decision that would haunt the Navy on December 7, 1941. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Military strategy changed and the realization that we needed to learn precision bombing was proven by the Japanese. IT is one of the reasons why our pilots and Naval Aviators are trained the way that they are. I am sure in a few years the Chinese will become a formidable opponent but right now, they are still learning and building. I wouldn't say they are not a threat but they have a lot to learn.

Match? yeah, right. The Gerald Ford will simply pummel the Fujian into submission with its insane endurance.

Everybody wants a ten minute quick vid not a three hour lullaby

THREE HOURS!?

China can't even build an apartment block or a road without it falling apart in a week. I'm sure their supercarriers are great!

drones carrier subs are more cost effective than aircraft carriers which are just missiles magnets.

21:55-22:02 🤣 🤣 🤣 “the Hog” 😆 made me laugh out loud, I have never heard you mispronounce anything that comes to mind

We just keep moving the goal line

If you don't have a nuclear reactor (or TWO nuclear reactors as featured on the new Ford class super carriers) to provide power then you can't really use an electromagnetic catapults system usefully.

The issue is we don’t send enough destroyers with an Aircraft Carrier battle group! They will get overwhelmed if China decides to really try to damage an entire group. The Navy needs to increase the number of destroyers sent with every battle group. There will be more defensive missiles and radars working together.

That’s not a carrier - it’s a big, flat boat.

where do you get 777 Chinese naval military ships, you counting fishing boats? At best I can find 435.

It would be epic if they made a submersible aircraft carrier.

13.6 million views an only 2 likes 😢

New carriers will be small and carry drones, or manufacture them.