China's Modern Military | Animated History 

We respect Holzern here!

We will all mostly be dead by 2049 so not sure why they're bothering

That was one of the most enjoyable commercials I've seen on RU-vid. I just bought a G-Shock Master Of Mud watch had I seen this sooner I would of bought in a split second. It's gonna be workin my head I'm sure till I get one..or two.

*2:14* I had no idea you had a wife and he's only 24yo. Glad you've made something of yourself.

Philippines army revolution 🙏😅

С Наступающим Новым Годом!

😅😊

Remember if you give RU-vid money you stay no matter the situation. If you want a bonus you must not be under “racist RU-vid employees” who will just age restrict you for no reason or ban

RU-vid has offices in russia, probably in China too Money does not smell, and they will suck anything their sponsors ask to.

A reminder that all the established news networks were grandfathered in by RU-vid, the usual rules don't apply to them and they thus monetize all their videos covering naughty topics like the latest mass shooting.

It's weird that both PRC and ROC has political commissars in their military

U forgot to mention Soviet Union declined comissars in 1942 and won ww2 without political commanders, that became battle commanders or privates depending to their abilities. Also Red Army accepted officer system in 1943, almost the same as in Russian Empire.

So does the Imperial guard and the 40k Ultramarines, and they're the most effective fighting force in the universe

​@@tanjeeschuan4999this is effectively how all modern militaries work. Socialist states are just open and direct about it while liberal states put up pretenses of being otherwise. You couldn't be an open Communist in the US military if the US had a serious and powerful Communist movement for the same reason the Chinese aren't interested in letting globalist aligned liberals into their army. It's a direct threat to Chinese sovereignty in general, not just the CPC

actually the soviets didn't get rid of political officers the simply changed the name and their precise duties.

There could be a simpler solution though. For example, instead of an aggressive build up they could try a steady and slow military buildup. Diplomatically speaking, aggressive wolf warrior tactics isn’t really helping them. Having a friendly and looking as non threatening as possible for as long as possible would’ve given them more time.

Us westerners also dont like the whole genocide of minorities thing.

@@Robsidians Does it remind them of themselves?

@@lolasdm6959 Reminds us of ancestors, yes. Equally disturbing to see what's supposed to be a modern nation doing it...

@@Apple.CC.technomail America has bases all over the pacific, including South Korea and Japan. How would a slow military build up make any sense? I mean imagine the reaction if China had major military bases in Mexico. China DID go the diplomatic route. Look at history! The diplomatic and friendly route hasn’t exactly worked for them seeing how the British flooded China with opium when trade wasn’t going their way or that Japan invaded them and committed some of the worst atrocities in history.

I’ll wait for the day he does one on Luxembourg, the most powerful nation on earth

Men's nipples are better than women's

@@pabcu2507Naw, if he is going to do that he needs to cover the military capabilities of Vatican City. Lol

This video almost covers the US military more than the PLA lol

@@conservativecatholic9030nah, the Great Sealand.

However, the reason why China lacks combat experience is that they don't need and have no idea of foreign aggression at all. For them, it is more important to protect their country and quickly organize forces to rescue in earthquakes, plagues and forest fires.

Because that''s a typical propaganda tactic. Saying your adversary aggressive but not competent at the same time. Powerful and simultaneously weak.

Both can be true, they are very agressive when enforcing the nine-dash line, for example. Doesn't mean they have combat experience as you'd find in an actual combined arms war.

I mean they are doing brinksmanship around Taiwan, and also sending ships into Japanese waters occasionally. That’s aggressive.

The experience of the United States is also to bully some small countries. These experiences lack reference significance in dealing with countries with comparable strength.

CCoPe

Or CCP rolls off the tongue better? Plus CPC looks like PCP.

Not really they were fighting a way superior opponent who had every advantage, I will admit tactically and sometimes strategically they would do some good maneuvers (Chosen being the biggest highlight) other then that it was very attritional, the loses they incurred basically stoped any hope of a Taiwan invasion for a very long time

@@enriqueperezarce5485 Taiwan's official name is Republic of China (ROC), according to its own constitution. ROC and PRC are still in a civil war situation.

@@enriqueperezarce5485 I mean the fact that the Chinese managed to fight the US to a stalemate while contributing the majority of the boots on the ground says something. Especially when you consider that contrary to the narrative of human waves, by the end of the war the number of Chinese and UN troops in Korea was pretty similar. I think people are quick to point to Soviet support for why they were able to do so, but there's only so much air power can do to affect the outcome of a war.

They did have the incredible advantage of being on the same continent as the war they were fighting.

@@enriqueperezarce5485 At that time, Korea was a way more important than Taiwan was. I mean US had the airpower for the whole duration, so the PLA knew this very much that this could be very attritional.

Well it doesn’t exactly match up with what is being said. But it’s because China and the Soviet Union split along ideological lines with China seeing the Soviets as abandoning the Marxist-Leninists. And well Albania didn’t go along with the Soviets so yea China saw itself as defenders of their ideology.

I hate North Korea

China actually gave a lot of weapons to Albania, for free, with zero political strings attached.

Albania was calligning with China more after the mid 1960s. We hve the insane amount of economic gifts to show for it. 😅

You have Hoxha to thank for that

The video has to be an hour, from the Shang Dynasty to the present, 4000 years

@@kongqiyiwang---And a lot of research would likely go into it as well. But if done right.. I wouldn't mind watching it. Even if it's an hour long.

​@@brokenbridge6316Not a lot of people would though

@@BaguettePair---I'm not most people

@@BaguettePair we the special people, we don't care about most people's opinions on a certain niche

美军不捣乱就谢天谢地了😂

Yes they do. For example, in 2005 during Hurricane Katrina, America's military was mobilizing for emergency response. Almost 10,000 National Guard troops were on the ground in Louisiana and Mississippi.

@@Meow-yj1ql There are undeniably examples of the US military, but obviously not every disaster, such as the fires in Hawaii. But China, I guarantee the people's army will be there for all natural disasters, history proves that

The CPC actually did want to interfere, as If the south won the war, the Americans and the west would be right at China's doorstep. It was called a volunteer army to lessen the perceived interference by the CPC.

The KMT soldiers who surrendered after losing the civil war in 1949 were involuntarily volunteered to fight the Korean war as cannon fodder.

"Volunteered" is certainly one way to say it.

BS!

⁠​⁠@rowdymacias9393I don’t get why being conscripts or volunteers would change the definition of it being a full military intervention. The Americans sent in a lot of draftees for Korea and still maintained that it was a police action.

With Japan picking up defense spending again, might be good to visit what Japan has in a few years.

@@zchen27 dosent there no navy treaty also end soon? Or is that still up to the u.n?

@@dirtysniper3434 There's no external Treaty, only Article 9 of the Constitution forbidding Japan from carrying out offensive war. Which can really be interpreted as loosely as you want.

I Hate Russia!

ไอ้พวกนี้มันก็แค่แนวหน้าอยู่แต่ถ้าขอให้เขาทำแนวหลังเขาน่าจะทำได้

And the coast guard. We can add many more ships to the navy. Personal fishing vessels can be conscripted during war under laws passed at the beginning of the modernization process (I suppose to be used as transports? idk the value)

they are the ones who did the oppression against Uyghurs and Tibetens

@@AN-jz3kf The coast guard is part of the people's armed police and the maritime militia is the agency that uses fishing vessels.

@@RynoG2003 ah. Thanks!

Too early to be thoroughly covered and studied without bias. Give it a decade or two and you might get a nice video or two.

In Ukraine?

@@fireironthesecond2909the US isn’t fighting in Ukraine.

@@fireironthesecond2909Even if the US joined in Ukraine, I don't think fighting alocholic conscripts is the same as fighting China.

Yeah, but the US has more experience in warfare though

I am confused by the comments. US was involved in multiple morden wars in the past decades, and they are regarded as the good guys and peace keepers? Just wondering what people on RU-vid want China to become ... if the youtuber said Chinese army is so strong, people will say "China is dangerous and bad", but if the youtuber said Chinese army is a joke and they don't dare to fight, people will still say "China is weak and bad" .... so it seems no matter what the Chinese are doing, they must be bad LOLLL

if there is then I already feel bad for the researchers and artists. Imagine having to draw all the warlord and infighting governments' uniforms!

​@@dergberg3923🤡

​​@@dergberg3923it wouldn't be any harder than drawing any other uniform....

​@@shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965it's less on about the drawing of uniform, more so of the quantity

视频必须是一个小时，从商代到现在，4000年

true lol

Hotdog

Not so funny now, is it? Cracks on the frontline are starting to show....

@@КомандаЛевиThis comment is 5 months old, and the fronts are still holding… 😂 A conventional conflict lasting this long is not “2nd most powerful military in the world” no matter how much Cold War era western equipment NATO gives Ukraine. Only explanation is that Putin doesn’t mind keeping the war pretty stagnant and will waste more Russian lives to die in a foreign country.

Less blood, more sweat. Dont forget: "amateur talk about tac-tic, professional talk about logistic"😎

Prob doesn’t want to mention the millions upon millions of deaths that it took to reach the point where they are now. China doesn’t exactly have the cleanest history…

🤣

👀

China will disappoint you…It doesn’t like leaking data

中国近代历史绝对是爽文一般的存在

😅👉🤡​@@yuluoxianjun

Can you perhaps elaborate?

In fact, intentionally or unintentionally, it reduced China's contribution to the Korean battlefield...

The objective of the UN forces was to free South Korea though. Conquering North Kor was just a bonus. Not to mention, the US has to fight a war half a world away

​@@MrkTanalso casualties not comparable

The US/UN only really lost 개성(開成), but saved South Korea as intended and even advanced in the eastern mountains. Plus the surprise success of the PVA only lasted a couple months until UN combined arms tactics got refined at 지평리(砥平里), afterward getting consistently beaten back until they were able to dig in for classic trench warfare at the line that splits the peninsula today. But sure continue to gloat about 장진(長津), where the outnumbered Americans escaped with practically all its serviceable equipment and organization intact and still had space to rescue over 80000 Korean refugees, while the PVA ultimately lost almost half its fighting strength and totally failed in its goals to destroy X Corps and conquer all of Korea.

​@outofturn331 I mean obviously, due to the huge disparity in industry and firepower

the US wanted to keep south korea alive. The US did lose, but so did the soviets and chinese. Neither wanted to commit to a long, drawn out war, which korea was quickly becoming, so soon after ww2. It was the lack of motivation from the Soviets and Americans that ended the war.

You pay with your datas my man. YT is owned by google and google probably knows more about you than you mother.

LMAO this is why people need to read data though and not just take words as is. China IS number 3 in nuclear weapons but that doesn't mean anything when America has like 5000 nukes.

So China has much fewer nukes than US LOL

你知道的只是让你知道的，既然是对手，那为什么要让你知道我底牌？

​@@Jake-dh9qk中国如果有需求的话，可以让核武器数目变成10000，不过是中国认为不需要那么多罢了，制造核武器的技术已经是古董，而中国也完全不缺材料

一堆半成品放在那，分分钟变成40000个，对于中国的制造能力简直轻松

The Soviet Union at no point ever lost control of their military. In fact commissars weakened their military, that’s why they got rid of them.

​@@baneofbanesThat's the reform of Galbajos.Lead to the Soviet UnionEven if there is truth, I can't change it.

October 7th

From the Palestinian perspective I hope

​@@SnakShaksClosedwell, I'd hope he'd be objective.

@@SnakShaksClosedtheir isn’t as huge of a Palestinian perspective as they weren’t a active player in the Yom Kippur war given that they didn’t exist for more then 2 decades at that time

i'd like to see this too honestly, a two part series, one video from the israeli, and another from the egyptian perspective. The Syrian perspective isnt as interesting in my opinion, as someone whose read a lot from generals from all 3 countries.

@ISIPrava711 Not exactly what i mean

@@OneSingularStair aint no way you're actually Polish

Honestly I can see why. The polish immigrants I've met here in the UK are some of the most hard working people I've met

Full marks for patriotism, buttttt..

@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial I’m Polish and Proud!

There's only one country that fits the superpower status... Everyone else is a regional power

​@@hamzamahmood9565Great powers. Regional powers are only able to influence their immediate surroundings/sphere of influence. Brazil and India would be examples of regional powers.

Well they are also superpowers same with russia. U.k and France have both been superpowers since the end of ww2. Japan in recent history has become one and would be one if it ever starts a navy again.

Apart from Russia,the others countries could hardly take any decision of their own.

Iran is regional power saudi arabia is a regional power India is a regional power germany too france is a global power if you can projet your force around the world you fit in the global power

I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

I think India's military history has most of its ties with foreign powers. A lot of Indian military equipment is not Indian. That will take a while to get over, but I absolutely expect it to be achieved.

Colloquially known as “二炮”。😂

dear my friend, where is Ogaden?

@@traditionalmusicoriginal2720 In Ethiopia

准确来说香港，澳门，台湾不能参加PLA，政治审核无法通过

​@@kongqiyiwangI Don't care Chinese PLAF

@@minhhieuchannel765 You don't care what it matters to me?

@@kongqiyiwang I Hate Chinese PLA

@@minhhieuchannel765 If you hate it, you will take a gun and fight them, what's the use of telling me?

438 lol

@@Damoney1111 I'm curious why you trust CCP's data so much.🤔🤔 In fact, they have been hiding and lying. According to Mossad intelligence in 2015. China has at least 2500-3000 standing thermonuclear warheads.

@@Damoney1111 I'm curious why you trust CCP's data so much. In fact, they have been hiding . According to Mossad intelligence in 2015. China has at least 2500-3000 standing thermonuclear warheads

@@Damoney1111LOL I'm curious why you trust CCP's data so much. In fact, they have been hiding and lying. According to Mossad intelligence in 2015. China has at least 2500-3000 standing thermonuclear warheads.

@@Damoney1111Why do you belive Western sources? China never said to the public on how much nuclear warheads they possess?

Stop with the hate😂

The idea of any country building a moon base in the next 20 years is laughable

​@@AndrewJeffersonCotterIs it? Will you laugh at someone who told you 20 years ago that the Chinese built their own space station, stealth aircraft and electric cars?😂

@@倾城空城 man has never set foot on the moon. The US faked the moon landings

​@@AndrewJeffersonCotterDon't underestimate we China people.😅When you say it, you can do it

Subscribers can not compare to trained army troops, and as for China its a volunteer army not nearly as easy as subscribing, not all of them may fight, some may be obese, sick, etc. Too young, just saying. 💀

@@deeznustincorporated332 Sounds like an exact match to the PLA in that case

@@cheeksakimbo6591L

@@cheeksakimbo6591how?

took the joke literally 🗿 @@deeznustincorporated332

We are a superpower.

They actually do, Russia has the strongest nuclear power in the world, more powerful than the US add EU

难搞哦，现在美帝开始认真研究咱们了。。

Part of being a great power is military force. Chinas military is untested and inexperienced. The West on the other hand does have military experience against many well armed foes.

China is a great power via economy. Their military power is a bit uncertain, but looks more like that of a regional power from what's seen

@@watching7721 西方人从来无法正确评估中国的战斗力，因为文化隔阂，你们不懂中国军队的文化内核，这是历史浅薄的国家无法理解的，中国人民把军人看成自己的孩子，军人以战死为荣耀，这是西方人无法理解的。当你们认为参军就是个工作而已，怎么能赢的了视死如归的战士。

Well, ar-my is easier to say than mi-li-ta-ry .

Nope. Informationization is a real word. A dedicated term.

Yup it was going for plausible deniability even though the commander on chief was Peng Dehuai, a big general in the Red Army / 8th Route Army / PLA and would later become one of the 10 only Field Marshals of the PLA.

U r right

I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

It already is

The party commands the reproductive organs.

@@ffff7164 "The party commands the egg" rolls off the tongue better.

realmente

gaymer moment

They will deploy their stealth units to sabotage US facilities,allowing China victory!

lol american delulu moment

USA is a joke, only win in cartoon

It's a trap.

you think you are smarter than this african friend?@@Elwin123

@@Elwin123 Oh no the random loser wanna lecture, what a joke

You haven’t gone through higher education, right?@@karlk7070

​@@Elwin123比你们买卖黑人好

Truee

这种视频真的一坨答辩

Did you comment on the wrong post? This is about china's lackluster military, not a lackluster movie.

like the jelly in my fridge, i JUST bought it, but idk if its gonna taste good on my pb&j. It is either yummy or not and the only way to know is for the munchies to kick in

@@Wild_DanimalFr

But as a dictatorship with complete control over the media and with conscription they can endure and fight a long war like the Americans never can

@@vermark8719No they definitely could.

​@@deeznustincorporated332no, they can't. They had a massive failure of leadership and structure in south Sudan recently

I wouldn’t say so, no. The Chinese army may be unproven but if it was a paper army, there would be evidence floating around of general incompetence in the army, like with Russia.

@@peanutbleach1012 There has been evidence floating around, not to mention "removal" of many more military leaders from their own government

比俄罗斯要强很多，起码不会像普京在乌克兰那样糟糕

多年没有实战肯定有些生疏，但是解放军的战斗意志和装备条件决定了，跟俄罗斯不是一个等级的，要不然美国怎么还不动手？