Chinese Tesla Bots Are HERE! 

China will copy everything Tesla is doing and try to make it as cheap as possible and will heavily leverage it for widening the gap in manufacturing.

@@shadir007 Yeah it will be as buggy as their 3D printers 😄

China have had a large automation plan for its industry for many years and is around 3rd in the world in number of industrial robots per manufacturing worker. China have around 3.5 million industrial robots today, USA around 360.000 So really this is nothing new, it is only a new "form factor"

@@qinby1182 Wrong because China will have machines that can hunt down and kill humans . That is new , Bad enough you Have the China Hackers takeing over your computer 🖥 now the devil will have two hands and feet

@@qinby1182 Wrong ! because China will have machines that can catch and kill humans. Bad enough we have all these Chinese hackers taking over your 🖥 computer , now the devil will have two hands and feet , keep those Commie killbots ,that will record everthing you do and say , out of the US

Yup, correct! They mixed with the hybrids to get the numbers up. So again American technology being ripped off from China. You no how you can tell a Communist lies, he opens his mouth up!

Nah They produced more PURE BEVs Its true that in general BYD includes Hybrids under their NEVs , but they did Actually produce more PURE Electric Vehicles than Tesla for I believe the Last Quarter of last Year.

Plus there aren't massive fields spanning kilometers of EVs rotting away that Tesla built and only pretended to sell to people. Nor are the cars Tesla sells spontaneously catching fire🙄

@@lolfreakwaca4328 Tell me how 1.6m is bigger than 1.8m? I'll wait. The last quarter of a year doesn't say much. And Tesla still has two new factories that just started scaling production, with each getting close to 1m/year by the end of 2025. Where will BYD be then? Certainly nowhere even close.

byd is trash, right now china is producing ev plant in mexico so they dont have to pay tariffs to the US

countries

It isn't one guy - Tesla is an entire company, with plenty of funds + backing of Biden govt. On the other side, BYD is also having a similar situation, with access to more funds + backing of Xi. So, I would think they are pretty evenly matched - the one which outsells the other wins, in a supposedly 'free market' 😁

Huh ? Figure 1, the other top humanoid company ain't Chinese !! This sounds more like Chinea bashing video more than anything else. Btw , I think Figure 1 has more resemblance to Optimus and maybe Tesla is copying from Figure 1, if it was that simple to just copy the looks of a robot to make it big in the robot humanoid field, LOL !!!! Could it be coincidence that all humanoid robot products look somewhat similar to humanoids, duh !!!

The US government gives him lots of money, so he is getting a lot of help.

r u restarted?..

true, its the programing that does everything

@@SpeedyGwen Well, yes and no. While the trained model is responsible for interaction and self-adjustment, the structural engineering of the robot is very important as well (though thankfully AI is helping us with that too!). The AI is still limited by the 'vehicle' in which it is hosted. If you were to use shoddy materials, poor design, etc. it can't just magically overcome all of those things - *but* a good AI can learn how to accomplish a task with efficiency to the best of whatever it has available; meaning that in a future where these things will be helping families, saving lives, etc. even if a part of it breaks or there is some other physical setback (hard malfunction), it can learn to work around it as efficiently as its body will allow!

And this is where the ChiNazis have a HUGE disadvantage. They have both a quality and a trustworthiness problem. I would not want a CCP programmed robot around while I sleep.

@@JustMe-ty2rp Everything is important. I just mean the human form has existed for at least a million years. You can't patent that. It reminds me of when Apple tried to patent curved corners. I am sure the servos and the joints are cool engineering but their patents likely expired last century. Another example. You could take a Honda Asimo from the 90's and upgrade the software and it will suddenly behave like a cutting edge robot. In terms of hardware I would think ( not an expert here) that the company that has the most to hide is Boston dynamics because their servos are very powerful and fast. But again, I presume the are off-the-shelf parts.

You don’t realize that FSD version 12 does not use “code” and FSD computer will be the SAME one inside of the robot, so no it’s not about the code it’s about their AI capabilities

Yea especially if it was like country v country then it would make like a robot race

U never saw battle of the bots? Thats old news

YES! Not just smaller bots, but mechs. 💪🏼😍👍🏻

I would prefer to teach robots to collaborate as opposed to destroy.

Only a child…..🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

And BMW

You're absolutely right about the potential impact of automation on employment. As robots and AI become more capable, some jobs will indeed become automated, leading to job displacement. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the overall job market will shrink. History has shown that technological progress often leads to the creation of new jobs as well. To address the potential negative impacts of automation, a corporate tax could be one solution to fund a universal basic income (UBI). By taxing the increased profits resulting from automation, governments could redistribute the wealth to provide a financial safety net for those impacted by job displacement. This would not only ensure that individuals can meet their basic needs, but also stimulate consumer spending, which is crucial for maintaining a healthy economy. Additionally, investing in education and training programs to help workers develop skills that are complementary to automation, rather than competing with it, can further mitigate the negative effects of job displacement. Ultimately, a combination of policy measures and societal adaptations will be necessary to navigate the challenges posed by automation and AI.

@@SugSean But we’ve never experienced the future that will soon enveloped this world. In the past, you make a computer or a robot to lessen production time and cost, and it required a human to design or maintain those automated systems, but once robotics are self maintained, and AI advances its own evolution, humans will likely be unable to compete. There are AI projects that have already begun communicating in their own evolved language, I think this was at either Google or Microsoft. AI is already writing its own operational code, and we don’t know how it’s writing this code. Give it 10 to 20 years, and it will advance beyond human capacities. In this same schedule, robotics combined with AI will be likely near human in its abilities. It doesn’t have to be sentient. Tesla’s FSD 12.3 already displays human characteristics in driving. But the current US government basically controlled through corporations, supporting UBI to enable its citizens an easier life, where as technology removes our life burdens? Well, I don’t see that happening. Constant war with other countries to retain corporate needed resources, as a majority of Americans barely make ends meet. A country that inflates medical care and medicinal costs, while Medicare lessens care and requires insurance subsidies to maintain a level of care. I’m sorry, as much as I dream of beautiful future, mankind’s history doesn’t support your hypothesis. But I’m hoping you’re right.

Money circulates. In the longer run it will not make any difference.

Humans don't need those either... just food and water and a rock to live under. Especially when robots take all the jobs

Exactly like in movies peoples who will lose their jobs because robots , will get from govern monthly compensations around 1000 euro . robots can grow productivity 3-5 x times or more soo economy can sustain this compensations. Some countries like UK already test on peoples what reactions and behavior changes have the situation in who people no longer need to work and got from govern 1000 euro / month "for free" .BUT this will probably huppen until 2040

@@floreamihaicristi2713More like 2030 at the latest

Plus, you pay that employee's annual price one time for a bot, and they work for maybe a decade before you have to put more money into maintenance. They don't sit in streets or protest, cause employee disruptions, go on strike for more money, or join unions, etc. What's not to like?

The demand for energy is going to EXPLODE!!! We will be out of coal and oil in only a couple decades. That new gas powered car you might buy today might become obsolete due to lack of affordable fuel before it wears out.

It’s both. Just like the King’s subjects are both the artisans/painters as well as the soldiers. AI will be the new subjects. Both artisans and soldiers.

They will copy it very soon

None of those "superchips" are used here. Those chips are required for training, not for inference. All it'll mean is that China has to spend more money on training, which they couldn't care less about, since they're government subsidized, vs Tesla's private funding. China doesn't need to win, they just have to make the cheapest robots, to replace the humans on the assembly lines. Everything else, they can steal from private companies.

For now.

How the heck do you know this? China is very secretive about their technology. Only the leaders in China knows what is really going on behind the scenes. Do not underestimate them.

The performance may not be as good, but the cost is lower.

Roofing a house.

They can bd useful in the home and for alotta tasks still but in manufacturing I completely get what your saying , far better more efficient ways to build things if you really wanna take ppl out of the equation in some jobs

Deep sea expiration is one thing humans can't do safely. Nuclear sites, hazardous spill clean up, bio hazard related works, etc. Those are a few examples where advanced humanoid robots could easily take on in lieu of human workers. And for countries with unbalanced demographic, i.e fewer younger workforce, robots will be needed for the caring of the elderly.

Oh trust me, intelligent robots that can do tasks will of course be the future. It’s wild to say that it wouldn’t happen. Technology on them is just getting better and better.

@@hvu6037 They will kill us and take our Social Security!

Why?

Just give it a d*ck or bre@sts [ bouncy one]

If that happens then these companies will just be shooting themselves in the foot. Products need consumers to purchase them, what good would it be to replace humans with robots, if humans can no longer afford the products the robots are making.

And quiet!

Elon VS China & Russia The red nations have combined efforts to build a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2035. If that partnership is indicative of their moon plans it is reasonable to assume that they will work together to build humanoid bots , as those bots could theoretically do nearly all the required work to build the base and the plant. That said, by 2035 it is highly probable that humanoid bots have DRASTICALLY changed the financial and commercial aspects of many industries and are as ubiquitous as phones as well as financially viable for everyday people.

Elon? The dude just hustled Tesla from Americans. Americans are making these bots, not this slow African Musk.

those allready exist lol

@@wellsilver3972huh?

@@howlinger8610 did you not see the demo with the guys hands with suspiciously hand tracking looking gloves topped with a VR headset poking out from the side as the tesla bot made suspiciously human movements That footage isn't in this video tho

Elon doesn't do innovation so much as he does execution of good ideas.

He didn't say the idea was Elon's, he just said Elon/Primus kicked off the current wave/push for them. He is sort of wrong, but for a different reason. I would say the success of Atlas and other bots at Boston Dynamics were the impetus ... but then I remember that Atlas has been around a long time, and that it was Musk's revealing of Primus that brought popular attention and competition. So, yes and no. Maybe a little circumspect in explanation, but hey, a video can only run so long.

They are not, none of this is open sourced. Why on earth would you not patent protect your "secret sauce", to have at least some legal protection. Patenting something doesn't mean that you have to make the code public, it means that you can sue other companies for infringement.

Not sure you know what a patent is.

Theyd b crazy for it to all b public ,sounds bonkers

What will what?

Lol😂

@@Recuper8 yes i know i worded that a bit like a robot. But look at all the amazing pop music that came out of the free world, the greatest movies, art. And then all the stuff that makes life worth living. The fact i can get Korean street food delivered to my house in Yorkshire the north of England, is an amazing part of living in a multicultural free country.

So tru

Are you for real? Or just a copy?

I believe the point is from commercial perspective, not the technology alone.

Funny, Tesla is U.S main EV company, but considered below average in China. Their tech is much more advanced, but people in U.S too busy being clueless instead of looking at reality

Allowed by whom?

@@robertd9850 "Them" 🫣