Christopher Wallis | Bernardo Kastrup: The artistry of life 

flow = one with aligned with the continuous constant moment

I know HOW and WHY everyone is wrong. It's explained in my video entitled "Why ALL current models (including metaphysical idealism) are incorrect, and how my model is correct." Bernardo is correct in addressing the langauge problem. I have identified the fundamental problem within langauge and have corrected it by amending the language itself. I hope to have a discussion with Bernardo using my model as the base of discussion. This is IT. The final, concluding Truth. 🙏

We know that time does not exist at the speed of light. Maybe consciousness works on the same system.

"The mind has a tendency to deceive itself." What if the disembodied voice in consciousness IS DECEPTION? What if that is its purpose? What/where is Satan/Maya/ignorance? How does it operate? What if the answer is meditation, taken all the way. That is, the silencing of the voice whispering within consciousness. Nisargardatta realized his Enlightenment in 3 years of practice. The practice was to: "All of my free time I spent looking at myself IN SILENCE." There is a singular problem and a singular cure to that problem. The conclusion of systems of thought is not brought about by an answer provided by thought. The conclusion of thought is to realize that it is the spell of Maya, and to intentionally conclude it 🙏

Flow and time are nothing more than distinction, and that distinction is optional.

I use tampax on my heavy flow days

Idealism: Metaphysical Idealism is the view that the objective, phenomenal world is the product of an IDEATION of the mind, whether that be the individual, discrete mind of a personal subject, or otherwise that of a Universal Conscious Mind (often case, a Supreme Deity), or perhaps more plausibly, in the latter form of Idealism, Impersonal Universal Consciousness Itself (“Nirguna Brahman”, in Sanskrit). The former variety of Idealism (that the external world is merely the product of an individual mind) seems to be a form of solipsism. The latter kind of Idealism is far more plausible, yet it reduces the objective world to nothing but a figment in the “Mind of God”. Thus, BOTH these forms of Idealism can be used to justify all kinds of immoral behaviour, on the premise that life is just a sort of dream in the mind of an individual human, or else in the consciousness of the Universal Mind, and therefore, any action that is deemed by society to be immoral takes place purely in the imagination (and of course, those who favour this philosophy rarely speak of how non-human animals fit into this metaphysical world-view, at least under the former kind of Idealism, subjective Idealism). Idealism (especially Monistic Idealism), is invariably the metaphysical position proffered by neo-advaita teachers outside of India (Bhārata), almost definitely due to the promulgation of the teachings in the West of Indian (so-called) “gurus” such as Mister Venkataraman Iyer (normally referred to by his assumed name, Ramana Maharshi). See the Glossary entry “neo-advaita”. This may explain why such (bogus) teachers use the terms “Consciousness” and/or “Awareness”, instead of the Vedantic Sanskrit word “Brahman”, since with “Brahman” there is ultimately no distinction between matter and spirit (i.e. the object-subject duality). At the risk of sounding facetious, anyone can dress themselves in a white robe and go before a camera or a live audience and repeat the words “Consciousness” and “Awareness” ad-infinitum and it would seem INDISTINGUISHABLE from the so called “satsangs” (a Sanskrit term that refers to a guru preaching to a gathering of spiritual seekers) of those fools who belong to the cult of neo-advaita. Although it may seem that in a couple of places in this treatise, that a form of Monistic Idealism is presented to the reader, the metaphysical view postulated here is, in fact, a form of neutral monism known as “decompositional dual-aspect monism” (“advaita”, in Sanskrit), and is a far more complete perspective than the immaterialism proposed by Idealism, and is the one realized and taught by the most enlightened sages throughout history, especially in the most “SPIRITUAL” piece of land on earth, Bhārata. Cf. “monism”. N.B. The Idealism referred to in the above definition (and in the body of this book) is metaphysical Idealism, not the ethical or political idealism often mentioned in public discourse (e.g. “I believe everyone in society ought to be given a basic income”). Therefore, to distinguish between sociological idealism and philosophical Idealism, the initial letter of the latter term is CAPITALIZED.