How often do you shoot in cinematic mode??? Get the best gear for your iPhone 14 👉 geni.us/iPhone14proGEAR OUR NEW MERCH 🧢 geni.us/AeeBOcE Download Our LUTS 🎨 geni.us/ourLUTs
Perhaps for the comparison to be more close, you should use nd filters for the iPhone to get the footage more similar, and maybe some color grading on the iPhone to match the Sony (: fun comparison overall! Can't wait to see more!
Mostly the raw footage had higher dynamic range in iPhone and using nd filters would've increased the difference even further. but yeah colour correcting to match the footages would've been nice but again it's the raw comparison that you get straight out of your camera 📷
@@thisiscuvo Yeah because it use cinematic mode which artificially blur but if it use tele lens it will have a better bokeh and nd filter for motion blur.
We take the FX3 and FX30 everywhere we go for on-location shooting here at the office. Sony knocked it out of the park with these two bodies and iterations. (Plus we didn't have to sell our old APS-C lenses which was a perk and a half haha). One downside to the iPhone... It has to use Moment Anamorphic Lens and not the all-new BIG BOY Anamorphic 😍😍
@H M didn’t you ever hear something about colorgrading? To be honest, iPhone wins only in terms of size, but in some kind of situations 14pro is more than enough for taking cinematic footage. I choose iPhone for mobility.
Hey team I am using moment app from past 1.5 year and it's great, just wanted to point out a problem which is that my videos are coming out unstable from my iphone 13 pro even the stabilization option is on in the settings and when I am shooting from native app it's just working fine as it should ! Please suggest something or roll out an update regarding this ! Hope you guys revert! ❤️
iPhone nearly always turns everything too bright. Especially with the new HDR video. The HDR crazy blue skies vs Sony’s nearly blown out white skies should also be a conversation. Pro cinema footage is usually shot in a Log or Raw format and carefully graded per shot. Is this straight out of camera Cinetone? I would’ve kept a hint of blue skies in the Sony footage too.
Its getting closer! The iPhone quality is now really getting good enough to where its light and convenient, easy to use and the quality will not degrade your ability to tell the story. FX3 is way better but you have to have more time, money and put in way more effort to tell that story with it. No doubt it will look better, but will the story itself be better? I dunno anymore, its getting good enough for more and more people.
Would you recommend the FX3 or A7SIII? I'm considering switching to Sony and can't decide! Also, do you have links to all of the Sony gear you all use?
FX3 has a body style and cooling abilities much more tailored to video and filmmaking, plus the top handle with XLR ports for pro audio is clutch as well. I'd say get FX3 if you plan on shooting mostly video, but if you equally do video and stills, or more stills, go A7Siii. FX3 is vastly better though if you mostly want a video camera. I think the one potential better video feature the A7Siii has is the electronic viewfinder. Some people really want that for videography and they removed it for the FX3 for some reason.
Why do videos recorded from a phone, no matter how high the resolution, have this over-sharpening effect? Normally I try in post-production to eliminate these effects by lowering the sharpness or noise or adding a smoothing filter or something like that but I don't know why that happens. Does it have to do with the size of the lens?
Imagine Apple investing in a bigger, better sensor using their camera technology now in a modular boxed-style cinema camera system. I would keep an eye out if they ever did that.
Somewhere - price needs to be part of the calculation… As good as cinematic mode is (and it’s pretty damn good) it’s a feature on a phone - not a stand alone camera. If you price out the iPhone’s camera modules + programming - it’s nothing like the cost of a high end Sony cinema camera… the fact that this is a serious topic speaks well of the iPhone’s cinematic mode.
I have the Fx6 for nearly two years and now I have the iPhone 14 pro max too 😅 it is nice to have a small cam for holidays but I think the FX6 is a cam beast and the iPhone is cool but it is still a iPhone 😂
Which is compare ? the video cannot compare in the first looking in your footage. the motion blur is too many diffence when the object moving and repeat.
Cannot deny that the difference is big, so big tbh, but its big because the sony fx3 is phenomenal and the iphones still great. Cmon iphone ur killing it
This video is very informative and has lot of quality. But the cinematic mode of the 14 is far better than the 13 now Imagine the 15. Apple will get there with the focus racking but maybe in iphone 17
The processing in the phone to compensate for the lack of sensor and lens size is what really shows. Phone cameras are amazing, but only because of software. You can't beat physics. FX3 is a clear winner here.
YA IDIOT KNOW NOTHING ABOUT " What's The Low Pass Filter and What's for ❓ and WHY YA NEED SHARPENING FUNCTION ON EVERY NLE EDITOR SUCH AS Premier Pro, FCPX & DaVinci ❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓" ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩 More than ９０% of Dedicated DSLR/Mirrorless Cameras Have Got Low Pass Filter in 'em. And Only One of Rare Exceptions that Has " Low Pass-Less Filter " in It is Nikon's Flagship Z９ of Which Image is Far Close to i-Phone that YA IDIOTS ARE ALL AMAZED AT ITS CRISP & SHARP IMAGE MORON ❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕😂😂😂😂😭😭😭😱🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👻👻👻🤪🤪🤪
Regardless of the quality of the bokeh, iPhone video still just looks like phone video. I think it's mainly because the image is too sharp and it makes t quite ugly. The image from the cinema camera has a much softer character. If they could fix this, I think the iphone shots would be much nicer.
I agree with what you said; "cinematic" does not just mean "bokeh." It's the whole package. Apple shouldn't misuse this word. They have made it so hard for me to look for "iPhone cinematic videos" since this mode was introduced. They should just call it the "bokeh mode."
He makes great points people but, when you are learning any camera professionally, you are taught in *MANUAL MODE* and not auto settings. These videos are great that RU-vidrs put out but they *always* leave out that *manual mode* is the main factor to being successful and not auto.
Don't get me wrong, the iPhone's footage is strong for social content perfectly adequate - but the hdr processing throws off the cinematic look, no matter what ND-Filter or color grading you use. It is a big give away that when people shoot iPhone footage you know it's an iPhone. Amazing technology tho, but no where near a real cinema setup.
No where near? I think the demos here and elsewhere are saying the exact opposite, iPhones are getting really close. With the right setting, fllters and grading - look out Sony, Canon, etc.
It drives me nuts when I’m out with my Arri rig and people say “my (insert phone model) is probably better than that.” Amazing how much these brands have brainwashed people. The ignorance is also mind blowing. Phones are good for some things and social media, but NOTHING compared to a full rig. A gear build is also a tool specific to what you need of it. I’ll take true optics over AI any day.
An iPhone 14 Pro will be " NOTHING compared to a full rig' only if used as it was in this ill designed review. Ignore the mediocre cinematic mode, add a Beastgrip 1.7 tele lens, Freewell VND filter and Cinema P3 cam app to a 14 Pro and you can shoot images that most people, including seasoned professionals, will not be able to distinguish from images shot with a Sony FX 3 unless they watch those images on a TV set. But more and more people are watching videos and films on their phones and computers.
@@drusticc5667 A company who creates content for a living to pedal their products should know better. Its not apples to apples but should as near as possible not just this vs that 🤡
@@wrighty338 cinema cameras are very dull by default so it wouldn’t be a very great comparison without colour correction anyways.. iphone has internal processing automatically
I think a lot of these features are better executed on the Xperia lineup - especially with the new Xperia 1 V - offering focus peaking and rack focus in video. Not to mention S-Cinetone for that cinematic look, there are also the looks from the Alpha line including VV, FL etc that can match different scenes and looks for a composition.
Thank you for saying that comparable is pretty dangerous, smartphone is threating real camera's not because it is better but because the untrained eye which is 98% may think it is same, or holds up
YA Need to Learn " What's The Low Pass Filter & What's for ❓ And WHY YA NEED SHARPENING FUNCTION ON EVERY NLE EDITOR Such As Premier Pro, FCPX and DaVinci ❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓ " i-Phone is Much Close to WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) Shooting.
This review about how close an iPhone 14 Pro is getting to a real cinema camera makes no sense to me. Why compare a professional, fully rigged Sony camera with an iPhone 14 Pro on automatic white balance and using the mediocre, amateurish Cinematic mode ? Ignore the third class cinematic mode, add a Beastgrip 1.7 tele lens and/or a Freewell VND filter plus Cinema P3 cam app to a 14 Pro and you can shoot images that most people, including seasoned professionals, will not be able to distinguish from images shot with a Sony FX 3 unless they watch those images on a TV set. But more and more people are watching videos and films on their phones and computers. I worked with Sony ENG cameras for 20 years or so. Today, I would choose an iPhone 14 Pro over a Sony FX 3 ten times out of ten.
Worst of all, was the FX3 flat? If so, that's not how that footage was meant to be seen. This reviewer didn't even bother to disclose this. He was too busy just mugging for the camera. It all just stinks. Philip "I beat women" Bloom did this for a living.
As new user on Iphone pro max 14 i am so happy what it can deliver on the photo and video quality for the money. As you said on pro you can spend whatever money. Actually i was watching team with 200.000 Eur camera that was heavy;)
The only people who will truly notice a difference on social are the minority of pixel peepers. An iPhone with good filters, lenses, and person holding it is more than enough for 90% of what you’d ever wanna film. Where do phones truly hail in comparison? Lowlight and focal length. But even the focal length can be tweaked with a Beastgrip DOF adapter. Let the FEW professionals use what they need to use and let the VAST MAJORITY of people enjoy the killer quality of an iPhone. People need to understand the difference in niche when it comes to filming something. Some people want it simple while others wanna do all the twists and twirls and annoying ramps/ transitions with a $5000 camera.
@@rockrecordreport7136 absolutely. I’d be mad af too if I spent a ton on gear just to have some average Joe get highly acceptable results with his stupid phone🤣
