Cinematography Masterclass: Filming Daytime Exteriors | Roundtable 

They're assuming it'll get fixed in post.

@@joshualeese2604 8--)

Agreed, I actually learnt a lot more about shooting day exteriors than I thought I would. I'm terrible at day exteriors on location (vs in soundstage), but somehow get lucky with overcast days!

We've split up the interviews based on the questions we received. Because we know you guys like longer edits, we're keeping this slightly longer than usual :)

I guess they don't really care. I mean that they don't really care about unpacking any useful information, because people who have been in the industry long enough, just figure it out on the spot. Its a little bit like, recording musicians in the record industry; You can't really teach someone to do something that so specific because there could be 101 different ways to overcome any problematic scenario. Likewise, these guys are more so just talking about problem that they've faced and how they overcame those specific challenges. But you're right, it could have been a bit more useful, but then again, unfortunately it wasn't really their aim.

Daniel Bezares yes, this talk has either not been facilitated in an even way or badly edited. There is one DOP who talks more than the rest too.

I got that impression too.

lol

Noticed it as well. A host would helped to control it.

ohmss006 on this channel?? Why even invite her then?

What about that freeform discussion told you that no one "gave her time" to speak? It was off the cuff, people chiming in whenever they had a thought and she chose to sit there in silence.

The channel commented above that in one of their other videos, she had some good comments - I watched that video and it was literally 30 seconds of Kate speaking. And that was the only time she spoke in the entire video. She must have said more during filming - someone just made the decision not to include it!

I totally agree with you. By minute 7 of the clip, I started anticipating that she may say something and the camera kept on panning to her but nothing was said. Smart ones usually sit back and observe and she might have done that but I would have liked to hear about her experience.

Everything you just said is completely conjured up in your own mind. Zero misogyny went on in that discussion. It was free form, off the cuff. Whether she didn't feel she had anything to contribute or felt she "couldn't" because the bad straight white men weren't giving her a window, it's all on her. Speak the fuck up if you have something to say and if you miss your opportunity then don't blame it on made up misogyny. (which, ironically, she probably would never. It's just random professional victims in the yt comments white knighting for someone who didn't ask for it. god, I hate right now.)

They have to be *some* race, and besides they only care about getting cinematographers to interview, not what race they are. You can't expect them to go out of their way to get specifically a non-white person on just because some douche thought there wasn't enough variety. Besides, I'd feel insulted if I was only invited due to my race, instead of my ability, and not proud that my race is represented. Because newsflash: people who care about results don't give a shit about race, it's irrelevant.

@@RazvanMaioru Lemme just make sure I understand. I watched all 20 videos in this series. You're basically saying they don't factor race into who they select at all, subconsciously or otherwise. So if over the course of 20 videos, if every single person they interviewed is white, that's either due to random luck, or it's simply reflective of the people who get "results", who time after time after time just happen to be only white. And why do you have to make your point via name-calling? I didn't resort to that, so I'm not sure why you feel the need to address me that way. Also, unless you're not white, you can't possibly know what it means to be our psyche to be included in these prestigious roundtables.

@@DarkwingproductionsNet www.studiobinder.com/blog/best-cinematographers/ Here is the first list that came up when I searched for, as you put it, "world-renowned cinematographers". Being the first one I found, you can't claim I've chosen one specifically because it fits my point. Also, being written by a black man, you can't claim much bias towards white people. That said, 21 out of the 27 on the list happen to be white, and one of the 6 others I distinctly remember being the focus of more than one video on this channel, though they weren't roundtable videos. To me that shows that there just aren't *as many* non-white cinematographers to choose from, and the non-white cinematographers that were interviewed just happened not to be part of the roundtable interviews, but were interviewed individually. As for the "name-calling", I wasn't insuting you specifically as an individual, rather referring to the condescending tone of the request for more variety. As a final note, I don't think race has an impact on thought process or opinion, unlike the way someone was brought up and other factors independent of race, just like how race doesn't have an impact on someone's favourite colour, but various events during their childhood do have an impact. Therefore I consider your final argument invalid, as everyone would have a different reaction that we two can't predict, which is completely independent of race, in that people of the same race but from different continents would have different reactions, just like people of different race in just your region would have different reactions. Lumping all white people (and then all non-white people) into having the same thoughts is a bit nonsensical to me.