Cities at Sea: How Aircraft Carriers Work 

@jweltsch22 you said airport and now I have an image in my head of a 747 being yeeted off the flight deck with its launching catapults.

@@switchplayer1016 Clearly too big, but they have landed and launched C-130's off of a carrier in the past.

The 3rd largest city in my state and one of its main ports (im not sure how many people lived there at the time but theres over 200k living there now) had a major power outage once due to some power plants being knocked out, so they literally hooked an aircraft carrier up to the power grid and powered most of the city with it.

@@arthas640 thank you US navy for providing ships that do double duty as both portable neuclear reactor systems and desolisation machines.

being an attack carrier like in the WW2 is more of a 2nd role today, while search and rescue/ disaster relief is more like 1th role

SMATF5 thank you sailor for your service. We patriots admire and appreciate you more then you know. You guys & gals are my hero’s.

To bad all u s aircraft carriers can get wiped out with one missile from either China or Russia. And we have nothing to stop them. We are so behind.

@@mrnewskin7831 , keep dreaming about Russian and Chinese capabilities. Just last week Russia tested a cruise missile that they want to use to target American Carriers. The damn thing exploded with its nuclear reactor and not only killed 5 of the scientists developing it but caused the worst Russian Nuclear accident since Cherynobil. Remember Russia and China is still more then 15 years behind us in all technology

Imagine how a space battleship would look like!

SMATF5 I used to have a recurring dream where I went through many, many rooms in my grandparents house, which I perceived as being humongous

@Norm T I wonder if naming anything after Napolean would cause an uproar.

Anything-- isn't a verb, or subject-- in US English. Political microlog.

@@paulhetherington3854 *nor, not 'or' in your sentence.

I think we just took to long to find a name and we were like, lets just take that name

For a country with such a looooong history of going to war with every motherfucker in the room you think the French could think of more than 1 war hero to name shit after. At least the US has the excuse of being relatively young, only becoming a major power in the last 150 years and for most of its recorded history it was only a backwater collection of disjointed settlements. France was famous for its warriors since the days of Rome, yet they name everything after a dude that died so recently there are plenty of people on this site that remember him making the news.

* incoming angry Europeans*

@@legitimate_opposition2002 *laughs in european* we dont waste our money on useless things like that. We have a health care system, public education, properer(ish) democracy and overall a higher quality of life. Europe surely isnt without its problems but we surely arent envy on the US military, else wed have a bigger one. The EU has the higher GDP and the higher man power. If we wanted, we could outpay you. But we dont and so we wont. And Im glad for that. But good luck with investing in death, from what I know, it has a horrible return on investment.

@@invalid8774 Europe’s turning into a shit hole 😭😭😭 thanks for the paragraph buddy

@@invalid8774 Also, wasting your money on useless things could’ve possibly saved your ass’ in WW2

@@legitimate_opposition2002 lol no EU was a shithole and still is a shithole but it gets better. USA is going nosedive down. And welcome in the 21st century, the war was 80 years ago and you have more nazis than us. Better make sure theyre armed for their next genocide.

You forgot humanitarian aid and natural disaster relief

@@andrewmoore7022 *deployment*

large percentage of it is flex i think.

100% Flex. Rest others.

PROFIT

It was Australia 75 years ago >:(

There was also the UK in WW2. That is the country where the American, Canadian, Australian, British and many other nation’s militaries gathered for D-day

It was Philippines b4 they have the biggest US military facilities outside America

@@danielearl3591 we pulled out most of our bases when your army beat the japanese but lost against emus

It technically move considering tectonic plates

brilliant idea, we should be able to deploy a country by a country carrier 2100

Hibiki I mean if you can make a boat the size of vieques you could absolutely send a fucking city filled with nukes and planes basically anywhere

and the boats are aircraft carriers

Somebody give this man a medal

Darkwarrior0920 and why would you need to have a aircraft carrier the size of a city carrying nuclear warheads that would put warning bells on everyone’s radar and you would get a sanction by other country’s we have ICBMs for a reason

They go slower than their cap since boat starts breaking up

top speed is actually around 75 MPH in full steam making a wake 5 Miles long behind the ship

exactly, our carriers are the fastest boats in the navy, with the nuclear power... they also can go that speed indefinitely. Like John Smith said, its more like 70-75 mph.... Which is just insane with how big it is

@@lorekeeper685 what?

@@foxtrotdeltausn4757 the carrier going full speed, will outrun its carrier strike group

No don't wait *Do IT*

Shipping a shipment to the ship

F-18 with the uber eats logo just lands in front of you

Rest in pieces uber eats guy

*guy on a jet ski with Uber logo slowly appears over the horizon*

Great video here, thanks for sharing all this info. Thank you to all who serve.

Actually, in case of carriers and e.g. C-17 it is the other way round.... USAF repeatedly said "please staph" on C-17 delivery...

Navy: As many as possible!

US Navy: enough to empire world

@@chefgiovanni why don't you just comment your opinion and not ruin the reply section?

@War Never Changes I think a Joan of arc air craft carrier would be pretty cool.

@@jasonirwin4631 I agree with you.

Charles De Gualle was nothing more than self absorbed idiot. Wait a second that sounds like most French people lol.

@@jasonirwin4631 France had an helicopter carrier named Jeanne d'Arc. But yeah, an aircraft carrier with that name would sound cool.

@@mississippirebel1409 But Trump is nothing more than a self absorbed idiot.

So they can deploy them to multiple locations at once, and have carriers on standby to fill in for others in dock for repairs and maintenance. (Yes I know you were joking.)

Aircraft carriers are a waste and everybody knows it. One nuclear pulse from a ballistic missile and the whole group is useless. They are just the Navy's way to get promotions and budgets. They never fight. When Trump tried to threaten N. Korea, the only carrier we had in the Pacific ran away. During the peak of the cold war, we had three. Now that they are useless, we have 11. 12?

And there's a reason why they travel with other 5 ships

@@DrJohnnyJ you are seriously delusional. No facts in anything you just spewed.

@kevin your logic is garbage, even the one down corrected you, they are supported by 5 other ship that are good at different defense for your carrier, anyway 1 submarine and all your 11 carrier are fuckin down

Peso

KelchanFerret qaq

Babylon falling Israel didn’t want the US to know how they will execute Operation Focus. If the US knew, a slip of intelligence may squeak out to the Arab league. There were many different scenarios that could compromise the operation. At the time, Iran could’ve sided with the Arabs that would’ve made religion more of the reason to defeat Israel. Iran already acquired American military hardware by 1967. Maybe the Israelis knew the capabilities of the F4 Phantom better than America did. At the time, Israel were using the Mirage fighter which took on the role of both tactical aerial dog fighter and bomber. F4 was a high altitude interceptor that can easily look down and shoot down the Mirages and also a very proficient attack bomber. I’m guessing the Iranians had something to do with why the Liberty was attacked. Research vessels gather information and radio waves. Mossad had their reasons but the reason can be that they exercised complete black out of any form of intelligence leading to the day of the attack.

USS Ranger had 7 decks above flight deck level - but the 0-10 level was fully enclosed so it might not count for your statement.

I was a cryptographer. I was on the O-11 level. Nothing up there but a tiny crypto room and antennas. USS Forrestal (CVA-59).

Champagne davy it’s literally 3 percent of our budget

KingBar -X out of five!

Should put more money into nasa

Us has over 3 trillion us dollar debts lol biggest debt in the world lol

Moocus14 we’re still the only country to land humans on the moon, and we have plans to go back by 2024 with progress going well. All that while have the biggest military in the world. No other country has landed humans on the moon yet, even though they had 50 years to do so. So yeah

Was looking for this

That person was so cool

IKR lol

I knew someone was gonna day something about that😂

😂😂😂👌🏽

Crazy part is where the full length of that massive anchor chain goes inside the ship -- two giant wells that go down the full height of the ship. I remember watching a tiny deck sailor get lowered into one via harness so she could clean the bottom. Scary business.

I was on the USS Independence CV-62. Our anchors weighed 30 tons each and the chains had 350 links that weighed 360 pounds per link.

I used to paint that anchor. And drive that ship lol

I wouldn't say the links were as big as you but definitely heavier than you. 350lbs

@@brad144k If you painted the anchor, you sure as fuck did not drive the ship. And your next comment is just stupid, and makes no sense.

All "by design" aircraft carriers have had dedicated hanger decks. Most conversion designs like the Langley did as well.

Looks like a Kite.

they seem to be connected by some sort of cables

@@Capt_Sid Only during UnReps.

If Poseidon finds out that you said "ex" it's gone be some drama ....from one sailor to another _sailor_

Unbelievable. You could convince millions and run for President

Greatest trend of STEM channels

Yesssssssssssss

For those who got these two channels mixed up.

real engineering = rocket

this guy get's it

My uncle served also USS Ranger early 70's joseph ortega

@@espedro65 my dad did briefly around the same time before getting changed to the Kitty Hawk

my father, he's still a farmer

Its strange how 300 meter ship can hold crew of 6000 people.

They shoudl paint Cool paint jobs on the front and sides of these ships like fighter planes Shark Teeth. For the missile cruisers they should paint a dick on the side and for the carrier they should paint a big black dick

@lilbeserk most are civilians though these ships are armed and tend to have retired military personnel on for security. the reason for this that companies will send goods for cheap , and supply ships are not near the fleet for long since the supply ships go for refuel and pick up of new supplies.

@Chuck Taylor no it's true. They use the designation USNS instead of USS in the U.S Navy.

Funny, every onrep I was ever involved it was from a Navy supply ship

How could one work in one of those?

deathbunny Depends on the AOR. Fifth fleet has military personnel pulling security.

We are a force to be reckoned with.

Shane , America is the guy who you made fun of for being bad at a game , then they got better than you and are also loaded

@@eighteen1741 Modern age Rome.

@Jason Stark crack done toppled your mind 😂😂

@Jason Stark Say that when the US is not the top economy in the world with businesses in every country in the world save for North Korea and military presence in nearly all countries as well.

i was looking for this comment

He’s got moves

You spotted an airbender.

I've been looking for this comment

but they have other pirates to worry about LOL

*laughs in Somali*

other sailors will steal your stuff believe me

Aircraft Carriers now have the Ring Doorbell at each gangplank

i dont know, China is pretty bold about stealing tech and secrets from the US military, I wouldnt be surprised if they sent spies to steal the Beats By Dre some sailor ordered.

i've tracked carriers, they go much faster than 35. The ship i was on couldn't cruise with carriers because we weren't fast enough, lol, not even close.

How was it on the Ford? I’ve always wanted to see that beauty in person!

@@xjones2087 uhm... classified info much? then again it's peacetime, so most of the ships doesn't get put through it's paces... aka a hidden sword up their ass crack and ready to rip.

@@xjones2087 "35" was just the disclosed speed...which that in itself is crazy!

@@spencercarruth9706 Amazing! Not quite as cool as the DDG1000 series or the LCS class, but it just needs to get the kinks out! Haha.

That is the top side PO, he is putting the plane in tension.

Davari02 Gaming but he’s doing it *in style* (^.^)

*Salt Bae has joined the chat*

Pelh24 f

It's necessary to communicate what he's doing, it's too loud for words.

I had Amazon prime and I ordered stuffs while I was on deployment back in 2016. Took me about a month or two to get them lol

yeah becaus it had to get cheeked

And door to door.

d1v1nel2ight Were there porch pirates?

yes mess with USA the one or even more might loom at your shores.

Hey that's not fair let's devide them equally

And funny thing, the India and China got theirs from our Russia, cuz we just sold em. Truly the greatest ditch in our gov. No money for maintainence ? Off you go. We're lucky to keep Kuznetsov around.

@@SasNolan you can sell other countries and still have one

USA USA USA USA USA USA USA FUCKING 'MERICA USA USA USA

@@Liam_Daly meinkraft

welcome to america

America! Fuck yeah!

If you really want to fly, join the Army or the Navy.

That would be United States Air Force, not airforce.

@@darrenchriest300 -_-

Onboard pub? You got to be shitting me? We got a beer day once like every 4 months at sea or something and could have 2 beers each. Some guys sold theirs lol

@@n.m.8802 57 in '72 if I remember correctly.

@@AurumFaber Don't think it was quite that high, as all of the WWII era "jeep carriers" were long since retired and there never were all THAT many LHA-class ships.

@@bricefleckenstein9666 I just reviewed my encyclopedia. I did not have it at the time that I posted my reply. It compares major navies at the time. It says; *US* : 742,000 personal, *56 carriers* , 37 cruisers, 694 destroyers, 260 landing craft, 207 submarines, 137 conventional, 70 nuclear. Russia; 500,000 personal, 0 carriers, 20 cruisers, 210 destroyers, 230 landing craft, 380 submarines, 340 conventional, 40 nuclear. *(Including warships not on active duty)* It doesn't give any more information on these specific navies than I have given. The encyclopedia list it's source as: Jane's Fighting Ships, 1966-1967 This is page 67 of the *N* book.

@@AurumFaber 56 carriers in the mid-1960s sounds about right - pretty much all of the Essex/Ticonderoga class that lived through WW II, many of the Forestall class (not sure if they all were in service yet, there were 2 built AFTER Enterprise), I think Big E was in service by then, and some of the "jeep" carriers were retained for a while.

hmmm, i dont want that many of em, eh make it 20

This moment u realize since ww2 the americans build nearly 100 aircraft carriers soo yeah

I’ll take your entire stock

Still a far cry from World War 2 when nations had dozens of aircraft carriers each

Completely unnecessary

That's a SMALL town

Indeed.

Where are your towns? How far is the nearest city?! 280,000 here in CA.

The nearest "city" is an hour drive away and still only has 9,985

280,000 is alot of people? LOL. Coming from NYC

Because all the cool kids have them.

Because China

Beacuse of the heated situation in the West Philippine Sea. China is building massive military bases on islands of the Philippines, which is by the way supposed to be illegal. However our president keeps telling us that it is a friendly matter which is most of us Filipinos think that it's not. Seriously though I would rather allow U.S. bases on our islands or waters than having those military based from China which imposes great threat in our freedom.

True bruh 😂😂😂

because Thailand likes to show off

That's because they're on their " on-duty " statues.

Because they are being recorded

Ball caps or covers are part of the Navy's working uniform. When a carrier is at sea, the cap is considered as a foreign object debris (FOD) that could ruin a jet engine so they aren't allowed on the flight deck. They also aren't required anywhere else except on the bridge where they are mandatory just for entry. As a flight deck guy that sometimes had to go on the bridge, I would have to make a long trip to my locker to get a cap and then make a long trip up to the bridge.

@@michaelmappin4425 why didn’t you put your cap in a pocket or something. Seems like a lot of work to walk to your bunk just to get your hat

@@MrJimheerenflight deck guys would normally never need a ball cap at sea. In fact, they are considered FOD (foreign object debris) around aircraft. We look forward to getting underway and locking that cap up for the entire time. It's only to get a working over the side chit or a crunch report signed that we would ever go up there.

Kerry Collier What did you guys do back then when you where working Any funny things you can share

Kerry Collier omg that’s worse than being forced to mop the flight deck 😂where do you guys come up with this stuff Like making us ask the CO for the keys to the jet 😭

@@KevinJCoburn I was there from 97 to 2000. I started in V-2 in Air Department but became an AG and ended up in OA.

Ahead flank 151. Set the high speed lineup....

yea cus 35mph made no sense with the distances he says it can travel over the days. def faster

probably most people click off at the start of the sponsor ad

We don't know anything about the doors safe passage if the sign is wrong.

What if the deadlyness of the doors can be switched and the sign is there just for the occasion?

@@cookiecookie1411 > If the first one is deadly, the sign cannot be considered "false" since you don't address what happens if it is deadly. This is terrible logic. It could still be false, even though it's not addressed. Unknown =! false. Therefore, the only thing we know is that it can't be 1.safe 2.deadly.

@@Co1010z Exactly. If the first door is safe, the second door is also safe. If the first door is deadly, nothing is known about the 2nd door. Also, we have no information about rather or not the first door is safe or deadly. However, the options on the quiz are: 1. Both doors are safe 2. The first door is safe; the second door is deadly 3. The first door is deadly, the second door is safe 4. Both doors are deadly I'm not so impressed with Brilliant.org if this is a legitimate sample question.

We had pilots get us McDonalds while in the Persian Gulf.

@@jasonlatham3238 Awesome 😎

Just ask Japan.

“Cut of one head 14 more will take its place” - Some Admiral probably

basically what japan sees during ww2: Japan: so..ok..The only Remaining aircraft carrier they have is USS Enterprise and it sank Japan: wait..what do you mean she survive Japan: wait... Saratoga is back? Japan: Wait..what do you mean Enterprise have Steam catapults and newer aircrafts Japan: WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY HAVE NEW CLASS CALLED ESSEX CLASS Japan: *WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY CREATED 32 ESSEX CLASS CARRIERS???!!!*

Currently, 1 is waiting to enter service, 2 are being constructed, and 1 more has been ordered.

Ethan Magdaleno Imagine Only Launching Light Aircrafts This Post Was Made By The Catapult Gang

@@eggman8053 Imagine using the inferior catapult which can't even launch a 90 kg projectile 300 meters. This post was made by trebuchet gang.

Imagine Using A Airbase On Land This Post Was Made By The Aircraft Carrier Gang

Gonna change my CoD clan tag (cringey, huh?) to FLDG (fl - flat d- deck g- gang) on like, some old one or something. Maybe original Black Ops (I prefer BO2 sadly)

We in the biz call them poverty ramps

They're made of spaghetti

Well almost the entire country is coast so it makes sense

That’s in case the captain beaches one while trying to impress a girl.

@@mmckenzie9367 Great reference, well played

Mind you, they're just enormous floating lasagnas with giant pizza slices as aircraft

Good idea, I’ll bet someone wants you going and seeing what’s in the first door with the funny writing on it 🤨 I’m not sure I can infer anything other than it’s definitely a trap for you. But then, 50/50 isn’t that bad of odds really in the cosmological schemes of things, I’d say…

I reached the same conclusion: Either both doors are safe, or both are deadly. If you can safely inspect one to see if passing through will be safe or deadly (for example, tossing a frog through), you'll know the state of the other.

@@danielhale1 was that a reference to the witch's house? cause if it was, props to you

@@スーパーカーのタイヤ I forget the name of the show, but it was indeed a reference to an episode I saw years ago. They're confronted with two doors and two frogs as guardians, one always lies and the other always tells the truth. One door leads to safety, the other to death. The guy has had it up to here, so he grabs a frog and tosses it through a door, causing it to burst into flames. He slams the door and says "welp, it wasn't that one!".

@@danielhale1 Actually, you can't say that with confidence. The sign states that "If door A is safe, door B is deadly" Assuming that is true, there are two options for door A. Option 1: Door A is safe, therefore Door B is deadly Option 2: Door A is deadly, and we therefore know nothing about Door B because the sign only provides information on the situation if Door A is Safe. Based on that, if we know the sign is False, then we can say Option 1: Door A is Safe and Door B is safe. Option 2: Door A is Deadly and we still no nothing about door B. If you must choose a door in this case, choose Door B as in any situation where Door A is Safe, Door B is also safe, but there are cases where Door b is safe and Door A is not.

Despite the USN being competely dry. Save for ports of call, the crew and officers are not allowed to drink on the ship.

HAY HAY AND UP SHE RISES

@@peterson7082 Generally true, but there have been rare exceptions usually involving long Indian Ocean deployments.

@Iskandar Ibrahim Oh, like Saddam tried to steal ALL OF KUWAIT? Or North Korea tried to steal South Korea? Among other examples of thefts the US has spent our own resources and lives PREVENTING?

@Iskandar Ibrahim are you just angry that we destroyed a lot of your property? thats understandable, but you also forget we bought all of those resources :)

Super Saiyan!

He is the last airbender.

Will Macca me when i’m home alone dancing in my room

That’s the damn Green Power Ranger

7:47

At least you're not the guy putting a smiley face on a cake.

Rather work as that than at a dead end office job

I mean that’s still pretty cool ngl

Why would you downplay anyone serving so you have a country to receive your mail in. Obviously youre very insecure if you had to Hey girl that youre anything

@@soulassassin0g hey it's not that bad of a job.

Rumour has it when they move into third world countries you can distinctly hear fortunate son playing in the distance

But the US didn't notice.

Swedish submarine wasn’t the only one. But they like to erase things from history. Same thing with their radar invisible planes. French were like “yeah we can see them. But we won’t tell anyone. Fix it.”

@@sn4tx Serbia was like, hey look, a US stealth plane. Let's shoot it down. Oh, we did!

*a small Swedish submarine has left the chat after sinking the comments*

@@sn4tx nice baiting but you're wrong. If anything you said was true, France wouldn't be striving to build a better stealth craft than the F35. Everybody wants to undermine the United States Navy with these cherry-picked scenarios that simply would not be replicated in actual combat conditions. Here you're talking about a submarine that has to hunt and kill an aircraft carrier. Where do you start? All of a sudden you realize right away how silly the "lol American carrier got sunk by diesel sub in wargame" sounds. The Swedish submarine had predetermined information of where the carrier would be operating, knew the composition of the fleet, and had the luxury of having time to prepare for the attack. In reality, you have to take about a hundred more factors into the equation to complete a kill chain on an American carrier with any weapon platform. The hardest thing in naval warfare is locating the enemy vessels. Even with all of our innovations in technology, it's still not possible to precisely track enemy fleets everywhere around the world. And since the Swedish submarine is diesel, there is very little chance it will find the carrier before it needs to refuel and resupply. In reality, though, the United States would simply use its speed and range to avoid any sort of sneaking submarine into the range of the carrier. But let's say for instance the submarine does find the carrier, however unlikely, it still needs to avoid detection. Even if the carrier is traveling at its slowest pace, it's still too fast for the diesel submarine to catch it. Cavitation happens for even the best and stealthiest submarines at 5-10 knots, with the exception being the United States Seawolf-class submarine with somewhere around 15-20 knots of speed before it begins to cavitate. The point is that even if the diesel submarine finds the carrier, the odds of it getting into a position to attack are slim as the carrier can outrun it even at a slow pace. And if the Diesel sub does attempt to travel above 5 knots, it will likely be detected by surface vessels or the opposing submarine and be hunted down within the hour. Next, you have to assume your weapons are going to hit the target. The diesel submarine might avoid detection, but the torpedo will be detected as soon as it's in the water. At this point, surface vessels will have launched decoys to throw the torpedo of course, mess with its tracker, and anything else to screw up the kill. However, these decoys are not very reliable, and will most likely be ignored by the on-board tracker. All in all the torpedo has about a 50/50 chance of a hit, assuming the weapon doesn't fail in-transit and was aimed properly. There are simply too many factors in a real-world scenario to really be concerned about a single diesel submarine. It would be a different story if there were dozens of them infested the ocean, but the whole "Swedish Submarine OP" is the dumbest excuse to undermine the United States Navy to date. It's a lot more complicated than just "lol get a stealthy submarine lol"

Or devastate un natural areas lol

@@StoneCoolds that if nuclear reactor blow up

I used to have protein and different snacks sent to my carrier. Family would send "care packages."

Topfelya Yes.

They typically have 2 "Ship's Stores" that sell hygene and toiletries, to snacks and cameras

Yes they do kind of.

Thank you !

Also called a comissary

I was looking for this comment hahaha

Lmao

HAHAHHAHA

top ninja shit to launch planes

LMAO true

And one here in New York City, the USS Intrepid

Yeah, I actually see it from the Roosevelt every day. Love being stationed down in San Diego, gorgeous area.

...and one in Charleston (Yorktown), and one in Texas (Lexington).

tspencer227 Hornet (Alameda County in the San Francisco Bay Area)

I just went to the Intrepid in NYC last week, great museum!

They also increase the ammo storage capacity of the ship. Each red shirt can fit up to 300 rounds in their chests.

@@Lorath333 Like, they eat the rounds?

Tom S Someone didn’t get the joke.

Huh

Don’t get confused by the color codes. Those vehicles contains lots of Souls, Human Being, Our or Your Family and that is important than anything. So, how do you expect that, makers of any kind of vehicle like that will tell you the truth?

comp sci?

Brilliant should specify what kind of conditional they mean. If it's a material conditional, then @Æ is right: A->B is false iff A true and B false. If it's something else (e.g. a counterfactual or indicative conditional) then the answer would be different.

That's brilliant.

Thank you for this, I was stuck!

@@Swiffah145 Yeah, this was my line of thinking. You have two indeterminate states, the sign can be false, but since it describes a safe door, if door 1 is deadly, it's impossible to determine the state of door 2.

They used to have the melbourne

Baha nah we don’t do shit

Wait don't you strayas have 2 helicopter carriers

Nah man, they ride crocodiles with Kookaburras shotgun.

@@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385 we do - but someone put the wrong fuel in them & buggered the engines from memory & they were grounded for around 12 months - cost a billion to replace them 'em - pretty sure they back up now though..

The true facts

wow copying the russian badger i see

@@pexton317 what vid?

The US rules the waves like its father before her

Reynard Nathaniel Most of the developed grown-up nation’s have just as skilled militaries as the US. They simply lack the gargantuan resources. Wargames between the US/UK/France and Germany for example are not nearly as one-sided as you might think. Far from it.

Nah it’s pretty balanced. The us just has a lot of resources. But if we’re talking resources even China has it.

@@gogobrasil7185 eh... china? i give it a 50/50 chance of superiority and 70/30 chance of total bullcrap that will sink their navy like their plastic produces

AsHalt the crap they produce comes from their civil industries, which mass produce for the entire world. Different from their military which not only has a lot more manpower, is very important for keeping the stability in their government.

That's what the Americans said to the Japanese because they produced low quality stuff before they got wrecked on the early part of world war 2. Don't underestimate.

Thanks for your service! I served USS Midway CVA-43 '71'. AK3

Thank you for your service.

lol, americans are so incompetent that they hurt themselves in war

vitorgas1 lol it gave my dad something to do

All while undergoing a double sex change! Well done to him/her :)

@@g00rb4u the "she" refers to the ship

@@vitorgas1 So True..... LOL

we have launched photon torpedoes, would be more hilarious

haha fyi they sped that up a bit. We do that a bit slower and more controlled than it showed... was funny though!

The V-2 topside petty officer gives visual reference to the yellow shirt director to hook up the aircraft to the catapult for launch.

@Bill Bo Haggins LOL...that's gold.

R They probably meant death machine

@Bill Bo Haggins q

@Bill Bo Haggins Phalanx is for pussies....Put on your big boy pants - Take a Phalanx up scale it to 30mm rounds and you get GOALKEEPER. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nY6nm-6eCzM.html

well there's also about 10 .50cal's mounts around a carrier too so those help for point defense against things like helo's and small boats

You mean most

I'm a Emo Furry Nick Fury basically part of the United States.

avatar1o1234 yeah he is actually.

Man..Nick is the servent of us military.. ! So whats the big deal in that...

Jake 85086 most advanced and most powerful aircraft carriers belong to the US.

While I agree on the possibilities, the probabilities are not necessarily true. We have no information about probabilities. So you are ASSUMING uniform distribution of the 4 base combinations of doors.

If the sign is false, then both doors are deadly.. I think.

Ex-Ranger sailor, from a couple years later. Which carrier were you on?

@@bricefleckenstein9666 1968-1970 CVA CVS 38, loved the sea and like Murphy would do it again.

well they can't leave even if they wanted to, its a big decision

@@DaftPunkSkittle Sounds like the Hotel California!

Lol are you from Newport News shipyard ?

im in trade school for welding does this job pay well? if you don't mind me asking

@@youreright4723 I'm at Newport News Shipbuilding. I'm a pipewelder on 2nd shift.

That profile pic is CREEPY

But battleship has battleships

"the South China Sea - an area in which China is attempting to assert control, much to the US's displeasure". The outrage of those Chinese attempting to assert control in their own sea. That's for the USA to do.

@@wazdude101 The problem is that China *doesn't* own it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea

@@fireblossom9618 That's the point. The U.S. Navy freely sails in the South China Sea because it's international waters. Massive amounts of trade flow through those waters and China is trying to seize control of it. All the U.S. Navy wants is free passage.... Just with a big middle finger because it's the carriers.

@@MyCrispLettuce "All the US Navy wants is free passage...." lol talk about being naive

@@fireblossom9618 two of our important allies are, and they wouldn't be able to keep China at bay by themselves

Max Aggropop lol

Blue shirts do the Irish fascism!

Star Trek stock characters. lol.

Max Aggropop I was a gunners mate on the USS Ranger, CVA-61 for two years. I handled a shitload of ordinance. FifthDivision was responsible for storing ordinance in bomb magazines. We also moved it from the magazines to the second deck so the Airedales could assemble the bombs, fuses and fins to the flight deck. I did NOT wear a red shirt.

@@sudochop that's probably where star trek got it from

Dylan Shramko basically the same things

One of those things could arguably topple the country's army

Actually no. The thing about aircraft carriers is they are very vulnerable in narrow waters - there is no way any carrier is going through the Straits of Hommuz, which are so narrow that the Iranians could hole it with 105mm field artillery, let alone serious antishipping stuff. The USAF, not the USN, is Iran's headache.

@@kenoliver8913 CVN 72 Abraham Lincoln was literally in the Strait of Hormuz a couple of weeks ago, we've been in the Persian Gulf before.

Good luck to Iran if they even attempt to shoot at a USN Aircraft Carrier.

fuck you biitch (:

@@jwpiranesi You kiss your mother with that mouth?!

@@Vivi_Strike said the Nick Fury

Happy New Year to you too. You are from Guelph Ontario? Like, the city that had a statue of a naked family and half the city had a collective freak-out?

Thanks!

And yes, THIS is how I react to a Department of Redundancy Department moment.

PRESS THE BOMB

Roberto Girault lol

US Gov.: "So how many carriers are you going to build?" US Navy: "Yes."

@@alliegottuso734 make a main comment on it,why ruin reply section?

nice analysis and solution of the problem.

@@yardenm15 Thanks, but I actually think it's flawed. I might have mixed up some conjunction there when I gave this task to my students, and when we analyzed it by covering all different cases if they made sense, I think we got a differet result.

why the hell do i keep seeing these coments

Bad example, given how Langley was sunk and when. 8-(

@@bricefleckenstein9666 langley was sunk in ww2 but was made and did many many! Operations berfore it sunk

heyday is when something has reached its peak, when langley was made and deployed US navy havent considered yet putting cvn in frontline, it was in ww2 pacific theatre when everyone saw the might of a carrier

The other confusing part about these types of problems is that they could walk and in and replace your phone without you requesting it, but it doesn't mean the phone was broken.

​@@EstrellaViajeViajero As bizarre as that would be, the warranty statement would still be true, because the IF condition never occurred (i.e. condition A is false). You can't complain about the company not honoring their warranty if the phone never breaks. The warranty says nothing about what they will do if it never breaks. Regarding the two doors problem, the we are told "IF door 1 is safe, THEN door two is deadly." That statement can only be false if door 1 is safe but door 2 is safe as well. If door one is deadly, the statement is not provably false (because the IF condition is not met) and therefore would be true, according to the rules of formal logic.

The example in video is a pretty good example of the logical nature of the material conditional. Your example obscures matters, since the statement you introduce is really a subjunctive conditional pretending to be a material conditional. As a subjunctive conditional, it is not properly explicated as a material conditional, but must be understood as a modal claim.

@@ClockCutter You're speaking as someone familiar with the subject, not thinking about how the problem would sound to a novice. It's not a good way to get someone interested in the subject. It's confusing to a novice because using common sense (not formal logic) tells us that knowing the sign is false tells us nothing about whether or not door 1 is safe or deadly. Only when we apply the arbitrary rule that, within formal logic, such a statement is TRUE if the initial condition is false, can we deduce the correct answer.

@@chadwickthezulu its kind of annoying that the rules of the game are not explained at the start but you can figure it out using common sense I did it just was a little confusing like reading legal documents its like a different language or someone with a bad accent. sorry about grammar am typing on a remote.

fun fact: they sometimes hook aircraft carriers up to cities or island nations to power them. They powered a decent chunk of the Puget Sound in Washington with some small, non-nuclear air craft carriers when some dams had to be shut down due to a drought and they power some Caribbean nations with the nuclear ones when their tiny islands get hit by storms.

@@arthas640 US non-nuclear carriers weren't always small. Enterprise was basically an "improved Forestall" class like Kitty Hawk or Constellation (etc) except for the original radar system and using nuclear reactors instead of conventional boilers, and the Nimitz class is only a LITTLE bigger, while the Ford class is only a LITTLE bigger than the Nimitz class.

Dont we have 2?

I think think the carrier mainly owned by UK but operated by US navy....

I used to work for a company with GSA contract and it wasn't uncommon for us to ship to a carrier. I sometimes wonder how amazon has changed this mailing situation. They must have some bundling practices for shipments, but the number of packages being shipped to a carrier has to have increased massively since online shopping was a thing.

If your curious, all they do is pull the plane forward so it reaches its liftoff speed faster. I think it would have been cool if he went over this, but he's not a science channel, more just general information channel

There's been plenty of doc videos made about the technical aspects of the launch system.

Steam

It's a steam powered launch. Steam Pressure is built in a sealed tank and when the plane is hooked up to a large piston below the deck (the long crack in the ground) the steam is released in to a long pipe that pushes the piston forward at speeds of up to 250 kilometers per hour in just 3 seconds.

Hey you really don't know anything about Brilliant, don't you? X)

i thought so.. but the sign being false would suggest the opposite is true. if #1 is not safe.. then #2 is not deadly. so #2 it is

The problem is that the sign says that IF (the first door is safe), then(result). There is no condition for if the door is deadly and there is no guarantee that the door is safe. The only answer that can be ruled out is the second one because we know that the statement that is on the sign is false. The first answer is possible, but so are 3 and 4 since the sign makes no suggestion of what could be true if the first door is deadly. #3 and #4 could both be true regardless of the sign being correct or not. Its a dumb question. It honestly doesn't give me much faith in Brilliant.

I'm confused what you mean by the difference between the sign being false and the conditional statement on the sign evaluating to false? Aren't both those equivalent to saying "it is not true that 1 is safe implies 2 is deadly?"

@@Jop_pop It's kind of a weird way of thinking about it to most people, but the sign is not the same thing as the condition on the sign. So it's like asking, is the sign and whoever put it up full of shit, or is the condition on the sign false?

It would only take money equal to 1/4 our yearly defense budget to lift every single American above the poverty line.

@@Jesse__H handouts for a year only? Then what happens next year? Create a another layer of handout culture?

@@chrishall2594 not a hand out, a hand up for people down on their luck.

Bloated US defense budget. Makes me wanna barf so hard. 🤢🤢

That’s the price you pay for defense. The shepherd with the most lambs attracts the most wolves.

I think they meant Fleet Carriers when talking about Aircraft Carriers in this vid. Otherwise you're correct as they did missed out on LHDs and similar type of ships.

I don't think hes counting LHDs because he didn't count the Juan carlos either so I guess that's why he didnt count the american LHDS

@@nicolomascitelli8127 Nor ex HMS Ocean (now Atlantico) nor the Mistrals etc. LHD's although they can operate Aircraft are an entirely different kind of ship, and though an American LHD may be roughly the same weight as the Cavor it has a very different primary mission to an Aircraft carrier.

It'll be nice if they make a vedio explaining exactly what the difference between the two.

@@sirbaenz9934 It's mostly to do with Welldecks ( upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/USS_Bonhomme_Richard_%28LHD-6%29_welldeck.jpg ) and space for troops vehicles that compromises the airwing compared to a carrier of similar size. This is why a Wasp class LHD at 40,000 tonnes carries roughly the same amount of aircraft as the much smaller 15,000 tonne Garibaldi class Carrier.