CK3 Devs respond to BRUTAL DLC backlash 

That would imply that other dlcs were good or st least okay releases FoI is bugged to this day where you can get a never ending cycles Tours and tournaments is at best also mediocre, but actually not a good release North lords is not even worth to mention, should be considered part of the base game Lol So pdx pulled it more than just two times lol

@@Bleilock1 I actually liked Tours. I think it provides a great platform for modders and I love how much it opens up the game to all titles. It was very refreshing after Royal Court. I'm also partial to Fate of Iberia. Although I've criticized it in the past, the struggle mechanic was original and it made Spain much more interesting to play

FoI so far has been my favorite. I haven't really liked the content mechanics of the last dlcs/patches. ​@@Bleilock1

@@slip6699 doesnt change the fact its still riddled with buggs Me first would want it to work properly

I think it was wrong how they handled the legend system. Not all legends are forgotten. Think of Robin Hood, King Arthor, Alexender the great. Heck some legends even become holidays such as Saint Patrick Day and Saint Nicolas (Dutch Holiday.) What they should have done as extra making a system that remembers the legend. For example combine it with the Tours and Tournament DLC. And at a new Contest in it, named the grand play. Giving the player bonuses on recreating that has ties to their family history. Perhaps also adding it somehow to your feast activity. That our court poet will bring forth all the legends of the world but will mostly pick that happened in your nation. Traveling Bards and Poets were the story tellers back in those days and they were the ones that spread legends and stories.

For real, they could have described legends with all the details, it wouldn't make that feature good. I believe that people are right when they say that mods make a better use of DLC mechanics, but I have no hopes for legends, it is flawed and should have a complete rework

It frankly shows a lack of maturity and understanding of community management

That is taking responsibility. It's saying they failed to communicate.

​@@unciuncia420 People aren't upset that they didn't get what they were promised. People are upset that the DLC and new mechanics in general actively make the game more annoying and tedious to play. The DLC legit makes the game worse.

"takes the blame", you take the blame for continuing to buy something you don't want, it's a great game, sorry that it can't also take your virginity at the same time, f off

I agree. Why continue to pay a small monthly fee for a legend that isn’t unique? It’s not even worth the upkeep

And the fact legend can overlap each other, really such

Well, I'm actually raised by wild boars so you opinion doesn't matter. Oh? What's that. You are *also* raised by wild boars?

Try a dragon. ​@@informitas0117

Dont these legends also dissapear after a while like wtf

Eh. It was too much fantasy for my taste

It's literally a pain in the butt. I started playing again and... what the heck is legitimacy and why the hell do I lose it for marriages!?! Or when a child joins the brothers in prayer. And why the hell does everyone hate me at a -40 opinion for it pretty much all through the time and how the hell can I raise it back up without fighting 100 wars, do pilgrimages and the likes. I literally don't want to be higher than a count in the early game anymore.

@@abseits_ger7274 Your right to rule. And you married a peasant probably

CK2 Bloodlines system: >be a woman >marry matrillineally to a male character with bloodline >profit I swear to god you CK2 glazers didn't play it that much

@@filip4767 I probably have over 1000 hours in ck2 and I still play it more than ck3 to this day. Its just more fun and has an actually complete and fun agot mod. Also, its way easier to mod and fix it yourself.

when I first played ck3 it felt like sailing over a deep ocean I could feel all the potential depth I could explore later but was 2 dimensional. years later it just feels 2d (really sad that steppe horse lords feel the same as every other culture/government)

One such event I am dying for as a romani person is the romani expansion(s) into europe and to be able to create myself as my culture. It could be done as a pop up like the Mongol invasion. You can get events to come across them while traveling with tours and tournaments or on walks and outings or during hunting excursions and a pop as entertainment during a feast. I was hoping for romani people and culture to come with tours and tournaments and am still holding out hope for roads.

Yeah that is PDX for you. Buy the next $800 worth of DLC and you will have what you desire.

a really big event pack would be great. They do get quite repetative and the desicions ofter are very low impact.

​@@vladthecon Exactly. The potential is there. So it's still possible to fix it, however at the current rate in which they are adding new content, I don't think that will happen anytime soon.

Yep i agree, why around royal court i unfollowed and stop watching all the big ck3 shilltubers

We ARE getting dlcs still

@@Gizz101 we are ?

Never mind the dlc, we just want a functional game to begin with.

@@ryanjamesbaldock5370 yes

I talk about this point briefly in my last video with Invictus. Although exceptional mods are a pathway to player numbers some may consider to be… unnatural ⚡️. If the game has a poor enough performance and is cancelled too early, it is an uphill battle to develop certain assets from scratch. Paradox has always treated its modders well, but they can only do so much for cancelled games - hopefully CK3 isn’t next

Oh, if only it was that simple. The Invictus mod for Imperator is perhaps the perfect example of how mods should not be overstated as a fixes for a bad game. Even though the Invictus team do awesome work in making Imperator reasonably playable, they still can't do much about the heaps of half-baked, shortsighted, incomplete, and poorly thought out mechanics built into the game.

But there are no really good mods that warrent more than one play through They arnt that good

@@Nunes2894 That is also another important consideration! I can't imagine having to modify plagues while dealing with that buggy release

@@Bleilock1 They are you're just baiting bro

Stellaris has had such a great turnaround from Astral Planes, and I love that it’s still going strong nearly 10 years later

The difference in DLC between Stellaris and CKIII is insane. The has never been a bad DLC or update to Stellaris. Some are less good than others but they are all good. Every single DLC and major update for CKIII has made the game worse with a possible exception of Royal court which is just ok. CKIII mods are awesome though.

​​​@@evilemperorzurg9615I have to massively disagree with you. Stellaris dlc has also been trash on more than one occasion. There is quite a bit that isn't worth it to get even when on sale. There have also been numerous updates that have only served to make the game worse, oftentimes having most of the changes reversed in later updates. Stellar is still a decent game (not as good as it's been in the past and overly bloated now, imo), but it isn't perfect by any means.

@@DrinkyMcBeer which ones did you not like?

@@evilemperorzurg9615 nemesis was 1) reused low-poly textures for anything, even the big bad galaxy destroyer 2) absolute f ton of game breaking bugs. Some crashes today are still from nemesis features 3) the worst absolutely annoying crisis mechanic you could've come up with. Compare it with cosmogenesis, for example. 4) it's personal, but the new mechanics weren't particularly fun even on the first run. Not to mention that I've played with a "no become crisis" mod ever since, because having a random hegemony leader on the other side of the galaxy ruin your very successful lategame tech rush once was quite enough. AI tends to take the perk without any regards to ethics, which makes the most random shit suddenly get a huge game ending fleets. Not to mention that there can be several at once.

I really hope they do something interesting the historical "theme" system in the byzantine empire. Hopefully they make it actually engaging and fun instead of making them regular feudal vassals that give you 2 or 3 events as "interaction" with the player.

No the main problem is crashing for Xbox players which is half the players

@@majormarketing6552 Lmao I doubt it’s half the players

There's no way half of ck3 players are on Xbox ​@@majormarketing6552

I feel like that is also a challenge in of itself. Having to make a 4X GSG game based in space from scratch when you have little to no experience with the theme in general is a pretty big hurdle. Bear in mind that Paradox did not work on any 4X games prior to Stellaris as of my current knowledge, so the pressure to define what Stellaris was as a product must have been incredibly stressful for the developers. I believe we really saw this with the first few DLC releases like Leviathan where Stellaris was still struggling to define its image. Games like CK3 have a preset map where they don't need to worry about system generation or performance issues nearly as much. I think a far more diplomatic take is that both games have very different challenges in how they decide to implement content, paid or otherwise.

@@4Xtraordinaire Those are mostly solvable and well understood technical issues among developers/programmers, though. Dozens of studios with less money and technical expertise have made decent space maps. Whereas not a single developer, including Paradox, has been able to simulate the course of history without intense railroading, and they've still fallen short even with that crutch.

@@axiomsofdominion They are issues that Stellaris grappled with for quite a while, and they proved to be a recurring issue when it came time to rework core systems of the game. I don’t really think there is a significant amount games similar to Stellaris that were also a similar size and as interactive that came before 2016. I can think of Sins of a Solar Empire and Endless Space 2, but otherwise I view Stellaris as a key innovator

@@4Xtraordinaire Stellaris was weird because it was real time but there's hundreds of space 4x games out there, dozens of which are relatively recent with 2016 as a benchmark, and which are 6/10 or better games. You don't seem to have videos for anything but like Civ 6 and Amplitude stuff plus Paradox, so I don't know how long you've been playing 4x games or how many you've played. But there's plenty of examples of games that have comparable features to Stellaris, especially the early version prior to the travel rework. After that of course it is a bit different because PDS likes to pile on "features" in a super messy and unintegrated way over many, many years in a way most traditional 4x developers don't do. But none of the individual features in Stellaris are ground breaking.

@@axiomsofdominion It may simply end up being a difference of opinions. While Stellaris may not have been a masterwork out of the gate, I personally hold it in high regard over other, similar games. I think Stellaris would have fallen into obscurity like ES2 and Sins if the developers did not aggressively rework the game from the ground up, but again, it's a matter of personal taste.

Really? WIth all the busted disease recovery events I've been racing to 100 development faster than ever... even after they nerfed it, it's still way OP if you focus even a little bit on development.

not to mention that lil loss of legitimacy that makes people hate you lmao they don't play the game I swear

@@leofwulf268 I have played 2 campaigns with the new update and if you're having trouble with legitimacy you're doing something wrong... That's not to say that I love the new DLC and all the stuff they added, but the idea behind legitimacy is going in the right direction imo, even if just to make super cheese strats less viable.

@@stephan4921 oh no no I just got lmfao'd by like 10 consecutive plagues there's literally no counterplay to that unless I cheated in that run

@@leofwulf268 Yeah, the plague frequency is busted. Though it should only give you a legitimacy hit if it started in your domain IIRC, so either you got extremely unlucky or you didn't manage it properly.

I think the developers still need to be careful on not taking a super heavy lean into specific roleplaying styles. CK2 was great because it offered a variety of different paid content tailored to different playstyles. I teased this a tiny bit in the video, but DLC like Monks & Mystics allows players to decide if they want to play with some of the wackier elements or not. There is a colossal menu full of customization options when you first open CK2, and I think this is why it was so beloved. While the map is not generated like Stellaris, these mechanics really alter how you interact with certain gameplay elements. I like some of your ideas, but at the same time I would also add options to play it in a more standardized manner. Players have limited bandwidth and may not always be in the mood for more fantastical elements, or vice versa. A lot of people seem to be of the opinion that mechanics need to tie more heavily into roleplay, and I agree. You bring up an interesting point with physicians, and the game so far has done a very lackluster job with tying in character interactions to core mechanics. It may be time consuming dev wise, but I would be willing to wait far longer between releases if there was more thought put into how preexisting mechanics could be interwoven with new content - not just resources like renown and prestige (Although renown should have had a far bigger role in Legends imo)

@@4Xtraordinaire Apologies in advance for the long-ass comment, I didnt want to oversimplify and cause the same miscommunication that my first comment seems to have done lol. I think there is too much of an emphasis on creating a game ((everyone)) can play, It leads to trouble designing interesting gameplay loops for PDXs target audience, and thats the primary reason I think PDX is having trouble with CK3s development over something like Stellaris, who knows their target audience. PDX is trying to appeal to everyone and instead appealing to no one, and so they fail to take risks and ignore adding realistic simulation for fear of losing players, but doesn’t realize that they are losing players keeping the systems dumb-ed down like this. But yeah I definitely didnt do the best to convey exactly the design I am thinking of (mainly because every sentence would be full of qualification and workarounds that the player can choose to increase options to deal with the system at hand, so I’ll just explain my philosophy rather than direct mechanics, or else this would be an even longer comment). I guess my main point would be that simulation elements can help encourage roleplay through realism, and it seems the devs also realize this but seem to not be taking risks. The system should be realistic to the point that if someone is trained in modern pathology, the system should be easy for them (thus exemplifying that the simulation is realistic), but the average player, who isnt trained, should feel like interacting with the system is both fun but also allows them to use the system better with experience or educated guessing (You cant remove the 21st century modern medical knowledge from the player, so you have to play into it). For example, if a certain disease is common in the game, then a player should feel confident that those certain, common symptoms will likely (not always) yield that diagnosis; Similar to playing CK2 and having your heart sink when your character gets a headache because you don’t know if your character just has a migraine or is about to die, this is the basis for the “guessing minigame”. The CK2 system has flaws, but the foundation is there for a system where a player can get good at guessing diagnosis to the point where they can recite Wikipedia-article-level of information on the symptoms of Diphtheria, or completely\partially bypass the guessing minigame using currency for an excellent\good physician. Ideally the minigame should be fun enough for people to want to learn atleast certain common diseases and their symptoms, but also giving the player an option to relatively ignore the system, if they can pay (or are the physician themselves). Of course the secondary nature of this system is to implement ways for players to counteract these symptoms, or even cure the diseases, based on their experience with the game or having a good physician recommending treatment automatically. Reward player engagement, but don’t punish the player for not engaging. Regardless, there needs to be some form of engagement from the player the way Reapers Due caused when the player would drop everything to make sure their character wasn't gonna be dead in 6 months. With what we got right now seems more akin to an Ant Farm where you just kinda watch the progress of diseases and their effects on the world, with minimal engagement from the player. I believe the solution is that the gameplay loop needs to harness a degree of realistic mystery to keep player knowledge in check, versus the medieval lord they are controlling, rewarding a knowledgeable player who fully interacts with the system, while even allowing the most casual player to use a good physician to bypass most of the system with ease, but not without risk, as the convenience should come with minor drawbacks. PDX is having trouble rectifying the depth of the systems they made in their previous games, with the ease of access to contemporary casual audiences, and unfortunately they cant seem to get that balance right and its costing them their target audience. At the very least, I think we can both agree on that.

And now they are proceeding to do the same with EU5... Like "Hey, see all this stuff that make the game cool and accessible to a lot of people, how about we remove all of this, and make it a Imperator/CK3/Vic3 clone? Our latest and greatest successes!"... I pre-ordered Imperator, and now holding for the other games to be developed and discounted long enough for them to be worth...

@@eu_maxinne wdym? what'd they say?

@@SaintRubicon I will agree that Paradox has been making wider, more broadly 'applicable' expansions unlike with CK2. I talk about this in the video, but CK2 took far bigger risks on average with mechanics like secret societies - yet they had a smaller and more dedicated community in my opinion, so they could afford to be more experimental. The point I am trying to make here is that instead of immediately pursuing 'riskier' content, they need to have a better understanding of what the community wants in the first place. Many people have aired desire for government changes - but how can you implement them without making it overly complex and confusing for newer players? I can understand being frustrated as a developer at this point, because finding compromises between certain groups of players is going to be a nightmare to begin with. Just look at all of the different ideas people have throughout my latest comments sections. As much as there is a need for deeper and more dynamic game mechanics, I can understand why Paradox is still being conservative with some of the latest DLC they have put out. They have a great foundation, far stronger than what they started out with in CK2, but you're going to step on some toes no matter your approach. They have talked about balancing and even potentially adding more complexity to existing systems, but what that involves I do not know. In the end, it only makes sense to chase after deeper gameplay mechanics if there is a genuine desire from the community. Do most players want plagues to expand beyond what they are now, instead of focusing dev attention towards other areas, like governments? I don't know.

starting as Rollo

@@jxslayz6663 Richard the Lionheart would be available.. He would be my first. Then ofcourse Rollo

You have to make a video about Byzantium once the appropriate DLC comes out It's inevitable

There was a big missed opportunity to incorporate the lifestyle mechanics into how Legends function. I actually think that they could have pulled off doing more generic legends if it in turn used them as a base to build an ever-evolving dynamic tale that you customized throughout your dynasty's history. It was an opportunity to go back and reminisce on past experiences with player characters and make campaigns memorable. What a shame

Persia was criticized because it reused a lot of Iberia's features with a new splash of paint. Players were expecting most of the struggle mechanics to be spread out across a few different regions in similar conflicts for a lower price tag. There's also the discussion of inflation and 13 dollars not being enough for what you get. The intermezzo tends to be much shorter than the struggle, and there are not as many interesting zoroastrian characters to play with in the 867 start date. CK2 got around this because of the Charlemagne DLC, which is one of the best ways to play Persia to this day imo

@@4Xtraordinaire Is everyone just playing persia just for the zoroastrians? I thought the conflict between caliphate vs non-caliphate supporters was much more interesting 😅

same, I love playing in persia with the new systems that were added!

@@senseishu937 CK3 has a very strong base of byzaboos partly due to EU4’s influence, and I feel like the desire to restore eastern rome also transfers over to post-sassanid persia

@@senseishu937 Nah I love bringing Nizarism to power since they're the specific muslim faith that have the Hashashin holy order.

Only looking at the more recent releases: Imperator was garbage, Ck3 sucked, Vicky3 sucked (Cities Skylines 2 also...). They're going to make EU5 also suck and I am going to mald so hard. I just dont see how they improve over games like EU4/Hoi4 with how poor the modern successors have been. This also may just be a personal gripe, but something about the modern Paradox map art styles just doesnt do it for me. I do believe these games will get much better over time but with their current directions, I don't see how any of their new titles surpass their predecessors.

I said it back then when ck3 was released on their forums You didnt listen I will say it again now Its players like you who are at fault why games are so bad You will uncritically defend a small indie, and throw money at them like a mad man And only after 4 years have passes will you come to complain If you complained right away like we did, some of this couldve been avoided But players like you literally encourage such company behaviours and never listen/learn Paradrones

@@justafella69 I'm hoping we're going through a punished Johan arc after Imperator's flop, but that's pure hopium on my part

I did the same and regret it.

​@@justafella69HoI4 was already a poor successor to the previous games. The game was pretty much untested when released, there were multiple duping bugs that were found out on a release date and it took 2 months to fix the most prominent ones because the dev team took a vacation. It's barely reaching the depth of vanilla HoI3 which in itself was not the greatest launch. It just sold well because they promised QoL features that would make HoI3 a bearable experience for most people.

We may never truly escape the consequences of priced unit packs from EU4. The game was rigged from the start

We already had those on EU3, but at least those were cheap.😢​@@4Xtraordinaire

@@davincisamait was in the napoleon game too

I hope there is a mod for ck2 law system

@@user-sj5wz7tt9u but i play the most time the agot mod and this dosent work

We do need a law system, but hopefully not the one in ck2. That one is completely lackluster and vassal contracts already do a better job at what it tried to do.

@@DanJuega ck2 law system is better than none

@@LunaMoon0 Lmao all the things you can do in ck2 law system you can do in ck3 with vassal contracts and centralization. Only thing missing is stuff for women’s right and by extension minorities.

Ck3 was never a good game There were players like me who complained since day one And delusional players like you who defended it under the pretense thatb"it will get better" Now you even have memory wipe and all of the sudden "it used to be such a good game" Can you stop defending pdx? It was never a good game And it didnt become a good game after 4 years Stop shilling and buying if you want to see changes, players like you are to blame on the state of gaming industry quality Lol

Also there is a mod that adds a WHOLE CONVERSATION SYSTEM THAT ACTUALLY ADDS MODIFIERS TO THE GAME. Like I can actually talk with my lord to buy a title off one of my fellow dukes. This is what Royal Court was meant to be.

Wait hold on, I think I missed the part where CK3 was ever a good game, because as far as I recall since release it has basically always been just a very shallow experience that despite having some good ideas never went anywhere with them and is still plagued by a spam of meaningless events (with bad writing might I add) in lieu of an actually deep gameplay. CK3 has never actually been good, so far it has only been a pretty shallow game that has the *potential* to be good but is never taken anywhere, it's like if you have the foundation of a house but it's almost completely empty with very few rooms inside and the ones that are there lack furniture or wallpaper, but instead of working on it you just decide to focus on renovating the facade to make it as appealing as possible to onlookers who might be interested to come see it closer (the job is sloppy however)

@@sephikong8323 I think he meant ck2

​@@justynajoniak6737 whats the name of the mod?

I'll break from the crowd and defend the heavy lean into RP. I think this is one of CK3's strong suits, and one of the reasons why it is so different to other titles. A lot of paradox games are falling into the trap of going heavy into pop mechanics which can cause performance issues and lean into micromanagement (See: Stellaris & Sectors). I will say that there is a cutoff limit for me personally where there is too much roleplaying expected, but it's also the heart of the game.

@@4Xtraordinaire Roleplay mechanics are nice but that’s all they’re giving us from what I can see. I’m still waiting on basic mechanics from CK2 like Republics and Nomads to get ported over.

@@pyxelknyght7149 I agree, more depth in basic mechanics like warfare and the politics between the ruler and the council would add a lot to the game. I think they went the right direction with their upcoming byzantine expansion, I'm just hoping it's good.

@@pyxelknyght7149 I wouldn't even say that Legends offered great roleplay mechanics. There are very little opportunities for character interactions and building a family history. The ideal DLC adds key features that create opportunities for more complex gameplay AND roleplay if the players want to pursue it

Roleplaying is important, but what lacks is a gameworld thats alive. Religions are static, there is no real inter vassal interaction, vassals are only thorns in your side you have to appease or humiliate instead of them being the stewards of the land you cannot control yourself. There is no real essence behind tge actions of the AI. It only reacts beside declaring war or havi g a faction.

Monks & Mystics my beloved...

I actually prefer the ck2 portraits and ui. It feels more historical. Ck3 feels like a mobile game

@@tosspot1305 this!

Tours and Tournament is semi worth it. The rest are on-sale only.

They should just sell a "All the good CK2 features" DLC for CK3. I need my ducal dynamic crusader states back.

Tributaries would fit very well with a DLC focused on the near east/steppes akin to horse lords in my opinion. There is a lot of potential for interesting content with the mongol invasion and the conflicts that arise from it

@@4Xtraordinaire Maybe tributary was the wrong word to use I ment more like Client States where they do partially what vassals do without the risk of rebellions. P.S I agree that the far east needs more content I literally never play over there

They've already stated that they have no intention to bring back viceroyalties. It's annoying because I want them back aswell

​@GreenSkinGentleman i mean most of them wouldnt fit in the way ck3 is done which a big reason why they aren't their yet. Also ill be honest so many of the ck2 features are so half baked and rushed like the tributaries and thats after being fixed through updates and patches. I do wish paradox would focus on updating and bringing those back though. Hope the byzantine dlc has some of that spark

I don't know if it's a real shakeup or just panic responses.

Stellaris continues to be the best. Not a high bar though.

​@Tetragramix only downside is the repetitive start makes me miserable (and makes me want to stick to saves that take 90 irl years for 1 in game day)

They just want money. Everyone should not only leave negative reviews, but also refund/not purchase the dlc.

It isn't? Half the time the player base wants things that are in opposition to each other or have half-baked ideas with no idea how to implement or balance them. By now I don't even take steam reviews serious anymore, because it feels like there is a hard core of people who just review negatively anyway, because they hated the last Stellaris DLC or something else.

This. We habe romaboos, weird nationalists and whatnot. Giving the masses what they want is not always the best choice. Heck. I bet those who wanted landless gameplay will be disappointed by the pdx version of it just because it wasnt possible to logically implement better in RtP. I think also that a lot of the playbase is detached of what they want in ck3. ​@@HDreamer

@@elmarm.5224 I remember the glory days of debates about what culture and religion Bosnia should have...in EU3! lol never mind that anything regarding the Balkans turns to madness anyway,but the details demanded for one single province were insane.

​@@Tetragramix That's why businesses exist buddy. If you dislike capitalism, move to Venezuela

I think a separate game focused on Asia would make more sense as opposed to adding even more regions east of India. There are already enough areas of the game that need to be developed, and east asia would just be adding fuel to the fire

​@@4Xtraordinaire adding China would ruin the game (not just being good but from the crashes) as China will break apart it will reform it will break again and reform 80 times IN ONE FUCKING YEAR

Yea except the game got the DM from the City council accounting department.

Na, Iberia and Tournaments were good

Thank you for updating me! I’ve been very slow to check on console updates, but I hope things start to turn around

Bene-israel btw or beni

I never play for official achievements, I set strange goals for myself and play towards those; hybrid Greek-norse culture that has united Christianity under a new Temporal pope. Reform Sunni islam to be syncretic with Christianity before the crusades even start. star as Khazaria and convert to organized Jewish religion and create a hybrid; khazar-Israeli or khazar-Magyar culture and conquer eastern europe and the steppes before the mongol invasion and stop the Mongol khans. form the west Francian empire as the Karlings and form a new French-Saxon or French-Dutch hybrid culture and take Britain and culture convert it all. I also always has a side-quest; of capturing various people from famous dynasties and have them stay as my landless courtiers and have them breed offspring with albino - dwarf and have them as my Jesters.

YT should already be auto tagging and crediting the music in the description with the video being over a week old

@@4Xtraordinaire it hasn't been done, since it's intermittent, hardly audible, and not even licensed with youtube probably

I really appreciate it! 💜

In short: Content creators that criticize Paradox too heavily risk being blacklisted from collaborating with them.

@@saffron1627 unfortunately, yeah