CLEAR WINNER!! TaylorMade P790 v’s Ping i530

Подписаться 4 тыс.

Просмотров 35 тыс.

50% 1

#matthewgalleygolf #golf #golfclub
This week I compare two of the leading hollow body irons in the form of the TaylorMade P790 against the Ping i530. These are both an ‘all round’ iron where manufacturers aim to combine distance and forgiveness with looks and feel.
I compare distance, spin, launch, ball speed and much more using a TrackMan 4.
Enjoy the watch, like and subscribe if you are enjoying the content!
SUBSCRIBE - / @matthewgalleygolf
ONLINE COACHING: skillest.com/app/profile/matt...
Use Code: MATT25 for 25% off
Watch this next:
1. TaylorMade QI Iron - FULL REVIEW
• TaylorMade QI Iron - F...
2. Ping have done it again! i530 Review
• Ping have done it agai...
#matthewgalleygolf #golf #clubreviews
Instagram: @matthewgalleygolf
Twitter: @MGalleyPGAPro
Facebook: Matthew Galley Golf
Website: www.matthewgalleygolf.co.uk
Email: matthewgalleygolf@gmail.com

Опубликовано:

29 мар 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 42

@Skye_the_toller

I had the p790.. I liked it, but the gap was quite difficult to adjust… if the Ping are longer… it will be worst!!! I still like my I230… one + club shorter, but more « predictable » trajectory… consistent.

@waywardwest

I would take the i530 with retro lofts. The number on the club is irrelevant. Ping has always produced clubs with consistent yardage gaps between clubs. As a lower handicap player I want to know I have a bag of clubs that cover all the yardages not the irons I can brag about hitting my 7 iron 190 yards.

@nataliedeyton6829

I was fitted last weekend and the i530 and the ZX4 I hit great .. both were absolutely the same for me .. went with the pings but it was a personal preference

@DonAl9114 16 часов назад

I do play the P 790. And if I hit them well the ball really flies well. Not sure if we average golfer really feel a difference between the two brands , unless the lift is different. There are plenty of really good golf clubs on the market available. 😊😊😊

@chrisb.4496

In the search for distance, companies and new golfers have actually backed themselves into a corner...

@leeloopatsy

For me the most important thing is control and trajectory with as little dispersion as possible. The distance is a plus. But provided you can control it, if the balls go all over the place then it is of no interest. Besides, going 150 yards with a 9 iron or a 7 or a 5 is of no importance. What matters is to know which iron you must use to be able to cover this distance and have balls that are always more or less in the middle of the fairway and/or green. This is why I chose the retro loft i530.

@Teamtimp88

Would love to see the spin rates with an 8 iron (i530), guessing same spin as the P790 7 iron…same same, would rather hit an eight into the green as opposed to a seven iron

@edbardoe2195 14 дней назад

No casual player should waste money for either, glad you can hit that dime sized sweet spot!

@robertshields6214

Cant this all be attributed to the stronger loft in the Ping?

@paulmcgee1867

Both could be said to have won. It all depends on what the expectations are

@rickylee3161

Genuinely surprised such difference with the distance. I played the i525 and it’s never the longest.

@joeclaman9186

How much impact to spin and land angle do you get with retro loft?

@LeslieGreenwood-bu9tn

I went with PXG 0311 P because looks , sound , feel , sensible distance , gerat spin numbers & the front to back dispersion is the best I've ever had, oh & the TT elevate shafts.

@ratbastard4443

Just curious, Were you using the same shaft for both of these??

@peterbuzz7279

Interesting outcome, wasn't expecting the one club difference in distance with the ping.

@atamagashock

These comparisons should be done with the same loft. I’d like to see the difference in spin and distance if they both played at 30.5. I think they would play a lot closer. I’m personally not a fan of all these sets with such strong lofts. At 29 degrees that’s a 6 iron not a 7. So that alone changes the numbers. You should see more distance, lower spin numbers, less height.

@Golfzilla5000 14 дней назад

it is fascinating on how to interpret the dispersion --- the Ping seems to have a wider horizontal dispersion, while the P790 seems to have a larger vertical dispersion. If you've got trouble in front of or behind the hole, then the Ping is the proper club. But if the trouble is to the sides, then the P790 is the club. In my experience, usually the danger is either right in front of you or if you go too long. Of course there's always going to be exceptions, but usually it's problematic if you're long or short more so than left or right (on approach shots, which is where the irons will shine or not).

@bobbygoodman2875

I believe you can get the Pings in retro-spec (more loft).

@JOSEGPH2018

Distance only with the driver, te rest must to be focused on controll.

@2tcreative

Where you are hitting a 7 iron with the P790 you would drop down a club (8 iron?) with the i530, which might bring the spin rate more in line with what you want. Distance withe the i530 8 iron might even be slightly longer if those numbers hold up. Was this the power spec or traditional?