I came up with an idea some years ago - making plywood from recyclable leaves. This would save many trees. I made a small prototype and it is possible and simple to do. Unable to get a patent , and with no more money to invest, I offer or give this idea to anyone interested. saving our planet one idea at a time is far more important than commercial greed.
I am 13 years old and I was told that my country won't make it in like 30 years cause of the pollution and that there will be starvation and dehydration. My family and school already recycle, but next to my school is a high school. In that high school nobody recycles and every time I pass by the high school to get to my home, there are 3 containers, AND RIGHT NEXT TO THEM IS LOTS AND LOTS OF TRASH, from plastic to metal. And I feel so sad when I see that. I want to help clean the earth in more ways. So I have a plan, where I go for summer is in a small town near the sea, but you can see lots of trash near that city, we go there every summer. I decided to take a couple of bags and make a contest with my little cousins who can pick up the trash from the ocean the most, aswell as sort. My cousins are young and like competitions so they'll agree. I will try to get more people with me. I also talked with my family to plant a couple of trees in a forest and they agreed. I'm so happy! I will try my best to keep earth clean
It's now 2019, still, nothing has been done 4 years later. We now have 12 years to fix this, if we changed then we would have had 16 years to fix this. I wonder come 4 years from now, if we will start to change, or if we will still be here just complaining.
Ok if you we're in high school you would have leaned about earth's greenhouse effect provides an average 10°F (5.55°C ) to earth's average temperature from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor which could completely absorbed all the greenhouse energy within 20 meters of the earth's surface. There is no greenhouse energy left after 20 meters from the surface so it further heat transfer is by convection which is molecules bumping into each other. This means that increasing noncondensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane don't actually have the ability to add more temperature retention to earth's greenhouse effect because all the energy that can loosely interact with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gas molecules is considered to have been completely absorbed. Carbon dioxide has about 1/4% share in earth's greenhouse effect on average which could be removed or greatly increased and since water vapor holds earth's greenhouse effect in heavy satiation that change would make no difference to the heat retention of earth's greenhouse effect. This why earth's greenhouse effect is sometimes simply said to come from water vapor. You maybe worried about adults talking about a warming planet.. The earth has not gotten any hotter since1991 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C and it is now 2023! So you shouldn't be scared about some adults scaring you about the world quickly becoming over heated! Global warming has been around 1°C for the past thirty years. Some adults unfortunately don't behave as responsible adults. Bad adults scare children to benefit themselves.
It is strange that if atmospheric carbon dioxide increases from 0.03% to 0.04%, the temperature will rise or not, or no one will experiment in a closed laboratory.
The earth is NOT a closed laboratory. The science of thermal radiation says CO2 atmospheric heating is not tangible ... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZB6KGUFbCkU.html
Man caused climate change started in the 1700s, except that it was also in the 170”s that a period know as The Little Ice Age ended. Basic science principals say the temp increase was more likely caused by the end of the Little I e age than actions by man
Greenhouse gases have one job and it isn't to warm the Earth. The only job of greenhouse gases is to regulate the amount of the sun's energy that is present at the Earth's surface at any given moment. They do this in three ways. First, they absorb as much of the energy as they can or as is necessary. Secondly, they block a portion of the energy from ever reaching the surface. Lastly, the energy that is reflected off of the planet's surface is reflected back towards the surface. Well, at least some of it. Some does escape back into space. It is well understood that an increase in greenhouse gases will result in less of the reflective energy from escaping and thus be reflected back to the surface, but few seem to realize that it would inevitably block more of the sun's energy from reaching the surface, as well. The two reactions would, therfor, cancel each other out and result in no effect on temperature
Reducing greenhouse gases is kinda vague; the biggest ways you can do this is eating less animal products (fish, meat, eggs, milk, etc.), taking public transport more, saving energy and if possible installing solar panels.
So many people protest but still buy the newest cell phones, clothes and splurge. It is time for them to really make a stand, start a real revolution and fight for those making cents an hour just to feed their families. Kids wake up because you are also the problem, need, need, need, do you really need it? Watch that video on 420 or 720 on your cell phone not HD that is just a waste of energy. One hour of streaming video typically uses around 0.08 kWh, but actual consumption depends on the device, network connection, and resolution. Even though this seems like a little amount, lets just say that RU-vid users stream around 5 billion RU-vid videos being watched each day. Hmmmmm, that's why I took the time to write a new song about it titled "You Can SMC". Make change now and let's start a real revolution. Together we are strong.
I like the kids enthusiasm, but you do realize this is a way for people in like green peace to make money. they present a plan to the gov't, usually a plan that involves the gov't giving a lot of money to them, then they keep their profit, then when asked why it does not work, they say we need another billion dollar plan.
Hello Rappler, Can I use this video for my study? I wanted to use this video to spread the knowledge about Global Warming for the children? Your response to this message is highly appreciated. Thank You.
Global Warming started in the 1700s? Uhhhhhm, the Maunder Minimum lasted into 1710. The French aristocracy wore animal pelts as undergarments, even shortly before the French Revolution. George Washington and the Valley Forge disaster happened in 1777. The Dalton Minimum lasted into the early 1800's. Napoleon's Army was destroyed by the Winter of 1812. The Summer that Never Was was in 1816. The Winters of 1830 & 1836 were record-breaking and vicious. The Potato Famine was in the 1840s. There was a Medieval Warming Period, though, from 900 to 1350. It's criminal to use children to advance a money-grabbing, a power-grabbing scheme, and the eugenicists dream, in claiming that "extra humans" are destroying the Earth via life-giving CO2. Plus, in the Obama years, even 112 BILLION of US taxpayer dollars was shelled out to activists and scientists for climate change "adaptation", for 2014 alone. Another $10 to $20 billion yearly, for "research." By the way, the law of Baroclinic Instability and Gradient Forcing is such that higher temps will result in less intense storms, due to the lesser degree of temp difference between the Equator of the Poles. And concerning Bill Nye's rant over the "Thermohaline" and Greenland melt: It's Ekman Transport, ocean gyre motion, and the Coriolis Effect, along with all high pressure systems' natural affinity to move toward low pressure systems is what moves the oceans. Moreover, mountain ice, such as Greenland's vaporize, when low pressure is present and sunlight is providing 72 calories of thermal energy per cm3 of ice/snow. Lots of US taxpayer dollars are involved in the Global Warming Scare. Thus, those scientists funded as such have a Conflict of Interest and can't be trusted in conveying the truth about climate. Climategate I proved this to be the case, along with Pausegate, Gleickgate, Glaciergate, etc. All that the US taxpayer saw was a group of scientists fudging the data and crying wolf, in order to receive grants amounting to a hundred billion+ taxpayer dollars per year. Next comes the profitable Carbon Credits, Carbon Tax, and an excuse to institutionalize sterilization, abortion, and euthanasia. If you're going to commit fraud, leave children out of it.
This is from a Kid; but it is the same as said by an adult, and even by a Professor. I wonder if this 'Kid' can do a clip on quantum mechanics, and contain all the knowledge? Climate talk doesn't change, it is like scripture (it is scripture that's why) and that is why I am sceptical. It is not complex, or difficult and there is consensus: that is not typical of other problems addressed in science; so it is not science, it is dogma, verging on religion. I have done my own research, there is nobody doing research on CO2 directly - unlike viruses, asteroids, clouds...etc .
Are you open for community contribution? I wanted to translate this video to Polish and show it to kids in my school. If you kindly open this video to this?
🐶hi Rappler (you don't have to do a Q&A video but) do you think you're a good person? if so do you think there's an afterlife? also i'm not better than anybody else.
