Тёмный

Climate Change is Affecting Our Health. Is There a Cure? | Jonathan Patz | TEDxOshkosh 

TEDx Talks
Подписаться 41 млн
Просмотров 69 тыс.
50% 1

Public health is being impacted by climate change via many pathways - from alterations in infectious disease transmission to water-source compromise, malnutrition, air pollution, and other factors. This talk includes recent analyses that show how mitigating global warming provides extensive health opportunities, as well as major savings in healthcare costs. Jonathan Patz, MD, MPH, is Professor & John P. Holton Chair in Health and the Environment at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he also directs the Global Health Institute.
He co-chaired the health expert panel of the first Congressionally mandated US National Assessment on Climate Change and was a convening lead author for the international Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. For 14 years, Patz was a lead author for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - co-recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
Patz is the author of nearly 100 peer-reviewed papers plus multiple reports, two co-edited textbooks and an encyclopedia on global environmental health This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

Опубликовано:

 

9 янв 2018

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 53   
@chubley5398
@chubley5398 4 года назад
So eye-opening and inspiring! So happy that a Wisconsin native can preach these issues on such a prominent stage. I hope this is only another stepping stone to bigger things for Pr. Patz and the earth!
@listenup1711
@listenup1711 2 года назад
I'm watching toda August 2021. They were right.
@listenup1711
@listenup1711 2 года назад
You need to get this to all people
@denisdaly1708
@denisdaly1708 2 года назад
Agree
@whosings
@whosings 4 года назад
I would love to get the full reference list for the talk, does anyone if the slides are published anywhere?
@lisadelbuono933
@lisadelbuono933 6 лет назад
I love that you included putting a price on GHG emissions. Great job!
@RodMartinJr
@RodMartinJr 5 лет назад
Why? Who gets the money? Rich globalists. We live in an Ice Age and they plan to cool the planet. That could kill off 7+ BILLION of us. Bill Gates and Harvard have their first live run of their cooling tech in spring 2019. That could end our interglacial real fast. We could have permanent snow throughout Canada within 50 years instead of the typical 5,000 to 10,000 natural cooling. Imagine that! Being tricked into thinking warmth is bad in an Ice Age. It's almost funny, if it weren't so deadly.
@Maria-by8wy
@Maria-by8wy 3 года назад
Hello j worship you I worship you🐕🐩
@cassianmaxton7416
@cassianmaxton7416 Год назад
It is so amazing and wonderful. You are a Doctor with a good heart. I LOVE YOU DOCTOR KHAM .
@ClaireRichardsRN
@ClaireRichardsRN 4 года назад
Yes, also the health benefit of more bikes rather than more cars! Think, less obesity, asthma, more happiness!
@ChiefCabioch
@ChiefCabioch 2 года назад
Take a ten speed to Denver, or Sacramento, or heck, just a couple of hundred miles,....and then try it in a wheel chair, cars give us mobility, if you don't like cars, sell yours....leave mine alone....
@rafaelfernandezaparicio734
@rafaelfernandezaparicio734 Год назад
Precisely today I have had an argument with a workmate that denies human responsibility with climate change.
@pablitopera
@pablitopera 4 года назад
I cannot like this video enough.
@phiquynh
@phiquynh Год назад
he gave me so many ideas used in Ielts writing task 2 haha
@wcsulliv1
@wcsulliv1 5 лет назад
Wonderful talk, Jonathan! I'm sharing it with my students -- indeed, it's now required watching.
@jonathanpatz
@jonathanpatz 5 лет назад
Hey, thanks for sharing this news! Much appreciated.
@RodMartinJr
@RodMartinJr 5 лет назад
William, I wouldn't share it with my students. It's junk based on lies with lies. Did you know that we live in an Ice Age and that the Globalists want to cool down the planet. Bill Gates and Harvard have a live run starting in spring 2019. Study history! You'll find that all of the major warming periods coincide with eras of prosperity; cooling aligns with periods of societal stress and collapse because of famines.
@freyfaust6218
@freyfaust6218 5 лет назад
97 percent consensus on dangerous man made global warming? The Studies ask Different Questions and have different parameters. Not a basis for agglomerated consent. Many scientists who do not agree with catastrophic AGW are listed in with those who do agree. Their objections are ignored, even if they publicly reject the results of studies that claim to prove the consensus. Actual study results Naomi Oreskes 2004 Study was published 4 days before the Kyoto Conference, before it was peer reviewed. It is always cited as a peer reviewed paper. there was Global Cooling noted by 2006 Al Gore claimed broadly, citing the Orensky study, that zero scientists disagreed w the AGW B. Pizer in England did same study as Orensky with very different results 13 explicit endorsement of CAGW 322 endorse but focus on impacts 89 mitigation proposals 67 reject or doubt consensus 470 no position at all… they just mentioned CC in their papers unrelated to climate change 44 natural factors 87 focus on methods Doran and Zimmerman 2009 Margaret Kendall Zimmermans thesis The consensus on the consensus 10257 earth scientists 3246 responded 79 self selected themselves to represent the study… they publish papers on climate Questions asked 1. Compared to pre 80s do you think the mean temperature has gone up or down? 2. Do you think humans are causing the uptick? This is an opinion poll… not empirical data. That's not science Data Base 38 objected… its the Sun 5 said humans have a nominal effect 1 said its HDCC 77 out of 79 agreed with one of the questions and 78 out of 79 agreed with the other. This is haberdashery. Anderegg et al - student paper published in the National Academy of Science Journal -not peer reviewed wrangled in by Steven Schneider “contributed articles” - scientific op ed, Angderegg went through the IPPC list and found out that 34 percent of scientists in the IPPC disagree with the notion of Catastrophic AGW. However, Andereeg chose to narrow the study to only the IPPC members who publish. They only make up 5 percent of the IPPC scientist staff. 97 percent of those who publish are with the ADGCC. One of the most cited studies: John Cook definition question/statement : Humans Cause Warming 67 percent had no position .5 percent endorsed AGW Many authors who are included in the study objected to how their work was characterized Actual Percentages of endorsements for Catastrophic AGW: Orensky 1.2 percent Doran and Zimmermann 2.38 percent Anderegg 66 percent Cook and al 0.54 percent
@haunterbuythem137
@haunterbuythem137 3 года назад
It is a good idea,.but unfortunately no one will move his investments. Collectively we don't act like worried people at all, that's why collapses exists.
@poohthewinnie7396
@poohthewinnie7396 3 года назад
how did you forget animal agriculture??
@Islamicway.755
@Islamicway.755 5 месяцев назад
@davidwilson2307
@davidwilson2307 5 лет назад
excellent talk, see climate change as an opportunity a s well as fixing the pending disaster that awaits humanity if we continue to do nothing
@RodMartinJr
@RodMartinJr 5 лет назад
Taking action is only as good as the direction. And cooling in an ongoing Ice Age is worse than folly. Cold kills; warmth promotes life and prosperity. These guys have it backwards.
@Maria-by8wy
@Maria-by8wy 3 года назад
I have a calipso on this so thank you for teaching us
@thuanpin
@thuanpin 4 года назад
It's not clear to me about the message of sedentary lifestyles that you wanted to convey. It seems to distract me on your topic.
@montithered4741
@montithered4741 Год назад
In all honesty, I started as a climate change denier until I started hearing just absolute nonsensical things from other denialists like Tony Heller. I stopped paying attention to social media, pundits, bureaucrats, and politicians. I started reading the actual research papers (not blogs, videos, or independent publishers). Climate change is not difficult to understand. Like weather, there are limited factors which affect climate. Understanding what they are and how they interact isn’t difficult.
@space-time-somdeep
@space-time-somdeep 7 месяцев назад
😢
@ashleycharles5255
@ashleycharles5255 Год назад
I'm so proud of DR OFENMU RU-vid CHANNEL for his good Medication. I finally defeated Hsv1&2 completely after taking his medication. Thanks
@a.randomjack6661
@a.randomjack6661 5 лет назад
Congrats!! If you don't believe in the greenhouse effect, you can go live on Venus ;-)
@RodMartinJr
@RodMartinJr 5 лет назад
Really? I used to believe in the greenhouse effect since the mid-70s. Earlier this year, I learned of something that eliminated the greenhouse effect as a possible cause of warming there and on Earth. Empirical evidence shows that the rise and fall of CO2 does NOT drive temperature.
@nealtauss1715
@nealtauss1715 3 года назад
Anything beyond surfeit can be a pollutant.... we're looking at a question of balance.... excess CO2 is not taken up by plants that are not allowed to exist.... and our current Agricultural and Industrial Methods are disruptive in the EXTREME.... for Natural Nurture FROM plant growth..... around the World. At the Same time we started hyper-injecting fossilized carbon into our atmosphere.... we began proliferating Iron Plow Tillage.... agriculturally disrupting photo-synthetic carbon sequestration.... effectively Doubling the Damage....at LEAST. We MIGHT be able to turn THAT around faster than anything else we CAN do.... EXPONENTIALLY increasing Soil Carbon Retention by adopting all-around no-till organic agricultural methods.... MANY beneficial Societal effects here... MO' Bettah Food&Health/Mo' Bettah Money (at the GROUND-level.... where LongGREENMoney makes Mo' Bettah Benefits in a bubble-UP ECOnomic model) & LESS+LESS money for the Manufacturers of Agri-Toxins.... where Mo' Money makes BUT Mo' Profit$forPoi$on$ and LITTLE el$e.... be$ide$ Profit$ for Political Power in Proliferation of Populate Pain AND Penury.... and THERE'$ your trouble.... NOW we know why it's so hard to even TALK about making beneficial changes much less understand root Need for So doing AND....Root Cau$e for NOT. Go ahead.... Wave your magic Wand.... even WITHOUT climate crisis.... these agri-poison$ cause Air/Water/Food AND Health Pollution.... so IF you should find yourselves mentally incapable of grasping a WIDER Scope for this Impending Horror... understand clearly NOW.... that carcinogenic and other-wise Toxic agri-chemical residues are CURRENTLY doing to your body&being what the manufacturers of those chemicals are doing to all Life IN and ON Earth. It is Time to Change.... not just how we generate and use our energy (Roof-topSolarW/BatteryBack-upNOnukes) but how we grow the very food we eat....and in So doing we can.... in all likelihood.... RESOLVE our Climate AND Pollution PROBLEMS.... in REAL Time.
@andrewhoward543
@andrewhoward543 Год назад
Glad someone mentioned Agriculture, the elephant in the room he didn't mention, effectively his is not holistic.
@freyfaust6218
@freyfaust6218 5 лет назад
97 percent consensus on dangerous man made global warming? The Studies ask Different Questions and have different parameters. Not a basis for agglomerated consent. Many scientists who do not agree with catastrophic AGW are listed in with those who do agree. Their objections are ignored, even if they publicly reject the results of studies that claim to prove the consensus. Actual study results Naomi Oreskes 2004 Study was published 4 days before the Kyoto Conference, before it was peer reviewed. It is always cited as a peer reviewed paper. there was Global Cooling noted by 2006 Al Gore claimed broadly, citing the Orensky study, that zero scientists disagreed w the AGW B. Pizer in England did same study as Orensky with very different results 13 explicit endorsement of CAGW 322 endorse but focus on impacts 89 mitigation proposals 67 reject or doubt consensus 470 no position at all… they just mentioned CC in their papers unrelated to climate change 44 natural factors 87 focus on methods Doran and Zimmerman 2009 Margaret Kendall Zimmermans thesis The consensus on the consensus 10257 earth scientists 3246 responded 79 self selected themselves to represent the study… they publish papers on climate Questions asked 1. Compared to pre 80s do you think the mean temperature has gone up or down? 2. Do you think humans are causing the uptick? This is an opinion poll… not empirical data. That's not science Data Base 38 objected… its the Sun 5 said humans have a nominal effect 1 said its HDCC 77 out of 79 agreed with one of the questions and 78 out of 79 agreed with the other. This is haberdashery. Anderegg et al - student paper published in the National Academy of Science Journal -not peer reviewed wrangled in by Steven Schneider “contributed articles” - scientific op ed, Angderegg went through the IPPC list and found out that 34 percent of scientists in the IPPC disagree with the notion of Catastrophic AGW. However, Andereeg chose to narrow the study to only the IPPC members who publish. They only make up 5 percent of the IPPC scientist staff. 97 percent of those who publish are with the ADGCC. One of the most cited studies: John Cook definition question/statement : Humans Cause Warming 67 percent had no position .5 percent endorsed AGW Many authors who are included in the study objected to how their work was characterized Actual Percentages of endorsements for Catastrophic AGW: Orensky 1.2 percent Doran and Zimmermann 2.38 percent Anderegg 66 percent Cook and al 0.54 percent
@nealtauss1715
@nealtauss1715 4 года назад
The natural market-based solutions to bio-hazardous pollutions are the same as the natural market-based solutions to woman-made climate change....
@truthfullattic8921
@truthfullattic8921 3 года назад
If we had a chance to end all wars forever, Trump wouldn't do it because "wE wOuLd lOsE a tOn oF jObS"
@kipronohterere.n4036
@kipronohterere.n4036 3 года назад
Scam
@user-rl6zo4cx4e
@user-rl6zo4cx4e 2 года назад
So.. him.. trying to show a better way and a healthier way of living as a health scientist.. makes u think of “ scam “ ?
@denisdaly1708
@denisdaly1708 2 года назад
Ignoramous.
@maribelmercado5492
@maribelmercado5492 3 месяца назад
Educate yourself kid
Далее
🎙Пою Вживую!
2:59:56
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Прилетели в Дубай
00:17
Просмотров 75 тыс.
ГЕНИИ МАРКЕТИНГА 😂
00:35
Просмотров 1,9 млн
🎙Пою Вживую!
2:59:56
Просмотров 1,2 млн