COH3 2v2 Haxes (AK) & ST Helios (AK) vs Olvadi (UK) & john5s (US) 

That caused me to go have a look. Automatch players in the last 24 hours is higher in COH3 now (COH2 still higher for full week and month)

Yeah I've been keeping an eye with the hope of seeing that happen. Need more of it though.

@@SvalbardSleeperDistrict small steps. We'll get there eventually 😃

Really is. I hate the auto repair and repair while moving.

John didn't go for tanks at all. Not sure why he did that; you can't just rely on bazookas and win.

@@dudeguybro yeah very risky strategy. I get that the Hellcat is ass in the current meta but you really need it in the late game.

Yeah, especially when you get the with the extra weapon from scavenging

@@tightropegaming It's easy to destroy the scalvage before it gets used

They don't get any of the benefits other infantry get from it. They also get increased upkeep and population so they have less power density than a 5 squad with 2 lmgs. VSL is pretty bad if you are going pgrens imo.

some nice rank 2000 plays, lol.

@@tyhy1 the blue one played like shit whole game

@@adikonas1978 blue kept them in the game while teal was hovering 30 pop army.

@@adikonas1978 when a bunch of new commanders come out you tend to fool around more than when the meta is settled. its only natural. though, he did miss a couple of fundamentals.

Maybe a bit of overconfidence :p.

It doesn't show in your munitions over time income. It arrives in a lump every minute. Also this replay mod is weird with how it shows income.

@@tightropegaming Ooh ok, thx for the quick answer Tighrope ! Have a nice week.

Due to the way flamethrowers work in general, spacing matters a lot for the flammpanzer's damage but if something is remotely bunched up it'll die very quickly. it remains a very good vehicle into rangers due to having 2MGs buffed by BG plus flamethrower.

health buff from vet + inf sup upgrade + rangers base per model hp is high

cos stuarts are hot garbage unfortunately and to add insult to injury you're paying to tech into them.

Yeah Stuarts suck, they're an expensive waste of fuel as we saw in this game. Crusaders are decent but you need three to four of them to make them effective. I think Olvadi would have been better off with Crusaders or Grants in this match, Matildas are just too slow when facing highly mobile DAK players.

Interesting to see people's opinions on stuarts. I know a number of quite high elo players that love them, so maybe it's personal preference. The answer is probably because grants got a huge buff last patch and are just really strong right now so it makes sense to try to rush them asap.

@@Haxses. Yeah any fuel spent in T2 has to be carefully considered, feels like the real Brit power spike is when you get T3 up and get Grants or Crusaders out. My issue with Stuarts is they need a big investment - not only in terms needing to get a couple out to justify the requisition cost but you then need Light Vehicle Training to make them actually hit stuff. Otherwise the gunner goes into full Stevie Wonder mode.

There is tons of space for flanking here, and there was tons of flanking in this match.

lol. Did you watch the game?

@@LordOfSevenLemons I am playing it

They're strong but you can rest easy knowing you won't see tanks anytime soon and allows you to double down on anti infantry without too much worry. you also have to factor in the reinforce cost and time making them very slow to get back in action. Model losses are a huge cost.

They are broken yes. USF in general is a bit weak at the moment though, so the unit is a crutch.

@@mr_ako662 then you'll know that axis have the best supression tools in the game. That's all you need to counter rangers. Yes, they're a good unit, but what about Guastatori? You can't even counter them with supression as they have free smoke. I would argue they are stronger in many situations