Instead of playing normal L. Elves, why not play Arbor Elf? Arbor Elf targeting a Dryad Arbor triggers Nadu, and then of course you can untap the Arbor Elf with Symbiote or Quirion Ranger, for another trigger, and then another trigger on the Dryad Arbor. So in this scenario, you get 3 triggers instead of only 1 if you had just a normal mana elf.
That's a really interesting, I suppose the drawback is empowering enemy wastelands a bit more as well as the fact that sometimes we are bouncing back our only forest for an untap so don't have access to the mana if we have Arbor. It's a cool idea that I didn't think of, will pass it onto the deck creator
0:06 Don't tell m,e about it. I've simply stopped playing Legacy since january of this year. Sure, I play some Arena still, but this makes me want to play Legacy again! (I mean, Infect isn't well suited to deal with the stupid orc either)
why llanowarelves and other manadogs ? Why dont stay at nettle sentinel und b. ranger. this manabase is a bit slower but much better for go for combo elves without nadu. ouphe in main is not good, too, because he is no elve. i played the deck at 3 tournements now and manadogs was very bad games.
The list isn't mine, but this list has been doing very well in tournaments. I think the manadorks allow for more reliable casting of Nadu on Turn 2 and are individually better to untap.