I don't understand why the deception is needed in these clips. No I'm not going on a fake video rant but rather how the actual betsize is the bonus buy and not the silly wager per spin showing. The person playing San Quentin didn't wage 0.20 they paid 400 to gain access to the bonus. The bet is 400 and the realistic number isn't 32000x on the win let's be honest and sincere here and stop the nonsense.
Why does it have to be deception? The math of the game showed you a 32000x win, so that'll be the most accurate descriptor for what you can expect to see in the game round. However, you're correct that the player paid more than 0.20, which is why we aim to always state how much the bonus buy cost was. It was more straightforward before bonus buys came into play, but now we have to make the best of what we've got. Using a combination of base bet size and bonus buy cost is what we've deemed the optimal way to describe it, for now at least.
@@CasinoGrounds That says it all though. If someone has paid 400 for a bonus buy thats the bet you've placed and no matter how much you go around it it you didn't wager 0.20 to get a 5000x bonus you placed a 400 USD bet and got x81.2 and not 32k to get a selling point across. If we're going to endorse gambling at least be transparent about it. The reality is I didn't place a 0.20 bet and won 32k times that amount I bet 400 and got 81 times my money.
@@chubbylme You got 81 times your money, but if you'd tell me you got a 81x bonus my expectations of what that'd look like would be way off. SQ2 is quite complex with pay lines, but if we look at something like Dead or Alive 2 you'll have 1500x base bet per wild line, no matter if you used the feature buy or not, *that's the math of the slot.* I don't expect you to agree with this concept, but that's the reason we're writing it like we do.
