Comparing Arcon and Condylar Articulators 

1:18 am i wrong or he just saied the articuler ball on the upper component and the GUIDING SURFACE ON THE UPPER?????? shouldnt be on the lower?????

55 milimeters is too less for the intercondylar distance in the Hanau articulator.

1:30 am i wrong or he just saied the articuler ball on the upper component and the GUIDING SURFACE ON THE UPPER?????? shouldnt be on the lower?????

I just cant get something! If the articulator represents the opposite of the mastication organ, then the upper part of the articulator should represent the mandibular bone. And if it represents the mandibular bone then how come the NON-Arcon type is opposite of the skull when the ball(condile) is on the upper part of the articulator which in fact is the mandibular bone?

Thank you for a great video. I appreciate it very much. Would you know if a Denar facebow record can be mounted on Dentatus articulator, for example? Could you please tell me if there are industry standards for mounting plate screws, etc.? So I take my Denar facebow, and send it to the laboratory with Dentatus mounting plates. Thank you.

The articulator is represented in the movie continues to only move your jaw ...Do not bother you more ...The only movement is the jawbone that always goes down ...Continue to push antifeatures articulators always reversed.Do you know what does it mean? That dynamic simulation is only approximate.Build instead is unconscionable ...My articulator Rainieri today is the only one that makes a difference, the truth is more appropriate ....

He's cute. Lol.

that's my dad lol.

where was this movie last year??? very good !!!

Burda ne isim var

Im glad you mentioned the Hanau equation L=H/8+12. Just wondering.. lets say the right side had a condylar inclination of 25degrees...that would be L=15 degrees. Isnt that also called the Bennett angle/shift? Did I miss anything else? Please write back asap

14yrrrrrr