Great to see some marketing directed at uses other than hunting. As of right now, I think the word is just starting to get out about how much this can help in wildlife photography, but no one that I personally know uses one yet aside from myself. I have the Helion 2 XP50 Pro, and I do wildlife photography multiple times per week. I'm never without it. People can't get over how many owls I'm able to find using it.
@@thomasjacksltd thank you. Or the Helion 2 XP Pro against the Axion XG35 to determine if the higher price for the XP is worth it (despite same sensor size). That's exactly the decision I am struggling with 😅.
I'd recommend you try them both to see what might suit your needs. If you're anywhere near the midlands - we're at the Game Fair, 29-31st July at Ragley Hall (STAND K016). We've a huge raised viewing platform, so you can test and compare both of these (or virtually any else in the Pulsar range... including the new Merger thermal binoculars).
Absolutely. They've all got a fast 50Hz refresh rate too, so they're perfect at capturing bats in flight. Bat conservationists also use these to passively monitor bat nests... if occupied they can pick up the heat from the bats inside. Here's a different Pulsar product (with the same sensor as the XQ35 - so it's comparable) showing a short clip of bats in flight - just skip to 2:15 in. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RZMQEiUBkmQ.html
At 20m the XM30F should do what you need... But to get a better idea of the difference between the Axions, check out these videos: 1. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gynL9-suA90.html 2. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VVb1SPsWa4k.html
