Comparing the Falcon 10X to the Gulfstream G700 

ACJs can’t do ultra long range, are slow and the cabin altitude makes it tiring. Also, there are many airports the ACJ is simply too large for. Oh, and it burns twice the fuel.

@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 ACJs can do ultra long range, these are fitted with additional equipment to cabin pressurization of lower altitude than commercial A320, cabin insulation is better, and international airports are large only. I don't know who lands on airstrip some international flight where immigration is available!! Speed hardly matters for long distance & the on board productivity is far more than conventional jets, fuel burn is more but you save on spares, maintenance, pilot training costs so ownership costs hardly much difference. Also in this segment, fuel is not the number 1 priority in anycase. And yes, large cargo is bonus. Try bringing some furniture from Dubai in G700 or Global 7500!! If you travel with 6 persons or more, it's impossible in traditional biz jets.

Good idea, thanks

we need more speed and new shapes. I think my interview with Steve Mera explains what has been going on when he says that a certain point aircraft tech advances went black...ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-R7zmsHbx-XY.html

Lineage is absolete aircraft, offers nothing except bigger cabin which isn't comfortable in air thanks to heavy turbulence.

ACJ is short on range and low on speed.

there was a glitch in the previous one, so editor modified and reloaded.

And poor lightning protection. Also it's expensive to fix the coating or metal shield once lightning strikes carbon fiber wings.