Competitive response consulting case interview: General Motors Strategy (w/ ex-BCG & EY consultants)

Подписаться 50 тыс.

Просмотров 1,7 тыс.

50% 1

🎥 Here’s a consulting case interview featuring an ex-BCG Consultant & ex-EY Parthenon Consultant focusing on a competitive response. In this case, the candidate is tasked with helping General Moter, a major automotive manfucaturing company, re-evaluate the company’s long-term strategy (phasing out combustion engine sales by 2035) in the face of short-term headwinds.
Watch Abigail Doekson (ex-BCG Consultant, Yale MBA) run Ben Wilson (ex-EY Parthenon, Darden MBA) through this competitive response case interview.
🎬 Video Sections:
00:00 Start
00:03 Introductions
00:33 Case question
02:51 Clarifying questions
05:51 Structure
10:39 Growth projections
17:59 Data analysis
22:39 Combustion engine pickups
25:21 EV vs. combustion split
33:00 Conclusion
🚀 Prepping for case interviews? RocketBlocks has the best concepts, drills, and coaching to get you more consulting offers: www.rocketblocks.me/consultin...
📝 Try this case on your own and read through sample answers with the full PDF: www.rocketblocks.me/full-cons...
➡️ Book a 1-on-1 coaching session with Ben here: www.rocketblocks.me/contribut...
➡️ Book a 1-on-1 coaching session with Abigail here: www.rocketblocks.me/contribut...
#consultinginterviews #consulting #bcg

Опубликовано:

24 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3

@zhangchitian1335 23 дня назад

for the math part is that only I am getting different answers? 2023 1.2 mio times 1.5 *1.5*1.5 = 9.75? For 50% of CAGR

@johnsemenza145 Месяц назад

Very helpful video. I have one question regarding the fact that the interviewee outlined his framework in the beginning but he does not ultimately touch on most of the points in his framework nor ask many questions about them. Is it common to state an entire framework out once without divining into the specifics like this? If the interviewer hadn't prompted him with new questions/graphs is the idea that he would have dove deeper into the specifics of his framework?